Citations

Clear

114 citation(s) found for "Weller, M".

CODEL: phase III study of RT, RT + TMZ, or TMZ for newly diagnosed 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglioma. Analysis from the initial study design
Jaeckle, Kurt A. , Ballman, Karla V. , Bent, Martin J. van den , Giannini, Caterina , Galanis, Evanthia , Brown, Paul D. , Jenkins, Robert B. , Cairncross, J. Gregory , Wick, Wolfgang , Weller, Michael , Aldape, Kenneth , Anderson, S. Keith , Cerhan, Jane H. , Klein, Martin , Schiff, David , Raizer, Jeffrey J. , Dhermain, F., Nordstrom, Donald G., Flynn, Patrick J. , Vogelbaum, Michael A. , Dixon, Jesse G. , Weller, Michael , van den Bent, Martin J , Galanis, Evanthia , Giannini, Caterina , Wick, Wolfgang , Jaeckle, Kurt A , Ballman, Karla , Dixon, Jesse G , Dixon, Jesse G , Wefel, Jeffrey S. , Grossman, Stuart A.

Mayo Clinic

Neuro-Oncology | July 13, 2020 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 457-467

10.1093/neuonc/noaa168 | PMID 32678879 Get It

Abstract Background We report the analysis involving patients treated on the initial CODEL design. Methods Adults (>18) with newly diagnosed 1p/19q World Health Organization (WHO) grade III oligodendroglioma were randomized to radiotherapy (RT; 5940 centigray ) alone (arm A); RT with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) (arm B); or TMZ alone (arm C). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), arm A versus B. Secondary comparisons were performed for OS and progression-free survival (PFS), comparing pooled RT arms versus TMZ-alone arm. Results Thirty-six patients were randomized equally. At median follow-up of 7.5 years, 83.3% (10/12) TMZ-alone patients progressed, versus 37.5% (9/24) on the RT arms. PFS was significantly shorter in TMZ-alone patients compared with RT patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.12; 95% CI: 1.26, 7.69; P = 0.014). Death from disease progression occurred in 3/12 (25%) of TMZ-alone patients and 4/24 (16.7%) on the RT arms. OS did not statistically differ between arms (comparison underpowered). After adjustment for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status (mutated/wildtype) in a Cox regression model utilizing IDH and RT treatment status as covariables (arm C vs pooled arms A + B), PFS remained shorter for patients not receiving RT (HR = 3.33; 95% CI: 1.31, 8.45; P = 0.011), but not OS ((HR = 2.78; 95% CI: 0.58, 13.22, P = 0.20). Grade 3+ adverse events occurred in 25%, 42%, and 33% of patients (arms A, B, and C). There were no differences between arms in neurocognitive decline comparing baseline to 3 months. Conclusions TMZ-alone patients experienced significantly shorter PFS than patients treated on the RT arms. The ongoing CODEL trial has been redesigned to compare RT + PCV versus RT + TMZ.
Development of a gene expression–based prognostic signature for IDH wild-type glioblastoma
Johnson, Radia Marie , Phillips, Heidi , Bais, Carlos , Daemen, Anneleen , Herrlinger, Ulrich , Jenkins, Robert B. , Mancao, Christoph , Weller, Michael , Garcia, Josep , Weller, Michael , Brennan, Cameron , Cloughesy, Timothy F. , Lai, Albert , Wick, Wolfgang , Bourgon, Richard

Mayo Clinic

Neuro-Oncology | July 9, 2020 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1742-1756

