Citations

Abstract Women remain underrepresented in physical medicine and rehabilitation, comprising only 36%–39% of residents despite evidence that diverse teams improve patient outcomes. Limited early exposure and systemic barriers may contribute to this disparity. In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed 1101 US premedical students from 198 colleges across 40 states and territories to assess perceptions of physical medicine and rehabilitation and identify effective early intervention strategies. While respondents included all gender identities, the analysis focused on the 870 female-identifying students (78.8%) due to the study’s primary aim of addressing gender equity in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Only 30.6% were familiar with physical medicine and rehabilitation, with exposure primarily through social media (42.6%) and personal connections (31.1%); just 9.0% had shadowed a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician. Financial concerns were prevalent, with 68.6% citing medical education costs and 66.4% citing application fees as deterrents. Despite these barriers, 60.6% expressed interest in learning more about physical medicine and rehabilitation. Preferred engagement strategies included shadowing (81.8%), interactive workshops (76.6%), mentorship programs (60.1%), and gender-specific events such as “Women in PM&R” (62.8%). These findings underscore the need for targeted, early outreach initiatives that address both informational and financial barriers, aiming to foster greater awareness and representation of women in physical medicine and rehabilitation and ultimately support a more inclusive physician workforce.

Abstract Introduction Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a complex reconstructive procedure performed to address acetabular dysplasia. Postoperative pain management is challenging due to surgical invasiveness and the need to limit opioid use. Regional and local anesthesia are commonly used but may be short-lived, increasing opioid requirements. However, methadone is a long-acting analgesic that may offset these limitations. This is the first study to evaluate methadone use in PAO with arthroscopy, comparing efficacy and opioid consumption of three different anesthetic regimens: (1) lumbar plexus catheter with a single shot intrathecal hydromorphone (LP+HM) (2) locally administered intraoperative soft tissue periarticular injection with ropivacaine, epinephrine, and ketorolac (arthroplasty block [AP]), and (3) AP with intraoperative methadone (AP+M). Methods We retrospectively reviewed PAO with arthroscopy cases from 2022 to 2025 at a single tertiary center. All cases were performed by the same surgeon and anesthesia team and managed on the same postoperative floor. Patients were categorized into three groups: (1) LP+HM, (2) AP, and (3) AP+M. Primary outcomes were 48-hour morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and total inpatient opioid consumption. Length of stay (LoS), operative time, VAS pain scores at 24h and 48h, and antiemetic use were also collected. Results Fifty PAO procedures were identified. The mean age was 16.0±2.3 years, 96% were female, and mean BMI was 22.8±4.4 kg/m2. No significant differences were seen between groups. The addition of methadone to the arthroplasty block regimen (AP+M) resulted in significantly lower 48-h MME compared to AP alone (55.9 mg vs 83.3 mg, p=0.030), but did not differ significantly from LP+HM (39.0mg, p=0.593). Total inpatient opioid consumption was also significantly reduced in the AP+M (69.3 mg) and LP+HM (66.7 mg) groups compared to AP (110.5 mg, p=0.012). Similarly, 24-hour pain scores were significantly lower in the AP+M (3.6±1.9) and LP+HM (3.7±2.1) groups compared to AP (6.4±1.6, p=0.041). Length of stay was comparable across groups (p=0.39). Conclusion Intraoperative methadone added to the arthroplasty block provided comparable analgesia and reduced total opioid use compared to arthroplasty block alone. These findings support methadone as an adjunct to periarticular anesthesia for improving pain control and reducing opioid use in hip preservation surgery.

