Citations

Clear

1905 citation(s) found for "Yu, Frank".

Endoscopic Browlift in Patients With Receding Hairlines
Boonipat, Thanapoom , Hebel, Nathan , Lin, J, Frank, Konstantin , Möllhoff, Nicholas, Cotofana, Sebastian, Cotofana, Sebastian , Bradley, Elizabeth A. , Shapiro, Daniel, Mardini, Samir

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery | October 1, 2021 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 615-619

10.1097/scs.0000000000008156 | PMID 34593745 Get It

Abstract Patients with receding or high hairlines have traditionally been considered unfavorable candidates for endoscopic brow lift as this can further lengthen the hairline. We analyzed outcomes in patients that underwent a novel endoscopic brow lift technique with placement of incisions and anchoring Endotine Forehead Devices (CoApt Systems Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA) directly at the natural forehead crease lines, in an effort to minimize elevation of the hairline, whereas providing well-hidden scars. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent this new Endotine and incision placement between 2016 and 2020. Preoperative and postoperative photographs of all patients were analyzed to determine the postoperative changes in brow elevation and forehead length proportion (defined as length from cranium to chin). The forehead length proportion was unchanged pre- and post-operatively, with no statistically significant differences noted (P = 0.48). The average brow position elevation ranged from 2.78 mm in the medial location to 5.05 mm in the lateral location. All patients were happy with their appearance and had improved visual fields postoperatively. The forehead scars healed well and were well hidden in forehead rhytids at long term follow-up. This novel endoscopic brow lift technique provides an option to utilize a minimally invasive approach in patients with receding hairline. With this technique, visible scars were minimized, whereas still being able to achieve reasonable brow elevation. Thus, our approach enables long term maintenance of brow elevation with inconspicuous scars in the forehead.
The Medical Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Narrative Review
Cortés, Pedro , Lukens, Frank , Cortés, Pedro , Lukens, Frank J., Kröner, Paul T.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Primary Care & Community Health | September 28, 2021 | Volume: 12 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/21501327211046736 | PMID 34581222 Get It

Objective The medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) continues to evolve. Our aim was to systematically assess the literature to provide an updated review of the evidence on lifestyle modifications and pharmacological therapy for the management of GERD. Background The cornerstones of GERD medical management consist of lifestyle modifications and pharmacologic agents. Most recently, evidence has emerged linking anti-reflux pharmacologic therapy to adverse events, such as kidney injury, metabolic bone disease, myocardial infarction, and even dementia, among others. Methods A systematic search of the databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed for articles on the medical management of GERD between inception and March 1, 2021. Conclusion Although pharmacological therapy has been associated with potential adverse events, further research is needed to determine if this association exists. For this reason, lifestyle modifications should be considered first-line, while pharmacologic therapy can be considered in patients in whom lifestyle modifications have proven to be ineffective in controlling their symptoms or cannot institute them. Naturally, extra-esophageal causes for GERD-like symptoms must be considered on suspected high-risk patients and excluded before considering treatment for GERD.
Critical appraisal of technologies to assess electrical activity during atrial fibrillation: a position paper from the European Heart Rhythm Association and European Society of Cardiology Working Group on eCardiology in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm
Groot, Natasja M.S. de , Shah, Dipen , Boyle, Patrick M. , Clifford, Gari D. , Dessel, Pascal van, Heinzel, Frank R. , Lambiase, Pier D. , Lumens, Joost , Platonov, Pyotr G. , Ngarmukos, Tachapong , Martí­nez, Juan Pablo , Sánchez, Alejandro Olaya, Takahashi, Yoshihide , Valdigem, Bruno Pereira , Veen, Alle-Jan van der, Vernooy, Kevin , Casado-Arroyo, Rubén , Group, ESC Scientific Document, Linz, Dominik , Svennberg, Emma , Kim, Young‐Hoon , López-Cabanillas, Néstor , Locati, Emanuela T, MacFarlane, Peter, Locati, Emanuela H. , Lambiase, Pier D , de Groot, Natasja M S , Linz, Dominik , Anter, Elad , Deisenhofer, Isabel , Deneke, Thomas , Dessel, Pascal F.H.M. van , Doessel, Olaf , Dilaveris, Polychronis E , Kapa, Suraj , Veen, Alle-Jan van der , Group, ESC Scientific Document, Potter, Tom J. R. De , Dinov, Borislav , Kosiuk, Jędrzej , Neubeck, Lis , Wan, Elaine Y. , Casado-Arroyo, Rubén

