Citations

Clear

4201 citation(s) found for "Chen, Chen".

Abstract A018: Identifying potential cell-surface targets for therapeutic treatment of DICER1 -related cancers
McNally, Brenya, Mallinger, Paige, Huntsman, David, FCCMG, Zhang, Joyce , Fraire, Claudette R. , Schoettler, Peter J., Schultz, Kris Ann P. , Chen, Kenneth S., Wang, Yemin , Schoettler, P.J.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | July 18, 2026 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 14_Supplement | Pages: A018-A018

10.1158/1538-7445.rareca26-a018 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor (SLCT) are DICER1-related tumors for which novel therapies are urgently needed. A subset of Wilms tumors are also associated with germline or somatic variants in DICER1. Current therapies include cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery, but there are limited options for patients with recurrent disease. Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADC) have emerged as promising therapies for several solid tumors. Aberrantly expressed cell surface proteins, including Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME), represent potential targets for immunotherapeutic treatments like CAR-T cell and antibody-based therapies in malignant cancers, including DICER1-associated tumors. METHODS: Individuals diagnosed with PPB, SLCT, and Wilms tumor who enrolled in the International PPB/DICER1 Registry, International OTST Registry, and/or UT Southwestern Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Biorepository were selected for analysis. We analyzed ten PPB samples (four PDX, six primary tumor), four SLCT samples (all primary tumor), and 54 Wilms tumor samples (4 PDX, 50 primary tumor). DICER1 hotspot variants were verified in all 14 PPB and SLCT samples, while none of the Wilms tumor samples we analyzed exhibited DICER1 hotspot variants. Mapped and normalized whole-transcriptome sequencing reads were used to examine expression of 73 targets of antibody- or cell-based therapies that are clinically approved or under clinical investigation on clinicaltrials.gov. Genes with a median expression exceeding 2.5 transcripts per million (TPM) were considered expressed in a given tumor type; this threshold was selected to be permissive in identifying potential targets for further evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 73 genes of interest, 21 targetable cell-surface genes met a median expression threshold of 2.5 TPM in at least one tumor type: 11 genes in PPB, 16 in SLCT, and 14 in Wilms. Seven genes (FN1, PRAME, MCAM, CD248, IL11RA, CD276 (B7-H3), and MRC2) were expressed at this level in all three tumor types. Additional genes were expressed above this level in only two of the tumor types; PDGFRA in PPB and SLCT; GPC2 and TYRO3 in SLCT and Wilms tumor; and CSPG4, ERBB2, FZD10 in PPB and Wilms tumor. Six genes were exclusively expressed in SLCT (AXL, GPNMB, PROM1, KDR, ITGA6, FGFR4), and two were unique to Wilms tumor (GPC1, ULBP3). Of these, PRAME was previously reported as frequently expressed in DICER1-associated tumors; little has been reported about the remaining potential targets. CONCLUSION: PPB, SLCT, and Wilms tumor express several potential immunotherapy targets by RNA-seq. Expression of these potential targets should be investigated by immunostaining in a wider panel of tumors. Further study on the potential for ADCs or CAR-T cell therapies to treat DICER1-related conditions is needed. Citation Format: Brenya McNally, BS, Paige H.R. Mallinger, MS, David Huntsman, MD, FRCPC, FCCMG, Yemin Wang, PhD, Joyce Zhang, PhD, Claudette R. Fraire, PhD, Peter J. Schoettler, MD, Kris Ann P. Schultz, MD, Kenneth S. Chen, MD. Identifying potential cell-surface targets for therapeutic treatment of DICER1-related cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Breaking Barriers in the Fight against Rare Cancers; 2026 Jul 18-20; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(14_Suppl):Abstract nr A018.
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Subtype‐Specific Prognostic Value of NGS in the Setting of Intensive Chemotherapy
Bolarinwa, Abiola , Al‐Kali, Aref , Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , Saliba, Antoine N. , Hefazi, Mehrdad , Matin, A, Elliott, Michelle A. , Litzow, Mark R. , Hogan, William J. , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Pardanani, Animesh , Foran, James M. , Punwani, Nathan , Palmer, Jeanne , Sproat, Lisa Z., Reichard, Kaaren K., He, Rong , Viswanatha, David S., Zepeda‐Mendoza, Cinthya , Gangat, Naseema , Begna, Kebede H. , Tefferi, Ayalew , Saliba, Antoine N. , Alkhateeb, Hassan B , Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , Saliba, Antoine N , Hefazi, Mehrdad , Elliott, Michelle , Litzow, Mark R. , Hogan, William J , Shah, Mithun V , Patnaik, Mrinal , Pardanani, Animesh , Foran, James M , Badar, Talha , Murthy, Hemant S , Chen, Dong , He, Rong , Zepeda-Mendoza, Cinthya J , Gangat, Naseema , Tefferi, Ayalew , Saliba, Antoine N , Bolarinwa, Abiola B , Alkhateeb, Hassan B. , Shah, Meera , Badar, Talha , Murthy, Hemant S. , Chen, Dong , Reichard, Kaaren K.