Abstract Introduction The utilization of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in skeletally immature patients remains controversial, with an open triradiate cartilage traditionally perceived as a relative contraindication due to concerns of acetabular fixation and component loosening. Early evidence suggests that THA may be a feasible option in this patient population yielding favorable short-term outcomes, however larger series and mid-term data are lacking. This study presents the largest series of THA in patients with open triradiate cartilage to date with mid-term clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes. Methods A retrospective review of our institutional Total Joint Registry identified 19 patients (22 hips) who underwent THA while having an open triradiate cartilage growth plate between the year 2000 and 2024. Skeletal maturity was assessed utilizing the modified Oxford bone age and all patients had a score of “1” or “2” on the triradiate cartilage stage of maturation. Demographics, surgical characteristics, implant data, radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes were collected. Functional hip scores were assessed via the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to analyze reoperation rates. Results The average age at surgery was 14 years (SD=1.68), the average BMI was 24 (SD=7.1) and 64% were male. Mean follow-up was 6.05 years (range 1-15). The mean modified Oxford bone age for this cohort was 23 (SD=1.4). The most common indications for THA were avascular necrosis (64%), degenerative joint disease (27%), and neoplasia (9%). Preoperatively, 54.5% of patients utilized gait aids. Postoperatively, all patients reported independent ambulation without assistive devices with an average HHS of 91.65 (SD=11.42). Ninety-six percent of implants were stable at final radiographic follow up. Both reported complications involved acetabular cup loosening, requiring revision of the acetabular component. Conclusion This study presents the largest cohort in the literature of patients who underwent THA with open triradiate cartilage. Our results highlight high patient reported outcomes and low revision rates at mid-term follow up. All patients had excellent implant fixation without radiographic signs of loosening at final radiographic follow up. These results support the use of THA in skeletally immature patients without the need to delay THA for closure of the triradiate cartilage.

Abstract Introduction Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is performed in the setting of hip dysplasia to increase acetabular coverage of the femoral head and improve joint biomechanics and longevity. PAO fixation is generally achieved with two or three 4.5 mm screws, as compared to the generally more substantial plate and screw constructs used in the setting of acetabular fractures or pelvic ring injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative changes in hip joint center medialization and lateral acetabular coverage following PAO, understanding that these radiographic measures are generally used to guide intra-operative assessment of correction. Methods A retrospective chart review of 100 consecutive PAOs during 2021-2023 at a single academic institution by four surgeons was performed. Perioperative radiographs and fluoroscopy images were evaluated to measure lateral center edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle, and medialization of the hip joint center. The hip joint center was measured at one-third of the diameter of the femoral head from inferior to superior, to the ilioischial line, as previously validated by Fowler and colleagues. Results One hundred PAOs in 87 patients (87% female, mean age: 23.0 years) were included. Average preoperative radiographic parameters were 19.9° for LCEA, 12.5° for Tönnis angle, and 12.6 mm for distance from the femoral head to ilioischial line. Ninety-four cases (94%) used three screws, and 6 cases (6%) used two screws for unstable fragment fixation. On immediate postoperative films, average correction was to 28.3° for LCEA, 4.9° for Tönnis angle, and 1.9 mm of pre- to postoperative femoral head medialization (p≤0.001). Patients were radiographically followed for an average of 13.3 months, with an average time to radiographic union of 7.1 months. During the course of follow-up, LCEA increased to 29.3°, Tönnis angle remained to 5.0° (p=0.47), and medialization increased to 2.7 mm (p≤0.02), suggesting further significant but clinically modest increases in lateral coverage and femoral head medialization. Conclusion While the majority of lateral acetabular coverage and femoral head medialization occurs intra-operatively at the time of PAO, patients undergo modest but statistically significant postoperative increases in lateral coverage and medialization prior to radiographic union.

