Citations

5023 Background: Skeletal-related events (SREs) drive morbidity in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In the ALSYMPCA study, Radium-223 (Ra223) was found to palliate pain in addition to prolonging survival and reducing SREs. Earlier onset of pain relief was noted when zoledronic acid (ZA) was administered within 24-48 hours of samarium; we evaluated whether the timing of bone supportive therapy (BST) affected pain palliation fromRa223. Methods: We identified patients who received Ra223 at University of Southern California or Mayo Clinic Arizona. Data extracted: Ra223 administration dates, pain scores, pain medications, ZA or denosumab administration dates, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels, prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, and concurrent prostate cancer therapy. Patients were evaluable for pain response if they had at least 2 pain scores documented before and after Ra223 with pain medication use data. Pain response was defined as > 2 point decrease in pain on a 10 point scale; flare was defined as > 2 point increase followed by return to baseline or lower. Results: Of 65 patients, 20 had baseline pain score > 0 and 34 were evaluable. Median #doses Ra223 was 5 (range 2-6). 18 patients received concurrent abiraterone (abi) or enzalutamide (enza), 16 did not. Pain response occurred in 6/6 (100%) patients who received BST within 1 month prior to first Ra223 dose and 4/8 (50%) patients who did not receive BST. Pain flare occurred in 6/21 patients (29%) without BST and 2/13 (15%) with BST. 6/10 (60%) patients with pain response had ALP decline but there was no consistent pattern of ALP changes in patients with flare. 8/8 patients with pain response had no PSA decline (6 increased, 2 stable). 6/12 (50%) and 2/22 (9%) patients on abi/enza had pain response and flare respectively, and 4/8 (50%) and 6/19 (32%) patients without concurrent abi/enza had response/flare. Conclusions: BST within 1 month prior to first Ra223 may be associated with increased likelihood of pain palliation and may prevent pain flare. PSA/ALP changes do not predict pain response. Concurrent use of abi/enza does not increase the likelihood of pain response and may decrease the likelihood of flare.

Abstract Castleman disease (CD) describes a group of heterogeneous hematologic disorders with characteristic histopathological features. CD can present with unicentric or multicentric (MCD) regions of lymph node enlargement. Some cases of MCD are caused by human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8), whereas others are HHV-8–negative/idiopathic (iMCD). Treatment of iMCD is challenging, and outcomes can be poor because no uniform treatment guidelines exist, few systematic studies have been conducted, and no agreed upon response criteria have been described. The purpose of this paper is to establish consensus, evidence-based treatment guidelines based on the severity of iMCD to improve outcomes. An international Working Group of 42 experts from 10 countries was convened by the Castleman Disease Collaborative Network to establish consensus guidelines for the management of iMCD based on published literature, review of treatment effectiveness for 344 cases, and expert opinion. The anti–interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody siltuximab (or tocilizumab, if siltuximab is not available) with or without corticosteroids is the preferred first-line therapy for iMCD. In the most severe cases, adjuvant combination chemotherapy is recommended. Additional agents are recommended, tailored by disease severity, as second- and third-line therapies for treatment failures. Response criteria were formulated to facilitate the evaluation of treatment failure or success. These guidelines should help treating physicians to stratify patients based on disease severity in order to select the best available therapeutic option. An international registry for patients with CD (ACCELERATE, #NCT02817997) was established in October 2016 to collect patient outcomes to increase the evidence base for selection of therapies in the future.

Abstract Lung cancer has the highest mortality across all cancers in the world. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is commonly mutated in lung adenocarcinomas from Asian non-smoking females. These tumors usually respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI), but the outcomes vary in different patients. Though EGFR T790M, amplification of MET and other mechanisms have been shown to confer EGFR-TKI resistance, the molecular mechanisms in around 30% of patients are still unknown. To uncover novel candidate pathways of EGFR-TKI resistance, we analyzed the whole exome mutation profiles of pre-treatment, EGFR T790M-free lung adenocarcinomas with typical activating mutations (L858R, exon 19 deletions). Amongst 19 non-responding (NR) tumors without significant shrinkage after gefitinib or erlotinib treatment, 67 cancer-related genes showed coding region non-synonymous single nucleotide variations (SNV) or insertion-deletions (indels) but they were not detected in 22 responding tumors. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed 14 of the 67 genes were involved in the EGFR and WNT signaling network (false discovery rate q=1.14 e-8 for EGFR and q=4.3 e-9 for WNT), including well-known TKI resistance-related genes PIK3CA, PTEN and NF1. Notably, ARID1A, which encodes a subunit of the chromatin remodeling complex, showed nonsense mutations in 2 NR but not responding tumors, which were validated by Sanger sequencing. More than 40% of ARID1A mutations in lung adenocarcinomas recorded in COSMIC were nonsense mutations or frameshift indels. Loss of function mutations of ARID1A have also been reported in various cancers, together suggesting ARID1A might be a tumor suppressor but its involvement in EGFR mutant lung cancers is unknown. To investigate the potential role of ARID1A, its expression was first studied using Kaplan-Meier plotter. Low expression of ARID1A is associated with significantly better overall survival than high expression level in lung adenocarcinoma patients (p=8.5 e-7). To test whether loss of ARID1A could cause TKI resistance, ARID1A was knocked down by shRNA in HCC827 lung cancer cell line harboring EGFR exon19 deletion. MTT cell viability assay using gefitinib showed increase of IC50. Western blot assay further showed ARID1A knockdown increased phosphorylation of AKT at Ser473. Together, the findings suggest loss of ARID1A could lead to EGFR bypass and promote activation of the downstream PI3K/AKT pathway, leading to EGFR TKI resistance. Overall, our findings suggest EGFR-TKI resistance mutations could be detected before TKI drug selection. Resistant gene mutations present in pre-treatment tumors could help to predict the treatment response. More specifically, our study identified a promising gene list involved in EGFR-TKI resistance, and suggested ARID1A loss could be a novel EGFR-TKI resistance mechanism. Citation Format: Xuyuan Gao, Hang Xu, James CM Ho, Oscar SH Chan, Feng Xu, Junwen Wang, Victor HF Lee, Vicky PC Tin, Zhijie Xiao, Siqi Wang, Judy WP Yam, Maria P Wong. EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas mutation profiles reveal ARID1A might be a novel tyrosine kinase resistance pathway [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-196.

