Citations

Background: It is currently unknown whether patient engagement in adult congenital heart disease (CHD) care is influenced by social determinants of health (SDOH) such as race/ethnicity, education, and income. Adapting from the chronic care model, patient engagement, defined as the knowledge, skills, ability, and willingness to manage one’s health, can minimize lapses in care and improve CHD care outcomes. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzes data from patients aged 18 and older with a self-reported diagnosis of CHD enrolled in a digital health research study called Empower My Congenital Heart. Patient engagement was measured using the Gothenburg Empowerment Scale (GES). We compared mean GES scores across demographic categories (race/ethnicity, education, and income), using independent samples t-tests or one-way ANOVA as appropriate. Additionally, we conducted a multivariate linear regression analysis to evaluate the impact of race/ethnicity, education, and income on GES scores, adjusting for age, gender, marital status, parental status, and employment status. Results: Of 323 adult CHD patients, the mean age was 45.6 ±15 years, 32.5% were males, 89.9% were non-Hispanic White, 29.7% had less than a Bachelor's degree, and 43.5% had less than $100,000 annual household income. The mean GES score was 61.8 ± 8, with significantly higher scores observed for non-Hispanic White identifying individuals (p=0.006) and those with a Bachelor's or higher level of education (p=0.005), while no difference across income levels (p = 0.394) (Figure 1). Linear regression analysis demonstrated that race and ethnicity remained significantly associated with GES scores (Table 1). Conclusions: Race/ethnicity and education level (in the bivariate analysis only), but not income, are the SDOH variables significantly associated with how empowered a CHD patient is in managing their health care. Future interventions that target enhancing patient engagement and self-management skills should take into consideration the influence of these demographic and social factors.

Introduction: Acoramidis, an oral transthyretin (TTR) stabilizer achieving near-complete (≥90%) TTR stabilization, is now approved in the USA, EU, Japan, and UK for the treatment of TTR amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). In the 30-month phase 3 ATTRibute-CM study, acoramidis reduced all-cause mortality (ACM) or first cardiovascular-related hospitalization (CVH) vs placebo. Through Month 42 (M42) of the open-label extension (OLE; 30 months ATTRibute-CM + 12 months OLE), the clinical benefit of acoramidis was sustained, resulting in a 36% and 43% risk reduction in ACM and ACM/first CVH, respectively, compared with the placebo to acoramidis group Research Question: Are the long-term clinical benefits of acoramidis on ACM and ACM/first CVH in ATTR-CM over 42 months consistent across patient subgroups? Methods: ATTRibute-CM study design has been previously described. At the end of the 30-month double-blind period, patients enrolled into OLE continued acoramidis or switched from placebo to acoramidis; all patients received open-label acoramidis HCI 800 mg BID. Data cut was performed after 12 months in OLE. Subgroup analysis for ACM and ACM/first CVH through M42 were conducted for randomization stratification factors (genotype, NT-proBNP, and eGFR levels) and other pre-specified subgroups. ACM included death due to any cause, cardiac mechanical assist device placement, and heart transplant. CVH included CV hospitalizations (≥24 h) and urgent visits (<24 h) for decompensated heart failure requiring IV diuretics and was adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee. Results: Overall, 389 patients enrolled in the OLE (263 continuous acoramidis and 126 placebo to acoramidis). The analyses of ACM/first CVH ( Figure 1 ) and ACM ( Figure 2 ) through M42 consistently favored patients initially randomized to acoramidis across all patient subgroups, including those based on sex, age, country, ATTR-CM genotype, baseline NT-proBNP, baseline eGFR, NYHA class, and NAC stage. The largest effect size for the reduction in ACM/first CVH (HR <0.50) was observed in the following subgroups: female, non-Caucasian patients, variant ATTR-CM, or NAC stage 2. Conclusions: The long-term benefit of acoramidis was consistently shown in patients initially randomized to acoramidis treatment compared with placebo to acoramidis switch after 30 months across multiple clinically relevant subgroups, underscoring the importance of early initiation of acoramidis to reduce the long-term risk of ACM or CVH.

