Citations

Clear

768 citation(s) found for "Su, Leon".

Cardiopulmonary bypass and intra‐aortic balloon pump use is associated with higher short and long term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A PARTNER trial substudy
Shreenivas, Satya , Lilly, Scott , Szeto, Wilson Y. , Anwaruddin, Saif , Bavaria, Joseph E. , Hudock, Kristin , Thourani, Vinod H. , Makkar, Raj , Pichard, Augusto D., Webb, John G. , Dewey, Todd, Suri, Rakesh M. , Xu, Ke , Leon, Martin B. , Desai, Nimesh D. , Kapadia, Samir , Herrmann, Howard C.

Mayo Clinic

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | December 24, 2014 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 316-322

10.1002/ccd.25776 | PMID 25546704 Get It

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the balloon‐expandable Sapien transcatheter heart valve improves survival compared to standard therapy in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and is noninferior to surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients at high operative risk. Nonetheless, a significant proportion of patients may require pre‐emptive or emergent support with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and/or intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP) during TAVR due to pre‐existing comorbid conditions or as a result of procedural complications. Objectives: We hypothesized that patients who required CPB or IABP would have increased periprocedural complications and reduced long‐term survival. In addition, we sought to determine whether preprocedural variables could predict the need for CPB and IABP. Methods: The study population included 2,525 patients in the PARTNER Trial (Cohort A and B) and the continuing access registry (CAR). Patients that received CPB or IABP were compared to patients that did not receive either, and then further divided into those that received support pre‐TAVR and those that were placed on support emergently. Results: One‐hundred sixty‐three patients (6.5%) were placed on CPB and/or IABP. The use of CPB or IABP was associated with higher 1 year mortality (49.1% vs. 21.6%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, utilization of CPB or IABP was an independent predictor of 30 day (HR 6.95) and 1‐year (HR 2.56) mortality. Although mortality was highest in emergent cases, mortality was also greater in planned CPB and IABP cases compared with non‐CPB/IABP cases (53.3% and 40.3% vs. 21.6%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings indicate that CPB and IABP use in TAVR portends a poor prognosis and its utilization, particularly in the setting of pre‐emptive use, needs reconsideration. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Individual Patient Data Analysis of Progression-Free Survival Versus Overall Survival As a First-Line End Point for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Modern Randomized Trials: Findings From the Analysis and Research in Cancers of the Digestive System Databas
Shi, Qian , Gramont, Aimery de , Grothey, Axel, Zalcberg, John , Chibaudel, Benoist , Seymour, Michel , Adams, Richard , Saltz, Leonard B. , Goldberg, Richard M. , Punt, Cornelis J.A. , Douillard, Jean‐Yves , Hoff, Paulo M. , Hecht, J. Randolph, Hurwitz, Herbert I. , Díaz‐Rubio, Eduardo , Porschen, Rainer, Fuchs, Charles S. , Souglakos, John , Falcone, Alfredo , Tournigand, Christophe , Kabbinavar, Fairooz F. , Heinemann, Volker , Bokemeyer, Carsten , de Gramont, Aimery, Schmoll, Hans‐Joachim , Seymour, Matthew T, Saltz, Leonard, Hecht, Joel Randolph, Hurwitz, Herbert, Díaz-Rubio, Eduardo, Tebbutt, Niall C. , van Cutsem, Eric, Buyse, Marc , Cutsem, Eric Van , Sargent, Daniel J. , Saltz, Leonard , Shi, Qian , Falcone, Alfredo , Seymour, Matthew T , Zalcberg, John , Adams, Richard , Chibaudel, Benoist

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | November 11, 2014 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 22-28