Abstract Purpose Acetabular overcoverage (pincer morphology) has been suggested to be both a source of pain and dysfunction as well as potentially protective against osteoarthritic change. The purpose of this study was to compare minimum 5-year clinical outcomes of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopic labral repair with a lateral center edge angle (LCEA) of ≥ 40° as compared to non-dysplastic controls with an LCEA of 25-40°. Methods We identified all patients that underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair between 2009-2019 at a single academic institution. Patients with LCEA ≥ 40° (pincer) were propensity matched to non-dysplastic controls with LCEA 25-40° on a 1:2 basis by sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and year of surgery. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Tegner activity score, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and Hip Outcome Score (HOS) were analyzed, as were reoperations and conversions to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Results Fifty-five patients with pincer morphology (mean preoperative LCEA: 41.9°, Tonnis angle: -7.3°, alpha angle: 58.8°) were matched to 110 non-dysplastic controls (LCEA: 31.2°, Tonnis angle: 2.2°, alpha angle: 58.9°), resulting in a total of 165 hips in 163 patients (67% females, mean age: 37.7 years, BMI: 26.8 kg/m2). Pincer patients were corrected to a mean postoperative LCEA of 38.7° (p<0.0001), with 22 pincer patients having residual overcoverage, namely a postoperative LCEA ≥ 40° (range: 40.0-45.8°). At mean 7.8 years follow-up (range: 5.1-13.2), there was no difference in any postoperative PROMs between pincers and controls (p>0.15) and no difference in PROMs between patients with residual overcoverage and pincer patients with a postoperatively normalized LCEA (p>0.25). At final follow-up, 4 patients in the pincer cohort (7%) and 21 controls (19%) had converted to THA (p=0.046). Conclusion Patients with lateral acetabular overcoverage demonstrated similar and satisfactory postoperative PROMs at a minimum of 5-year follow-up compared to propensity-matched non-dysplastic controls, regardless of if the LCEA was corrected to <40°. Of note, non-dysplastic controls demonstrated an increased rate of conversion to THA, supporting the potentially chondroprotective role of acetabular overcoverage.

Abstract Background Some studies have reported more severe chondral pathology and less successful hip arthroscopic outcomes in patients with acetabular subchondral cysts. Purpose The purpose of this study is to report multicenter arthroscopic outcomes of patients with and without acetabular bone cysts. Methods A multicenter matched-pair study was performed with data from a large prospectively collected database. Inclusion criteria were adult patients that had undergone primary unilateral hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). The study group was defined by the presence of a superolateral acetabular subchondral cyst on preoperative imaging with > 2mm minimum joint width. 1:1 matching on age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), Alpha angle, and rendered arthroscopic treatments of femoroplasty, acetabuloplasty, and labral treatment (i.e., repair, reconstruction, or debridement). Beck chondral grade and minimum 2-year outcomes utilizing VAS for pain, iHOT-12, MCID, SBC, and PASS scores were compared. Results There were 82 patients. The study group had a mean age of 42.16 ± 11.26 years with 48.78% women and a mean BMI of 26.51 ± 4.31 kg/m2. Mean Beck chondral grade was 2.59 ± 1.27 in the study group and 2.70 ± 0.95 in the matched control group (p=0.72). Two-year mean postoperative iHOT-12 scores for the study and control groups were 69.49 ± 24.51 and 73.24 ± 25.16 (p=0.38), while mean postoperative pain VAS were 18.84 ± 18.17 and 20.74 ± 21.39 (p=0.70) The study group reached MCID in 82.93%, SBC in 58.54%, and PASS in 65.85%. The control group reached MCID in 78.05%, SBC in 65.85%, and PASS in 73.17%, with no significant difference between the cohorts (p=0.57, p=0.49, p=0.47, respectively). Discussion/Conclusion Acetabular subchondral cysts are not associated with more chondral pathology than strictly matched controls and may not be a contraindication to hip arthroscopy in patients with FAIS that would otherwise be indicated for this surgery. This finding has pragmatic value in that a significant subset of patients that would otherwise have been denied elective hip arthroscopy may now be potential arthroscopic candidates.