Background: The progression of CHF after MI has been traditionally evaluated by serial changes in EF. However, mechanical parameters can provide a greater insight into cardiac function. Wall strain measures myocardial deformation, and reflects contractile function as a percentage change in length. Wall stress represents the force per unit area on the myocardium, as an evaluation of LV afterload. The relationship between wall stress and wall strain is termed Young’s modulus, and it represents cardiac elasticity. This study leverages in-vivo Young’s modulus analysis derived from cardiac MRI, which has the potential to quantify the extent of myocardial remodeling, and aid in early detection of heart failure progression. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that Young’s modulus offers a more detailed assessment of regional wall motion abnormality than conventional imaging measures alone. Methods: Male Yucatan mini-swine underwent 90-minute balloon occlusion-reperfusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery to induce MI (N=13). Cardiac MRIs were obtained at baseline and 1-month post-MI. Cardiac wall stress and wall strain were calculated separately in the anteroseptal (infarcted) and inferolateral (non-infarcted) regions, and in the longitudinal and circumferential fiber orientations. These measurements were correlated to determine the Young’s modulus of the LV. Results: Anteroseptal and inferolateral longitudinal Young’s modulus increased from 28.01±8.14 to 67.14±15.08 kPa (p < 0.05) from 13.88±1.92 to 38.80±7.29 kPa (p < 0.001), respectively. Anteroseptal and inferolateral circumferential Young’s modulus increased from 34.61±10.33 to 119.17±30.94 kPa (p < 0.05) and from 16.77±1.32 to 58.76±18.98 kPa (p < 0.001), respectively. The regional changes were accompanied by a decrease in EF from 60.6±1.5 to 50.9±3.3% (p < 0.01). Discussion: Our findings show that Young’s modulus is a valuable parameter in quantifying regional changes that occur with LV systolic dysfunction after ischemic insult; specifically that regional abnormalities occur in the non-infarcted area as well as the infarcted area––a change that would not be picked up by global LV EF. Thus, quantifying regional and directional cardiac elasticity non-invasively is a novel parameter that warrants further study. Prior research has explored the in-vitro characteristics of cardiac elasticity, but there is limited research that details the in-vivo changes within any disease affecting myocardial fiber contractility.

Background: Subaortic membrane (SAM) is a fibromuscular ridge beneath the aortic valve that causes fixed left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. Surgical resection is the standard treatment for symptomatic patients or those with high gradients; however, recurrence occurs in up to 14% of adults within 5 years. While radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is well-established in arrhythmia management, its role in treating SAM has not been previously described. Case Information: 53-year-old man with HTN, BMI 51.7, and well-controlled OSA presented with worsening exertional dyspnea and fatigue in April 2024. He had prior surgical SAM resection in 2018, complicated by third-degree AV block requiring pacemaker implantation. Follow-up echocardiography revealed SAM recurrence with peak LVOT gradient of 52 mmHg. Given elevated surgical risk, a novel catheter-based RFA approach was pursued. In July 2024, the patient underwent catheter-based RFA under general anesthesia. A ThermoCool SmartTouch SF catheter was advanced retroaortically across the aortic valve toward the subaortic ridge, guided by CARTO 3 with CartoSound. A semi-circular lesion set was delivered to the septum inferior to the membrane. Two steam pops occurred during ablation in this area. Serial transthoracic echocardiograms at 3 and 8 months demonstrated sustained LVOT gradient reduction, from 52 mmHg pre-ablation to 49 mmHg and 38 mmHg, respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) remained stable at 61%, with no new wall motion abnormalities or pericardial effusion. The patient reported marked improvement in symptoms and normalization of daily activity tolerance. No procedural complications or hospital readmissions occurred. Decision-Making: Given the patient’s high surgical risk and recurrent symptoms, the multidisciplinary team determined that repeat sternotomy carried elevated morbidity. RFA offered a targeted, minimally invasive solution that leveraged electrophysiology tools and preserved structural integrity while maximizing safety. Conclusions: This first-in-human case illustrates the feasibility of intracardiac RFA for recurrent SAM. The patient experienced sustained LVOT gradient reduction, preserved EF, and marked symptomatic improvement. This novel approach may offer a viable option for select patients with recurrent subaortic obstruction and prior sternotomy, warranting further investigation to define lesion durability, depth of tissue effect, and conduction system safety.

Background: Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) screening algorithms based on pulse oximetry have up to 27% false positive rate at high altitudes (>2500 m) despite altitude-specific cutoff changes. We examined the added value of an adult-based AI model applied to phonocardiography (AI-PCG) in the digital stethoscope EKO Core 500 in these settings. Research Question: What is the diagnostic performance of AI-PCG model compared to pulse oximetry in detecting neonatal CCHD across different altitudes in Latin America? Methods: This observational, prospective, case-control study included newborns born at different altitudes from 0 to 4380 meters in Peru, Mexico, Colombia and Bolivia. All underwent preductal and postductal oximetry at least 18 hours after birth, electrocardiography and PCG with the digital stethoscope. All CCHD cases were confirmed by echocardiography. Non-CCHD cases were defined by echocardiography or clinically if they were alive for 1 month and had 1) negative pulse oximetry, 2) no hospitalization due to cardiac or pulmonary causes and 3) no cyanosis or pneumonia. Those with abnormal pulse oximetry, genetic syndromes or murmur detection underwent echocardiography. Diagnostic performance metrics [area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity and false positive rate] were evaluated per modality. Results: A total of 1152 newborns were enrolled, 725 at <2500 m [13 (1.8%) with CCHD] and 427 at >2500 m [6 (1.4%) with CCHD]. Out of 19 CCHD cases, 17 had positive pulse oximetry and 9 had a positive AI-PCG model. One newborn with severe coarctation of the aorta and atrial septal defect had negative pulse oximetry and AI-PCG model. Pulse oximetry showed superior AUROC (0.932 vs 0.664), sensitivity (89.5% vs 47.4%), specificity (97% vs 85.5%) and lower false positive rate (3% vs 14.5%) compared to the AI-PCG model across altitudes. Diagnostic accuracy varied with altitude (Figure): at <2500 m, pulse oximetry showed higher AUROC (0.999 vs 0.612) and lower false positive rate (0.1% vs 16%) than AI-PCG model, but at >2500 m, pulse oximetry had similar AUROC (0.794 vs 0.774) and lower false positive rate (7.8% vs 11.9%) than the AI-PCG model. Conclusion: Pulse oximetry has superior diagnostic performance than an adult-based AI-PCG model when screening for neonatal CCHD at <2500 m, but similar performance is found >2500 m.