10.1200/jco.2014.56.5887 | PMID 25385741 Get It

PurposeProgression-free survival (PFS) has previously been established as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Because mCRC treatment has advanced in the last decade with extended OS, this surrogacy requires re-examination.MethodsIndividual patient data from 16,762 patients were available from 22 first-line mCRC studies conducted from 1997 to 2006; 12 of those studies tested antiangiogenic and/or anti–epidermal growth factor receptor agents. The relationship between PFS (first event of progression or death) and OS was evaluated by using R2statistics (the closer the value is to 1, the stronger the correlation) from weighted least squares regression of trial-specific hazard ratios estimated by using Cox and Copula models.ResultsForty-four percent of patients received a regimen that included biologic agents. Median first-line PFS was 8.3 months, and median OS was 18.2 months. The correlation between PFS and OS was modest (R2, 0.45 to 0.69). Analyses limited to trials that tested treatments with biologic agents, nonstrategy trials, or superiority trials did not improve surrogacy.ConclusionIn modern mCRC trials, in which survival after the first progression exceeds time to first progression, a positive but modest correlation was observed between OS and PFS at both the patient and trial levels. This finding demonstrates the substantial variability in OS introduced by the number of lines of therapy and types of effective subsequent treatments and the associated challenge to the use of OS as an end point to assess the benefit attributable to a single line of therapy. PFS remains an appropriate primary end point for first-line mCRC trials to detect the direct treatment effect of new agents.
Fine-mapping of the HNF1B multicancer locus identifies candidate variants that mediate endometrial cancer risk
Painter, Jodie N. , Batra, Jyotsna , Cheng, Timothy, Lose, Felicity , Dennis, Joe, Michailidou, Kyriaki , Ahmed, Shahana, Ferguson, Kaltin , Healey, Catherine S., Kaufmann, S., Hillman, Kristine M. , Walpole, Carina , Moya, Leire , Pollock, Pamela M. , Jones, Angela, Howarth, Kimberley, Martin, L. J., Gorman, Maggie, Hodgson, Shirley, (NSECG), National Study of Endometrial Cancer Genetics Group, Polanco, Ma. Magdalena Echeverry De, Sans, Monica, Carracedo, Angel, Castellvi-Bel, Sergi, Rojas-Martinez, Augusto, Santos, Erika, Teixeira, Manuel R., Carvajal-Carmona, Luis, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Long, Jirong, Zheng, Wei, Xiang, Yong-Bing, (ANECS), The Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study Group, Montgomery, Grant W., Webb, Penelope M., Scott, Rodney J., McEvoy, Mark, Attia, John, Holliday, Elizabeth, Martin, Nicholas G., Nyholt, Dale R., Henders, Anjali K., Fasching, Peter A., Hein, Alexander, Beckmann, Matthias W., Renner, Stefan P., Dörk, Thilo, Hillemanns, Peter, Dürst, Matthias, Runnebaum, Ingo, Lambrechts, Diether, Coenegrachts, Lieve, Schrauwen, Stefanie, Amant, Frederic, Winterhoff, Boris, Dowdy, Sean C., Goode, Ellen L., Teoman, Attila, Salvesen, Helga B., Trovik, Jone, Njolstad, Tormund S., Werner, Henrica M.J., Ashton, Katie, Proietto, Tony, Otton, Geoffrey, Tzortzatos, Gerasimos, Mints, Miriam, Tham, Emma, RENDOCAS, Hall, Per, Czene, Kamila, Liu, Jianjun, Li, Jingmei, Hopper, John L., Southey, Melissa C., (AOCS), Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Ekici, Arif B., Ruebner, Matthias, Johnson, Nicola, Peto, Julian, Burwinkel, Barbara, Marme, Frederik, Brenner, Hermann, Dieffenbach, Aida K., Meindl, Alfons, Brauch, Hiltrud, Network, The GENICA, Lindblom, Annika, Depreeuw, Jeroen, Moisse, Matthieu, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Couch, Fergus J., Olson, Janet E., Giles, Graham G., Bruinsma, Fiona, Cunningham, Julie M., Fridley, Brooke L., Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Kristensen, Vessela N., Cox, Angela, Swerdlow, Anthony J., Orr, Nicholas, Bolla, Manjeet K., Wang, Qin, Weber, Rachel Palmieri, Chen, Zhihua, Shah, Mitul, French, Juliet D., Pharoah, Paul D.P., Dunning, Alison M., Tomlinson, Ian, Easton, Douglas F., Edwards, Stacey L., Thompson, Deborah J., Spurdle, Amanda B., Webb, Penelope M. