Citations

Significance Provision of sufficient activating signals can drive self-tolerant T cells to cross-react on self-peptide-MHC in a breakdown of tolerance. This approach has been applied in the development of heteroclitic peptide vaccines, which retain sufficient similarity to self to allow reactivation of effector cells on unaltered self-epitopes but require detailed knowledge about the behavior of individual altered self-peptide antigens. We designed altered-self MHC mutant antigen-presenting molecules to drive CTL capable of cross-reacting on self-peptide-MHC and demonstrate the breaking of self-tolerance to defined and undefined self-antigens. These findings bear particular importance in the field of cancer immunotherapy in which breaking tolerance to weakly antigenic cancer-associated antigens is fundamental to vaccination strategies.

HIV-1 infections usually start at a mucosal surface after sexual contact. Creating a barrier of protection at these mucosal sites may be a good strategy for to protect against HIV-1 infections. While HIV-1 enters at mucosa, most vaccines are not delivered here. Most are instead injected into the muscle, a site well distant and functionally different than mucosal tissues. This study tested if delivering HIV vaccines at mucosa or in the muscle makes a difference in the quality, quantity, and location of immune responses against the virus. These data suggest that there are indeed advantages to educating the immune system at mucosal sites with an HIV-1 vaccine.

Abstract Oncolytic viruses hold promise as “self-amplifying” cancer therapies wherein a virally killed cell can produce thousands of new viral “drugs” that can kill more cancer cells. Oncolytic viruses may also serve to reawaken or initiate immune responses against cancers by virtue of their abilities to lyse cells, liberate cancer antigens, and provide viral DNA and proteins as immune adjuvants. Oncolytics can also be armed with cytokine or checkpoint inhibitors to amplify antitumor immune responses. Adenoviruses (Ads) are one family of oncolytic viruses. Most human studies have used human Ad serotype 5 (Ad5). Unfortunately, most patients are already immune to Ad5, increasing the likelihood that the agent will be neutralized if used as a cancer therapy. In this work, low seroprevalence Ad6 and Ad57 oncolytic viruses were tested as intravenous therapies against distant prostate cancer sites. After prostate cell infection in vitro, Ad viruses executed these cells efficiently and generated 10,000 to 100,000 progeny infectious viruses. This genome replication also amplified transgene protein production by 100 to 1,000-fold when compared to nonreplicating Ad vectors. Ad5, Ad6, and Ad57 were injected intravenously a single time in nude mice bearing human prostate tumors, and toxicity and efficacy were assessed. Ad6 and 57 produced 30-fold lower liver damage and less toxicity than Ad5. Ad6 and Ad57 significantly repressed the growth of androgen-resistant human DU145 prostate tumors and androgen-sensitive LNCaP prostate tumors and extended survival after single intravenous injection in mice. Ad6 and Ad57 E1 protein were also modified to protect normal cells from viral oncolysis while allowing the virus to amplify and kill prostate cancer cells having perturbations in p300 and pRB pathways. These and other data suggest that targeted and untargeted low seroprevalent Ad6 and Ad57 have better efficacy and safety than the benchmark oncolytic virus Ad5 for systemic therapy of advanced prostate cancer. Citation Format: Tien Nguyen, Michael A. Barry. Systemic oncolytic virotherapy for prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Prostate Cancer: Advances in Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research; 2017 Dec 2-5; Orlando, Florida. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(16 Suppl):Abstract nr A062.

Oncolytic viruses would ideally be of use for systemic therapy to treat disseminated cancer. To do this safely, this may require multiple layers of cancer specificity. The pharmacology and specificity of oncolytic adenoviruses can be modified by (1) physical retargeting, (2) physical detargeting, (3) chemical shielding, or (4) by modifying the ability of viral early gene products to selectively activate in cancer versus normal cells. We explored the utility of these approaches with oncolytic adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5) in immunocompetent Syrian hamsters bearing subcutaneous HaK tumors. After a single intravenous injection to reach the distant tumors, the physically hepatocyte-detargeted virus Ad5-hexon-BAP was more effective than conditionally replicating Ad5-dl1101/07 with mutations in its E1A protein. When these control or Ad5 treated animals were treated a second time by intratumoral injection, prior exposure to Ad5 did not affect tumor growth, suggesting that anti-Ad immunity neither prevented treatment nor amplified anti-tumor immune responses. Ad5-dl1101/07 was next chemically shielded with polyethylene glycol (PEG). While 5 kDa of PEG blunted pro-inflammatory IL-6 production induced by Ad5-dl1101/07, this shielding reduced Ad oncolytic activity.