Citations

Aim Cefazolin, a first generation cephalosporin, is the standard of care for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in hip and knee arthroplasty patients. Research has shown that prosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates are significantly higher when non-cefazolin antibiotics are used for perioperative TKA and THA prophylaxis. Cefazolin contains an R1 side chain that has not shown cross reactivity with other cephalosporins. Despite these data, the declaration of a cephalosporin allergy causes uncertainty regarding the optimal antibiotic choice in these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of administering perioperative cefazolin in patients with a cephalosporin allergy undergoing joint arthroplasty. Methods We identified all patients (n=1267) with a documented cephalosporin allergy who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty at a high volume academic medical center from 2016-2024. We compared patients who received perioperative cefazolin despite the presence of a cephalosporin allergy (n=481) to patients who received alternative antibiotic prophylaxis (n=786). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of IgE mediated allergic reactions within the first 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included 90-day complication rates including PJI, C. difficile infection, adverse events and readmission. Results The incidence of allergic reaction in cephalosporin allergic patients who received cefazolin was 0.0% (0/481) compared to 0.51% (4/786) in patients who received alternative antibiotics prophylaxis (p=0.12). There were no significant differences in the incidences of PJI (0.23% vs. 0.30%; p=0.83), C. difficile infection (0.0% vs. 0.0%) or readmission (3.95% vs. 4.34%; p=0.75) within 90 days. There was one adverse event related to cefazolin administration which was urethral irritation and was self-limited. There were three adverse events related to alternative antibiotic prophylaxis including cutaneous manifestations, GI distress and headache in a patient with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. All four allergic reactions in the alternative antibiotic prophylaxis cohort required supportive treatment with IV corticosteroids, fluids and antihistamines. Conclusion In this cohort of hip and knee arthroplasty patients, cefazolin administration in the setting of a cephalosporin allergy resulted in a 0.0% incidence of IgE mediated allergic reactions. These data and the fact that cefazolin's unique R1 side chain is not shared by any other cephalosporins suggests that cefazolin can safely be administered to most patients with a documented cephalosporin allergy.

Abstract Purpose: Relapse is a major cause of failure in human papillomavirus–independent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clinicopathologic criteria for adjuvant treatment remain imprecise and have not changed for decades. We investigated whether ctDNA in lymphatic exudate collected via surgical drains (“lymph”) 24 hours after surgery identified molecular residual disease (MRD) and compared its performance with time-matched plasma. Experimental Design: Using an ultra-sensitive tumor-informed sequencing approach, tumor variants were called in lymph and plasma to classify patients as ctDNA positive or ctDNA negative, trained in an initial cohort of 36 patients, and replicated in an independent cohort of 37 patients. Progression-free survival was compared in ctDNA(+) versus ctDNA(–) patients. Results: Lymph identified MRD in two independent multi-site cohorts (initial cohort sensitivity = 76% and specificity = 63%; log-rank P = 0.01; replication cohort sensitivity = 65% and specificity = 70%; log-rank P = 0.04). Lymph performance was enhanced in locoregional relapse (sensitivity = 78% and specificity = 67%; log-rank P = 0.0004) and generalized to early-stage patients. Analysis of matched plasma collected at this early timepoint was not predictive of recurrence (sensitivity = 35% and specificity = 72%; log-rank P = 0.7). In patients with intermediate-risk pathology, lymph ctDNA was associated with recurrence (sensitivity = 88% and specificity = 67%; log-rank P = 0.0008), suggesting an opportunity for improved stratification of patients who may benefit from additional adjuvant treatment. Conclusions: Postoperative lymph is a novel, proximal, and early source of MRD with the potential to introduce more precision into adjuvant therapy decision-making and improve outcomes, especially for patients with intermediate-risk human papillomavirus–independent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Importance The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) previously identified premenopausal patients with tumors in which the ratio of expression of HOXB13 relative to IL17BR (hereafter, BCI [H/I]–low tumors) as likely to derive greatest benefit from ovarian function suppression (OFS)–containing adjuvant therapy in the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT) trial. Objectives To assess BCI as a predictive biomarker of benefit from exemestane plus OFS vs tamoxifen plus OFS and to validate BCI as a prognostic biomarker for premenopausal patients. Design, Setting, and Participants This prognostic study used a prospective-retrospective translational design within the Tamoxifen and Exemestane (TEXT) and SOFT trials (enrolled November 2003 to April 2011). Blinded BCI testing in all available tumor samples was completed in March 2024. Premenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer randomized to tamoxifen plus OFS or exemestane plus OFS who had BCI assessed were included. Analysis occurred from March to August 2024. Exposure 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen plus OFS or exemestane plus OFS. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) for predictive analyses and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) for prognostic analyses after a median follow-up of 13 years in the TEXT cohort. Secondary objectives examined the predictive performance of BCI (H/I) in the combined TEXT and SOFT cohort overall and in prespecified clinical subgroups. Results Of 1782 patients in the TEXT study, 1034 (58.0%) had BCI (H/I)–low tumors; 915 (51.3%) of patients had N0 disease and 1077 (60.4%) were younger than 45 years. Patients with BCI (H/I)–low tumors had a 6.6% absolute benefit in 12-year BCFI (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44-0.85) for exemestane plus OFS vs tamoxifen plus OFS, while those with BCI (H/I)–high tumors had a 6.3% absolute benefit (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57-1.07; P for interaction = .29). Results were consistent in the combined TEXT plus SOFT cohort (2896 patients) and adjusting for clinicopathological variables. Clinical subgroup analyses consistently showed benefit of exemestane plus OFS vs tamoxifen plus OFS for BCI (H/I)–low tumors, and more variable relative treatment effects among BCI (H/I)–high tumors, including by age. Post hoc exploratory time-varying estimates suggested the treatment × BCI associations may differ in years 0 to 5 vs greater than 5 years. BCI and BCI N+ as continuous indices were prognostic for distant recurrence in N0 (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.11-1.44; P < .001) and N1 (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.21-2.05; P < .001) cancers. The 12-year DRFI was 96.3%, 90.3%, and 84.9% for BCI low-, intermediate-, and high-risk N0 cancers, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance In this study of premenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, BCI (H/I) status did not clearly predict greater benefit of adjuvant exemestane plus OFS vs tamoxifen plus OFS for women with BCI (H/I)–low tumors than for those with BCI (H/I)–high tumors; BCI continuous indices were reconfirmed as prognostic for premenopausal women. These findings support prior results of SOFT, which compared tamoxifen-alone vs OFS with either exemestane or tamoxifen, indicating premenopausal patients with BCI (H/I)–low tumors may benefit from more intensive endocrine therapy.

Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is a common and debilitating symptom of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The epileptogenic zone, defined as cortex responsible for seizure generation, is located at the peritumoral region for most tumors, and lower-grade intrinsic brain tumors have the highest seizure incidence. Surgery is often the most effective treatment for the reduction in seizures in BTRE. However, surgical decisions have historically often been made exclusively for oncologic reasons, with less emphasis on seizure control. Surgical approaches for all tumor types are reviewed, highlighting relevant risk factors. Adjunctive tools during surgery, such as intraoperative electrocorticography (ECoG), may help identify and remove surrounding brain areas which are epileptogenic. Minimally invasive surgery is also gaining traction, given its utility in treating seizures deep-seated tumors. This review explores epileptogenic brain tumors, surgery for BTRE, and emerging strategies to better achieve seizure control.

Introduction: The use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to guide lower extremity deep venous stent placement is associated with improved identification of the degree of maximal vessel stenosis, vessel obstruction, and thrombus burden, compared to venography alone. As the US medical system moves towards value-based care, the financial impact of interventional tools requires close consideration. Currently, there are limited evaluations of the cost effectiveness of IVUS during venous procedures. Research Question: This study seeks to examine the cost-effectiveness of IVUS in lower extremity deep venous interventions. Methods: Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2016 through 2021 for beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years undergoing lower extremity venous interventions with stent placement, thrombolysis, and/or thrombectomy were analyzed. Cost ratios between IVUS-guided and non-IVUS-guided procedures were assessed using gamma regression, adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. Results: A total of 52,610 patients were included, with 42.6% undergoing IVUS-guided procedures. IVUS utilization varied by setting, with higher usage in hospital-based outpatient centers (75.3%) and ambulatory surgical centers/outpatient-based laboratories (ASC/OBL; 86.4%) compared to inpatient hospitalizations (10.4%). Among inpatient procedures, IVUS-guided venous intervention was associated with greater cost than non-IVUS procedures at 90 days, with an adjusted cost ratio of 1.04 (95% CI 1.01-1.07), yet was associated with an average 0.6-day shorter hospitalization (p < 0.001; Figure 1, Figure 2 ). There were marginal increased costs associated with use of IVUS in inpatient procedures persisting through one- and three-years follow-up, with adjusted cost ratios of 1.05 (95% CI 1.02-1.08) and 1.05 (95% CI 1.02-1.09), respectively. In contrast, IVUS use was associated with significant cost savings in outpatient settings, with adjusted cost ratios of 0.71 (95% CI 0.69-0.73) in hospital-based outpatient settings and 0.75 (95% CI 0.73-0.78) in ASC/OBL at 90 days. These cost savings persisted at one- and three-year follow-up. Conclusions: IVUS-guided venous intervention was associated with cost savings in outpatient and ASC/OBL settings, while maintaining near cost equivalence in inpatient settings. These findings suggest that in addition to the clinical benefit of IVUS for venous intervention, IVUS is a cost-effective strategy, particularly in the outpatient setting.