Abstract Purpose Patients presenting for iliopsoas tendinitis consultation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) often describe a prolonged time to diagnosis and subsequent surgical management. The purpose of this study was to quantify time from symptom onset to diagnosis and subsequent arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening, including number of providers seen. Methods Patients undergoing arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening after THA were prospectively identified between 2023-2025 at a single institution. Time from symptom onset to iliopsoas tendinitis diagnosis as well as arthroscopic lengthening were determined. Number of providers seen, diagnostic relief from preoperative iliopsoas bursal injections, and postoperative satisfaction after fractional lengthening were also evaluated to better quantify indications and outcomes of arthroscopic intervention in this population. Results A total of 44 hips in 41 patients (23 females and 18 males) were included (mean age: 64.7 ± 10.2, mean BMI: 29.9 ± 5.9 kg/m2). Of note, 7 patients (16%) had undergone revision THA prior to iliopsoas symptom onset. Patients had on average 2.2 ± 2.1 years of symptoms and saw 2.5 ± 1.7 [range: 1-8] providers prior to being diagnosed with iliopsoas tendinitis and referred for consideration of arthroscopic fractional lengthening. Preoperatively, 93% of patients underwent at least 1 iliopsoas bursal corticosteroid injection, with an average of 81.1% symptom relief during the diagnostic (anesthetic) phase. The mean time between THA and iliopsoas fractional lengthening was 4.8 ± 3.4 years, whereas the mean time between initial iliopsoas tendinitis symptoms to fractional lengthening was 3.1 ± 2.5 years. At a mean of 11.3 ± 6.8 months postoperatively, mean surgery satisfaction was 8.1 ± 2.6 on a scale of 1 to 10, with the vast majority of patients (89.5%) stating that they would undergo fractional lengthening again. Conclusion Patients often experience a protracted period of symptoms and see multiple clinicians prior to being diagnosed with iliopsoas tendinitis and undergoing arthroscopic management. In patients refractory to conservative management, arthroscopic fractional lengthening can provide high surgery satisfaction, with most patients stating they would undergo the procedure again. These findings highlight the importance of increased recognition and appropriate referral of patients with iliopsoas tendinitis following THA.

Abstract Purpose Iliopsoas tendinitis following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been described to result from acetabular component overhang as well as prominent femoral collars. Yet, a portion of patients experience iliopsoas tendinitis in the setting of well-positioned components. The purpose of this study was to assess anatomic factors predisposing to iliopsoas tendinitis after THA. Methods Patients with THAs performed at three academic institutions who subsequently underwent arthroscopic iliopsoas release were retrospectively reviewed from 2015 to 2025 and propensity matched in a 1:3 fashion to a control group of THAs without subsequent iliopsoas release. Controls were matched by age, surgery date, laterality, sex, surgical approach, and implanted femoral component. Patients with iliopsoas tendinitis and subsequent release (THA-IP) were evaluated for anterior acetabular component overhang and femoral collar overhang, when a collar was present. We also evaluated the absolute and relative profile of the lesser trochanter on anteroposterior radiographs, understanding that when less of the lesser trochanter is visualized, the trochanter is anatomically displaced posterolaterally, resulting in a more arduous route from the inner pelvic origin of the iliopsoas to its insertion on the femur. Results Forty-five patients (mean age: 57±11; 71% female; 19 direct anterior, 10 anterolateral, 16 posterior approach) undergoing THA-IP were analyzed and matched to 135 controls. Both groups demonstrated a median cup size of 54 mm and head size of 36 mm. Average time to iliopsoas release after THA was 4 years. Anterior cup overhang of >2 mm was present in 49% of THA-IP patients, with 18% having collared femoral components, and 9% demonstrating collar overhang of >2 mm. Overall, 19 THA-IP patients had <2 mm of cup and collar overhang and 26 patients had >2 mm of overhang. THA-IP patients with <2 mm of cup and collar overhang had significantly greater relative posterolateralization of the lesser trochanter compared to those with overhang of >2 mm (p=0.010) and to controls (p=0.037). Conclusion Visualizing “Less of the Lesser” on anteroposterior hip radiographs and associated posterolateralization of the lesser trochanter may be an anatomic risk factor for iliopsoas tendinitis following THA, even in the presence of satisfactorily positioned components.

