Citations

Clear

105 citation(s) found for "Western, Daniel".

Considerations from the College of American Pathologists for Implementation of an Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Testing after a Change in Regulatory Status
Peaper, David R. , Rhoads, Daniel D. , Sullivan, Kaede V. , Couturier, Marc Roger , Humphries, Romney M. , Nolte, Frederick S. , Rowlinson, Marie‐Claire , She, Rosemary C. , Simner, Patricia J. , Theel, Elitza S. , Wojewoda, Christina , Nolte, Frederick S , Simner, Patricia J , Theel, Elitza S , Wojewoda, Christina M , Humphries, Romney , Rhoads, Daniel D , Martin, Isabella W.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | July 14, 2021 | Volume: 59 | Issue: 10 | Pages: No page available

10.1128/jcm.01167-21 | PMID 34260276 Get It

The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) regulates the marketing of manufacturers’ in vitro diagnostic tests (IVDs), including assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.
Cancer Misinformation and Harmful Information on Facebook and Other Social Media: A Brief Report
Johnson, Skyler B. , Parsons, Matthew, Dorff, Tanya B. , Moran, Meena S. , Akerley, Wallace , Bauman, Jessica R. , Spratt, Daniel E. , Bylund, Carma L. , Swire‐Thompson, Briony , Scherer, Laura D. , Spratt, Daniel E , Parsons, Matthew, Ward, John Headley , Cohen, Stacey A. , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Onega, Tracy , Tward, Jonathan D. , Fagerlin, Angela

Mayo Clinic

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | July 14, 2021 | Volume: 114 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1036-1039

