Back to Authors

Davidson, Karina

0000-0002-9162-477X

Mayo Clinic

Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA.

Citations 35

Scientific opportunities in resilience research for cardiovascular health and wellness. Report from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop

The FASEB Journal | November 2, 2022 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.1096/fj.202201407r | PMID 36322029

Abstract Exposure of biological systems to acute or chronic insults triggers a host of molecular and physiological responses to either tolerate, adapt, or fully restore homeostasis; these responses constitute the hallmarks of resilience. Given the many facets, dimensions, and discipline‐specific focus, gaining a shared understanding of “resilience” has been identified as a priority for supporting advances in cardiovascular health. This report is based on the working definition: “ Resilience is the ability of living systems to successfully maintain or return to homeostasis in response to physical, molecular, individual, social, societal, or environmental stressors or challenges ,” developed after considering many factors contributing to cardiovascular resilience through deliberations of multidisciplinary experts convened by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute during a workshop entitled: “ Enhancing Resilience for Cardiovascular Health and Wellness.” Some of the main emerging themes that support the possibility of enhancing resilience for cardiovascular health include optimal energy management and substrate diversity, a robust immune system that safeguards tissue homeostasis, and social and community support. The report also highlights existing research challenges, along with immediate and long‐term opportunities for resilience research. Certain immediate opportunities identified are based on leveraging existing high‐dimensional data from longitudinal clinical studies to identify vascular resilience measures, create a ‘resilience index,’ and adopt a life‐course approach. Long‐term opportunities include developing quantitative cell/organ/system/community models to identify resilience factors and mechanisms at these various levels, designing experimental and clinical interventions that specifically assess resilience, adopting global sharing of resilience‐related data, and cross‐domain training of next‐generation researchers in this field.
Collaboration and Shared Decision-Making Between Patients and Clinicians in Preventive Health Care Decisions and US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations

JAMA | March 22, 2022 | Volume: 327 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1171

10.1001/jama.2022.3267 | PMID 35315879

Screening for Atrial Fibrillation

JAMA | January 25, 2022 | Volume: 327 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 360

10.1001/jama.2021.23732 | PMID 35076659

Screening and Interventions to Prevent Dental Caries in Children Younger Than 5 Years

JAMA | December 7, 2021 | Volume: 326 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 2172

10.1001/jama.2021.20007 | PMID 34874412

Actions to Transform US Preventive Services Task Force Methods to Mitigate Systemic Racism in Clinical Preventive Services

JAMA | November 8, 2021 | Volume: 326 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 2405

10.1001/jama.2021.17594 | PMID 34747970

Aspirin Use to Prevent Preeclampsia and Related Morbidity and Mortality

JAMA | September 28, 2021 | Volume: 326 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1186

10.1001/jama.2021.14781 | PMID 34581729

Importance Preeclampsia is one of the most serious health problems that affect pregnant persons. It is a complication in approximately 4% of pregnancies in the US and contributes to both maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. Preeclampsia also accounts for 6% of preterm births and 19% of medically indicated preterm births in the US. There are racial and ethnic disparities in the prevalence of and mortality from preeclampsia. Non-Hispanic Black women are at greater risk for developing preeclampsia than other women and experience higher rates of maternal and infant morbidity and perinatal mortality. Objective To update its 2014 recommendation, the USPSTF commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin use to prevent preeclampsia. Population Pregnant persons at high risk for preeclampsia who have no prior adverse effects with or contraindications to low-dose aspirin. Evidence Assessment The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that there is a substantial net benefit of daily low-dose aspirin use to reduce the risk for preeclampsia, preterm birth, small for gestational age/intrauterine growth restriction, and perinatal mortality in pregnant persons at high risk for preeclampsia. Recommendation The USPSTF recommends the use of low-dose aspirin (81 mg/d) as preventive medication for preeclampsia after 12 weeks of gestation in persons who are at high risk for preeclampsia. (B recommendation)
Screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea

JAMA | September 14, 2021 | Volume: 326 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 949

10.1001/jama.2021.14081 | PMID 34519796

Incorporation of Social Risk in US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations and Identification of Key Challenges for Primary Care

JAMA | September 1, 2021 | Volume: 326 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 1410

10.1001/jama.2021.12833 | PMID 34468692

Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes

JAMA | August 24, 2021 | Volume: 326 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 736

10.1001/jama.2021.12531 | PMID 34427594

Screening for Gestational Diabetes

JAMA | August 10, 2021 | Volume: 326 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 531

10.1001/jama.2021.11922 | PMID 34374716