Citations

Abstract Background Clinicians’ views on clinical readiness of Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers (BBM) are not well understood. Method The Alzheimer's Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment Biofluid‐Based Biomarkers Professional Interest Area conducted a survey to elicit clinician opinions on AD BBM implementation, including contexts of use, assay selection, reporting and result interpretation. Result Clinician respondents ( n = 212) practiced in Europe (56%), North America (24%), Caribbean and Central or South America (11%) and other continents (9%). Most respondents were medical doctors (80%) practicing in secondary or tertiary care (88%) (Table 1). For 56% of respondents, CSF AD biomarkers or amyloid PET were accessible, but 48% agreed and 52% disagreed with implementation of AD BBM in any clinical context (Table 2). Respondents emphasized the need for data from diverse populations and educational resources to support test interpretation. Conclusion Surveyed clinicians generally agreed with published appropriate use recommendations but were divided on AD BBM readiness for clinical use.

Abstract Background Brain cells secrete extracellular vesicles (EVs) containing signaling and pathological proteins related to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related disorders. Recent studies demonstrate brain‐derived EVs (BDEVs) contain misfolded tau and are transmissible of tau pathology in the brain. However, the underlying mechanism regarding EV‐mediated tau pathology is still largely uncharacterized. Method We conducted the immuno‐affinity purification of tau in human brain‐derived EVs (BDEVs) isolated from age and sex‐matched 14 AD and 14 CTRL cases and performed tandem mass‐tag mass spectrometry to profile unbiased tau interactome in BDEVs. We used Nanotemper Monolith to validate the interaction of EV‐tau interactors with tau, and super‐resolution microscopy (Nanoimager) to detect their colocalization in a single‐EV level. We next designed siRNAs to silence EV‐tau interactors in SH‐SY5Y cells overexpressing human P301L tau (SH‐SY5Y‐P301Ltau) and assessed tau loading to EVs by Flow Nanoanalyzer. These EVs were tested for their uptake and tau seeding by human iPSC‐derived neurons (iNeurons). We finally tested the inhibitors of identified molecules on BDEV‐mediated tau propagation in vivo . Result A total of 764 proteins were identified in BDEV‐associated tau interactome from CTRL and AD patients. Sixty‐five proteins were significantly downregulated in AD BDEVs; whereas 5 proteins were significantly upregulated in AD BDEVs compared to CTRL BDEVs. The most enriched tau‐interacting proteins were significantly positively correlated with Braak stage. We confirmed the direct binding of candidate proteins to tau with micromolar binding affinities by Monolith, and their colocalization with tau in human BDEVs using Nanoimager. Silencing of candidate molecules in human SH‐SY5Y‐P301Ltau cells showed reduced loading of tau in EVs, their reduced uptake by iNeurons, and tau seeding activities. Finally, intracerebroventricular injection of neutralizing antibody against the most promising target results in reduction of tau pathology in PS19 mice expressing P301S human tau mutant. Conclusion Our study identified tau‐interacting molecules highly enriched in AD BDEVs compared to CTRL BDVs. Silencing of candidate molecule reduced tau loading to the EVs and their uptake by iNeurons and neutralizing antibody suppressed tau dissemination, highlighting them as promising therapeutic targets to halt tau pathology in AD and related tauopathy.