Introduction: Semaglutide 2.4 mg has been shown to reduce the risk and severity of cardiometabolic comorbidities (CMCs) and to improve cardiometabolic biomarkers in patients with overweight or obesity in clinical trials. However, real-world evidence in these areas is limited. Research Question: This study compared the incidence rates of CMCs and 12-month changes in biomarkers between adults with overweight/obesity with and without once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg use. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using a large U.S. claims database linked with clinical data evaluated patients with semaglutide 2.4 mg use for ≥12 months (June 2021–June 2023) and those without. For each CMC, including hypertension, T2D, dyslipidemia, HF, prediabetes, ASCVD, and CVD, patients were excluded from analysis of each individual CMC if they had claims indicating the corresponding CMC during the 12-month baseline. For each biomarker, patients were required to have the corresponding biomarker measurements at both baseline and 12-month follow-up. For each CMC and biomarker, propensity score weighting was used to balance patient characteristics between semaglutide 2.4 mg users and non-users. Time to CMCs were compared using weighted Cox proportional hazards models and biomarker changes were compared using weighted linear regression. Results: Sample sizes ranged from 14,067 to 25,490 in semaglutide 2.4 mg users and 4,271,926 to 8,578,948 in non-users across CMCs. After balancing, baseline characteristics were similar between users and non-users. Mean age ranged from 44.4 to 47.2 years among users and 44.4 to 47.4 years among non-users; 77%–83% of users and 75%–82% of non-users were women. Compared to non-users, semaglutide 2.4 mg users had significantly lower risk of incident hypertension (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.57; 0.68), T2D (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.39; 0.51), HF (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.38; 0.61), prediabetes (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.70; 0.80), ASCVD (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.58; 0.72), and CVD (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.64; 0.75) (all p<0.001). The risk of dyslipidemia was similar between users and non-users (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00; 1.11, p=0.05). Semaglutide 2.4 mg use was also associated with significant improvements in cardiometabolic biomarkers specified in Table 1 and slower decline in eGFR. Conclusion: In adults with overweight/obesity, semaglutide 2.4 mg was associated with lower risk of specified CMCs and greater improvements in cardiometabolic biomarkers.

