Citations

ABSTRACT Nowadays, consent to use donor bodies for medical education and research is obtained from the body donors and their families before the donation. Recently, the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA) published guidelines that could restrict the appearance of cadaveric images in commercial anatomical resources such as textbooks and other educational products. These guidelines state that the donor must expressly consent to using such images for this purpose. Cadaveric photos and drawings made from dissections of cadavers have been used in anatomy textbooks and atlases for hundreds of years. They are invaluable for anatomy students and clinical/surgical practitioners. The IFAA guidelines should not restrict the use of those older books; to do so would infringe the rights of those seeking knowledge from these resources. As the images in such textbooks and atlases are anonymized and are used for teaching and research, and the donors and their families are informed about this before the donation, we believe no additional consent is needed. It is impossible to separate educational from “commercial” usage entirely in any situation, e.g., publications from publishers and the use of cadavers in medical schools. Therefore, our best efforts to avoid unethical use of cadaveric images by following traditional consent processes are still needed so that more people will reap the benefits from them. As senior textbook/atlas authors/editors from over 10 countries, we believe that using cadaveric images in anatomy textbooks is appropriate, and no additional consent should be necessary. Such usage falls within the good faith of professionals using these invaluable gifts.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The intraosseous subarcuate loop (SL) is a unique variant of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA), where a loop of the artery is trapped in the petrous bone's subarcuate fossa (SF). Recognizing this variant is crucial for planning cerebellopontine angle (CPA) surgeries; however, data regarding its frequency and management vary in the published literature. A cohort from a single center was studied using MRI to assess its prevalence, and the findings were compared with the existing literature. In addition, an intraoperative guide for mobilizing the intraosseous AICA's SL was provided through a detailed step-by-step cadaveric dissection. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-eight patients who had undergone MRI scans of the CPA (516 sides) were retrospectively reviewed. MRIs displaying vascular loops visible in the axial view were analyzed using multiplanar reconstruction, and the intraosseous loop frequency was evaluated. A scoping review was undertaken to provide an overview of previously published data on its prevalence. One embalmed and latex-injected specimen with intraosseous AICA's SL was dissected through a retrosigmoid approach, and 1 surgical case was detailed, describing the procedure to release it. RESULTS: Intraosseous AICA's SL mobilization involves the identification of its entry and exit points within the petrous bone, dural incision to expose the SF, SF drilling, subarcuate artery division, and detaching the vascular loop. Preservation of a dural cuff is crucial to prevent vascular injury. We analyzed 258 brain MRIs (mean age 55 years, 42% male). The intraosseous AICA's SL was present in 4 of 516 evaluated CPAs (0.8%). The prevalence of the vascular anomaly in the reviewed literature using different radiological modalities ranged from 0.2% to 1.6%. CONCLUSION: The intraosseous AICA's SL is an uncommon anatomic variation detectable by MRI, posing an added risk in CPA surgery. Identifying and properly mobilizing it is crucial for safe vascular preservation.