Citations

AbstractBackgroundAn internal risk stratification algorithm was developed to decrease the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) during lead extractions (LEs).ObjectiveTo report upon the impact of a risk stratification algorithm (RISE [RIsk Stratification prior to lead Extraction] protocol) on outcomes of LEs in a high‐volume center.MethodsA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained LEs database was performed to identify features associated with MACEs. On the basis of the retrospective data, the RISE protocol differentiated LEs procedures into “High” and “Low” risk for occurrence of MACEs. High‐risk LEs included dual‐coil defibrillator lead (≥3 years), pacemaker and single‐coil lead (≥5 years), and any StarFix coronary sinus lead. During the prospective evaluation of the RISE protocol, “High‐risk” LEs were performed in an operating room (OR) or hybrid laboratory with the cardiac anesthesiologist, OR nursing team, perfusionist in the room, and a cardiac surgeon on the premises. “Low‐risk” LEs were performed in the electrophysiology (EP) laboratory with anesthesia provided by EP nursing team. The preintervention (pre‐RISE) and postintervention (post‐RISE) group spanned 19 and 40 months and consisted of 449 (632 leads) and 751 patients (1055 leads), respectively. The primary outcome of MACEs in the two groups was compared.ResultsProtocol compliance was 100%. The primary outcome of MACEs occurred in 15 patients (3.34%) before and 12 (1.6%) after implementation of the RISE protocol (P = .04).ConclusionRISE identified a low‐risk group where minimal resources are needed and allowed for rapid intervention in the high‐risk group that reduced the consequences of MACEs.

Abstract Background: HER-2 is a transmembrane receptor that is overexpressed in multiple epithelial tumors. We have previously shown that a first generation HER-2 B-cell peptide vaccine targeting epitopes (628-647) and (316-339) was safe and relatively active. We recently developed a novel B-cell epitope specific vaccine (HER-Vaxx) consisting of epitopes derived from the extracellular domain of HER-2 that correspond to amino acid sequences 597-626 (pertuzumab binding site) and 266-296 (trastuzumab binding site). Methods: This first-in-human Phase 1b study evaluated the safety, optimal immunologic/biologic dose (OID/OBD) and immunogenicity of HER-Vaxx. Using a 3+3 dose escalation design, 3 patients (pts) were treated at each dose level (DL). If <2 pts experience dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), we required an additional 3 pts to be entered at that DL for OID/OBD assessment (defined as the dose level inducing a strong immunogenic response for 5 out of 6 patients). We also required that at least 6 patients at each DL to receive 3 inoculations of the combination vaccines at 3-week intervals and that < 2 of the 6 pts experience DLT before dose escalation. DLs were 1.0 mg (DL1), 1.5 mg (DL2), 2.0 mg (DL3) and 2.5 mg (DL4) of each peptide. Each dose contained 0.025 mg of n-MDP. Results: 49 patients with metastatic and/or recurrent solid tumors and a median of 4 prior lines of chemotherapy received at least one inoculation of HER-vaxx. Common related toxicities include injection site reactions (56% grade 1/2 and 5% grade 3/4). There were no DLTs. The OID/OBD was found to be DL 2 (1.5 mg of each peptide vaccine).A total of 28 patients received ≥ 3 vaccinations including 2 with a partial response and 14 with stable disease. Of those, 6 patients received at least one 6-month boost. The vaccine generated sustained humoral response eliciting HER-2 specific antibodies in the majority of responding patients. Conclusion: We demonstrate that HER-Vaxx is well tolerated and able to generate sustained anti-HER-2 immune response. Given the promise, continuous development of the vaccine is ongoing at the suggested OBD in HER-2 overexpressing tumors. Citation Format: Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Lai Wei, Robert Wesolowski, Daniel Ahn, Christina Wu, Maryam Lustberg, Amir Mortazavi, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Jay Overholser, Pravin Kaumaya. A Phase Ib of a combination of two chimeric (Trastuzumab-like and Pertuzumab-like) HER-2 B cell peptide vaccine emulsified in ISA 720 and nor-MDP adjuvant in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT017.