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Brauch, Hiltrud , Dörk, Thilo , Cox, Angela , Giles, Graham G. , Southey, Melissa C. , Zheng, Wei , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Long, Jirong , Dunning, Alison M. , Lindblom, Annika , Ekici, Arif B. , Czene, Kamila , Liu, Jianjun , Carracedo, Ángel , Hein, Alexander , Hillemanns, Peter , Lambrechts, Diether , Martin, Nicholas G. , Montgomery, Grant W. , Brenner, Hermann , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Orr, Nick , Li, Jingmei , Bowtell, David D.L. , Weber, Rachel Palmieri , Nyholt, Dale R. , Rabstein, Sylvia , Lotz, Anne , Moisse, Matthieu , Teixeira, Manuel R. , French, Juliet D. , McEvoy, Mark , Njølstad, Tormund S. , Tham, Emma , Renner, Stefan P. , Henders, Anjali K. , Lambrechts, Diether , Rogatto, Sílvia Regina , Nicklin, James , Scott, Rodney J. , O’Mara, Tracy A. , Cheng, Timothy, Dennis, Joe, Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Ahmed, Shahana, Jones, Angela, Howarth, Kimberley, Gorman, Maggie, (NSECG), National Study of Endometrial Cancer Genetics Group, Polanco, Ma. Magdalena Echeverry De, Sans, Monica, Carracedo, Angel, Castellvi-Bel, Sergi, Rojas-Martinez, Augusto, Santos, Erika, Teixeira, Manuel R., Carvajal-Carmona, Luis, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Long, Jirong, Zheng, Wei, Xiang, Yong-Bing, (ANECS), The Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study Group, Montgomery, Grant W., Webb, Penelope M., Scott, Rodney J., McEvoy, Mark, Attia, John, Holliday, Elizabeth, Martin, Nicholas G., Nyholt, Dale R., Henders, Anjali K., Fasching, Peter A., Hein, Alexander, Beckmann, Matthias W., Renner, Stefan P., Dörk, Thilo, Hillemanns, Peter, Dürst, Matthias, Runnebaum, Ingo, Lambrechts, Diether, Coenegrachts, Lieve, Schrauwen, Stefanie, Amant, Frederic, Winterhoff, Boris, Dowdy, Sean C., Goode, Ellen L., Teoman, Attila, Salvesen, Helga B., Trovik, Jone, Njolstad, Tormund S., Werner, Henrica M.J., Ashton, Katie, Proietto, Tony, Otton, Geoffrey, Tzortzatos, Gerasimos, Mints, Miriam, Tham, Emma, RENDOCAS, Hall, Per, Czene, Kamila, Liu, Jianjun, Li, Jingmei, Hopper, John L., Southey, Melissa C., (AOCS), Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Ekici, Arif B., Ruebner, Matthias, Johnson, Nicola, Peto, Julian, Burwinkel, Barbara, Marme, Frederik, Brenner, Hermann, Dieffenbach, Aida K., Meindl, Alfons, Brauch, Hiltrud, Network, The GENICA, Lindblom, Annika, Depreeuw, Jeroen, Moisse, Matthieu, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Couch, Fergus J., Olson, Janet E., Giles, Graham G., Bruinsma, Fiona, Cunningham, Julie M., Fridley, Brooke L., Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Kristensen, Vessela N., Cox, Angela, Swerdlow, Anthony J., Orr, Nicholas, Bolla, Manjeet K., Wang, Qin, Weber, Rachel Palmieri, Chen, Zhihua, Shah, Mitul, French, Juliet D., Pharoah, Paul D.P., Dunning, Alison M., Tomlinson, Ian, Easton, Douglas F., Edwards, Stacey L., Thompson, Deborah J., Spurdle, Amanda B., Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Giles, Graham G , Spurdle, Amanda B , Teixeira, Manuel R , Webb, Penelope M , Hein, Alexander , Hillemanns, Peter , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Southey, Melissa C , Martin, Nicholas G , Rogatto, S R , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Dunning, Alison M , Lambrechts, Diether , Brenner, Hermann , Cox, Angela , Li, Jingmei , Ekici, Arif B , Moisse, Matthieu , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Zheng, Wei , Czene, Kamila , Bowtell, David D , Batra, Jyotsna , Brauch, Hiltrud , Lindblom, Annika , Orr, Nick , Liu, Jing

