Citations

Advances in cancer therapies have transformed many malignancies into chronic or manageable conditions, but have been linked to adverse, including cardiovascular, events. Vascular toxicities associated with cancer treatment range from abnormal vasoreactivity to accelerated atherosclerosis, arterial thrombotic events, vasculitis, and arterial aneurysms or dissections. 5-fluorouracil and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) inhibitors are the agents most commonly linked to abnormal vasoreactivity, whereas BCR-ABL (breakpoint cluster region–Abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog) inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been associated with accelerated atherosclerosis. Arterial thrombotic events are seen with VEGF and BCR-ABL inhibitors as well as platinum drugs. Vasculitis emerged with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and arterial aneurysms and dissections with VEGF inhibitors. Radiation therapy can lead to several of the outlined vascular toxicities. This review comprehensively explores the mechanisms of vascular complications associated with chemotherapy, targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and radiation therapy. Key contributors include endothelial injury and dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammation. An understanding of the mechanisms of vascular toxicities may facilitate optimal treatment and preventive strategies in patients with cancer.

Background: Accurate characterization of tumor stiffness and adhesion is crucial when surgically resecting meningiomas. Currently, such determinations are difficult to ascertain through standard preoperative imaging diagnostics and clinical experience. Herein, we explored magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as a means of assessing these parameters and thereby improving neurosurgical resections. Methods: This prospective study of 193 patients with meningiomas involved three distinct patient subsets (cohort 1, 88 [2017–2021]; cohort 2, 55 [2022–2023]; cohort 3, 50 [2023–2024]. We analyzed preoperatively obtained MRE data on meningioma stiffness (cohorts 1 and 2) and adhesion (cohort 2) for accuracy, while matching subjects with or without MRE studies (cohort 3, 1:1 ratio) to define the role of preoperative MRE in improving operative outcomes. Results: Areas under the curve (AUCs) for MRE in gauging meningioma stiffness and adhesion were 0.87 and 0.89, respectively. Both parameters significantly surpassed empiric predictions of stiffness and adhesion rendered by surgeons and radiologists, based on routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRE-determined stiffness measures independently correlated with prolonged resection duration, whereas MRE-assessed adhesion showed independent associations with increased blood loss, longer duration of tumor resection, and higher risk of pial injury. Ultimately, results based on cohort 3 demonstrated that MRE has great potential in this setting to improve neurosurgical procedures by significantly reducing intraoperative bleeding, resection duration, and risks of pial injury. Conclusion: MRE is a promising, noninvasive tool for accurately assessing meningioma stiffness and adhesion, standing to improve the precision and safety of needed surgical intervention.

Abstract Objectives The aim of this work was to develop an American Headache Society position statement addressing diagnostic screening for migraine among girls and women. Background Despite its high prevalence and substantial negative impacts, migraine is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Diagnostic screening for migraine enables more patients to receive timely, appropriate, and effective management. Methods Development of this position statement followed the rules established by the American Headache Society Guidelines Committee. The published literature was reviewed to determine if migraine meets criteria for when disease screening is justified, to guide recommendations for screening tools, and to determine subpopulation(s) for which migraine screening is indicated. After author consensus was reached, the position statement was reviewed and approved by the American Headache Society Board of Directors. Results Migraine fulfills established criteria for conditions in which screening is appropriate since it is highly prevalent, results in significant morbidity, and exerts substantial economic and social costs. Migraine incidence and prevalence are exceptionally high among girls and women during adolescence and through menopause. Furthermore, there are valid and reliable diagnostic screening methods (e.g., ID Migraine) and effective treatments that reduce migraine symptoms and disease impact. Conclusion Yearly diagnostic screening for migraine should be included as part of women's preventive healthcare services, particularly from adolescence to menopause.