Abstract Introduction Abductor tendon pathology is a common cause of greater trochanteric pain syndrome. The gluteus minimus tendon inserts on the anterior facet of the greater trochanter; the gluteus medius tendon inserts at both the lateral and posterosuperior facets. The Dunn view brings the anterior facet into profile and allows for differentiation of the anterior facet and the insertion of the gluteus minumus from the insertion site of gluteus medius. We hypothesize isolated enthesophytes at the anterior facet best seen on the Dunn view are associated with gluteus minimus tendon pathology. Methods Fifty patients with a history of lateral hip pain with hip radiographs and ipsilateral hip MRI were reviewed. Patients were excluded if the time between radiographs and MRIs >6months or if the patient had prior surgery on the affected side. The radiographs were reviewed by a single-reader to identify enthesophytes (≥ 2mm) at the anterior facet on the Dunn views and lateral facet on the AP view. MRIs were reviewed to categorize the gluteus minimus and medius tendons into the following: normal, tendinopathy, partial thickness tear and full thickness tear. Results The mean age of the fifty patients was 62 (range 19-79; 80% were females). 28 patients had left hip pathology and 22 had right hip. The mean difference between the time between radiograph and MRI was 53 days. Out of the 50 patients, 38 had anterior facet enthesophytes on Dunn views. 97% of these patients had gluteus minimus tendon pathology on MRI, including 76% with tendon tears (positive predictive value [PPV] of 89%). 30 patients had lateral enthesophytes on AP views. 87% of these patients had gluteus medius pathology, including 70% tears (PPV of 83%). Only 3 out of 50 patients had posterosuperior facet enthesophytes. All 3 of these patients had abductor pathology (PPV of 67%). Conclusion There is a correlation between enthesophytes at the greater trochanter anterior facet and lateral facet with respective gluteus minimus and medius tendon pathology. Dunn views add value in detecting anterior facet enthesophytes not visible on AP views and are highly predictive of gluteus minimus tendon pathology.

Abstract Introduction Labral reconstruction has seen an increase in utilization over the last decade. As a result of the increasing number of labral reconstructions being performed, there has been a subsequent increase in the number of failed labral reconstructions requiring revision. The purpose of the present study was to report the short-term survivorship and outcomes of patients who underwent segmental acetabular labral reconstruction in the setting of a failed prior labral reconstruction. Methods A retrospective review of all labral reconstructions performed by the senior author between 01/01/2010-04/01/2022 was conducted. Patients who underwent a labral reconstruction and were over 18 at the time of surgery were included. Patients with a history of avascular necrosis, Legg-Calvé-Perthes, or with a lateral center edge angle < 18° were excluded. Demographics, radiographic parameters, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) were collected. Patients who underwent a labral reconstruction in the setting of a prior failed labral reconstruction (Group B) were matched in a 1:1 fashion to patients in a control group who underwent only one labral reconstruction (Group A) by age, sex, LCEA, minimum joint space, and the presence of an Outerbridge Grade 3 or 4 defect. Results A total of 24 hips (23 patients) were included in Group B. Mean age at the time of surgery was 36 ± 13 years, and most hips were female (n=14, 58%). Twenty-two (92%) of the hips met a study endpoint, with 3 (14%) converting to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 3 (14%) undergoing a subsequent hip-preserving surgery. The remaining 16 hips reported 2-year minimum PROs and had a median patient satisfaction of 9.5 (Range: 6-10). Additionally, they demonstrated significant improvement from baseline in SF-12 PCS (p=0.004), WOMAC Total (p<0.001), mHHS (p=0.004), HOS-ADL (p=0.002), and HOS-Sport (p=0.002). Notably, patients in Group B demonstrated similar improvement in PROs from baseline compared to the matched-control group (Group A). Conclusion Patients who undergo revision labral reconstruction in the setting of a failed prior labral reconstruction demonstrate significant improvement in PROs post-operatively compared to baseline at a rate similar to patients who underwent only one labral reconstruction.