Abstract Background: HRAS is a proto-oncogene that is mutated in head and neck, bladder, thyroid, and salivary gland tumors, among others. While discovered over 40 years ago, no specific therapies have yet been developed targeting mutant HRAS. Tipifarnib is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of farnesyltransferase, a critical enzyme requisite for HRAS activation. Over 5,000 patients (pts) have been treated with tipifarnib; although responses have been documented in several tumor indications, the mechanisms of response are still poorly understood. Tipifarnib has demonstrated robust activity in HRAS mutant patient derived xenograft (PDX) models of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and squamous non-small cell lung cancer that are resistant to standard therapies. This Phase 2 study (NCT02383927) was conducted to test the hypothesis that inhibition of mutant HRAS oncogenic activity with tipifarnib could translate to objective responses in HNSCC pts driven by the HRAS oncogene. Methods: The study was originally designed to enroll pts into 2 single-arm study cohorts: Cohort 1 (thyroid cancer) and Cohort 2 (other solid tumors), each one with a 2-stage design (11+7 evaluable pts) to determine overall response rate (ORR) as the primary objective. This design has 80% power to detect a difference between 10% and 30% ORR at one-sided significance level of 0.087. Two objective responses were needed to be observed in the first stage for each cohort to proceed to stage 2. The study is considered positive if at least 4 responses are observed in one of the 2 cohorts (N=18 each, stages 1 and 2 combined). The prespecified activity goal for the first stage of accrual in Cohort 2 was met and based on data observed in the first stage of this Cohort, ongoing enrollment to the second stage of Cohort 2 was limited to HRAS mutant HNSCC. For enrollment, pts must have an HRAS mutant, locally advanced/unresectable and/or metastatic solid tumor malignancy and RECIST v1.1 measurable disease. Tipifarnib is given at 900 mg orally twice daily on days 1-7 and 15-21 of 28-day cycles. Response assessments are conducted every 8 weeks. Results: As of August 30, 2017, 28 pts have been enrolled. Tipifarnib was generally well tolerated with myelosuppression, gastrointestinal disturbances (nausea, vomiting and diarrhea) and fatigue constituting the most common adverse events (≥30% of pts, all grades). Twenty four pts are currently evaluable for efficacy: 10 in Cohort 1 and 14 in Cohort 2. Stage 1 enrollment continues in Cohort 1. The primary objective was met for Cohort 2 prior to completing full enrollment, with 4 confirmed responses observed out of 14 evaluable pts. Notably, of the 6 pts in Cohort 2 with HNSCC currently evaluable for efficacy, 4 (67%) achieved a confirmed partial response. Three of these pts remain on treatment in cycles 3, 5, and 19, and one subject discontinued at Cycle 21. Two (33%) pts had disease stabilization as best response (4 cycles, ongoing and 7 cycles). Importantly, 4 of these pts were refractory to prior therapies, including regimens containing immunotherapy (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) or cetuximab +/- chemotherapy. None of the 6 HNSCC patients experienced an objective partial response on their last prior therapy. Conclusions: These data suggest that HRAS mutant HNSCC pts may be refractory to standard therapies but can derive prolonged clinical benefit from tipifarnib treatment. Based on the encouraging activity of tipifarnib in pts with HNSCC with HRAS mutations, enrollment continues in this cohort. Citation Format: Alan Ho, Nicole Chau, Deborah J. Wong, Maria E. Cabanillas, Jessica Bauman, Marcia S. Brose, Keith Bible, Valentina Boni, Irene Brana, Charles Ferte, Caroline Even, Francis Burrows, Linda Kessler, Vishnu Mishra, Kelly Magnuson, Catherine Scholz, Antonio Gualberto. Preliminary results from a phase 2 proof of concept trial of tipifarnib in tumors with HRAS mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-A10.

Valosin-containing protein ( VCP) is involved in multiple cellular activities. Mutations in VCP lead to heterogeneous clinical presentations including inclusion body myopathy with Paget’s disease of the bone, frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, even in patients carrying the same mutation. We screened a cohort of 48 patients with familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) negative for MAPT, GRN, and C9orf72 mutations for other known FTD genes by using whole exome sequencing. In addition, we carried out targeted sequencing of a cohort of 37 patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with Transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) subtype from the Netherlands Brain bank. Two novel (p.Thr262Ser and p.Arg159Ser) and one reported (p.Met158Val) VCP mutations in three patients with a clinical diagnosis of FTD were identified, and were absence in population-match controls. All three patients presented with behavioral changes, with additional semantic deficits in one. No signs of Paget or muscle disease were observed. Pathological examination of the patient with VCP p.Arg159Ser mutation showed numerous TDP-43 immunoreactive (IR) neuronal intranuclear inclusions (NII) and dystrophic neurites (DN), while a lower number of NII and DN were observed in the patient with the VCP p.Thr262Ser mutation. Pathological findings of both patients were consistent with FTLD-TDP subtype D. Furthermore, only rare VCP-IR NII was observed in both cases. Our study expands the clinical heterogeneity of VCP mutations carriers, and indicates that other additional factors, such as genetic modifiers, may determine the clinical phenotype.