Citations

This economic evaluation estimates the implementation costs and cost per additional patient receiving the vaccine associated with each of the intervention strategies for increasing rates of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in primary care practices.

Abstract Context Adult growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is characterized by metabolic abnormalities caused by insufficient GH production. Lonapegsomatropin, a prodrug administered once weekly, was designed to provide sustained release of unmodified somatropin to reduce the burden of daily somatropin injections. Objective This work aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lonapegsomatropin vs placebo as treatment for adults with GHD. Methods The foresiGHt trial was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled (double-blind) and active-controlled (open-label) trial (NCT04615273) conducted at 116 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. The trial randomly assigned and dosed 259 adults with GHD. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive once-weekly lonapegsomatropin, once-weekly placebo, or daily somatropin for 38 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in trunk percent fat at week 38. Secondary efficacy end points included change from baseline in trunk fat mass and total body lean mass. Results At week 38, lonapegsomatropin significantly reduced trunk percent fat (−1.68% vs +0.37%; least squares [LS] mean difference −2.04%; P < .001), increased total body lean mass (+1.60 kg vs −0.11 kg; LS mean difference 1.70 kg; P < .0001), and reduced trunk fat mass (−0.48 kg vs +0.22 kg; LS mean difference −0.70 kg; P = .0053) vs placebo. The safety and tolerability profile of lonapegsomatropin was comparable to somatropin. Conclusion The foresiGHt trial met its primary efficacy end point by demonstrating superiority of lonapegsomatropin vs placebo with similar safety and tolerability, supporting its potential as a once-weekly treatment option for adults with GHD.

Abstract Objective Evidence on the duration of post-operative adrenal insufficiency (AI) in patients with endogenous hypercortisolism is scarce. We sought to determine the duration of post-operative AI and to identify factors associated with the duration of AI in patients undergoing surgery for endogenous hypercortisolism. Methods We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study, 2019-2025, of patients with endogenous hypercortisolism [Cushing syndrome (CS) or mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS)] treated with surgery. Associations of demographics, body mass index (BMI), clinical, and biochemical hypercortisolism severity, subtype of hypercortisolism, pre-surgical hypercortisolism duration, glucocorticoid type, and nadir cortisol in relation to duration of AI were investigated. Results The 242 patients [41% MACS, 46% pituitary CS, 12% adrenal CS, 1% ectopic CS, median age 50 years (IQR: 40-60), 85% women] who developed postsurgical AI were followed for a median duration of 13.7 months (IQR 7.2-26.3). The median time to recovery of AI was shorter in MACS vs. overt CS (3.9 months (95% CI: 3.3-6.2) vs. 13.5 months (95% CI 11.3-18.3), P value < .001). On multivariable analysis adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and glucocorticoid type, moderate to severe biochemical severity score (β = 11, P value < .001) and moderate to severe clinical severity score (β=8.7, P < .001), were associated with a longer duration of AI. Conclusions Baseline clinical and biochemical hypercortisolism severity scores may inform individualized counseling on post-operative AI duration in patients treated for CS and MACS.

ABSTRACT Objectives Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) refers to purulent sinusitis caused by infectious maxillary dental pathologies, with > 90% occurring unilaterally. While various clinical features suggest ODS, diagnosing some ODS patients can be challenging. This study aimed to determine the value of maxillary sinus papillary edema (MSPE) in predicting ODS. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent at least maxillary antrostomy for unilateral sinus disease (USD). Adequately powered samples of three USD cohorts were generated: ODS, infectious maxillary CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), and noninfectious CRSwNP. Multiple variables were collected, but the primary outcome was MSPE presence via double‐blinded endoscopic image review by three rhinologists. Inter‐rater agreement was calculated, and a predictive model for MSPE was generated. Results Of 41 ODS, 22 infectious CRSsNP, and 13 noninfectious CRSwNP patients, mean age was 57.0 years and 55.3% were female. There was almost perfect agreement between rhinologists when assessing for MSPE on endoscopic images ( κ = 0.927). MSPE was seen in 100% of ODS, 22.7% infectious CRSsNP, and 0% CRSwNP. MSPE was significantly more likely in ODS compared to non‐odontogenic CRS ( p < 0.0001), demonstrating 100% sensitivity and 89.1% specificity for ODS, with 85.7% positive and 100% negative predictive values. Conclusions MSPE is a distinct finding that is reliably identifiable and is significantly more likely in ODS compared to infectious CRSsNP and noninfectious CRSwNP. With 100% sensitivity and NPV, MSPE absence makes ODS very unlikely. With 86% PPV, MSPE is not pathognomonic for ODS, but should arouse suspicion for a possible odontogenic source. Level of Evidence 3.

Abstract Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), comprising Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, are chronic, inflammatory, immune mediated, relapsing-remitting conditions of the gastrointestinal tract with multidimensional and often negative effects on patients’ quality of life. The global burden of IBD is increasing and is forecast to affect 1% of the population in early industrialized nations over the next 10 years. Advances in our understanding of the causes and pathogenesis of IBD in the past three decades have translated into new treatments that modulate the immune inflammatory cascade. Modern goals of treatment are clinical remission through assessment of patient reported outcomes and deep remission defined as mucosal healing on colonoscopy or imaging. Achieving both clinical and deep remission affords patients a better long term prognosis and quality of life. This review summarizes the latest evidence on IBD diagnosis, staging, and prognosis, with a detailed focus on current treatments.

Objective: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the agreement rate on judgments made using the Murad tool by different systematic review teams. Introduction: Evaluating the methodological quality of case reports and case series is challenging but some tools do exist for this purpose. We leveraged the presence of studies that have been evaluated by different systematic review teams to assess the inter-consensus agreement among different teams on Murad tool domains. Methods: Using a back-citation method, we identified systematic reviews that used the Murad tool and retrieved all the included primary studies. We selected studies that were assessed by more than 1 systematic review team. We calculated observed agreement and Gwet’s agreement coefficient on judgments made about each signaling question. Results: We identified 982 systematic reviews that cited the Murad tool and collectively cited 59,080 references. The final data comprised of 81 duplicated case reports and series assessed by more than 1 systematic review team. Overall, the signaling questions had very high observed agreement with 5 of the 8 questions having agreement over 75%. The signaling questions with the highest agreement addressed the adequacy of the ascertainment of the exposure (coefficient 0.959), ascertainment of the outcome (coefficient 0.829), presence of a dose-response gradient (perfect agreement), and clarity of reporting (coefficient 0.755). Conclusion: The current study demonstrates overall high agreement among different systematic review teams that used the Murad tool for appraisal of the same case series and case reports. Leveraging duplicated studies across systematic reviews is a feasible way to retrospectively assess the reliability of the tool.