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Hematology | July 18, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ajh.70443 | PMID 42470254 Get It

ABSTRACT We examined the prognostic value of routine NGS data in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with intensive (7 + 3 backbone) induction, specified by AML subtype. A contemporary (2015–2025) series of 545 Mayo Clinic patients (median age 56 years, females 44%) was considered. Median follow‐up was 49 months with 341 (63%) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (AHSCT) recorded. AML subtypes included core‐binding factor (CBF; N = 72; 13%), primary non‐CBF ( N = 403; 74%), post‐myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or post‐myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (post‐MDS‐MDS/MPN; N = 28; 5%), post‐MPN ( N = 15; 3%), and therapy‐related (t‐AML; N = 27; 5%). Corresponding complete remission rates, with/without count recovery (CR/CRi), were 89%, 76%, 64%, 27%, and 78% ( p < 0.01) and 5‐year transplant‐censored survival rates 68%, 57%, 21%, 0%, and 55% ( p < 0.01). In multivariable analyses, the prognostic value of specific mutations was mostly limited to primary non‐CBF AML where adverse karyotype (OR 1.9; p = 0.04) predicted inferior and FLT3 ‐ITD (OR 0.4; p < 0.01) or NPM1 MUT / FLT3 WT (OR 0.1; p < 0.01) superior CR/CRi while KRAS MUT (HR 8.8; p < 0.01), TP53 MUT (HR 5.4; p < 0.01), and TET2 MUT (HR 2.3; p = 0.01) predicted inferior and NPM1 MUT / FLT3 WT (HR 0.3; p = 0.01) superior survival. Prognostication in intensively‐treated AML should start with subtype specification and recognition of the limited value of NGS in non‐primary AML. Post‐MPN AML is particularly associated with dismal outcomes and should be prognostically distinguished from post‐MDS‐MDS/MPN AML. In primary non‐CBF AML, in addition to previously established risk factors, the favorable impact of FLT3 ‐ITD on achieving CR/CRi and the unfavorable impact of KRAS MUT and TET2 MUT on transplant‐censored survival were noted and require confirmation from additional studies.
Endotypes of Vascular Health Predict Transplantation‐Free Survival in Pulmonary Hypertension
Farha, Samar , Hu, Bo , Chen, Ruoying, Barnard, John , Comhair, Suzy , Heresi, Gustavo A. , Parambil, Joseph, Tonelli, Adriano R. , Beck, Gerald J. , Rosenzweig, Erika B. , Finet, J. Emanuel , Grünig, Gabriele , Hill, Nicholas S. , Jellis, Christine , Park, Margaret , Rischard, Franz P., Olman, Mitchell A. , Erzurum, Serpil C. , Dweik, Raed A. , Group, the PVDOMICS Study, Heresi, Gustavo , Tonelli, Adriano , Beck, Gerald J , Rosenzweig, Erika B , DuBrock, Hilary M , Finet, J Emanuel , Frantz, Robert P , Hassoun, Paul M , Hemnes, Anna , Hill, Nicholas S , Horn, Evelyn M , Jellis, Christine L , Leopold, Jane A , Park, Margaret M , Simpson, Catherine E , Tang, W H Wilson , Erzurum, Serpil C , Dweik, Raed A , Barnard, John , Comhair, Suzy , Hu, Bo , Chen, Ruoying, Parambil, Joseph G. , DuBrock, Hilary M. , Frantz, Robert P. , Hassoun, Paul M. , Hemnes, Anna R. , Horn, Evelyn M. , Leopold, Jane A. , Rischard, Franz , Simpson, Catherine E. , Tang, W.H. Wilson , Group, The PVDOMICS Study

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the American Heart Association | July 17, 2026 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 14 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.125.048795 | PMID 42466490 Get It