10.1093/neuonc/noaa157 | PMID 32897363 Get It

Abstract Background We aimed to develop a gene expression–based prognostic signature for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma using clinical trial datasets representative of glioblastoma clinical trial populations. Methods Samples were collected from newly diagnosed patients with IDH wild-type glioblastoma in the ARTE, TAMIGA, EORTC 26101 (referred to as “ATE”), AVAglio, and GLARIUS trials, or treated at UCLA. Transcriptional profiling was achieved with the NanoString gene expression platform. To identify genes prognostic for overall survival (OS), we built an elastic net penalized Cox proportional hazards regression model using the discovery ATE dataset. For validation in independent datasets (AVAglio, GLARIUS, UCLA), we combined elastic net–selected genes into a robust z-score signature (ATE score) to overcome gene expression platform differences between discovery and validation cohorts. Results NanoString data were available from 512 patients in the ATE dataset. Elastic net identified a prognostic signature of 9 genes (CHEK1, GPR17, IGF2BP3, MGMT, MTHFD1L, PTRH2, SOX11, S100A9, and TFRC). Translating weighted elastic net scores to the ATE score conserved the prognostic value of the genes. The ATE score was prognostic for OS in the ATE dataset (P < 0.0001), as expected, and in the validation cohorts (AVAglio, P < 0.0001; GLARIUS, P = 0.02; UCLA, P = 0.004). The ATE score remained prognostic following adjustment for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status and corticosteroid use at baseline. A positive correlation between ATE score and proneural/proliferative subtypes was observed in patients with MGMT non-methylated promoter status. Conclusions The ATE score showed prognostic value and may enable clinical trial stratification for IDH wild-type glioblastoma.
Phase 0 and window of opportunity clinical trial design in neuro-oncology: a RANO review
Vogelbaum, Michael A. , Krivosheya, Daria, Borghei‐Razavi, Hamid , Sanai, Nader , Weller, Michael , Wick, Wolfgang , Reardon, David A. , Wen, Patrick Y. , Bent, Martin J. van den , Chang, Susan M. , Weller, Michael , van den Bent, Martin J , Wick, Wolfgang , Borghei-Razavi, Hamid , Soffietti, Riccardo , Aghi, Manish Kumar , Galanis, Evanthia , Wen, Patrick Yung

Mayo Clinic

Neuro-Oncology | June 19, 2020 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1568-1579

10.1093/neuonc/noaa149 | PMID 32598442 Get It

Abstract Glioblastoma is a devastating disease with poor prognosis. Few effective chemotherapeutics are currently available, and much effort has been expended to identify new drugs capable of slowing tumor progression. The phase 0 trial design was developed to facilitate early identification of promising agents for cancer that should undergo accelerated approval. This design features an early in-human study that enrolls a small number of patients who receive subtherapeutic doses of medication with the goals of describing pharmacokinetics through drug blood level measurements and determining intratumoral concentrations of the investigational compound as well as pharmacodynamics by studying the biochemical and physiological effects of drugs. In neuro-oncology, however, the presence of the blood–brain barrier and difficulty in obtaining brain tumor tissue warrant a separate set of considerations. In this paper, we critically reviewed the protocols used in all brain tumor related in-human phase 0 and phase 0–like (“window of opportunity”) studies between 1993 and 2018, as well as ongoing clinical trials, and identified major challenges in trial design as applied to central nervous system tumors that include surgical specimen collection and storage, brain tumor drug level analysis, and confirmation of drug action. We therefore propose that phase 0 trials in neuro-oncology should include (i) only patients in whom a resection of the tumor is planned, (ii) use of clinical doses of an investigational agent, (iii) tissue sampling from enhancing and non-enhancing portions of the tumor, and (iv) assessment of drug-specific target effects. Standardization of clinical protocols for phase 0/window of opportunity studies can help accelerate the development of effective treatments for glioblastoma.
Consensus recommendations for a dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocol for use in high-grade gliomas
Boxerman, Jerrold L. , Quarles, C. Chad , Hu, Leland , Gerstner, Elizabeth R. , Smits, Marion , Barboriak, Daniel P. , Huang, Raymond, Wick, Wolfgang , Weller, Michael , Kalpathy–Cramer, Jayashree , Shankar, Lalitha , Jacobs, Paula , Chung, Caroline , Bent, Martin J. van den , Chang, Susan M. , Yung, Wai Kuen, Wen, Patrick Y. , Rosen, Bruce R. , Arons, David F., Kingston, Ann E, Sandak, David, Wallace, M. Z., Musella, Al , Haynes, Chas, Weller, Michael , van den Bent, Martin J , Boxerman, Jerrold L , Wick, Wolfgang , Smits, Marion , Barboriak, Daniel P , Erickson, Bradley J. , Kaufmann, Timothy J. , Galanis, Evanthia , Chang, Susan Marina , Yung, W K Al, Cloughesy, Timothy F. , Wen, Patrick Yung , Gilbert, Mark R. , Ellingson, Benjamin M. , Schmainda, Kathleen M