Abstract Background Given low representation of diverse populations in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research, it remains unclear if AD biomarker relationships observed primarily in non‐Hispanic White (NHW) cohorts generalize to other groups. Here we evaluate associations between key AD biomarkers and cognitive performance among cognitively unimpaired non‐Hispanic Blck (NHB) and NHW participants across 2 cohorts with unique sample characteristics. Method Participants included cognitively unimpaired NHB and NHW participants with Aβ and tau PET in ADNI (69 NHB, 402 NHW) and POINTER Imaging (135 NHB, 637 NHW). We examined harmonized measures of global Aβ (in centiloids), entorhinal cortex (EC) tau (quantified with MK6240 in POINTER and FTP in ADNI) and Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC) scores. Regression models within each ethnoracial group evaluated relationships between 1) Aβ and EC tau, and 2) EC tau and PACC performance. Interaction models within each cohort were also conducted to assess differences in these associations by ethnoracial group. All models were adjusted for age and gender. Models with PACC additionally adjusted for education. Result In US POINTER, NHBs had lower Aβ and EC tau burden compared to NHWs (Table 1). In ADNI, there was no difference in EC tau between groups, and no differenence in Aβ after adjusting for age and gender. In US POINTER, the positive Aβ‐EC tau relationship was observed in both ethnoracial groups whereas in ADNI, Aβ was associated with higher EC tau in the NHW but not the NHB group. In both cohorts, EC tau was associated with worse PACC performance in both NHB and NHW and there were no differences in this association by ethnoracial group in interaction models (Figure 1). Conclusion NHBs had lower Aβ and EC tau than NHWs in POINTER but not ADNI, and there were inconsistent associations between Aβ and EC tau across cohorts. Despite these differences, AD biomarkers appear similarly related to cognitive outcomes across ethnoracial groups in both cohorts. Future analyses will attempt to further determine the generalizability of AD biomarker relationships in diverse samples by considering matching on relevant health and demographic characteristics, and inclusion of additional cohorts with harmonized biomarker and cognitive measurements.

Abstract Background Plasma biomarkers offer improved accessibility compared to established diagnostic modalities for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, current plasma biomarker candidates have not been tested comprehensively in diverse populations, and represent only a fraction of pathways dysregulated in AD. This study seeks to address these knowledge gaps through untargeted plasma biomarker discovery in African Americans (AA), an underrepresented group in AD research despite having a higher risk of developing dementia compared to non‐Hispanic Whites (NHW). Method Untargeted proteomics were generated using the SomaScan 7k platform on plasma samples from AA study participants clinically diagnosed as AD dementia ( n = 181) or cognitively unimpaired (CU; n = 142). Machine learning was implemented to identify a set of plasma proteins to distinguish between AD dementia and CU. Predictive models were constructed by elastic net regression optimized with nested cross‐validation on 6,853 proteins and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The generalizability of plasma protein predictors was evaluated in an external Alzheimer's Disease Research Center cohort of 369 NHW and AA study participants diagnosed as AD dementia or CU. Result Thirty‐six proteins were selected as predictors. Proteins selected by machine learning were enriched for processes previously associated with AD including synaptic dysfunction, inflammation, vascular dysfunction, and amyloid processing. The 36 plasma proteins alone achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 to classify AD dementia in the discovery cohort, representing a 22% improvement over a model including age and sex. The 36 proteins were validated in an external cohort also achieving AUC=0.94, a 35% improvement over age and sex. Conclusion Biomarker discovery combining untargeted proteomics and machine learning identified a set of plasma proteins that could serve as a novel and highly accurate diagnostic plasma biomarker panel for AD. Work is underway to assess the association of the predictive panel with p ‐tau217, medical comorbidities, and social/structural determinants of health.

Abstract Background Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) can detect iron deposition or myelin loss in the brain by estimating magnetic susceptibility properties. Iron is an important component in neurofibrillary tangles and is known to co‐localize in regions with tangle burden in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Abnormal magnetic susceptibility measured on QSM has been observed in atypical AD, although it is unclear if susceptibility is regionally related to AV‐1451‐PET uptake in atypical AD. Method Forty atypical AD patients (visual variant=24, language variant=7, others=9) were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research group from the Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. They underwent a 3T MRI scan with a five‐echo gradient echo sequence for calculation of QSM ( n = 80), Aβ (Pittsburgh Compound‐B) and a 18 F‐ AV‐1451 PET scan ( n = 73). All patients showed evidence of Aβ positivity on PET. To assess the relationship between QSM and AV‐1451‐PET, two approaches were used i) Voxel‐based regression analysis using VoxelStats for the whole brain, and ii) region‐of‐interest (ROI)‐based Spearman's correlation analyses using cortical and subcortical ROIs. All models were adjusted for age and sex as covariates and were corrected for multiple comparisons, specifically the VoxelStats regression maps were corrected using random field theory and the ROI‐based correlation plots were corrected using false discovery rate. Result At the voxel‐level, positive correlations between AV‐1451‐PET and QSM were only observed in the left caudate (Figure 1). At the ROI‐level, no significant associations were found, although uncorrected data showed a positive association in the occipital lobe (red circle) and a negative association between substantia nigra susceptibility and occipital AV‐1451 uptake (blue circle) (Figure 2). Since these findings did not survive corrections, they should be interpreted cautiously. Conclusion Our data provides little evidence that regional AV‐1451 PET uptake is related to susceptibility changes in patients with atypical AD, suggesting that iron deposition may not be associated with regional tau accumulation in AD.