Mayo Clinic

Human Molecular Genetics | November 6, 2014 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1478-1492

10.1093/hmg/ddu552 | PMID 25378557 Get It

Costs of Periprocedural Complications in Patients Treated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Lei, Yang , Reynolds, Matthew R. , Magnuson, Elizabeth A. , Suri, Rakesh M. , Tuzcu, E. Murat , Petersen, John L., Douglas, Pamela S. , Svensson, Lars G. , Gada, Hemal, Thourani, Vinod H. , Kodali, Susheel , Mack, Michael J. , Leon, Martin B. , Arnold, Suzanne V. , Cohen, David Jonathan , Douglas, Pamela S

Mayo Clinic

Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions | October 22, 2014 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 829-836

10.1161/circinterventions.114.001395 | PMID 25336467 Get It

Background— In patients with severe aortic stenosis, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) improves survival when compared with nonsurgical therapy but with higher in-hospital and lifetime costs. Complications associated with TAVR may decrease with greater experience and improved devices, thereby reducing the overall cost of the procedure. Therefore, we sought to estimate the effect of periprocedural complications on in-hospital costs and length of stay of TAVR. Methods and Results— Using detailed cost data from 406 TAVR patients enrolled in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve (PARTNER) I trial, we developed multivariable models to estimate the incremental cost and length of stay associated with specific periprocedural complications. Attributable costs and length of stay for each complication were calculated by multiplying the independent cost of each event by its frequency in the treatment group. Mean cost for the initial hospitalization was $79 619±40 570 ($50 891 excluding the valve); 49% of patients had ≥1 complication. Seven complications were independently associated with increased hospital costs, with major bleeding, arrhythmia, and death accounting for the largest attributable cost per patient. Renal failure and the need for repeat TAVR, although less frequent, were also associated with substantial incremental and attributable costs. Overall, complications accounted for $12 475 per patient in initial hospital costs and 2.4 days of hospitalization. Conclusions— In the PARTNER trial, periprocedural complications were frequent, costly, and accounted for ≈25% of non-implant–related hospital costs. Avoidance of complications should improve the cost-effectiveness of TAVR for inoperable and high-risk patients, but reductions in the cost of uncomplicated TAVR will also be necessary for optimal efficiency. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00530894.
Candidate Genetic Modifiers for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers
Peterlongo, Paolo , Chang-Claude, Jenny, Moysich, Kirsten B., Schmutzler, Rita K., Simard, Jacques , Soucy, Penny, Eeles, Rosalind A. , Easton, Douglas F. , Hamann, Ute, Wilkening, Stefan, Chen, Bowang , Rookus, Matti A. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Baan, Frederieke H. van der , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Walker, Logan C. , Lose, Felicity , Maia, Ana-Teresa , Montagna, Marco , Matricardi, Laura , Lubiński, Jan , Jakubowska, Anna , Gómez, E. , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Nathanson, Katherine L. , Rebbeck, Timothy R., Arun, Banu K., Karlan, Beth Y., Oršulić, Sandra , Lester, Jenny, Chung, Wendy K., Miron, Alex, Southey, Melissa C. , Goldgar, David E., Janavičius, Ramūnas , Dorfling, Cecilia M., Rensburg, Elizabeth J. van , Ding, Yuan Chun , Neuhausen, Susan L., Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Gerdes, Anne‐Marie , Ejlertsen, Bent , Jønson, Lars, Osório, Ana , Martínez-Bouzas, Cristina, Benı́tez, Javier , Conway, Edye E., Blazer, Kathleen R. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Manoukian, Siranoush , Peissel, Bernard , Zaffaroni, Daniela , Scuvera, Giulietta, Barile, Monica, Ficarazzi, Filomena , Mariette, Frédérique, Fortuzzi, Stefano , Viel, Alessandra , Giannini, Giuseppe , Papi, Laura , Martayan, Aline , Tibiletti, Maria Grazia , Radice, Paolo , Vratimos, Athanassios, Fostira, Florentia, Donaldson, Alan, Brewer, Carole, Foo, Claire, Evans, D. Gareth , Frost, Debra, Eccles, Diana , Brady, Angela, Adlard, Julian , Walker, Lisa, Izatt, Louise , Side, Lucy E., Rogers, Mark T., Porteous, Mary, Morrison, Patrick J., Platte, Radka, Davidson, Rosemarie, Hodgson, Shirley V. , Ellis, Steve, Cole, Trevor, EMBRACE, on behalf of, Claes, Kathleen , Maerken, Tom Van, Meindl, Alfons , Gehrig, Andrea, Sutter, Christian , Engel, Christoph , Niederacher, Dieter , Plendl, Hansjoerg, Kast, Karin, Rhiem, Kerstin, Ditsch, Nina , Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda, Wappenschmidt, Barbara , Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Paillerets, Brigitte Bressac–de , Buecher, Bruno , Delnatte, Capucine, Houdayer, Claude , Coupier, Isabelle, Barjhoux, Laure, Venat‐Bouvet, Laurence , Boutry‐Kryza, Nadia, Sinilnikova, Olga M., Caron, Olivier , Mazoyer, Sylvie , Belotti, Muriel, Collaborators, on behalf of GEMO Study, Piedmonte, Marion, Friedländer, Michael , Rodriguez, Gustavo C., Copeland, Larry J. , Hoya, Miguel de la , Segura, Pedro Pérez, Nevanlinna, Heli , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Os, Theo A.M. van, Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne E.J., Hout, Annemarie H. van der, Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline, Ausems, Margreet G.E.M. , Doorn, Helena C. van , Collée, Margriet , HEBON, on behalf of, Oláh, Edith , Dı́ez, Orland , Blanco, Ignacio , Lázaro, Conxi , Brunet, Joan , Feliubadaló, Lídia , Cybulski, Cezary, Durda, Katarzyna, Jaworska–Bieniek, Katarzyna, Sukiennicki, Grzegorz, Arason, Aðalgeir , Chiquette, Jocelyne , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Olswold, Curtis, Lindor, Noralane M. , Offit, Kenneth, Corines, Marina, Jacobs, Lauren , Robson, Mark E. , Zhang, Liying , Vijai, Joseph , Berger, Andreas, Singer, Christian F., Rappaport, Christine , Kaulich, Daphne Geschwantler, Pfeiler, Georg , Tea, Muy-Kheng M., Phelan, Catherine M., Greene, Mark H. , Mai, Phuong L., Rennert, Gad , Mulligan, Anna Marie , Glendon, Gord , Tchatchou, Sandrine, Andrulis, Irene L., Bojesen, Anders , Pedersen, Inge Søkilde , Thomassen, Mads , Jensen, Uffe Birk , Laitman, Yael , Rantala, Johanna, Wachenfeldt, Anna von , Ehrencrona, Hans , Askmalm, Marie Stenmark, Borg, Åke , Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B., McGuffog, Lesley, Barrowdale, Daniel , Healey, Sue, Lee, Andrew , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Investigators, on behalf of KConFab, Antoniou, Antonis C. , Friedman, Eitan , Durocher, Francine , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline , Thorne, Heather , Stenmark‐Askmalm, Marie , Wang, Xianshu , Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Moysich, Kirsten B. , Rudolph, Anja , Nussbaum, Robert L. , Domchek, Susan M. , Arun, Banu , By, Karlan, Chung, Wendy K. , Buys, Saundra S. , Garber, Judy E. , Cook, Jackie A , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Barwell, Julian , Kennedy, Michael John , Ellis, Steve, EMBRACE, on behalf of, Godwin, Andrew K. , Meindl, Alfons , Steinemann, Doris , Arnold, Norbert , Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Stoppa‐Lyonnet, Dominique , Damiola, Francesca , Golmard, Lisa , Pujol, Pascal , Collaborators, on behalf of GEMO Study, Meijers‐Heijboer, Hanne , Vreeswijk, Maaike P.G. , Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline, HEBON, on behalf of, Gronwald, Jacek , Couch, Fergus J. , Szabo, Csilla I. , Singer, Christian F , Mai, Phuong L., Toland, Amanda Ewart , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Investigators, on behalf of KConFab, Nevanlinna, H , Peterlongo, Paolo , Rennert, Gad , Spurdle, Amanda B , Teixeira, Manuel R , van Rensburg, Elizabeth J , Eccles, Diana , Moysich, Kirsten , de la Hoya, Miguel , Diez, Orland , Radice, Paolo , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Claes, Kathleen B M , Adlard, Julian , Brunet, Joan , Eeles, Rosalind A , Ehrencrona, Hans , Evans, D Gareth , Joseph, Vijai , Matricardi, Laura , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Southey, Melissa C , Jakubowska, Anna , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Nathanson, Katherine L , Friedlander, Michael , Arason, Adalgeir , Barrowdale, Daniel , Benitez, Javier , Engel, Christoph , Lazaro, Conxi , Montagna, Marco , Robson, Mark , Viel, Alessandra , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Feliubadaló, Lidia , Gómez-García, Encarna B , Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Manoukian, Siranoush , Lubinski, Jan , Rhiem, Kerstin