Mayo Clinic

Neuro-Oncology | June 3, 2020 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1262-1275

10.1093/neuonc/noaa141 | PMID 32516388 Get It

Abstract Despite the widespread clinical use of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI, DSC-MRI methodology has not been standardized, hindering its utilization for response assessment in multicenter trials. Recently, the DSC-MRI Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition issued an updated consensus DSC-MRI protocol compatible with the standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) for high-grade gliomas that is increasingly used in the clinical setting and is the default MRI protocol for the National Clinical Trials Network. After reviewing the basis for controversy over DSC-MRI protocols, this paper provides evidence-based best practices for clinical DSC-MRI as determined by the Committee, including pulse sequence (gradient echo vs spin echo), BTIP-compliant contrast agent dosing (preload and bolus), flip angle (FA), echo time (TE), and post-processing leakage correction. In summary, full-dose preload, full-dose bolus dosing using intermediate (60°) FA and field strength-dependent TE (40–50 ms at 1.5 T, 20–35 ms at 3 T) provides overall best accuracy and precision for cerebral blood volume estimates. When single-dose contrast agent usage is desired, no-preload, full-dose bolus dosing using low FA (30°) and field strength-dependent TE provides excellent performance, with reduced contrast agent usage and elimination of potential systematic errors introduced by variations in preload dose and incubation time.
Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions
Wen, Patrick Y. , Weller, Michael , Lee, Eudocia Q. , Barnholtz‐Sloan, Jill S. , Barthel, Floris P , Batchelor, Tracy T. , Chang, Susan M. , DeGroot, John, Hegi, Monika E. , Huang, Raymond Y. , Lassman, Andrew B. , Lim, Michael , Mellinghoff, Ingo K. , Minniti, Giuseppe , Nathanson, David A. , Platten, Michael , Preusser, Matthias , Roth, Patrick , Sanson, Marc , Schiff, David , Short, Susan , Taphoorn, Martin , Tonn, Joerg-Christian, Tsang, Jonathan , Verhaak, Roel G.W. , Deimling, Andreas von , Zadeh, Gelareh , Reardon, David A. , Aldape, Kenneth , Bent, Martin J. van den , Weller, Michael , Short, Susan C , van den Bent, Martin J , Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S , Platten, Michael , Preusser, Matthias , Sanson, Marc , von Deimling, Andreas , Mellinghoff, Ingo K , Huang, Raymond , Roth, Patrick , Barthel, Floris P , Wen, Patrick Yung , Alexander, Brian M. , Bindra, Ranjit S. , Chiocca, E Antonio , Cloughesy, Timothy F. , Galanis, Evanthia , Gilbert, Mark R. , Horbinski, Craig , Rhun, Émilie Le , Mehta, Minesh P. , Tonn, Joerg-Christian , Wick, Wolfgang

Mayo Clinic

Neuro-Oncology | April 20, 2020 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1073-1113