Abstract Background Motor disturbances are common in neurodegenerative disorders. Digital health technologies can be a tool for remote, accessible, and low‐burden motor assessments. The ALLFTD Mobile App includes a finger‐tapping test (mApp‐FTT) to assess dexterity. We evaluated the reliability and construct validity of smartphone‐based measures of finger tapping in an in‐person sample. Methods Participants ( n = 33; mean age=68.2 [SD=8.6]) completed the mobile finger‐tapping test (mApp‐FTT) on iOS and Android devices (two counterbalanced 20‐second trials per hand) and the mechanical finger‐tapping test (FTT). The sample included cognitively unimpaired participants (22.2%) and those diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia‐spectrum disorders (41.7%), Alzheimer's dementia (22.2%), and progressive supranuclear palsy or corticobasal syndrome (13.9%). A motor domain was calculated based on neurological exam and added to the Clinical Dementia Rating® plus National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center–Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD). Pearson's correlations assessed associations between mApp‐FTT performance and FTT performance, clinical severity (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD Box Score), motor rating scales (Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale [PSPRS] and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS]), and cognitive function. Due to small sample size, PSPRS subdomains were dichotomized, and t‐tests were performed to evaluate group differences based on symptom presence. Results Total mApp‐FTT taps on iOS and Android were strongly correlated ( r = 0.86, 95% CI [0.76, 0.92], p < .001). mApp‐FTT was associated with manual FTT on iOS ( r = 0.70, 95% CI [0.52, 0.82], p < .001) and Android ( r = 0.62, 95% CI [0.41, 0.77], p < .001). Among iOS users, total PSPRS score was negatively correlated with mApp‐FTT ( r = ‐0.60, 95% CI [‐0.75, ‐0.39], p < .001). Worse mApp‐FTT performance was observed in participants with higher limb rigidity (mean difference=15.46, 95% CI [3.40, 27.52], p < .001), limb dystonia (mean difference=19.22, 95% CI [5.67, 32.77], p < .001), and finger tapping (mean difference=12.74, 95% CI [3.42, 22.06], p < .001). Total UPDRS score correlated with lower mApp‐FTT ( r = ‐0.48, 95% CI [‐0.66, ‐0.28], p < .001), as did disease severity (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD Box Score; r=‐0.46, 95% CI [‐0.66, ‐0.22], p < .001). Conclusion Smartphone‐based finger‐tapping assessments effectively detect motor and cognitive impairment, with stronger associations for motor function. Findings in iOS users highlight the need to assess operating system‐related biases and validate in Android. Remote smartphone assessments offer a scalable tool for tracking disease progression, warranting larger longitudinal studies.