Background: Clozapine is the preferred medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) suggested to mediate its safe and effective use. However, clozapine TDM is not a ubiquitous element of care in clinical practice. Understanding the current state of clinicians' perceptions of and barriers to clozapine TDM is a crucial step in improving its use. Methods: A survey related to the use, perceptions, and barriers of clozapine TDM was distributed across multiple national organizations in the United States, representing several disciplines. Results: Most of the 190 respondents were consultants or attending physicians (42.5%) or pharmacists (52.3%). Nearly 80% of respondents had ordered clozapine level measurements in the year before completing the survey but identified slow turnaround time (TaT) as an important barrier; 73.5% of respondents noted that level measurements were performed at an offsite laboratory. Although 86.8% agreed that clozapine levels should be checked once an initial target dose was reached, less than half would subsequently order clozapine level measurements routinely, unless clinical factors such as nonadherence (96.5% agreement), new interaction (94.5% agreement), or change in smoking status (94.5% agreement) occurred. More pharmacists than prescribers indicated confidence in interpreting and clinically applying clozapine TDM results (84.6% versus 70.1%, P = 0.024), with a similar finding between the groups regarding faster clozapine TDM TaT, resulting in improved patient safety (89.0% versus 68.7% agreement, P = 0.003). In addition, more pharmacists would also conduct clozapine TDM in the setting of an acute inflammatory or infectious process (84.9% versus 61.2%, P = 0.002). Conclusions: These data provide insights into clozapine TDM perception, availability, TaT, and barriers. Further research is required to assess whether a faster TaT and more frequent clozapine TDM positively influence patient outcomes from a safety and effectiveness perspective.

PURPOSE Venetoclax, an oral BCL-2 inhibitor, has efficacy in t(11;14)-positive relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), which is enhanced by dexamethasone, which promotes BCL-2 dependency. METHODS The randomized, open-label, phase III CANOVA study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03539744 ) enrolled adults with t(11;14)-positive RRMM who had received ≥2 previous lines of therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to venetoclax-dexamethasone or pomalidomide-dexamethasone until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was independent review committee assessed–progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population analyzed by stratified log-rank test (two-sided type I error rate, α = .05), with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI estimated by stratified Cox proportional hazard model. Secondary end points included response rates, overall survival (OS), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate (<10 –5 ), and safety. RESULTS Overall, 263 patients were randomly assigned (venetoclax-dexamethasone, n = 133; pomalidomide-dexamethasone, n = 130). Median PFS was 9.9 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 12.6) with venetoclax-dexamethasone versus 5.8 months (95% CI, 3.8 to 9.2) with pomalidomide-dexamethasone (HR, 0.823 [95% CI, 0.596 to 1.136]; P = .24). Overall response and very good partial response or better rates were 62% and 39%, respectively, with venetoclax-dexamethasone versus 35% and 14% with pomalidomide-dexamethasone. MRD negativity rate was 8% with venetoclax-dexamethasone and 0% with pomalidomide-dexamethasone. Median OS was 32.4 months (95% CI, 26.4 to 40.7) with venetoclax-dexamethasone and 26.9 months (95% CI, 20.4 to 38.9) with pomalidomide-dexamethasone (HR, 0.856 [95% CI, 0.612 to 1.197]). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event rates were 67% with venetoclax-dexamethasone versus 83% with pomalidomide-dexamethasone. There were 16 (12%) treatment-emergent deaths with venetoclax-dexamethasone versus 8 (6%) with pomalidomide-dexamethasone. CONCLUSION The primary end point of PFS was not met. PFS and OS were numerically longer with venetoclax-dexamethasone versus pomalidomide-dexamethasone in t(11;14)-positive RRMM. Consistent with previous studies, infections were associated with venetoclax-dexamethasone; no new safety signals were observed.