10.1093/jnci/djab141 | PMID 34291289 Get It

Abstract There are few data on the quality of cancer treatment information available on social media. Here, we quantify the accuracy of cancer treatment information on social media and its potential for harm. Two cancer experts reviewed 50 of the most popular social media articles on each of the 4 most common cancers. The proportion of misinformation and potential for harm were reported for all 200 articles and their association with the number of social media engagements using a 2-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Of 200 total articles, 32.5% (n = 65) contained misinformation and 30.5% (n = 61) contained harmful information. Among articles containing misinformation, 76.9% (50 of 65) contained harmful information. The median number of engagements for articles with misinformation was greater than factual articles (median [interquartile range] = 2300 [1200-4700] vs 1600 [819-4700], P = .05). The median number of engagements for articles with harmful information was statistically significantly greater than safe articles (median [interquartile range] = 2300 [1400-4700] vs 1500 [810-4700], P = .007).
Characteristics of Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer
Collaborative, REACCT, Zaborowski, Alexandra , Abdile, Ahmed, Adamina, Michel , Aigner, Felix , d’Allens, Laura, Allmer, Caterina, Álvarez, Andrea, Anula, Rocío, Atallah, S. , Bach, Simon P. , Barussaud, Marie, Baušys, Augustinas , Bebington, Brendan , Beggs, Andrew D. , Bellolio, Felipe, Bennett, Melissa-Rose , Berdinskikh, Anton, Bevan, Vicki, Bislenghi, Gabriele , Bludau, Marc , Boutall, Adam , Brouwer, Nelleke P.M. , Bruns, Christiane J. , Burger, Jacobus W. A. , Бурлов, Никита , Campanelli, Michela , Capdepont, Maylis, Carvello, Michele , Chew, Hwee-Hoon, Christoforidis, Dimitri, Clark, David A. , Climent, Marta, Cologne, Kyle G. , Contreras, Tomás, Croner, Roland S. , Daniels, I. R. , Delrio, Paolo , Deutsch, Michael , D’Hoore, André , Drozdov, E. S. , Duek, Daniel, Dunlop, Malcolm G. , Edmundson, Aleksandra , Efetov, Sergey , El‐Hussuna, Alaa , Elliot, Brodie, Espín, Eloy , Faes, Seraina , Faiz, Omar , Frasson, Matteo , Figueiredo, Nuno , Forgan, Tim , Frizelle, Frank , Gadaev, Shamil, Gellona, José, Glyn, Tamara , Gong, Jianping, Barisic, Goran, Greenwood, Emma, Guren, Marianne G. , Guillon, Stephanie, Gutlic, Ida , Hanly, Ann, Hasegawa, Hirotoshi , Iversen, Lene Hjerrild , Hill, James , Hoch, Jiří, Hoffmeister, Michael , Hompes, Roel , Hurtado‐Pardo, Luis , Iaquinandi, Fabiano , Imbrasaitė, Ugnė , Jafari, Mehrenah Dorna, Kanemitsu, Yukihide , Karimuddin, Ahmer , Keller, Deborah S. , Kelly, Justin, Kennelly, Rory , Khrykov, Gleb , Kocián, Petr , Koh, Cherry , Kok, N. F. M., Knight, Katrina , Knol, Joep, Kontovounisios, Christos , Kørner, Hartwig , Kronberger, Irmgard, Kroon, Hidde M. , Kural, Said , Lakkis, Zaher , Lankov, Timur , Larson, Dave, Lázár, György , Lee, Kai-Yin , Lepistö, Anna , Loi, Lynette , Lynch, Craig, Maillou‐Martinaud, Helene, Maroli, Annalisa , Martling, Anna , Matzel, Klaus E. , Mayol, Julio , McDermott, Frank , Meurette, G. , Mitteregger, Martin , Моисеенко, А С, Monson, John R.T. , Moritani, Konosuke , Munini, Martino , Nahas, Caio Sérgio Rizkallah , Negoi, Ionuţ , Novikova, A , Ocares, Misael, Olkina, Alexandra, Oñate‐Ocaña, Luis F. , Otero, Jaime, Özen, Cihan , Pace, Ugo , Julião, Guilherme Pagin São , Panaiotti, Lidiia , Panís, Yves , Papamichael, Demetris , Uriburu, Juan C Patrón , Pera, Miguél , Perez, Rodrigo Oliva , Pfeffer, F. , Phang, P. Terry , Poškus, Tomas , Pringle, Heather , Proud, David , Raguz, Ivana , Rama, N. , Rasheed, Shahnawaz, Raval, Manoj J. , Reißfelder, Christoph , Meneses, Juan Carlos Reyes , Ris, Frédéric , Riss, Stefan , Rodríguez‐Zentner, Homero , Saklani, Avanish , Salido, Andrea Jiménez, Sammour, Tarik , Saraste, Deborah , Schneider, Martin , Seishima, Ryo , Sekulic, Aleksander , Seppälä, Toni T. , Sheahan, Kieran , Shine, Rebecca , Shlomina, Alexandra , Sica, Guiseppe S., Singnomklao, T, Siragusa, Leandro , Spinelli, Antonino , Staiger, Roxane D. , Stamos, Michael J. , Sunderland, Michael, Tan, Ker‐Kan , Tanis, Pieter J. , Tekkis, Paris, Teklay, Biniam, Tengku, Sabrina , Jiménez‐Toscano, Marta , Turina, Matthias , Ulrich, Alexis , Vailati, Bruna Borba , Harten, Meike van, Warrier, Satish K. , Wexner, Steve, Wilt, Hans De, Xynos, Evangelos , You, Nancy, Zakharenko, Alexander, Zeballos, Justino, Winter, D. C. , Wexner, Steven D. , Hoffmeister, Michael , Seppälä, Toni T , Spinelli, Antonino , Wexner, Steven D , Ris, Frederic , Collaborative, REACCT, Andric, Mihailo , Bala, Miklosh , Biondo, Sebastiano , Brown, Carl James , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Buchwald, Pamela , Dapri, Giovanni , Davies, Justin , Denost, Quentin , Dias, André Roncon , Dziki, Adam Janusz , Emile, Sameh Hany , Evans, Martyn D. , Fleming, Fergal J. , Foppa, Caterina , Fowler, G , Gong, Jianping, Greenwood, Emma, Hahnloser, Dieter , Hampel, Heather , Hill, Andrew Graham , Islam, Rumana, Jafari, Mehrenah D, Карачун, А. М. , Krivokapić, Zoran , Kryžauskas, Marius , Kusters, Miranda , Lee, Suk-Hwan , Lefèvre, Jérémie H. , Lieu, Christopher H. , Martin, Sean, Millán, Mónica , Morărașu, Ștefan , Möslein, Gabriela , Nahas, Sérgio Carlos , Okabayashi, Koji , Олькина, Александра Юрьевна , Park, Jason , Patel, Swati , Petrov, Alexei, Rega, Daniela , Roxburgh, Campbell S.D. , Smart, Neil James , Solis, Alejandro, Steele, Scott R. , Владимирович, Царьков Петр , Verhoef, Cornelis , Weinberg, Benjamin A. , Wells, Cameron I. , Wolthuis, Albert M.

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Surgery | June 30, 2021 | Volume: 156 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 865

10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2380 | PMID 34190968 Get It

Evaluation of predictive model performance of an existing model in the presence of missing data
Li, Pin , Taylor, Jeremy M. G. , Spratt, Daniel E. , Karnes, R. Jeffery, Schipper, Matthew J. , Spratt, Daniel E , Karnes, R. Jeffrey

Mayo Clinic

Statistics in Medicine | April 12, 2021 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 3477-3498