Mayo Clinic

EP Europace | September 21, 2021 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 313-330

10.1093/europace/euab254 | PMID 34878119 Get It

Abstract We aim to provide a critical appraisal of basic concepts underlying signal recording and processing technologies applied for (i) atrial fibrillation (AF) mapping to unravel AF mechanisms and/or identifying target sites for AF therapy and (ii) AF detection, to optimize usage of technologies, stimulate research aimed at closing knowledge gaps, and developing ideal AF recording and processing technologies. Recording and processing techniques for assessment of electrical activity during AF essential for diagnosis and guiding ablative therapy including body surface electrocardiograms (ECG) and endo- or epicardial electrograms (EGM) are evaluated. Discussion of (i) differences in uni-, bi-, and multi-polar (omnipolar/Laplacian) recording modes, (ii) impact of recording technologies on EGM morphology, (iii) global or local mapping using various types of EGM involving signal processing techniques including isochronal-, voltage- fractionation-, dipole density-, and rotor mapping, enabling derivation of parameters like atrial rate, entropy, conduction velocity/direction, (iv) value of epicardial and optical mapping, (v) AF detection by cardiac implantable electronic devices containing various detection algorithms applicable to stored EGMs, (vi) contribution of machine learning (ML) to further improvement of signals processing technologies. Recording and processing of EGM (or ECG) are the cornerstones of (body surface) mapping of AF. Currently available AF recording and processing technologies are mainly restricted to specific applications or have technological limitations. Improvements in AF mapping by obtaining highest fidelity source signals (e.g. catheter–electrode combinations) for signal processing (e.g. filtering, digitization, and noise elimination) is of utmost importance. Novel acquisition instruments (multi-polar catheters combined with improved physical modelling and ML techniques) will enable enhanced and automated interpretation of EGM recordings in the near future.
Comparison of pulse‐dose and high‐dose corticosteroids with no corticosteroid treatment for COVID‐19 pneumonia in the intensive care unit
Yaqoob, Hamid , Greenberg, Daniel J. , Lee, Curtis , Vernik, David, Manglani, Ravi , Murad, Mohammed , Chandy, Dipak , Epelbaum, Oleg , Hwang, Frank, Wang, Zhen

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Medical Virology | September 20, 2021 | Volume: 94 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 349-356