Introduction/Background: CHIP is a risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality. Previous work has shown that CHIP, and particularly larger CHIP clones, are associated with adverse CV outcomes, yet the molecular pathways through which CHIP impacts CV risk are poorly defined. Hypothesis/Research Question: We hypothesize that the integration of whole blood transcriptomics and methylomics will provide novel insights into the pathophysiology of CHIP. Methods/Approach: Whole blood DNA methylation profiling, transcriptomics, and whole exome sequencing with CHIP calling for variant allele frequencies (VAF) of ≥2% (CHIP) and ≥10% (large CHIP) were performed for 507 ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD participants with moderate-severe ischemia. We identified transcriptomic and methylomic differences between participants with CHIP and large CHIP vs no CHIP using DESeq2 and limma, adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and probe set enrichment analysis (PSEA) were performed to identify pathway-level alterations in transcription and methylation, respectively. Results/Data: Clinical characteristics of study participants are described in Fig 1A . Compared to no CHIP (n=391), transcriptomics identified 6 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CHIP (n=116) and 27 DEGs in large CHIP (n=35) (p-adj<0.05; abs(logFC)>0.25) (Fig 1B) . Compared to no CHIP, methylation identified no differentially methylated probes in CHIP and 6 in large CHIP (padj<0.20, abs(logFC)>0.03). GSEA identified 137 pathways significantly different in both CHIP and large CHIP vs. no CHIP (padj<0.05), while PSEA identified 724 and 2356 pathways (padj<0.20), respectively. Given its stronger relationship with methylation and transcription, downstream analyses focused on large CHIP. Integrating these data, we found 58 pathways to be both hypomethylated and transcriptionally upregulated in large CHIP, including azurophil granule-related pathways implicated in neutrophil degranulation (Fig 1C) . Further investigation into the gene-probe pairs driving the azurophil granule pathway enrichment in large CHIP revealed hypomethylation and increased transcription of genes implicated in neutrophil extracellular trap formation, including ELANE, PTRN3, AZU1, and CTSG (Fig 1D) . Conclusions: Integration of the methylome and transcriptome suggests large CHIP is linked to neutrophil-mediated immune pathways in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Background: Pre-clinical animal studies have demonstrated improved cerebral blood flow and neurological survival with Automated Head Up Position (AHUP) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as compared to flat conventional (C) CPR. AHUP CPR consists of 1) automated head and thorax elevation 2) active compression decompression CPR and 3) an impedance threshold device. Subsequently, observational propensity-matched studies of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients demonstrated a time-dependent association between survival with intact neurological function (SNF) and application of AHUP CPR. However, comparison of AHUP CPR outcomes with contemporaneous C-CPR controls is lacking. Hypothesis: Use of AHUP CPR for OHCA by first responder agencies will demonstrate a higher incidence of SNF compared to C-CPR outcomes from a national registry Methods: Data from the previous 5 years (2020-2024) from an AHUP-CPR Registry comprised of OHCA patients routinely treated by first responders with AHUP CPR were compared with data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES). Patient demographics, arrest characteristics, ROSC, SHD, and SNF were recorded. SNF was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 at hospital discharge. A two-sample test of proportions was used for outcome comparisons. Results: Nine AHUP registry sites (MN, FL, TN, IL, OK, VA, AL, IA, MI) were included. Summary 5-year demographics (Table 1) and clinical outcomes (Table 2) are presented. For 2020-2024 AHUP sites, the average time (mm:ss, SD) from 9-1-1 call to start of CPR was 9:09 (4:37) and time to start of AHUP CPR was 12:46 (5:57). The AHUP registry had a higher 5-yr incidence of SNF versus the CARES registry (difference 2.8%, 95% CI 1.8-3.8, p < 0.00001). This difference was consistent year over year (Figure 1). Secondary outcomes of sustained return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge in the AHUP registry were also significantly higher than CARES registry data (Table 2). Conclusions: Over a 5-year period, an unadjusted analysis of aggregate data from two OHCA patient registries demonstrated that the incidence of survival with intact neurological function was higher in patients treated with AHUP CPR as part of first responder care versus patients treated with more conventional CPR methods.

Background: MARVEL-HCM is a US multicenter study assessing the safety and effectiveness of mavacamten in real-world academic and community practices. Mavacamten is a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor (CMI) and the only CMI currently approved in over 50 countries for use in patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Modest evidence exists describing the effectiveness and safety of mavacamten monotherapy. Aims: To describe the real-world outcomes of patients using mavacamten as monotherapy for oHCM. Methods: Patient-level data from medical records at 5 sites were analyzed to describe mavacamten monotherapy, defined as monotherapy at baseline or after background HCM therapy (beta-blockers [BB], calcium channel blockers [CCB], disopyramide) discontinuation within 12 weeks(wks) of mavacamten initiation and without reinitiation, up to 60 wks. A minimum of 12 wks follow-up was required for inclusion. Patient characteristics, echocardiographic data, and safety are reported at baseline and follow-up visits. Results: The monotherapy cohort comprised 13.4% (32/239) of patients: 24 were on mavacamten monotherapy at initiation, and 8 discontinued background therapy. Baseline characteristics included: NYHA Class II (46.9%) and III (53.1%), female (66%), hypertension (50%), and atrial fibrillation (AF) (18%) (Table 1). Median follow-up and duration of mavacamten monotherapy were 48 wks (range 12-60 wks) and 57 wks (range 14-60 wks), respectively. Resting left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTg) was ≤ 30 mmHg in 93%, 91% and 100% of patients at Wk 24, 36, and 60. Valsalva LVOTg was ≤ 30 mmHg in 61%, 77% and 86% of patients at Wk 24, 36, and 60 (Fig 1). No patients were in NYHA Class III at wk 60, and ~50% of patients were NYHA Class I by wk 48 (Fig 2). Mean reduction in LVEF was 4.8% over 60 wks. One patient had LVEF < 50% at Wk 20, resulting in a dose reduction (10 to 7.5 mg). Safety events included 3 hospitalizations due to AF ablation (n=1), viral gastrointestinal illness (n=1) and heart failure (n=1). Demographic, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were similar across the mavacamten monotherapy cohort, mavacamten in combination with background HCM therapy (n=207), and the overall cohort of MARVEL-HCM (N=239). Conclusions: Mavacamten monotherapy was effective, safe, and consistent with the overall MARVEL cohort, as well as previously reported monotherapy cohorts from pivotal, long-term, and real-world evidence.