Background. Liver transplantation (LT) remains the most effective treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), offering 5-y recurrence rates as low as 15%. Recent advances in organ preservation, particularly hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE), have demonstrated the ability to attenuate ischemia–reperfusion injury (IRI). However, whether HOPE can reduce HCC recurrence rates by mitigating IRI remains an open question. In this study, we aimed to compare oncological outcomes after LT for HCC with and without the use of HOPE. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 137 patients who underwent LT for HCC with grafts from donation after brain death. Risk factors for HCC recurrence were analyzed using Cox regression. To assess the impact of HOPE on oncological outcomes, propensity score matching was used to adjust for baseline differences. Results. Cox regression identified Milan Criteria status as a significant predictor of HCC recurrence. Among the 32 patients in the HOPE group, no HCC recurrence was observed over a median follow-up of 2.11 y. In contrast, within the control group of 105 patients, 8 (7.6%) experienced recurrence within 2 y posttransplantation. Although this translated into a significant difference in time-to-recurrence after propensity score matching, recurrence-free survival and overall survival did not differ significantly. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that HOPE treatment of donation after brain death liver grafts may reduce early HCC recurrence after LT. Although only nonsignificant trends were observed in recurrence-free survival and overall survival within the first 2 y posttransplant, these results underscore the potential of HOPE to influence oncological outcomes. Long-term follow-up, prospective randomized controlled trials, and basic research are warranted to further elucidate the role of HOPE and IRI.

Abstract Detection of germline pathogenic Variants (PVs) in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other genes that significantly elevate lifetime breast cancer (BC) risk are indications for early initiation of intensive screening. BRCA1/2 PVs guidelines recommend that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening begin at age 25 and mammography screening at age 30. However, pregnancy, breastfeeding, and the postpartum period may complicate adherence due to patient concerns about MRI contrast, radiation exposure, logistical barriers, and limited guidance on timing. The incidence of BC peaks approximately 5 years postpartum, especially among women with a positive family history, and early-onset cancers are frequently aggressive, exacerbating the effects of delayed detection. We assessed screening and counseling practices during reproductive periods among women with or at risk for PVs to identify knowledge gaps and opportunities to improve surveillance. We conducted an anonymous survey from March 2023 through January 2025 distributed by Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered (FORCE) and social media platforms. Data were collected through a secure REDCap instrument and summarized with descriptive statistics and logistic regression. The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt. Among the 537 respondents (median age 43 years; 88.5% U.S. residents; 87.5% White), 66.2% were parous and 61.8% knew their family history of BC during pregnancy. Most women reported receiving counseling on screening breast examination, mammography, and MRI; however, 74-77% received no specific guidance about screening before, during, or after pregnancy and weaning. At the time of the survey, 89.9% had undergone BC screening, including 66.2% with annual mammography and 53.1% with annual MRI. Yet during pregnancy and breastfeeding, 69% reported not being screened. Parous women were more likely than nulliparous women to report screening (96.9% vs 85.6%,p&lt;0.0001) and regular mammography (76.4% vs 57.2%,p&lt;0.0001). Screening during pregnancy and breastfeeding was more common among the BRCA1/2 carriers than among carriers of other PVs. Breastfeeding affected screening behavior in 32% of the BRCA1/2 carriers versus 10.9% of other PV carriers, yet only 5.1% of PV carriers stopped breastfeeding to undergo imaging. After their last birth, many women postponed screenings for more than 3 years and only 20.5% received a mammogram within a year of their delivery. Overall, 28.8% of participants reported a history of cancer, of which 66.2% was BC. Approximately 20% of breast cancers reported were diagnosed within 3 years postpartum, with 8.6% occurring during lactation. Despite high rates of BC screening, most high-risk women received little counseling about imaging during pregnancy and breastfeeding, potentially contributing to delayed surveillance at a time of heightened BC risk. These findings highlight the need for targeted counseling, scheduling strategies to support MRI or other imaging during and after pregnancy, and development of novel early-detection tools such as blood or breastmilk biomarkers. Citation Format: Laura M. Pacheco-Spann, Sue Friedman, Diane Rose, William D. Foulkes, Zhihui Fang, Lauren E. Haydu, Mark E. Sherman. Breast Cancer Screening During Reproductive Years in Women with Germline Pathogenic Variants: Gaps in Counseling and Practice [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: The Rise in Early-Onset Cancers—Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities; 2025 Dec 10-13; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(23_Suppl):Abstract nr A029.