10.1002/jmv.27351 | PMID 34542192 Get It

AbstractCorticosteroid dosing in the range of 0.5–2 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone equivalents has become a standard part of the management of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia based on positive results of randomized trials and a meta‐analysis. Alongside such conventional dosing, administration of 1 gm of methylprednisolone daily (pulse dosing) has also been reported in the literature with claims of favorable outcomes. Comparisons between such disparate approaches to corticosteroids for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pneumonia are lacking. In this retrospective study of patients admitted to the ICU with COVID‐19 pneumonia, we compared patients treated with 0.5–2 mg/kg/day in methylprednisolone equivalents (high‐dose corticosteroids) and patients treated with 1 gm of methylprednisolone (pulse‐dose corticosteroids) to those who did not receive any corticosteroids. The endpoints of interest were hospital mortality, ICU‐free days at Day 28, and complications potentially attributable to corticosteroids. Pulse‐dose corticosteroid therapy was associated with a significant increase in ICU‐free days at Day 28 compared to no receipt: adjusted relative risk (aRR): 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05–2.02; p = 0.03) and compared with high‐dose corticosteroid administration (p = 0.003). Nonetheless, receipt of high‐dose corticosteroids—but not of pulse‐dose corticosteroids—significantly reduced the odds of hospital mortality compared to no receipt: adjusted Odds ratio (aOR) 0.31 (95% CI: 0.12–0.77; p = 0.01). High‐dose corticosteroids reduced mortality compared to pulse‐dose corticosteroids (p = 0.04). Pulse‐dose corticosteroids—but not high‐dose corticosteroids—significantly increased the odds of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy compared to no receipt: aOR 3.53 (95% CI: 1.27–9.82; p = 0.02). The odds of this complication were also significantly higher in the pulse‐dose group when compared to the high‐dose group (p = 0.05 for the comparison). In this single‐center study, pulse‐dose corticosteroid therapy for COVID‐19 pneumonia in the ICU was associated with an increase in ICU‐free days but failed to impact hospital mortality, perhaps because of its association with development of severe renal failure. In line with existing trial data, the effect of high‐dose corticosteroids on mortality was favorable.
Population screening for liver fibrosis: Toward early diagnosis and intervention for chronic liver diseases
Ginès, Pere , Lammert, Frank , Graupera, Isabel , Serra‐Burriel, Miquel , Allen, Alina M. , Wong, Vincent Wai‐Sun , Thiele, Maja , Grgurević, Ivica , Augustín, Salvador , Tsochatzis, Emmanuel , Schattenberg, Jörn M. , Guha, Indra Neil , Martini, Andréa , Morillas, Rosa M. , Koning, Harry J. de , Pich, Judit, T., Ann , Díaz, M. A. Cruz , Newsome, Philip N. , Manns, Michael P. , Kamath, Patrick S. , Krag, Aleksander , Cervera, Marta , Allen, Alina M , Wong, Vincent Wai-Sun , de Knegt, Robert J , Tsochatzis, Emmanuel A , Schattenberg, Jörn M , Guha, Indra Neil , de Koning, Harry J , Fabrellas, Núria , Ma, Ann T , Newsome, Philip N , Krag, Aleksander , Gines, Pere , Thiele, Maja , Castera, Laurent , Hartmann, Phillipp , Caballería, Llorenç , Garcı́a-Retortillo, Montserrat , Fabrellas, Núria , Diaz, M. Alba, Roulot, Dominique M.

Mayo Clinic

Hepatology | September 19, 2021 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 219-228

10.1002/hep.32163 | PMID 34537988 Get It

Abstract Cirrhosis, highly prevalent worldwide, develops after years of hepatic inflammation triggering progressive fibrosis. Currently, the main etiologies of cirrhosis are non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease and alcohol‐related liver disease, although chronic hepatitis B and C infections are still major etiological factors in some areas of the world. Recent studies have shown that liver fibrosis can be assessed with relatively high accuracy noninvasively by serological tests, transient elastography, and radiological methods. These modalities may be utilized for screening for liver fibrosis in at‐risk populations. Thus far, a limited number of population‐based studies using noninvasive tests in different areas of the world indicate that a significant percentage of subjects without known liver disease (around 5% in general populations and a higher rate −18% to 27%‐in populations with risk factors for liver disease) have significant undetected liver fibrosis or established cirrhosis. Larger international studies are required to show the harms and benefits before concluding that screening for liver fibrosis should be applied to populations at risk for chronic liver diseases. Screening for liver fibrosis has the potential for changing the current approach from diagnosing chronic liver diseases late when patients have already developed complications of cirrhosis to diagnosing liver fibrosis in asymptomatic subjects providing the opportunity of preventing disease progression.
Longevity and subject‐reported satisfaction after minimally invasive jawline contouring
Müller, Daniel S. , Prinz, Valentina, Sulovsky, Monika , Cajkovsky, Mia, Cotofana, Sebastian , Frank, Konstantin , Müller, Daniel , Cotofana, Sebastian , Frank, Konstantin , Moellhoff, Nicholas

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology | September 18, 2021 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 199-206