10.1093/neuonc/noaa106 | PMID 32328653 Get It

Abstract Glioblastomas are the most common form of malignant primary brain tumor and an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent years there have been important advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis and biology of these tumors, but this has not translated into significantly improved outcomes for patients. In this consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO), the current management of isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype (IDHwt) glioblastomas will be discussed. In addition, novel therapies such as targeted molecular therapies, agents targeting DNA damage response and metabolism, immunotherapies, and viral therapies will be reviewed, as well as the current challenges and future directions for research.
cIMPACT‐NOW update 6: new entity and diagnostic principle recommendations of the cIMPACT‐Utrecht meeting on future CNS tumor classification and grading
Louis, David N. , Wesseling, Pieter , Aldape, Kenneth , Capper, David , Cree, Ian A. , Figarella‐Branger, Dominique , Fouladi, Maryam, Haberler, Christine , Hawkins, Cynthia , Komori, Takashi, Ng, Ho‐Keung , Orr, Brent A. , Paulus, Werner, Pietsch, Torsten , Reifenberger, Guido , Rosenblum, Marc, Rous, Brian , Sahm, Felix , Sarkar, Chitra , Solomon, David A. , Tabori, Uri , Bent, Martin J. van den , Deimling, Andreas von , Weller, Michael , White, Valerie A. , Ellison, David W. , Figarella-Branger, Dominique , Pietsch, Torsten , Sarkar, Chitra , Solomon, David A , Weller, Michael , van den Bent, Martin J , Orr, Brent A , Wesseling, Pieter , von Deimling, Andreas , Tabori, Uri , Sahm, Felix , Capper, David , Brat, Daniel J. , Eberhart, Charles G. , Fouladi, Maryam , Fuller, Gregory N. , Giannini, Caterina , Kros, Johan M. , Park, Sung-Hye , Perry, Arie , Rosenblum, Marc

Mayo Clinic

Brain Pathology | April 20, 2020 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 844-856

10.1111/bpa.12832 | PMID 32307792 Get It

Abstract cIMPACT‐NOW (the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy) was established to evaluate and make practical recommendations on recent advances in the field of CNS tumor classification, particularly in light of the rapid progress in molecular insights into these neoplasms. For Round 2 of its deliberations, cIMPACT‐NOW Working Committee 3 was reconstituted and convened in Utrecht, The Netherlands, for a meeting designed to review putative new CNS tumor types in advance of any future World Health Organization meeting on CNS tumor classification. In preparatory activities for the meeting and at the actual meeting, a list of possible entities was assembled and each type and subtype debated. Working Committee 3 recommended that a substantial number of newly recognized types and subtypes should be considered for inclusion in future CNS tumor classifications. In addition, the group endorsed a number of principles—relating to classification categories, approaches to classification, nomenclature, and grading—that the group hopes will also inform the future classification of CNS neoplasms.
Lipid droplet degradation through a novel and direct engulfment by endo‐lysosomes
Mehall, Bridget, Weller, Shaun G. , McNiven, Mark A. , Schott, Micah B. , Schulze, Ryan J.