Abstract Background: The incidence of cancers diagnosed before age 50 has risen steadily over the past several decades. Survivorship research has not advanced at the same pace as these trends. Existing models of care were developed primarily for older adults and emphasize medical surveillance and risk reduction. Psychosocial dimensions, including anxiety, fear of recurrence, uncertainty about long-term health, and difficulty returning to social or professional roles, remain less consistently addressed. These needs are increasingly relevant as more individuals face the long-term impact of early-onset cancers. Methods: We are developing a digital survivorship model designed to extend support beyond the clinic and focus on psychosocial recovery in the early post-treatment period. The intervention integrates evidence-based behavioral strategies with participatory input from survivors, providers, and community partners. Features under development include educational modules, guided reflection, and interactive prompts to strengthen coping, resilience, and self-management. Evaluation will examine feasibility, acceptability, and early signals of impact using surveys, usage metrics, and qualitative interviews. Preliminary Results: Stakeholder engagement to date has demonstrated strong demand for resources that are both accessible and relevant to the life stage of early-onset survivors. Survivors report that many existing programs feel generic or better suited to older adults. Key priorities identified include managing fear of recurrence, navigating uncertainty about long-term effects, and balancing recovery with the responsibilities of family, career, and caregiving. These themes are informing design decisions and shaping evaluation measures. Conclusion: The rise in early-onset cancers creates an opportunity to expand the scope of cancer control to include survivorship as a central focus. Addressing psychosocial outcomes such as coping, resilience, and quality of life is essential for long-term health. Digital health strategies provide a scalable way to meet these needs by delivering tailored support that complements advances in prevention, detection, and treatment. Integrating survivorship into the broader response to early-onset cancers ensures progress is measured not only by survival but also by the ability of survivors to live well after treatment. Citation Format: Manisha Salinas. Psychosocial Survivorship Gaps in Early-Onset Cancers: Opportunities for Digital Health Research [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: The Rise in Early-Onset Cancers—Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities; 2025 Dec 10-13; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(23_Suppl):Abstract nr A008.

PURPOSE The HER2CLIMB-05 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05132582 ) is investigating the efficacy and safety of adding tucatinib to trastuzumab and pertuzumab as first-line (1L) maintenance therapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS Patients with centrally confirmed HER2+ MBC without evidence of progression post induction therapy and no or asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to tucatinib (300 mg) or placebo twice a day combined with trastuzumab/pertuzumab. The primary end point is investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points include overall survival (OS), PFS per blinded independent central review, CNS-PFS, and safety. RESULTS Between March 2022 and July 2024, 654 patients were randomly assigned to tucatinib (n = 326) and placebo (n = 328) arms. All patients were female (median age, 54 years), 69.3% had de novo MBC, 52.6% were hormone receptor–positive, and 12.4% had presence/history of baseline BM. In this primary analysis, PFS was statistically significantly improved with addition of tucatinib versus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.641 [95% CI, 0.514 to 0.799]; P < .0001; median PFS: 24.9 v 16.3 months); a PFS benefit was seen regardless of the presence/absence of BM or hormone receptor status. OS data remain immature. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the tucatinib arm were diarrhea (72.7%), nausea (33.1%), and elevated liver enzymes (ALT: 28.2%; AST: 25.8%), of which 6.1%, 0.9%, 13.5%, and 7.1%, respectively, were grade ≥3. In the tucatinib arm, 13.5% discontinued tucatinib because of TEAEs. CONCLUSION Tucatinib addition to trastuzumab and pertuzumab demonstrated improvement in PFS with no new safety signals identified and may be an option for 1L maintenance therapy in patients with HER2+ MBC.