Background The current classification of pulmonary hypertension (PH), based largely on expert opinion, has limitations in prognostication and guiding therapies. We hypothesize that novel PH clusters that predict survival will reveal mechanistic phenotypes associated with biomarkers of vascular health across all PH groups. Methods We first identify novel PH clinical clusters by performing unsupervised clustering analysis on the CC‐PH (Cleveland Clinic PH) registry (N=1529). We develop classification models to predict the new PH clusters and then apply them to the multicenter PVDOMICS (Pulmonary Vascular Diseases Phenomics) cohort (N=853) for validation. We compare transplantation‐free survival across the new PH clusters. We quantify metabolites of the arginine‐nitric oxide pathway and D‐dimer levels and calculate global arginine bioavailability (arginine/[ornithine+citrulline]) to assess endothelial function and activation in the new clusters and link these biomarkers to clinical outcomes. Results Clustering analysis identify 3 clear clusters in CC ‐ PH that are validated in PVDOMICS and outperform conventional classifications in predicting transplantation‐free survival. The phenotype associated with the worst survival is characterized by reduced lung diffusion capacity, decreased arginine bioavailability and nitrate levels, and elevated D‐dimer levels, consistent with loss of pulmonary microcirculation and endothelial dysfunction. Conclusions We identify new informative PH phenotypes associated with mortality and defined by biomarkers of endothelial function and activation. Loss of endothelial health and pronounced pulmonary vascular rarefication contribute more substantially to mortality across the spectrum of PH than right heart function. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02980887.
Cross-cohort analysis of expression and splicing quantitative trait loci in TOPMed
Blackwell, Thomas W., Kachuri, Linda , Castaldi, Peter J. , Cho, Michael H. , Christenson, Stephanie A. , Durda, Peter , Gabriel, Stacey , Hersh, Craig P. , Huntsman, Scott , Hwang, S.-J., Joehanes, Roby, Johnson, Mari , Li, Xingnan , Lin, Honghuang , Liu, Ching‐Ti , Liu, Yongmei , Mak, Angel C. Y. , Manichaikul, Ani , Paik, David T. , Saferali, Aabida , Smith, Joshua D. , Taylor, Kent D. , Wang, Jiongming , Weinstock, Joshua S. , Weiss, Jeffrey, Wheeler, Heather E. , Zhou, Ying , Zoellner, Sebastian, Mestroni, Luisa , Graw, Sharon , Taylor, Matthew R.G. , Ortega, Victor E. , Johnson, Craig , Gan, Weiniu , Abecasis, Gonçalo , Nickerson, Deborah A. , Ardlie, Kristin G., Woodruff, Prescott G. , Bowler, Russell P. , Meyers, Deborah A. , Reiner, Alex, Kooperberg, Charles , Ziv, Elad , Vasan, Ramachandran S. , Silverman, Edwin K. , Rich, Stephen S., Heard‐Costa, Nancy L. , Tang, Hua, Rotter, Jerome I. , Smith, Albert V. , Aguet, François, Scott, Laura J. , Raffield, Laura M. , Parker, Stephen C.J. , Abe, Namiko, Almasy, Laura, Ament, Seth, Anugu, Pramod, Auer, Paul, Avramopoulos, Dimitrios, Balasubramanian, Adithya, Barr, R. Graham, Barwick, Lucas, Beaty, Terri, Becker, Diane, Becker, Lewis, Beitelshees, Amber, Benos, Takis, Bezerra, Marcos, Bis, Joshua, Brody, Jennifer, Broeckel, Ulrich, Broome, Jai, Bunting, Karen, Buth, Erin, Carey, Vincent, Carty, Cara, Casaburi, Richard, Chaffin, Mark, Chang, Christy, Chang, Yi-Cheng, Chavan, Sameer, Chen, Bo-Juen, Chen, Wei-Min, Choi, Seung Hoan, Chuang, Lee-Ming, Chung, Ren-Hua, Conomos, Matthew, Cornell, Elaine, Crandall, Carolyn, Crapo, James, Curtis, Jeffrey, Damcott, Coleen, David, Sean, Fuentes, Lisa de las, Vries, Paul de, Deka, Ranjan, DeMeo, Dawn, Devine, Scott, Dinh, Huyen, Doddapaneni, Harsha, Duan, Qing, Duggirala, Ravi, Eaton, Charles, Ekunwe, Lynette, Boueiz, Adel