Mayo Clinic

The FASEB Journal | April 19, 2020 | Volume: 34 | Issue: S1 | Pages: 1-1

10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.08730 Get It

Lipid droplets (LDs) are fat‐storage organelles that play critical roles in energy homeostasis, but can excessively accumulate in metabolic diseases such as obesity and fatty liver where hepatocytes become grossly engorged with excess lipid. The catabolism of LDs aids in disease resolution and occurs in part by lipophagy, a form of selective autophagy, but the molecular and vesicle trafficking events that facilitate this process are not fully understood. During lipophagy, autophagosomes are thought to target LDs prior to fusion with acidic lysosomes, where neutral lipids are terminally degraded by lysosomal acid lipase. Ultrastructural viewing of hepatocytes showing LDs contained within electron‐dense acidic vesicles is consistent with this concept. In addition to canonical autophagy, we find that most LDs undergoing degradation are encased within single‐membrane endo‐lysosomes, and few LDs are observed within traditional double‐membrane autophagosomes. Further, studies of LD catabolism in yeast have shown that LDs can be directly internalized by the large acidic vacuole through a process known as microlipophagy. Thus, the GOAL of this study was to test if similar microlipophagy mechanisms occur in mammalian cells such as hepatocytes, and whether this process involves autophagy. METHODS To test this, we used microscopic fatty acid tracing studies and time‐lapse confocal microscopy to determine the role of autophagosomes versus endo‐lysosomes in LD catabolism. To trace the fate of LDs into terminal degradative vesicles, cells were first loaded with the fluorescent lipid marker Bodipy C12, then treated for 24h with LAListat, an inhibitor of lysosomal acid lipase. RESULTS We observed a ~5‐fold higher incidence of LDs within endo‐lysosomes (marked with the tetraspanin CD63), compared with autophagosomes (marked by the autophagy protein LC3). Furthermore, siRNA knockdown of macroautophagy proteins (Atg5, Atg7, and Fip200) did not inhibit LD internalization by endo‐lysosomes, suggesting that autophagy is not a prerequisite for this process. In addition, time‐lapse microscopy revealed a direct internalization of cytosolic LDs by endo‐lysosomes positive for lysotracker or CD63‐mCherry. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that hepatocytes utilize a distinct form of microautophagy that entails the direct envelopment of cytoplasmic LDs by endocytic vesicles such as multivesicular bodies and lysosomes/late endosomes. In addition to lipolysis and canonical macroautophagy, this process plays an important role in the catabolic utilization of LDs by the hepatocyte. Support or Funding Information This study was supported by NIH R01DK044650 (to M.A.M.), RO1AA020735 (to M.A.M.), and the K99AA020735 (to M.B.S.).
Maintenance Rituximab after CVP Results in Superior Clinical Outcome in Advanced Follicular Lymphoma (FL): Results of the E1496 Phase III Trial from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.
Höchster, Howard S. , Weller, Edie, Gascoyne, Randy D. , Ryan, Teresa S., Frankel, Stanley R., Horning, Sandra J., Habermann, Thomas M. , Gordon, Leo I.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | April 19, 2020 | Volume: 106 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 349-349

10.1182/blood.v106.11.349.349 Get It

Abstract E1496 is a phase III trial designed to evaluate the ability of 2 years (yr) of maintenance rituximab (MR) to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) after CVP (cyclophosphamide 1 G/m2 day [d] 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 [max = 2 mg] d 1, prednisone 100 mg/m2 d 1–5) chemotherapy in stage III–IV follicular grade 1 and 2 and small lymphocytic lymphoma. After CVP treatment to maximum response, (6–8 cycles), stable and responding patients (pt) were randomized to MR (375 mg/m2 weekly x 4) every 6 months x 4 or observation (OBS). Stratification factors included histology, response and residual disease after CVP. With 3-yr median follow-up, survivals (from time of randomization, one-sided logrank p values) for all pt (n=304) favored MR for PFS (p = 3 x 10–8; hazard rate {HR} = 0.38 [0.28;0.54, 95% confidence intervals]) and OS (p = 0.09; HR = 0.66 [0.36–1.22]). Because the large majority of pt have FL and because rituximab efficacy is notably greater in FL, we focused in this report on the 237 FL pt. Median age was 58 yr, 65% were stage IV, 64% had marrow disease, 64% had high tumor burden and 37% had high-risk disease by the follicular lymphoma prognostic index. PFS after randomization was significantly longer for MR vs OBS (p = 3 x 10-7; HR = 0.39 [0.27;0.57]). The estimated PFS at 4 yr (~4.5 yr after start of treatment) was 56% for MR vs 33% for OBS. Differences in PFS were significant within the predefined strata and the differences were most significant in favor of MR for pt with high initial tumor burden and minimal residual disease after CVP. Overall survival was superior for MR (p = 0.03; HR = 0.51 [0.25;1.04]. Estimated OS at 4 yr (~4.5 years after start of treatment) was 88% for MR vs 72% for OBS. Of 33 deaths, 21 occurred on the OBS arm. These data demonstrate that maintenance rituximab not only significantly delays disease progression in FL compared with OBS but that a substantial proportion of patients treated with MR remain disease-free at 4 years after the completion of CVP. These are the first data to strongly suggest a survival benefit with a therapy that includes rituximab and CVP and the first to strongly suggest a survival benefit with maintenance rituximab in FL.