10.1111/jocd.14410 | PMID 34536051 Get It

AbstractBackgroundMinimally invasive treatments as soft tissue filler injections can enhance the appearance of the jawline. This prospective, single‐center study investigated aesthetic outcome, patient satisfaction, adverse events, and volume changes after jawline contouring using standardized reporting scales and objectifiable 3D surface analysis.MethodsA total of 30 patients (1 male and 29 females, mean age: 57.2 (±8.7) years) were investigated. Patients underwent jawline augmentation using a highly cross‐linked hyaluronic acid–based soft tissue filler. Three‐dimensional surface imaging was performed after 2 weeks, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Furthermore, the aesthetic results and the occurrence of complications were investigated after two weeks, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.ResultsThe surface‐volume coefficient (SVC) had an average of 1.10 ± 0.2 after 14 days, 0.95 ± 0.1 after 3 months, 0.83 ± 0.1 after 6 months, 0.74 ± 0.1 after 9 months, and 0.63 ± 0.1 after 12 months. A significant correlation was revealed between time of measurement and measured SVC with rp = −0.761, p < 0.001. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant difference between the measured SVC and the different time points of measurement with p < 0.001. The data revealed strong aesthetic improvement with results most often reported as “very much improved” according to the 5‐point GAIS after 3, 6, and 9 months, both by the investigator and by the patients. A 12‐month follow‐up analysis showed “much improved” results in a majority of cases.ConclusionThe result of this investigation showed that jawline enhancement using minimally invasive soft tissue filler injections produces durable, safe results that are generally rated as very satisfying from a patient's and investigator's perspective over a time period of 12 months.
A prolactin-dependent sexually dimorphic mechanism of migraine chronification
Ikegami, Daigo , Navratilova, Edita , Yue, Xu , Moutal, Aubin , Kopruszinski, Caroline Machado , Patwardhan, Amol , Kopruszinski, Caroline , Navratilova, Edita , Khanna, Rajesh , Dodick, David W. , Porreca, Frank

Mayo Clinic

Cephalalgia | September 13, 2021 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 197-208