Objective To evaluate outcomes in patients with type 2 endoleak (T2E) and the impact of treatment outside the device instructions for use (IFU). Methods This retrospective single-center study included abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) patients who underwent EVAR (2011- 2024). Primary outcomes were 30-day and mid-term complications, reintervention, and mortality by T2E status. Propensity score matching was applied and secondary analysis stratified outcomes by IFU compliance, comparing within ( in IFU) or outside( out IFU) IFU in each T2E group. Results Among 154 EVAR patients (137 men (89.1%) and 17 women (11.0%); mean age 77.5 ± 7.6 years), 77 were T2E(−), and 77 were T2E(+). Baseline characteristics were similar. Thirty-day complications were comparable (T2E(−): 5, 6.4% vs T2E(+): 2, 2.56%, P = 0.72). The mean follow-up duration was 2.7 ± 2.4 years. Sac diameter change (Δ) decreased in the T2E(−) (7.7 ± 8.4 mm) and enlarged in the T2E(+) (1.79 ± 12.5 mm; P < 0.01). Mid-term graft-related complications (T2E(−): 3, 3.8% vs T2E(+): 49, 62.8%, P < 0.01) and reinterventions (T2E(−): 3, 3.8%, vs T2E(+): 20, 25.6% P < 0.01) were higher in the T2E(+) with no difference in mortality ( P = 1.00). These findings remained after excluding type 1 endoleaks. Among the T2E(+), those treated out IFU had longer hospital stays ( out IFU: 3.0 ± 2.8 days vs in IFU: 1.8 ± 2.0 days, P = 0.03), higher T1E ( out IFU: 3, 33.3% vs in IFU: 1, 4.34%, P < 0.01), higher rates of reintervention ( out IFU: 9, 100.0% vs in IFU:17; 24.6%, P < 0.01) and higher all-cause mortality than those within IFU criteria ( out IFU: 5, 55.0% vs in IFU: 13, 18.8%, P < 0.01). IFU status did not significantly affect outcomes in T2E(−) patients. Conclusions T2E is associated with sac growth and increased reinterventions, but not higher mortality. On subgroup analysis, those T2E(+) treated out IFU had longer hospitalizations, higher T1E rates, more reinterventions, and higher all-cause; but not aneurysmal-related mortality.

Importance Adjuvant radiotherapy can improve locoregional control and survival in patients with olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), particularly with advanced-stage and histologic-grade disease. Standard radiotherapy treatment is with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Proton beam radiotherapy (PBRT) provides theoretical advantages in greater sparing of dose to uninvolved organs at risk. Objective To investigate if there are differences in the effectiveness and radiation treatment–related adverse events (RTAEs) between adjuvant IMRT and PBRT for patients with ONB. Design, Setting, and Participants This propensity score–matched cohort study included patients with ONB treated between February 2005 and April 2021 with either IMRT or PBRT at 9 academic tertiary care centers in North America. Patients were matched 1:2 based on age, modified Kadish stage, and Hyams grade. Data were analyzed from July 2024 to January 2025. Exposure Adjuvant IMRT or adjuvant PBRT. Main Outcomes and Measures Local recurrence-free survival (RFS), any RFS, and overall survival (OS). RTAEs, ie, grade 2 events or higher based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, were recorded for both modalities. Results Of 54 included patients, 27 (50%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 46.2 (15.4) years. A total of 18 were treated with PBRT and 36 were treated with IMRT. Most patients had modified Kadish stage C disease (33 of 54 [61%]), and 24 patients (44%) had Hyams grade III or IV disease. The RTAE rate was 20% (8 of 40); IMRT had a rate of 21% (6 of 29), and PBRT had a rate of 18% (2 of 11). The difference in the point estimates for 10-year RFS showed a potential clinical benefit favoring IMRT, although the wide confidence interval indicates uncertainty (10-year RFS: IMRT, 63.3%; 95% CI, 44.6-89.8; PBRT, 37.8%; 95% CI, 14.2-100; difference, 25.5 percentage points; 95% CI, −17.6 to 68.6). There were no clinically meaningful differences in 10-year local RFS (IMRT, 75.6%; 95% CI, 59.8-95.4; PBRT, 72.7%; 95% CI, 45.2-100; difference, 2.9 percentage points; 95% CI, −35.9 to 41.7) or 10-year OS (IMRT, 61.8%; 95% CI, 42.8-89.1; PBRT, 57.1%; 95% CI, 24.3-100; difference, 4.7 percentage points; 95% CI, −49.2 to 58.6), although wide confidence intervals indicate considerable uncertainty. Conclusions and Relevance Due to the imprecision of estimates, no definitive conclusions can be made regarding the comparative effectiveness of IMRT vs PBRT for patients with ONB. These preliminary data may inform the design of appropriately powered prospective studies evaluating the efficacy of PBRT vs IMRT in this population.