El, Emery, Leslie, Farber, Charles, Farek, Jesse, Franceschini, Nora, Frazar, Chris, Fu, Mao, Fullerton, Stephanie M., Fulton, Lucinda, Gao, Shanshan, Gao, Yan, Gass, Margery, Geiger, Heather, Ghosh, Auyon, Gignoux, Chris, Glahn, David, Gogarten, Stephanie, Gong, Da-Wei, Goring, Harald, Grine, Daniel, Gu, C. Charles, Guan, Yue, Hall, Michael, Han, Yi, Harris, Daniel, Heavner, Ben, Herrington, David, Hobbs, Brian, Hong, Elliott, Hoth, Karin, Hsiung, Chao (Agnes), Hu, Jianhong, Hung, Yi-Jen, Huston, Haley, Hwu, Chii Min, Jackson, Rebecca, Jain, Deepti, Johnsen, Jill, Johnston, Rich, Jones, Kimberly, Kessler, Michael, Khan, Alyna, Khan, Ziad, Kim, Wonji, Kimoff, John, Kinney, Greg, Kramer, Holly, Lange, Christoph, Lange, Ethan, Laurie, Cathy, Laurie, Cecelia, LeBoff, Meryl, Lee, Sandra, Lee, Wen-Jane, Levine, David, Lewis, Joshua, Li, Yun, Lin, Xihong, Liu, Simin, Liu, Yu, Make, Barry, Manning, Alisa, Manson, JoAnn, Martin, Lisa, Marton, Melissa, Mathai, Susan, May, Susanne, McArdle, Patrick, McDonald, Merry-Lynn, McFarland, Sean, McGoldrick, Daniel, McHugh, Caitlin, Mei, Hao, Meigs, James, Menon, Vipin, Min, Nancy, Moll, Matt, Momin, Zeineen, Montasser, May, Mychaleckyj, Josyf C, Naik, Rakhi, Naseri, Take, Natarajan, Pradeep, Nelson, Sarah C., Neltner, Bonnie, Nessner, Caitlin, Nkechinyere, Osuji, O'Connell, Jeff, O’Connor, Tim, Ochs-Balcom, Heather, Okwuonu, Geoffrey, Pankow, James, Parker, Cora, Peloso, Gina, Peralta, Juan Manuel, Perez, Marco, Perry, James, Peters, Ulrike, Phillips, Lawrence S, Pollin, Toni, Becker, Julia Powers, Boorgula, Meher Preethi, Psaty, Bruce, Qiao, Dandi, Rafaels, Nicholas, Rajendran, Mahitha, Rasmussen-Torvik, Laura, Ratan, Aakrosh, Reed, Robert, Regan, Elizabeth, Reupena, Muagututi‘a Sefuiva, Robillard, Rebecca, Roselli, Carolina, Ruczinski, Ingo, Runnels, Alexi, Russell, Pamela, Ryan, Kathleen, Sabino, Ester Cerdeira, Salimi, Shabnam, Salvi, Sejal, Salzberg, Steven, Sandow, Kevin, Santibanez, Jireh, Schwander, Karen, Sciurba, Frank, Sériès, Frédéric, Shetty, Amol, Shetty, Aniket, Silver, Brian, Skomro, Robert, Smith, Tanja, Smoller, Sylvia, Snively, Beverly, Stilp, Adrienne M., Storm, Garrett, Streeten, Elizabeth, Su, Jessica Lasky, Sung, Yun Ju, Sylvia, Jody, Szpiro, Adam, Taub, Margaret, Taylor, Simeon, Thornton, Timothy A., Threlkeld, Machiko, Tinker, Lesley, Tirschwell, David, Tiwari, Hemant, Tong, Catherine, Tsai, Michael, Vaidya, Dhananjay, Walker, Tarik, Wallace, Robert, Walts, Avram, Wang, Fei Fei, Wang, Heming, Watson, Karol, Watt, Jennifer, Weng, Lu-Chen, Wessel, Jennifer, Williams, Kayleen, Wilson, Carla, Wilson, James, Winterkorn, Lara, Wong, Quenna, Wu, Baojun, Xu, Huichun, Yanek, Lisa, Yang, Ivana, Zekavat, Seyedeh Maryam, Zhao, Snow Xueyan, Zhao, Wei, Zhu, Xiaofeng, Rich, Stephen S. , Pankow, James S. , Reiner, Alex P. , Aguet, François , Johnson, W. Craig , Ardlie, Kristin , Orchard, Peter , Kachuri, Linda , Castaldi, Peter J , Cho, Michael H , Christenson, Stephanie A , Durda, Peter , Hersh, Craig P , Huntsman, Scott , Hwang, Seungyong , Joehanes, Roby , Johnson, Mari , Li, Xingnan , Lin, Honghuang , Liu, Ching-Ti , Liu, Yongmei , Mak, Angel C Y , Manichaikul, Ani W , Paik, David T , Smith, Joshua D , Taylor, Kent D , Tracy, Russell P , Wang, Jiongming , Wang, Mingqiang , Weinstock, Joshua S , Weiss, Jeffrey , Wheeler, Heather E , Zhou, Ying , Zöllner, Sebastian , Wu, Joseph C , Mestroni, Luisa , Graw, Sharon , Taylor, Matthew R G , Ortega, Victor E , Johnson, W Craig , Gan, Weiniu , Gupta, Namrata , Ardlie, Kristin , Woodruff, Prescott G , Bowler, Russell P , Reiner, Alexander P , Kooperberg, Charles , Ziv, Elad , Vasan, Ramachandran S , Silverman, Edwin K , Rich, Stephen S , Heard-Costa, Nancy , Tang, Hua , Rotter, Jerome I , Smith, Albert V , Levy, Daniel , Aguet, François , Scott, Laura J , Raffield, Laura M , Parker, Stephen C J , Pankow, James S , Tracy, Russell P. , Wu, Joseph C. , Larson, Martin G. , Cupples, L. Adrienne , Abe, Namiko, Almasy, Laura, Ament, Seth, Anugu, Pramod, Auer, Paul, Avramopoulos, Dimitrios, Balasubramanian, Adithya, Barr, R. Graham, Barwick, Lucas, Beaty, Terri, Becker, Diane, Becker, Lewis, Beitelshees, Amber, Benos, Takis, Bezerra, Marcos, Bis, Joshua, Brody, Jennifer, Broeckel, Ulrich, Broome, Jai, Bunting, Karen, Buth, Erin, Carey, Vincent, Carty, Cara, Casaburi, Richard, Chaffin, Mark, Chang, Christy, Chang, Yi-Cheng, Chavan, Sameer, Chen, Bo-Juen, Chen, Wei-Min, Choi, Seung Hoan , Chuang, Lee-Ming, Chung, Ren-Hua, Conomos, Matthew, Cornell, Elaine, Crandall, Carolyn, Crapo, James, Curtis, Jeffrey, Damcott, Coleen, David, Sean, Fuentes, Lisa de las, Vries, Paul de, Deka, Ranjan, DeMeo, Dawn, Devine, Scott, Dinh, Huyen, Doddapaneni, Harsha, Duan, Qing, Duggirala, Ravi, Eaton, Charles, Ekunwe, Lynette, Boueiz, Adel El, Emery, Leslie, Farber, Charles, Farek, Jesse, Franceschini, Nora, Frazar, Chris, Fu, Mao, Fullerton, Stephanie M., Fulton, Lucinda, Gao, Shanshan, Gao, Yan, Gass, Margery, Geiger, Heather, Ghosh, Auyon, Gignoux, Chris, Glahn, David, Gogarten, Stephanie, Gong, Da-Wei, Goring, Harald, Grine, Daniel, Gu, C. Charles, Guan, Yue, Hall, Michael, Han, Yi, Harris, Daniel, Heavner, Ben, Herrington, David, Hobbs, Brian, Hong, Elliott, Hoth, Karin, Hsiung, Chao (Agnes), Hu, Jianhong, Hung, Yi-Jen, Huston, Haley, Hwu, Chii Min, Jackson, Rebecca, Jain, Deepti, Johnsen, Jill, Johnston, Rich, Jones, Kimberly, Kessler, Michael, Khan, Alyna, Khan, Ziad, Kim, Wonji, Kimoff, John, Kinney, Greg, Kramer, Holly, Lange, Christoph, Lange, Ethan, Laurie, Cathy, Laurie, Cecelia, LeBoff, Meryl, Lee, Sandra, Lee, Wen-Jane, Levine, David, Lewis, Joshua, Li, Yun, Lin, Xihong, Liu, Simin, Liu, Yu, Make, Barry, Manning, Alisa, Manson, JoAnn, Martin, Lisa, Marton, Melissa, Mathai, Susan, May, Susanne, McArdle, Patrick, McDonald, Merry-Lynn, McFarland, Sean, McGoldrick, Daniel, McHugh, Caitlin, Mei, Hao, Meigs, James, Menon, Vipin, Min, Nancy, Moll, Matt, Momin, Zeineen, Montasser, May, Mychaleckyj, Josyf C, Naik, Rakhi, Naseri, Take, Natarajan, Pradeep, Nelson, Sarah C., Neltner, Bonnie, Nessner, Caitlin, Nkechinyere, Osuji, O'Connell, Jeff, O’Connor, Tim, Ochs-Balcom, Heather, Okwuonu, Geoffrey, Parker, Cora, Peloso, Gina, Peralta, Juan Manuel, Perez, Marco, Perry, James, Peters, Ulrike, Phillips, Lawrence S, Pollin, Toni, Becker, Julia Powers, Boorgula, Meher Preethi, Psaty, Bruce, Qiao, Dandi, Rafaels, Nicholas, Rajendran, Mahitha, Rasmussen-Torvik, Laura, Ratan, Aakrosh, Reed, Robert, Regan, Elizabeth, Reupena, Muagututi‘a Sefuiva, Robillard, Rebecca, Roselli, Carolina, Ruczinski, Ingo, Runnels, Alexi, Russell, Pamela, Ryan, Kathleen, Sabino, Ester Cerdeira, Salimi, Shabnam, Salvi, Sejal, Salzberg, Steven, Sandow, Kevin, Santibanez, Jireh, Schwander, Karen, Sciurba, Frank, Sériès, Frédéric , Shetty, Amol, Shetty, Aniket, Silver, Brian, Skomro, Robert, Smith, Tanja, Smoller, Sylvia, Snively, Beverly, Stilp, Adrienne M., Storm, Garrett, Streeten, Elizabeth, Su, Jessica Lasky, Sung, Yun Ju, Sylvia, Jody, Szpiro, Adam, Taub, Margaret, Taylor, Simeon, Thornton, Timothy A., Threlkeld, Machiko, Tinker, Lesley, Tirschwell, David, Tiwari, Hemant, Tong, Catherine, Tsai, Michael, Vaidya, Dhananjay, Walker, Tarik, Wallace, Robert, Walts, Avram, Wang, Fei Fei, Wang, Heming, Watson, Karol, Watt, Jennifer, Weng, Lu-Chen, Wessel, Jennifer, Williams, Kayleen, Wilson, Carla, Wilson, James, Winterkorn, Lara, Wong, Quenna, Wu, Baojun, Xu, Huichun, Yanek, Lisa, Yang, Ivana, Zekavat, Seyedeh Maryam, Zhao, Snow Xueyan, Zhao, Wei, Zhu, Xiaofeng