10.1177/03331024211039813 | PMID 34510920 Get It

Objective Determination of possible sex differences in mechanisms promoting migraine progression and the contribution of prolactin and the prolactin long (PRLR-L) and short (PRLR-S) receptor isoforms. Background The majority of patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache are female. Prolactin is present at higher levels in women and increases migraine. Prolactin signaling at the PRLR-S selectively sensitizes nociceptors in female rodents, while expression of the PRLR-L is protective. Methods Medication overuse headache was modeled by repeated sumatriptan administration in male and female mice. Periorbital and hindpaw cutaneous allodynia served as a surrogate of migraine-like pain. PRLR-L and PRLR-S isoforms were measured in the trigeminal ganglion with western blotting. Possible co-localization of PRLR with serotonin 5HT1B and 5HT1D receptors was determined with RNAscope. Cabergoline, a dopamine receptor agonist that inhibits circulating prolactin, was co-administered with sumatriptan. Nasal administration of CRISPR/Cas9 plasmid was used to edit expression of both PRLR isoforms. Results PRLR was co-localized with 5HT1B or 5HT1D receptors in the ophthalmic region of female trigeminal ganglion. A single injection of sumatriptan increased serum PRL levels in female mice. Repeated sumatriptan promoted cutaneous allodynia in both sexes but down-regulated trigeminal ganglion PRLR-L, without altering PRLR-S, only in females. Co-administration of sumatriptan with cabergoline prevented allodynia and down-regulation of PRLR-L only in females. CRISPR/Cas9 editing of both PRLR isoforms in the trigeminal ganglion prevented sumatriptan-induced periorbital allodynia in females. Interpretation We identified a sexually dimorphic mechanism of migraine chronification that involves down-regulation of PRLR-L and increased signaling of circulating prolactin at PRLR-S. These studies reveal a previously unrecognized neuroendocrine mechanism linking the hypothalamus to nociceptor sensitization that increases the risk of migraine pain in females and suggest opportunities for novel sex-specific therapies including gene editing through nasal delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 constructs.
Association of Variants in the SPTLC1 Gene With Juvenile Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Johnson, Janel O., Chia, Ruth , Miller, Danny E. , Kumaran, Ravindran, Abramzon, Yevgeniya, Alahmady, Nada F. , Topp, Simon , Gibbs, J. Raphael , Cookson, Mark , Sabir, Marya S. , Dalgard, Clifton L. , Troakes, Claire , Jones, Ashley R., Shatunov, Aleksey , Iacoangeli, Alfredo , Khleifat, Ahmad Al , Ticozzi, Nicola , Gellera, Cinzia , Blair, Ian P. , Dobson‐Stone, Carol , Bonkowski, Emily , Palvadeau, Robin , Tienari, Pentti J. , Morrison, Karen , Shaw, Pamela J. , Brown, Robert H., Calvo, Andrea, Al-Saif, Hind, Leigh, Fawn, Chang, Irene J. , Perlman, Seth J. , Scott, Anna I. , Başak, A. Nazlı , Landers, John E. , Crawford, Thomas O. , Smith, Bradley , Traynor, Bryan J. , Gkazi, Athina Soragia, Kenna, Kevin P., Keagle, Pamela, Tiloca, Cinzia , Vance, Caroline , King, Andrew , Pensato, Viviana , Castellotti, Barbara , Baas, Frank , Asbroek, Anneloor L.M.A. ten , McKenna‐Yasek, Diane, McLaughlin, Russell L. , Polak, Meraida , Asress, Seneshaw, Stević, Zorica, D’Alfonso, Sandra , Mazzini, Letizia, Bo, Roberto Del, Gagliardi, Stella , Querin, Giorgia, Bertolin, Cinzia , Rademakers, Rosa, Blitterswijk, Marka van , Lauria, Giuseppe, Corrado, Lucia , Sorarú, Gianni , Williams, Kelly L. , Leblond-Manry, Claire, Hardiman, Orla , Berg, Leonard H. van den, Pall, Hardev, Taroni, Franco , Wu, Zheyang , Glass, Jonathan D., Ratti, Antonia, Adeleye, Adelani, Alba, Camille , Viollet, Coralie , Bačíková, Dagmar, Hupalo, Daniel N., Pollard, Harvey B. , Martinez, Elisa McGrath, Ahmed, Sarah , Arepalli, Sampath, Baloh, Robert H. , Bowser, Robert , Campbell, Roy H. , Camu, William, Cooper‐Knock, Johnathan , Ding, Jinhui, Drory, Vivian E., Dunckley, Travis , Eicher, John D., England, Bryce, Faghri, Faraz , Feldman, Eva, Floeter, Mary Kay, Fratta, Pietro , Geiger, Joshua T. , Gibson, Summer, Hardy, John , Harms, Matthew , Heiman‐Patterson, Terry , Hernandez, Dena G., Jansson, Lilja, Kowall, Neil W. , Laaksovirta, Hannu , Landi, Francesco , Ber, Isabelle Le , Lumbroso, Serge , MacGowan, Daniel J., Maragakis, Nicholas J., Mouzat, Kévin , Murphy, Natalie A., Myllykangas, Liisa , Nalls, Mike A., Orrell, Richard W., Ostrow, Lyle W., Pickering‐Brown, Stuart , Pioro, Erik P., Pletniková, Olga , Ravits, John , Rivera, Alberto , Robberecht, Wim, Rogaeva, Ekaterina, Rollinson, Sara, Rothstein, Jeffrey D., Scholz, Sonja W. , Sendtner, Michael , Sidle, Katie, Singleton, Andrew, Smith, Nathan, Stone, David J. , Troncoso, Juan C., Valori, Miko , Damme, Philip Van , Deerlin, Vivianna M Van, Bosch, Ludo Van Den , Zinman, Lorne, Landers, John E., Chiò, Adriano, Angelocola, Stefania, Ausiello, Francesco P., Barberis, Marco, Bartolomei, Ilaria, Battistini, Stefania, Bisogni, Giulia , Borghero, Giuseppe , Brunetti, Maura, Canale, Fabrizio , Canosa, Antonio, Cantisani, Teresa A., Cardinali, Patrizio, Casale, Federico , Colletti, Tiziana , Conforti, F. L. , Conte, Amelia , Conti, Elisa, Corbo, Massimo , Cuccu, Stefania, D’Errico, Eustachio , Marco, Giovanni De , Dubbioso, Raffaele, Ferrarese, Carlo , Ferraro, Pilar M. , Floris, Gianluca , Fuda, Giuseppe, Gallone, Salvatore , Gianferrari, Giulia , Giannini, Fabio, Grassano, Maurizio, Greco, Lucia Catherine , Iazzolino, Barbara, Introna, Alessandro , Logroscino, Giancarlo , Logullo, Francesco, Lunetta, Christian , Mandich, Paola , Mandrioli, Jessica , Manera, Umberto , Manganelli, Fiore, Martinelli, Ilaria , Moglia, Cristina, Mosca, Lorena, Murru, Maria Rita, Origone, Paola , Petrelli, Cristina, Pozzi, Susanna, Pugliatti, Maura , Ricci, Claudia , Riolo, Giulia , Russo, Massimo, Salamone, Paolina, Salivetto, Marco, Salvi, Fabrizio, Santarelli, Marialuisa, Sbaiz, Luca, Sideri, Riccardo , Simonini, Cecilia , Tanel, Raffaella , Tedeschi, Gioacchino, Ticca, Anna, Torriello, Antonella, Tranquilli, Stefania, Tremolizzo, Lucio , Vasta, Rosario , Vacchiano, Veria, Volanti, Paolo , Zollino, Marcella , Lauria, Giuseppe , Ratti, Antonia , Ostrow, Lyle W. , Fratta, Pietro , Chia, Ruth , Logroscino, Giancarlo , van Blitterswijk, Marka , Scholz, Sonja W , Van Den Bosch, Ludo , Van Damme, Philip , Hardy, John , Fratta, Pietro , Fratta, Pietro , Troakes, Claire , Hardiman, Orla , Dalgard, Clifton L , Myllykangas, Liisa , Li, Rachel , Renton, Alan , Jones, Ashley R., Silani, Vincenzo , Kwok, John B. , Al‐Chalabi, Ammar , Calvo, Andrea , Mora, Gabriele , Gotkine, Marc , Glass, Ian A. , Shaw, Christopher E. , Chiò, Adriano , Fallini, Claudia , Gkazi, Soragia Athina , Scotter, Emma L. , Kenna, Kevin Patrick , Keagle, Pamela , Colombrita, Claudia , Asress, Seneshaw, Esteban‐Pérez, Jesús , Mazzini, Letizia , Comi, Giacomo P. , Ceroni, Mauro , Rheenen, Wouter van , Rademakers, Rosa , Duga, Stefano , Corti, Stefania Paola , Cereda, Cristina , Nicholson, Garth A. , Rouleau, Guy Armand , Veldink, Jan H. , Berg, Leonard H. van den , Turner, Martin R. , Talbot, Kevin , García‐Redondo, Alberto , Adeleye, Adelani, Soltis, Anthony R. , Sukumar, Gauthaman , Wilkerson, Matthew D. , Brady, Christopher B. , Brice, Alexis , Broach, James R , Campbell, Roy H., Ding, Jinhui , Drepper, Carsten , Gerhard, Glenn S. , Harms, Matthew B. , Hernandez, Dena G., Kirby, Janine , Landeck, Natalie , Maragakis, Nicholas J. , Pamphlett, Roger , Pliner, Hannah A. , Pulst, Stefan M. , Rothstein, Jeffrey D. , Simmons, Zachary , Singleton, Andrew , Smith, Nathan, Troncoso, Juan C. , Deerlin, Vivianna M. Van , Zinman, Lorne , Ausiello, Francesco Pio, Barberis, Marco , Battistini, Stefania , Bersano, Enrica , Brunetti, Maura , Cabona, Corrado , Canosa, Antonio , Capasso, Margherita , Caponnetto, Claudia , Carrera, Paola , Bella, Eleonora Dalla , Dubbioso, Raffaele , Filippi, Massimo , Fini, Nicola , Grassano, Maurizio , Iazzolino, Barbara, Bella, Vincenzo La , Lattante, Serena , Liguori, Rocco , Manganelli, Fiore , Marangi, Giuseppe , Marinou, Kalliopi , Marrosu, Maria Giovanna , Messina, Sonia , Moglia, Cristina , Mosca, Lorena, Passaniti, Carla , Petrucci, Antonio , Quattrini, Angelo , Riva, Nilo , Russo, Massimo, Sabatelli, Mario , Salamone, Paolina , Simone, Isabella Laura , Spataro, Rossella , Tedeschi, Gioacchino , Trojsi, Francesca , Vacchiano, Veria , Vita, Giuseppe , Zucchi, Elisabetta

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Neurology | August 30, 2021 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1236

10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2598 | PMID 34459874 Get It