Peris-Celda, Maria

Objective To compare the utility of intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) and electrically evoked stapedial reflex testing (eSRT) for cochlear nerve integrity monitoring during simultaneous translabyrinthine resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS) and cochlear implantation. Study design Historical cohort study. Setting Tertiary academic referral center. Patients Eleven patients (12 cases) who underwent translabyrinthine tumor resection with simultaneous placement of a standard, unmodified cochlear implant (CI). Intervention A CI placed at the beginning of the operation before tumor resection to facilitate intraoperative cochlear nerve monitoring through a CI-delivered electrical stimulus. Main outcome measure Correlation of intraoperative monitoring outcomes with postoperative CI performance. Results Among the 12 cases (median age, 47 years), eABR waveforms were present at the conclusion of tumor resection in 10, including 6 that achieved open set speech perception. Of the 2 cases with negative eABR, 1 achieved open set speech perception. By contrast, of the 8 cases with a positive eSRT response, 7 achieved open set speech perception. Of the 4 cases with a negative eSRT response, none achieved open set speech perception. The 3 cases that did not receive auditory stimulation included 2 with positive and 1 with negative eABR; all 3 had a negative eSRT response. Conclusions Intraoperative eSRT using an unmodified CI is a promising new method for monitoring the integrity of the cochlear nerve during simultaneous VS resection. eSRT response at the conclusion of tumor resection strongly correlated with CI open set speech capacity. Although still useful, eABR was less reliable at predicting postoperative hearing outcomes in this series.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Access to the amygdala and hippocampus (A/H) is complex. To address the limitations and invasiveness of traditional approaches, including the Transsylvian, Subtemporal, and Supracerebellar infratentorial approaches, we developed the suprapetrous infratemporal (SPIT) approach. This study describes the nuances of this approach in both cadaveric studies and clinical cases. METHODS: Three unilateral exposures were performed using microscopic and endoscopic methodologies in the SPIT approach. After cadaveric investigation, this approach was successfully implemented in representative clinical cases. RESULTS: The SPIT approach enabled direct access to the inferior A/H, circumventing the requirement for temporal lobe retraction and detachment of the temporal lobe from the dura through a subtemporal route by drilling the upper part of the mastoid, consequently mitigating tension on the vein of Labbé. This enabled a bottom-up view because one would gain with a zygomatic osteotomy and forward projection like a mini-posterior petrosal view by using a transmastoid view, without cutting down the zygomatic arch and opening the dura subtemporally, limiting patient pain and preventing case comorbidity. The SPIT approach was performed in 2 cases of mesial temporal cavernoma presenting with seizures. The lesion was visualized intraoperatively and was successfully removed in these cases. The postoperative course was excellent with no complications, and gross total resection was radiographically confirmed with Engel Class 1a seizure freedom. CONCLUSION: The SPIT approach is a complementary approach for inferior A/H disease, combining the combined middle fossa approach modified for intradural pathology. Limited drilling of the upper aspect of the mastoid with a medial dural opening at the level of the arcuate eminence provides a direct trajectory with minimal brain retraction. Additional research encompassing a larger patient cohort and extended follow-up periods is required to substantiate the advantages of SPIT in the management of inferior A/H lesions.