Mayo Clinic

Science | July 16, 2026 | Volume: 393 | Issue: 6808 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/science.adx2989 | PMID 42462027 Get It

Most genetic variants associated with complex traits are hypothesized to regulate gene expression. To understand the genetics underlying gene expression variability, we characterized 14,324 RNA-sequencing samples from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine program and performed expression and splicing quantitative trait locus (e/sQTL) analyses in six tissues and cell types, including whole blood ( n = 6454) and lung ( n = 1291). We detected tens of thousands of secondary cis-e/sQTLs, showing that secondary cis-e/sQTL discovery remains unsaturated. We fine-mapped UK Biobank–derived genome-wide association study (GWAS) signals from 164 traits and identified e/sQTL colocalizations for 10,611 GWAS signals, including 7096 that colocalize with secondary e/sQTLs. Our results suggest that even larger e/sQTL analyses will uncover additional secondary e/sQTLs, further benefiting GWAS interpretation.
Impact of GLP‐1 Receptor Agonists on Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Cross‐Sectional Survey
Javaheri, Elika D , Godfrey, Hannah, Yee, Claire, Chen, S, Chen, Stella X., Javaheri, Elika D. , Godfrey, Hannah

Mayo Clinic

International Journal of Dermatology | July 16, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1111/ijd.70586 | PMID 42461155 Get It

Reproducibility of 3.0 T single-frequency cardiac MR elastography for quantification of left ventricular myocardial stiffness
Cheng, Yong, Jiang, Yewen, Zheng, Z. M. , Li, Zhanglei, Wang, Zi , An, Shutian, Chen, Jun, Glaser, Kevin J. , Arani, Arvin, Yu, Y Y, Zhao, Ren, Li, Xiaohu, MD, PhD, Wang, Jun , Wang, Zhen , Glaser, Kevin J , Yu, Yongqiang , Cheng, Yong , Zheng, Zijun, Arani, Arvin , Zhao, Ren

Mayo Clinic

Radiology Advances | July 16, 2026 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/radadv/umag032 | PMID 42565103 Get It

Abstract Background Cardiac magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) allows the non-invasive quantification of myocardial stiffness, but long-interval reproducibility data at 3.0 T single-frequency 140-Hz remain limited. Purpose To evaluate the short- and long-interval reproducibility of 3.0 T cardiac MRE for left ventricular (LV) myocardial stiffness across healthy volunteers and patients with conditions associated with elevated myocardial stiffness. Materials and Methods This prospective single-center study included 69 participants: 60 healthy volunteers and 9 with cardiovascular disease (6 with aortic stenosis and 3 with long-standing hypertension). All participants underwent baseline cardiac MRE (scanner: Signa Premier 3.0 T, GE Healthcare, driver: Resoundant), an immediate short-interval rescan (SIR) within 5 minutes, and a long-interval rescan (LIR) after approximately 1 month. Left ventricular myocardial stiffness and octahedral shear strain signal-to-noise ratio were measured independently by 2 readers. Reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), within-subject coefficient of variation, standard error of measurement, and smallest detectable change at the 95% confidence (SDC95) level. Results Baseline LV myocardial stiffness was higher in the disease group than in healthy volunteers, 11.73 ± 1.01 kPa and 7.80 ± 0.70 kPa (mean ± SD; P &lt; .001), respectively. Inter-reader agreement was excellent across all timepoints, with ICCs of 0.970 at baseline (95% CI, 0.953-0.982), 0.966 for SIR (95% CI, 0.945-0.979), and 0.962 for LIR (95% CI, 0.939-0.976). Within-reader scan-rescan reproducibility was also excellent. For Reader 1, stiffness ICC was 0.979 for the SIR (95% CI, 0.966-0.987) and 0.957 for the LIR (95% CI, 0.932-0.973), with SDC95 values of 0.616 kPa (95% CI, 0.528-0.741) and 0.869 kPa (95% CI, 0.744-1.044), respectively. Reader 2 showed excellent reproducibility, with ICCs ≤0.943. Conclusions 3D single-frequency 140-Hz cardiac MRE at 3.0 T provides excellent short- and long-interval reproducibility for LV myocardial stiffness quantification. The SDC95 values may help distinguish true longitudinal stiffness changes from measurement variability.
Clinical Recommendations for Remote Robotic Assisted Surgery From the CRSA 2025 International Consensus Conference
Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle , Kavoussi, Louis, Wren, Sherry M. , Fowler, Dennis, Anvari, Mehran, Bianco, Francesco, Liang, Xiao, Li, Zheyong, Yin, Xiaoyu, Piccoli, Micaela, Marks, John, Shen, Baiyong, Ko, Clifford, Seeliger, Barbara, Hagendoorn, Jeroen, Essani, Rahila, Walsh, R. Matthew, Oleynikov, Dmitry, Jones, Stephanie B., Bindal, Vivek , Kim, Hyun Koo, Hyung, Woo Jin, Hashimoto, Daniel, Chen, Liaohai Leo, Burt, Bryan M., Lafaro, Kelly, Elli, Fernando, Wilson, Erik, Bianchi, Paolo Pietro, Morgan, Annette, Bartlett, Stephen T., Rashidi, Laila, Yu, Liu, Gawkins, Bill, Hinoul, Piet, Peine, Bill, Woo, Yanghee, Raoof, Mustafa, Jones, Daniel, Deshpande, Supriya, Bernard, Jordana , Wang, Yulun, Broering, Dieter C., Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo, Fong, Yuman , Raptis, Dimitri , Wren, Sherry M , Aldousari, Saad , Ruurda, Jelle P. H. , Bindal, Vivek , Melstrom, Laleh , Celotto, Francesco , Kudsi, Yusef , Ratti, Francesca , Bernard, Jordana , Kavoussi, Louis R., Fowler, Dennis L. , Anvari, Mehran , Bianco, Francesco Maria , Piccoli, Micaela , Marks, John, Ko, Clifford, Seeliger, Barbara , Hagendoorn, Jeroen , Essani, Rahila, Walsh, R. Matthew , Oleynikov, Dmitry , Hyung, Woo Jin , Hashimoto, Daniel A. , Burt, Bryan M. , Lafaro, Kelly J. , Elli, Fernando, Bianchi, Paolo Pietro, Rashidi, Laila, Hinoul, Piet , Peine, Bill, Woo, Yanghee , Raoof, Mustafa , Jones, Daniel, Deshpande, Supriya , Bröering, Dieter C. , Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo

Mayo Clinic

World Journal of Surgery | July 14, 2026 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 2274-2288

10.1002/wjs.70468 | PMID 42444290 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Implementation of remote robotic‐assisted surgery (rRAS) has the potential to significantly improve access to high‐quality surgical care for patients worldwide. Advances in robotic systems and telecommunications now enable highly reliable, low latency, and cybersecure connectivity. These technological developments, together with the broader adoption of telemedicine, have driven an increasing interest in the implementation of rRAS. Methods The Clinical Robotic Surgery Association (CRSA) convened a conference to develop international clinical recommendations for rRAS using the Danish Model of Consensus. The society identified five key issue categories and invited a panel of experts to address specific questions for each. Panel members and a jury of 10 unbiased, non‐expert in rRAS professionals participated in a day‐long conference on November 19, 2025 (Los Angeles, USA). During the conference, participants presented, discussed, and reached consensus on specific guidelines relevant to each category. Immediately after the conference, the jury reviewed and approved the recommended guidelines. Results Multiple recommendations were approved for each of the following categories: Operating Models, Roles and Responsibilities (2 recommendations), Clinical Pathway (2 recommendations), Emergency Management (8 recommendations), Technical Considerations (5 recommendations), and Medico‐legal and Ethical Considerations (4 recommendations). Conclusions There was consensus that with recent advances in telecommunication and robotic technologies, rRAS can be offered safely and effectively if the identified safeguards are realized. Adoption of rRAS is expected to continue advancing rapidly.
Clinical and Economic Implications of High-Sensitivity Troponin-Informed Admission Strategies in Non-AMI Chest Pain
Chen, Wanyi, Jaffe, Allan S. , Apple, Fred S., deFilippi, Christopher, Peacock, W. Frank , Wu, Alan H. B., Fayyad, Rana, Bethoney, Sarah , Zhang, Jingjing, Boltyenkov, Artem T. , Peacock, William Frank , Chen, Wanyi, Jaffe, Allan S. , Apple, Fred S., deFilippi, Christopher R. , Wu, Alan H.B. , Fayyad, Rana S., Bethoney, Sarah , Zhang, Jingjing, Boltyenkov, Artem

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease | July 14, 2026 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 328