Abstract Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased blood‐based biomarker concentrations, potentially confounding their utility in Alzheimer's disease (AD) evaluation. While plasma phosphorylated tau217 ( p ‐tau217) is elevated in the presence of amyloid related pathology, amyloid beta 1‐42 (Aβ42) is decreased. We investigated the association of plasma p ‐tau217, non‐phosphorylated tau217 (np‐tau217), Aβ42, Aβ40, as well as the Aβ42/Aβ40 and p ‐tau217/Aβ42 ratios, versus decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR in mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) in individuals without amyloid pathology. Method This study included participants with CKD stages 1‐2 (eGFR 60‐98, n = 50), and stages 3‐4 (eGFR 25‐59, n = 33), who were Pittsburgh 11 C‐Compound B amyloid‐PET negative (Centiloid of < 25). Plasma p ‐tau217, np‐tau217, Aβ42, and Aβ40 were measured by immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry (C 2 N Diagnostics). %p‐tau217 [( p ‐tau217/np‐tau217) x100], Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, and p ‐tau217/Aβ42 ratio were calculated. Log‐Log (power function) best‐fit regression analysis was used to quantitatively predict effects of changes in eGFR (2021 CKD‐EPI equation) versus each single analyte or ratio (Figure 1). Result Selected best‐fit analyte equations versus eGFR are shown in Table 1. The predicted percent increase of p ‐tau217 as eGFR decreases from 60 to 45 was 52% (95% CI: 30–78%). Significantly smaller increases of 16% were predicted for Aβ42 (95% CI: 12–21%), and 19% for Aβ40 (95% CI: 16–23%) over the same eGFR range. The best‐fit predicted increase for the p ‐tau217/Aβ42 ratio and %p‐tau217 as eGFR decreases from 60 to 45 was 31% (95% CI: 12–53%), and 19% (95% CI: 2–38%), respectively. While not recommended for assessment of amyloid pathology, the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio did not exhibit a predicted increase (‐2.3% decrease, 95% CI: ‐5.2–0.6%) versus decreasing eGFR from 60 to 45. Conclusion The use of either %p‐tau217 or the p ‐tau217/Aβ42 ratio (to a lesser degree) reduced the confounding effects of decreasing eGFR as compared to p ‐tau217 alone. Aβ42 and Aβ40 exhibited similar reduced predicted increases versus decreasing eGFR as compared to p ‐tau217. Relative to the predicted effects of decreasing eGFR on p ‐tau217 measurements, the p ‐tau217/Aβ42 ratio relative increase was reduced by 40%, while the relative increase was reduced by 63% for %p‐tau217 measurements.

Abstract Background Self‐administered and remote digital cognitive assessments provide a scalable method for screening and longitudinal cognitive monitoring. Mayo Test Drive (MTD) is one such assessment with previously demonstrated usability, reliability, validity and multi‐device compatibility. MTD includes a computer‐adaptive word list memory test (Stricker Learning Span) and a measure of processing speed/executive functioning (Symbols Test) that combine to provide an MTD Composite. This study aimed to develop a conditional normative model predicting longitudinal cognitive change for MTD, and to validate the model in two independent samples of cognitively unimpaired (CU) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/dementia (DEM) participants. Method 1355 CU participants at initial MTD assessment with 2‐4 consecutive MTD assessments every 7.5 months comprised the development dataset. Linear mixed effects models were used to construct a conditional normative model for MTD assessments 2‐4. The baseline model was chosen a priori , consisting of age, sex, education, baseline score, number of assessments, and time. Device type, race, and baseline score by time interactions were also considered. Variables were only added if a >1% increment in r‐squared was observed. The models were externally validated in 113 CU and 51 MCI/DEM patients. Following model development, the data were updated and additional follow‐up MTD assessments were added for many participants, including the addition of additional CU validation data at test 3 ( N = 126) and 4 ( N = 279). T‐tests compared observed and predicted differences and residual z‐scores between development and validation at each follow‐up assessment. Result Table 1 presents demographic variables. No additional variables increased the r‐squared by >1%. The final models are presented in Table 2. Age, baseline score, sex, and education were significant. Residual z‐scores were not significantly different between CU development and CU validation cohorts, indicating observed scores were in line with model predicted scores. Residual z‐scores were significantly worse among MCI/DEM compared to CU development in 11/12 comparisons (Figure 1), indicating observed scores were below model predicted expectations and implying sensitivity to longitudinal cognitive decline. Conclusion These longitudinal normative models can be used to identify individuals with follow‐up scores outside of expected predicted ranges, signifying abnormal longitudinal cognitive decline.