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | October 22, 2014 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 308-316

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0532 | PMID 25336561 Get It

Abstract Background:BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are at substantially increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer. The incomplete penetrance coupled with the variable age at diagnosis in carriers of the same mutation suggests the existence of genetic and nongenetic modifying factors. In this study, we evaluated the putative role of variants in many candidate modifier genes. Methods: Genotyping data from 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers, for known variants (n = 3,248) located within or around 445 candidate genes, were available through the iCOGS custom-designed array. Breast and ovarian cancer association analysis was performed within a retrospective cohort approach. Results: The observed P values of association ranged between 0.005 and 1.000. None of the variants was significantly associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, after multiple testing adjustments. Conclusion: There is little evidence that any of the evaluated candidate variants act as modifiers of breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Impact: Genome-wide association studies have been more successful at identifying genetic modifiers of BRCA1/2 penetrance than candidate gene studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(1); 308–16. ©2014 AACR.
Impact of Aortic Annulus Size on Valve Hemodynamics and Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
Rodés‐Cabau, Josep , Pîbarot, Philippe , Suri, Rakesh M. , Kodali, Susheel , Thourani, Vinod H. , Szeto, Wilson Y. , Svensson, Lars G. , Dumont, Éric , Xu, Ke , Leon, Martin B. , Douglas, Pamela S. , Pibarot, Phillippe , Hahn, Rebecca T , Douglas, Pamela S

Mayo Clinic

Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions | October 1, 2014 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 701-711