Abstract Introduction The clival, paraclival, and craniocervical junction regions are challenging surgical targets. To approach these areas, endoscopic endonasal transclival approaches (EETCAs) and their extensions (far-medial approach and odontoidectomy) have gained popularity as they obviate manipulating and working between neurovascular structures. Although several cadaveric studies have further refined these contemporary approaches, few provide a detailed step-by-step description. Thus, we aim to didactically describe the steps of the EETCAs and their extensions for trainees. Methods Six formalin-fixed cadaveric head specimens were dissected. All specimens were latex-injected using a six-vessel technique. Endoscopic endonasal middle and inferior clivectomies, far-medial approaches, and odontoidectomy were performed. Results Using angled endoscopes and surgical instruments, an endoscopic endonasal midclivectomy and partial inferior clivectomy were performed without nasopharyngeal tissue disruption. To complete the inferior clivectomy, far-medial approach, and partially remove the anterior arch of C1 and odontoid process, anteroinferior transposition of the Eustachian–nasopharynx complex was required by transecting pterygosphenoidal fissure tissue, but incision in the nasopharynx was not necessary. Full exposure of the craniocervical junction necessitated bilateral sharp incision and additional inferior mobilization of the posterior nasopharynx. Unobstructed access to neurovascular anatomy of the ventral posterior fossa and craniocervical junction was provided. Conclusion EETCAs are a powerful tool for the skull-base surgeon as they offer a direct corridor to the ventral posterior fossa and craniocervical junction unobstructed by eloquent neurovasculature. To facilitate easier understanding of the EETCAs and their extensions for trainees, we described the anatomy and surgical nuances in a didactic and step-by-step fashion.

Abstract Introduction Although many neuroanatomic atlases have been published, few have detailed complex cranial approaches and pertinent anatomic considerations in a stepwise fashion intended for rapid comprehension by neurosurgery students, residents, and fellows. Methods Five sides of formalin-fixed latex-injected specimens were dissected under microscopic magnification. The frontotemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches were performed by neurosurgical residents and fellows at different training levels with limited previous experience in anatomical dissection mentored by the senior authors (M.P.C. and M.J.L.). Meticulous surgical anatomic dissections were performed until sufficient visual and technical completion was attained, with parameters of effectively demonstrating key surgical steps for educational training purposes. Following the completion of dissection and three-dimensional photography, illustrative case examples were reviewed to demonstrate the relative benefits and optimal applications of each approach. Results The frontotemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches afford excellent access to anterior and middle skull base pathologies, as well as the exposure of the infratemporal fossa. Key considerations include head positioning, skin incision, scalp retraction, fat pad dissection and facial nerve protection, true or false MacCarty keyhole fashioning, sphenoid wing drilling and anterior clinoidectomy, completion of the craniotomy and accessory orbital osteotomy cuts, dural opening, and intradural neurovascular access. Conclusion The frontotemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches are core craniotomies that offer distinct advantages for complex cranial operations. Learning and internalizing their key steps and nuanced applications in a clinical context is critical for trainees of many levels. The orbitozygomatic craniotomy in particular is a versatile but challenging approach; operative-style laboratory dissection is an essential component of its mastery and one that will be powerfully enhanced by the current work.

Abstract Introduction Surgery of the sellar and parasellar regions can be challenging due to the complexity of neurovascular relationships. The main goal of this study is to develop an educational resource to help trainees understand the pertinent anatomy and procedural steps of the endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) to the sellar and parasellar regions. Methods Ten formalin-fixed latex-injected specimens were dissected. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal transsellar, transtuberculum-transplanum, and transcavernous approaches were performed by a neurosurgery trainee, under supervision from the senior authors and a PhD in anatomy with advanced neuroanatomy experience. Dissections were supplemented with representative case applications. Results Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approaches afford excellent direct access to sellar and parasellar regions. After a wide sphenoidotomy, a limited sellar osteotomy opens the space to sellar region and medial portion of the cavernous sinus. To reach the suprasellar space (infrachiasmatic and suprachiasmatic corridors), a transplanum-prechiasmatic sulcus-transtuberculum adjunct is needed. The transcavernous approach gains access to the contents of the cavernous sinus and both medial (posterior clinoid and interpeduncular cistern) and lateral structures of the retrosellar region. Conclusion The anatomical understanding and technical skills required to confidently remove skull base lesions with EEAs are traditionally gained after years of specialized training. We comprehensively describe EEAs to sellar and parasellar regions for trainees to build knowledge and improve familiarity with these approaches and facilitate comprehension and learning in both the surgical anatomy laboratory and the operating room.