Abstract Background More than 85% of Alzheimer's disease (AD) donor brains exhibit some degree of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), which is characterized predominantly by Aβ40 deposits in the brain vasculature and can cause blood brain barrier (BBB) leakage. CAA is associated with risk of infarcts, cerebral hemorrhages, and cognitive decline. Brain cell type‐specific mechanisms that influence CAA pathology, as well as related measures such as Aβ40 biochemical measures and tight junction proteins, an indicator of BBB integrity, are still elusive. Method We performed single‐nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) of temporal cortex tissue from 79 AD donors, with varying levels of CAA co‐pathology. Measurements of soluble, insoluble and membrane‐associated fractions of brain Aβ40 and tight junction protein (claudin‐5, occludin) levels were available for these donors. We correlated these measures with cell proportions. We also conducted differential gene expression and analyses for intercellular communications and regulatory networks. Result We identified 25 clusters and annotated them with major brain cell types. There were 3 oligodendrocyte, 7 excitatory and 7 inhibitory neuronal, 2 microglial, 2 astrocytic, and 1 each for endothelial, pericytic, fibroblast, and oligodendrocyte precursor cell clusters. We found that higher CAA and Aβ40 levels correlate with reduced neuronal and increased microglial, astrocytic and vascular cell proportions. Increased tight junction proteins correlate with increased inhibitory neuronal and reduced microglial, astrocytic and vascular cell proportions. Among all clusters, one microglial, both astrocytic and the pericytic clusters have greater number of genes significantly associated with CAA, Aβ40 and tight junction protein levels. Most significant genes have negative associations with CAA and membrane‐bound Aβ40 and positive with tight junction protein measures. Using these genes as input for intercellular communications analysis, we prioritized ligand‐target interactions from microglia or astrocytes to pericytes. Some of the prioritized targets are transcription factors in pericytes. Using regulon analysis, we identified genes downstream of these transcription factors that are also significantly associated with lower CAA and membrane‐bound Aβ40 and higher tight junction protein levels. Conclusion We revealed glia‐to‐pericytes intercellular interactions and pericytic gene regulatory networks that are potentially perturbed by CAA and BBB breakdown. Future directions include analyzing external snRNAseq datasets and performing functional validations.

Abstract Background In addition to visuospatial and visuoperceptual deficits, most PCA patients also report deficits in visual attention, episodic memory, and working memory. The dorsal attention network is known to play a critical role in modulating these clinical functions. However, little is known about the relationship of the dorsal attention network with other core networks and relationships to volume loss and memory functions in PCA. Method Fifty‐seven PCA patients were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research group, Mayo Clinic, and compared to 60 cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. The CONN functional connectivity toolbox was used to calculate within‐ and between‐network connectivity. Functional connectivity within the key regions (i.e., inter‐hemisphere connectivity) of the dorsal attention network, namely frontal eye field (FEF) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS), and the entire network was generated. Functional connectivity between the dorsal attention network and the frontoparietal, visual, and default mode networks (DMN) were also generated using CONN's network parcellation atlas. Multivariate linear regression models were fit i) to compare within‐ and between‐network connectivity between both groups and ii) to assess relationships between within‐network connectivity and both gray matter volumes and clinical test scores. Result PCA showed reduced within‐network connectivity in the dorsal attention network, specifically within the IPS and the entire network compared to CU. An increase in between‐network connectivity between the frontoparietal network and both FEF and the entire dorsal attention network was noted in PCA compared to CU (Figure 1). Lower dorsal attention within‐network connectivity was associated with a trend for lower volumes in the entire network (Figure 2) and significantly lower scores on the auditory verbal learning test‐recognition percent correct (AVLT‐RCP) and Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) III‐digit span backward in PCA (Figure 3). Conclusion These findings suggest that within‐ and between‐network connectivity of the dorsal attention network, both within key regions and the entire network, was disrupted in PCA patients. However, this network did not show disrupted connectivity with the core PCA networks. Within‐network connectivity disruptions in the dorsal attention network are associated with aspects of memory function, and to some extent, with volume loss.