10.1161/circinterventions.114.001681 | PMID 25270901 Get It

Background— The objective was to evaluate the effects of aortic annulus size on valve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in those patients included in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) randomized controlled trial cohort A and the nonrandomized continued access cohort. Methods and Results— Patients included the randomized controlled trial (n=574) and nonrandomized continued access (n=1358) cohorts were divided in tertiles according to aortic annulus diameter (small aortic annulus tertile, medium aortic annulus tertile, and large aortic annulus tertile [LAA], respectively) as measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Severe prosthesis–patient mismatch was defined as an effective aortic orifice area of <0.65 cm 2 /m 2 . In the randomized controlled trial cohort, patients in the small aortic annulus tertile who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement had a lower incidence of severe prosthesis–patient mismatch (19.7% versus 37.5%; P =0.03) and only a trend toward a higher incidence of moderate-to-severe paravalvular leaks compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (5.7% versus 0%; P =0.06). In the LAA tertile, there were no differences in the rate of prosthesis–patient mismatch between groups, and a significant increase in moderate-to-severe paravalvular leaks was associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (9% versus 0%; P =0.01). There were no differences in mortality between transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement. In the nonrandomized continued access cohort, there were no differences in prosthesis–patient mismatch between the small aortic annulus and LAA tertiles, but a higher rate of moderate-to-severe paravalvular leaks was observed in the LAA tertile (5.9% versus 11.5%; P =0.009). Patients in the LAA tertile had a higher mortality rate at 1-year follow-up ( P =0.02), and differences persisted in multivariable analysis ( P =0.048 for LAA versus medium aortic annulus tertile, P =0.035 for LAA versus small aortic annulus tertile). Conclusions— Aortic annulus size had a major impact on valve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement. This study highlights the importance of considering aortic annulus size in the evaluation of high-risk patients who are candidates for aortic valve replacement. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00530894.
Utility of Routine Post-Therapy Surveillance Imaging in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Thompson, Carrie A. , Ghesquières, Hervé , Maurer, Matthew J. , Biron, Pierre, Ansell, Stephen M. , Chassagne‐Clément, Catherine, Inwards, David J. , Gargi, Thérèse, Johnston, Patrick B. , Nicolas‐Virelizier, Emmanuelle , Macon, William R. , Peix, Marie, Micallef, Ivana N. , Sebban, Catherine, Nowakowski, Grzegorz S. , Porrata, Luis F. , Weiner, George J. , Link, Brian K. , Chassagne-Clément, Catherine, Nicolas-Virelizier, Emmanuelle, Cerhan, James R. , Witzig, Thomas E. , Habermann, Thomas M. , Maurer, Matthew , Link, Brian K , Weiner, George

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 30, 2014 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 31 | Pages: 3506-3512