10.3390/jcdd13070328 | PMID 42505905 Get It

Most patients with chest pain do not have acute myocardial infarction (AMI), yet post-AMI rule-out disposition remains variable. Detectable but sub-99th percentile high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) provides additional prognostic information. We evaluated the economic value of hs-cTnI-guided hospitalizations among non-AMI patients. We analyzed 1481 non-AMI chest pain visits with detectable baseline hs-cTnI across 29 U.S. emergency departments (2014–2016) in the prospective HIGH-US trial using the Atellica IM TnIH assay(Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, US). We compared observed standard-of-care admissions with modeled pathways incorporating hs-cTnI thresholds and risk scores, assessing admission rates, costs, and diagnostic accuracy for 30-day death/MI. Overall, 1.0% (n = 15/1481) experienced 30-day death/MI. Standard-of-care admitted 59% of patients with 93% sensitivity and 41% specificity. The modeled pathway using hs-cTnI ≥ 5 ng/L plus non-low risk scores was associated with reduced projected admission of 41%, higher specificity of 60%, and the same 93% sensitivity. Estimated per-patient diagnostic costs were lower under Scenario 1 (noninvasive diagnostic testing only; $1025 vs. $1139) and under Scenario 2 (including inpatient/invasive procedures; $2672 vs. $3536). In subgroups, higher hs-cTnI thresholds conferred further economic benefit without compromising sensitivity. Incorporating sub-99th percentile hs-cTnI thresholds alongside risk scores may support more efficient resource use while maintaining safety, although findings require prospective validation.
Drivers of Diagnostic Variation in a Digital Global Kidney Transplant Reader Study
Hofstraat-Boersma, Rianne, Long, Romy du , Buzzanca, Giorgio , Abiola, Adeyemi A., Albadri, Sam, Ali, Zahabia, Altaleb, Ahmed, Banu, Sultana G., Barry, Marc , Bhalodia, Ami , Bianco, Paola, Broecker, Verena , Buelow, Roman, Cheunsuchon, Boonyarit , Crisi, Giovanna M., Daneshvar, Simin, Dokouhaki, Pouneh, Drachenberg, C., Florquin, Sandrine, Gibson, Ian W., Gujarathi, Saurabh, Hendricks, Allen R. , Islam, Jaynul, Ismail, Wesam, Jagannathan, Geetha , Kläger, Johannes, Krizova, Adriana , Kurien, Anila A., Kwon, Boomi , Ledesma, Felipe L., Martin, Jonne, Mehta, Shweta S., Messias, Nidia , Mignano, Salvatore , Miranda, Monik E., Moeckel, Gilbert, Pala, Chiara, Ranson, Marc A., Rodriguez, A Castell, Rosenberg, Avi, Setty, Suman , Sheaff, M., Soares, Maria F.S., Surintrspanont, Jerasit , Terinte-Balcan, George, Testa, Francesca , Ticas, David O. Hendriquez, Toniolo, Maria F., Midden, Dominique van, Velagapudi, R, Viswanathan, Seethalakshmi , Stillfried, Saskia von, Kalverboer, Nienke , Bruns, Imke B. , Callegaro, Giulia , Vries, A A F De, Peters-Sengers, Hessel, Kers, Jesper, Hofstraat, Rianne , Adefidipe, Adeyemi Abiola, Albadri, Sam , Angioi, Andrea , Banu, Sultana Gulshana, Bianco, Paola, Buelow, Roman David, Chauveau, Bertrand , Chen, Guoli , Crisi, Giovanna Maria, Dendooven, Amélie , Drachenberg, Cinthia Beskow , Farris, Alton B. , Ferlicot, Sophie , Florquin, Sandrine , Fontana, Francesco , Gibier, Jean‐Baptiste , Gibson, Ian W. , Husain, Sufia , Ismail, Wesam, Kläger, Johannes Philipp , Kozakowski, Nicolas , Kurien, Anila Abraham , L’Imperio, Vincenzo , Ledesma, Felipe L , Low, Julia P. , Miranda, Monik Ediana , Price, Brendon , Ranson, Marc Andres, Roelofs, Joris J. T. H. , Sadeghipour, Alireza , Sekulic, Miroslav , Setty, Suman , Soares, Maria Fernanda , Terinte‐Balcan, George , Ticas, David Henriquez, Toniolo, María Fernanda , Midden, Dominique van , Velagapudi, Ramya Krishna , Stillfried, Saskia Freifrau von , Wu, Chih‐Ying , Water, Bob van de , Helm, Danny van der , Sengers, Hessel Peters , Kers, Jesper

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | July 13, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.07.09.26357318 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Diagnostic interpretation of kidney allograft biopsies using the Banff classification remains variable, but the determinants of this variability are not fully defined. We performed a global, fully digital multi-reader study to identify the principal drivers of disagreement in Banff-based assessment. Methods Thirty-six kidney transplant biopsies were independently scored by 67 renal pathologists on a standardized digital platform. Readers assessed Banff lesions on hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid–Schiff, and Jones’ silver stains; final diagnostic categories were assigned using prespecified Banff-based decision rules. Interobserver agreement was quantified with Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC) statistics. Determinants of diagnostic agreement were evaluated using pairwise mixed-effects logistic regression, and reader similarity was examined by principal component analysis (PCA) with post hoc molecular annotation. Results Agreement for final diagnostic categories was moderate (Gwet’s AC1, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.47–0.63). Lesion-level agreement varied substantially, with lowest agreement for selected threshold-dependent inflammatory or semi-quantitative lesions, including interstitial inflammation in areas of IFTA, peritubular capillaritis and arteriolar hyalinosis. Diagnostic concordance differed markedly across biopsies, indicating strong case-level heterogeneity. In pairwise models, differences in active inflammatory and vascular lesion scoring were the strongest correlates of diagnostic disagreement; reader experience and geography contributed minimally. Principal component analysis showed reader variation was organized along two dominant axes: a rejection-calling threshold axis linked mainly to tubulointerstitial inflammatory injury, and a T cell-mediated (TCMR/TI) and antibody-mediated/microvascular (AMR/MVI) inflammation-oriented phenotypic classification axis. Conclusion Interobserver variation in Banff-based kidney transplant biopsy assessment is structured rather than random and driven mainly by how readers threshold and integrate key inflammatory lesion compartments rather than experience or geographic location.