Abstract Clinical flow cytometry laboratories are facing rising test volumes, greater assay complexity, and increasing requirements for quality control and assay validation. In response, the International Clinical Cytometry Society (ICCS) conducted a workload survey in early 2023 to gather updated information on assay volumes, complexity, staffing, and technology. Data analysis focused on identifying correlations between length of time to introduce new assays and other factors as a means to gain insight about laboratories that seem to be either adapting or struggling. Flow cytometry assays were categorized into 3 levels of technical/interpretative complexity: high (e.g., measurable/minimal residual disease (MRD assays)), moderate (e.g., leukemia/lymphoma assays (Assays L&L ), excluding MRD assays), and low (e.g., CD4 count). Annual assays per staff member were calculated according to staff involved in case sign‐out (Staff Signout ) or other laboratory operations (Staff LabOps ). Respondents were from 101 laboratories in the United States (69.3%), Canada (4.0%), and other countries (26.7%). Low, moderate, and high technical/interpretative complexity assays were performed in 85.1%, 97.0%, and 47.5% of all laboratories, respectively. Median annual total assays (Assays Total ) per laboratory were 3515 and, based on complexity, were 1518.5 (low), 1808.8 (moderate), and 350 (high). Among all laboratories, the median time (interquartile range) to introduce new Assays L&L was 6 mos. (4–12 mos.), to introduce MRD assays was 11 mos. (5–12 mos.), and to validate/go‐live with new cytometers was 8 mos. (4–12 mos.); these times positively correlated with each other. This study confirmed significantly increased workload since the prior ICCS 2013 workload survey with a concurrent decrease in Staff LabOps . Faster introduction of new assays correlated with other successes, including quicker validation of and going live with new cytometers. Among all laboratories, those that performed myeloid MRD assays versus those that did not were also found to be faster to introduce new assays. The need for sufficient staffing has been emphasized because laboratories with both higher annual volumes of myeloma MRD assays and higher ratios of Assays Total per Staff LabOps were slower to introduce new assays. “Lack of staff and/or time dedicated or protected for assay development” and, more generally, “staff number” were the most commonly identified major barriers for new assay development, with the former specifically linked to slower introduction of new assays among all laboratories.

ABSTRACT Objectives This portion of the Geriatric Emergency Department (GED) Guidelines 2.0 focuses on delirium in the emergency department (ED). Methods A multidisciplinary group applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and develop recommendations related to older ED patients with possible delirium. Results The GED Guidelines 2.0 Delirium Work Group derived six evidence‐based recommendations for risk stratification, diagnosis, and brain imaging. To reduce universal screening, the Delirium Risk Score may be used to identify older adults at low risk for delirium, though the evidence certainty is very low. In adults over 65 admitted to ED observation units, Zucchelli's risk assessment tool (threshold ≥ 4) may stratify delirium risk, also with very low certainty. For adults over 75, the REDEEM Score may be used to identify low‐ or high‐risk individuals, again with very low certainty. For diagnosis, 4AT, bCAM, CAM‐ICU, mCAM, AMT‐4, or RASS may be used to rule delirium in or out, based on very low certainty. The Delirium Triage Screen (DTS) may be used to rule out, but not to rule in, delirium, also with very low certainty. For diagnostic imaging, there is very low certainty of evidence to recommend for or against obtaining a head CT as part of the evaluation for older ED patients with delirium. All recommendations are conditional, reflecting very low certainty of evidence due to the lack of high‐quality ED‐based studies and comparative effectiveness research. Conclusion Rigorous ED‐based research is needed to strengthen evidence and guide delirium care for older adults in geriatric emergency medicine.