10.1200/jco.2014.55.7561 | PMID 25267745 Get It

Purpose We examined the utility of post-therapy surveillance imaging in a large, prospectively enrolled cohort of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) from the United States and confirmed our results in an independent cohort of patients from France. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and treated with anthracycline-based immunochemotherapy were identified from the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence and the Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France. In those with relapse, details at relapse and outcomes were abstracted from records. Results 680 individuals with DLBCL were identified from the MER, 552 (81%) of whom achieved remission after induction. 112 of the 552 patients (20%) suffered a relapse. The majority (64%) of relapses were identified before a scheduled follow-up visit. Surveillance imaging detected DLBCL relapse before clinical manifestations in nine out of 552 patients (1.6%) observed after therapy. In the Lyon cohort, imaging identified asymptomatic DLBCL relapse in four out of 222 patients (1.8%). There was no difference in survival after DLBCL relapse in patients detected at scheduled follow-up versus before scheduled follow-up in both the MER (P = .56) and Lyon cohorts (P = .25). Conclusion The majority of DLBCL relapses are detected outside of planned follow-up, with no difference in outcome in patients with DLBCL detected at a scheduled visit compared with patients with relapse detected outside of planned follow-up. These data do not support the use of routine surveillance imaging for follow-up of DLBCL.
The EADC‐ADNI Harmonized Protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance: Evidence of validity
Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Jack, Clifford R. , Bocchetta, Martina , Frederiksen, Kristian Steen , Liu, Yawu , Preboske, Gregory M., Swihart, Tim, Blair, Melanie , Cavedo, Enrica , Grothe, Michel J. , Lanfredi, Mariangela , Martinez, Oliver, Nishikawa, Masami, Portegies, Marileen, Stoub, Travis , Ward, Chadwich, Apostolova, Liana G. , Ganzola, Rossana , Barkhof, Frederik , Bartzokis, George, DeCarli, Charles , Csernansky, John G., deToledo‐Morrell, Leyla, Geerlings, Mirjam I. , Lehéricy, Stéphane , O’Brien, John T. , Silbert, Lisa C. , Scheltens, Philip , Waldemar, Gunhild, Fellgiebel, Andreas , Barnes, Josephine , Gerritsen, Lotte , Henneman, Wouter J.P., Malykhin, Nikolai , Pruessner, Jens C. , Watson, Craig, Leon, Mony J. de , Pantel, Johannes, Ferrari, Clarissa , Bosco, Paolo , Pasqualetti, Patrizio , Duchesne, Simon , Duvernoy, Henri M., Boccardi, Marina , Initiative, EADC‐ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Volumetry and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging, Albert, Marilyn S. , Bennet, David, Camicioli, Richard , Collins, D. Louis , Dubois, Bruno , Hampel, Harald , denHeijer, Tom, Hock, Christofer, Jagust, William J. , Launer, Leonore J., Maller, Jerome J. , Mueller, S. G., Sachdev, Perminder S. , Simmons, Andy, Visser, Peter‐Jelle, Wahlund, Lars‐Olof , Weiner, Michael W. , Winblad, Bengt , Boccardi, Marina , Frisoni, Giovanni B. , DeCarli, Charles , Preboske, Gregory, Bauer, Corinna M. , Wolf, Dominik Georg Friedrich , Kaye, Jeffrey , Killiany, Ronald , Matsuda, Hiroshi , O'Brien, John Tiernan , Soininen, Hilkka S. , Teipel, Stefan Johannes , Waldemar, Gunhild , Firbank, Michael John , Wang, Lei , Wolf, Henrike , Initiative, EADC‐ADNI Working Group on The Harmonized Protocol for Manual Hippocampal Volumetry and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging, Thompson, Paul M. , Jack, Clifford R , Sachdev, Perminder S , Barkhof, Frederik , Scheltens, Philip , Wahlund, Lars-Olof , Grothe, Michel J , Bocchetta, Martina , Stoub, Travis

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | September 27, 2014 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 111-125

10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.1756 | PMID 25267715 Get It

Abstract Background An international Delphi panel has defined a harmonized protocol (HarP) for the manual segmentation of the hippocampus on MR. The aim of this study is to study the concurrent validity of the HarP toward local protocols, and its major sources of variance. Methods Fourteen tracers segmented 10 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cases scanned at 1.5 T and 3T following local protocols, qualified for segmentation based on the HarP through a standard web‐platform and resegmented following the HarP. The five most accurate tracers followed the HarP to segment 15 ADNI cases acquired at three time points on both 1.5 T and 3T. Results The agreement among tracers was relatively low with the local protocols (absolute left/right ICC 0.44/0.43) and much higher with the HarP (absolute left/right ICC 0.88/0.89). On the larger set of 15 cases, the HarP agreement within (left/right ICC range: 0.94/0.95 to 0.99/0.99) and among tracers (left/right ICC range: 0.89/0.90) was very high. The volume variance due to different tracers was 0.9% of the total, comparing favorably to variance due to scanner manufacturer (1.2), atrophy rates (3.5), hemispheric asymmetry (3.7), field strength (4.4), and significantly smaller than the variance due to atrophy (33.5%, P < .001), and physiological variability (49.2%, P < .001). Conclusions The HarP has high measurement stability compared with local segmentation protocols, and good reproducibility within and among human tracers. Hippocampi segmented with the HarP can be used as a reference for the qualification of human tracers and automated segmentation algorithms.
Bariatric surgery improved HbA1c more than intensive medical therapy in obese patients with uncontrolled type 2 DM
Leon, B. Gisella Carranza, Montori, Víctor M. , Montori, Victor M

Mayo Clinic

Annals of Internal Medicine | August 18, 2014 | Volume: 161 | Issue: 4 | Pages: JC4

10.7326/0003-4819-161-4-201408190-02004 | PMID 25133383 Get It