Abstract Background: High mammographic breast density is a strong, well-established breast cancer risk factor. A recent study found increased expression of stem cell markers in the areas of high breast density, but, whether stem cells may explain high breast cancer risk due to high breast density is unknown. We investigated the association between breast density and the risk of breast cancer by the status of stem cell markers CD44, CD24, and ALDH1A1 in the tumor. Methods: We included 223 postmenopausal women with primary invasive or in-situ breast cancer and 399 age-matched controls from Mayo Clinic Mammography Study. Percent breast density, absolute dense area and non-dense area were assessed using computer-assisted thresholding technique. Immunohistochemical analysis of the markers was performed on tumor tissue microarrays according to a standard protocol with commercial antibodies. Cases with positive staining (≥1% positively stained cells) on one or more cores were considered marker-positive. We used polychotomous logistic regression to quantify the associations of breast density measures with breast cancer risk by the status of each of the markers. Heterogeneity tests were conducted to compare the differences in associations by marker-defined tumor subtypes. Results: Of the 223 cancers in the study, 182 (82%) were positive for CD44, 83 (37%) for CD24 and 52 (23%) for ALDH1A1. Associations of percent density were not significantly different across any of the marker-defined subtypes (density 51%+ vs. 11-25%: OR=2.83, 95% CI 1.49-5.37 for CD44+ vs. OR=1.87, 95% CI 0.47-7.51 for CD44-, p-heterogeneity=0.66; OR=2.80, 95% CI 1.27-6.18 for CD24+ vs. OR=2.44, 95% CI 1.14-5.22 for CD24-, p-heterogeneity=0.61; OR=3.04, 95% CI 1.14-8.10 for ALDH1A1+ vs. OR=2.57. 95% CI 1.30-5.08 for ALDH1A1-, p-heterogeneity=0.94). Positive associations of absolute dense area and inverse associations of non-dense area with breast cancer risk were similar across marker-defined subtypes. Similar associations of breast density measures with breast cancer were seen when cancer subtypes were defined using combined marker expression status (none, one positive marker, or two and more positive markers). Conclusions: We found no evidence of differential associations of breast density measures with breast cancer risk by the status of stem cell markers. However, our power was limited and further studies in larger study populations are warranted to confirm these associations in a larger sample. Citation Format: Lusine Yaghjyan, Ashwini Esnakula, Christopher Scott, Akemi Wijayabahu, Matthew Jensen, Celine Vachon. Associations of mammographic breast density with breast stem cell marker-defined breast cancer subtypes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 592.

Abstract Background: Therapeutic blockade of the signaling axis between PD-1 and its ligand programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) with monoclonal antibodies has shown remarkable clinical success in the treatment of cancer and demonstrated impressive activity across a broad set of cancer subtypes, even at advanced and metastatic stages of disease. Contrary to treatment with monoclonal antibodies, chimeric B-cell cancer vaccines have the advantage of producing a specific immune response that can potentially induce memory B & T cell responses, while reducing immune evasion and suppression. Methods: We have translated two HER-2 combination peptide vaccines (B-Vaxx) to the clinic in a Phase 1/2b trial to safely deliver curative and transformative cancer immunotherapies to advanced cancer patients. We have created and established the development of a novel B-cell peptide vaccine (Key-Vaxx) with high immunogenicity that binds to human PD-1 and produces tumor inhibition in vivo in an animal model of colon cancer. Here, we describe the transferable CT-26-HER2 neu tumor model in Balb/c was used to test for synergistic effects of anti-PD1 immunization therapy in combination with anti-HER2 immunization therapy to determine whether this combination could increase immunogenicity, enhance anti-tumor responses and provide synergistic benefit in inhibiting tumor growth. Results: We show robust HER-2 and PD-1 antibody responses in all vaccinated mice indicating that the combined vaccination is effective in reducing tumor growth in a Balb/c syngeneic model of colon carcinoma versus either the PD-1 vaccine or more importantly the positive control gold standard that is anti-mouse PD-1 monoclonal antibody. The vaccine combination was found to be safe and did not appear to exhibit toxicity or autoimmunity. Conclusion: Development of a novel PD-1 vaccine in combination with two Chimeric HER-2 peptide vaccine provides synergistic inhibition of tumor growth with no evidence of toxicity or autoimmunity. A clinical trial with the combination is under planning. Citation Format: Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Jay Overholser, Yuhong Yang, Manuel Penichet, Pravin Kaumaya. Development of a novel PD-1 vaccine and in combination with two Chimeric HER-2 peptide vaccine provides synergistic inhibition of tumor growth in a syngeneic Balb/c model challenged with CT26/HER-2 carcinoma cell line [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1453.

Background: Many studies have investigated factors that predict a return to sport participation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but it is unclear whether the same factors are associated with a return to preinjury level of sport performance. Purpose: To identify factors that contribute to an athlete’s return to preinjury level of performance after ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A cohort of 222 patients (132 male, 90 female) who had ACL reconstruction surgery and completed a 12-month postoperative assessment were followed out to a mean 3 years (range, 2-4 years) to determine whether they had returned to their self-reported preinjury levels of sport performance. Rates of return to preinjury performance were calculated. Measures that had been recorded at the 12-month postoperative review—demographic (age, sex), sport activity level (Marx Activity Rating Scale, return to competition sport), knee laxity, limb symmetry (single and triple crossover hop), subjective function/symptoms (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective), and psychological readiness (Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury scale)—were compared between patients who returned to their preinjury levels of performance and those who did not. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were also used to prospectively determine the association between these measures and return to preinjury level of sport performance. Results: A total of 135 (61%) patients reported that they had returned to their preinjury levels of performance, with return rates similar between males (59%) and females (63%) and between those who had returned to competition at 12 months (62%) and those who had not (60%). There was no significant age difference between patients who returned to their preinjury levels of sport performance and those who did not; however, higher psychological readiness ( P < .0001), greater limb symmetry ( P < .05), higher subjective knee scores ( P = .01), and a higher activity level ( P < .04) were all associated with a return to performance. In the multivariate model, psychological readiness was the only variable that remained a significant predictor (odds ratio = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P < .0001). Conclusion: A majority of athletes who returned to sport after ACL reconstruction reported that their performance was comparable with preinjury. Having a greater psychological readiness to return during rehabilitation was the most significant predictor of a subsequent return to comparable performance.