10.1002/sim.8978 | PMID 33843085 Get It

In medical research, the Brier score (BS) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) are two common metrics used to evaluate prediction models of a binary outcome, such as using biomarkers to predict the risk of developing a disease in the future. The assessment of an existing prediction models using data with missing covariate values is challenging. In this article, we propose inverse probability weighted (IPW) and augmented inverse probability weighted (AIPW) estimates of AUC and BS to handle the missing data. An alternative approach uses multiple imputation (MI), which requires a model for the distribution of the missing variable. We evaluated the performance of IPW and AIPW in comparison with MI in simulation studies under missing completely at random, missing at random, and missing not at random scenarios. When there are missing observations in the data, MI and IPW can be used to obtain unbiased estimates of BS and AUC if the imputation model for the missing variable or the model for the missingness is correctly specified. MI is more efficient than IPW. Our simulation results suggest that AIPW can be more efficient than IPW, and also achieves double robustness from miss‐specification of either the missingness model or the imputation model. The outcome variable should be included in the model for the missing variable under all scenarios, while it only needs to be included in missingness model if the missingness depends on the outcome. We illustrate these methods using an example from prostate cancer.
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021
Schaeffer, Edward M. , Srinivas, Sandy, Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Armstrong, Andrew J. , Bekelman, Justin E. , Cheng, Heather H. , D’Amico, Anthony V. , Desai, Neil , Dorff, Tanya B. , Eastham, James A., Farrington, Thomas A., Gao, Xin , Horwitz, Eric M. , Kuettel, Michael, McKay, Rana R. , McKenney, Jesse K. , Netto, George J. , Pow‐Sang, Julio M. , Reiter, Robert E. , Richey, Sylvia, Roach, Mack , Rosenfeld, Stan, Shabsigh, Ahmad , Spratt, Daniel E. , Teply, Benjamin A. , Shead, Dorothy A. , Freedman-Cass, Deborah A., Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Davis, Brian J. , Spratt, Daniel E , Cheng, Heather H , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Teply, Benjamin A , Armstrong, Andrew J , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Ippolito, Joseph E. , Lang, Joshua M. , Penson, David F. , Tward, Jonathan D.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | February 9, 2021 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 134-143

10.6004/jnccn.2021.0008 | PMID 33545689 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer address staging and risk assessment after a prostate cancer diagnosis and include management options for localized, regional, and metastatic disease. Recommendations for disease monitoring and treatment of recurrent disease are also included. The NCCN Prostate Cancer Panel meets annually to reevaluate and update their recommendations based on new clinical data and input from within NCCN Member Institutions and from external entities. This article summarizes the panel’s discussions for the 2021 update of the guidelines with regard to systemic therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Interlaboratory Agreement of Anti–Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Serologic Assays in the Expedited College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Program
Tacker, Danyel H. , Bashleben, Christine , Long, Thomas C., Theel, Elitza S. , Knight, Vijaya , Kadkhoda, Kamran , Rhoads, Daniel D. , Fink, Susan L. , Rhoads, Daniel D , Linden, Michael A.

Mayo Clinic

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | January 18, 2021 | Volume: 145 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 536-542

10.5858/arpa.2020-0811-sa | PMID 33461214 Get It

Context.— Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a recently emerged, currently pandemic virus, and the etiologic agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Clinical testing for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 has rapidly become widespread, but data regarding the interlaboratory performance of these serologic assays are limited. Objective.— To describe the development and initial results of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) SARS-CoV-2 Serology Survey. Design.— Members from the CAP Microbiology and Diagnostic Immunology and Flow Cytometry Committees formed a working group to support development of a new proficiency testing survey for anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays. Supplemental questions in the survey assessed the state of SARS-CoV-2 serologic testing among participating laboratories as of July 2020. Results were analyzed for agreement by immunoglobulin (Ig) isotype tested, assay manufacturer, and methodology. Results.— A total of 4125 qualitative results were received from 1110 laboratories participating in the first survey. Qualitative agreement for assays measuring anti–SARS-CoV-2 total antibodies or IgG was greater than 90% for all 3 samples in the survey. Qualitative agreement for IgM and IgA for the negative sample was greater than 95%, but lacked consensus for the other 2 samples. Conclusions.— These initial data suggest overall excellent agreement and comparable performance for most qualitative anti–SARS-CoV-2 IgG and total antibody assays across all participating clinical laboratories, regardless of specific target antigen or assay methodology.
Prostate Radiotherapy With Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Improves Metastasis-Free Survival Compared to Neoadjuvant ADT: An Individual Patient Meta-Analysis
Spratt, Daniel E. , Malone, Shawn , Roy, Soumyajit , Grimes, Scott, Eapen, Libni , Morgan, Scott C. , Malone, Julia, Craig, Julia , Dess, Robert T. , Kishan, Amar U. , Mehra, Rohit , Kaffenberger, Samuel D. , Reichert, Zachery R. , Alumkal, Joshi J. , Michalski, Jeff M. , Lee, W. Robert , Pisansky, Thomas M. , Feng, Felix Y. , Shipley, William U. , Schipper, Mathew J., Roach, Mack , Sun, Yilun , Lawton, C.A., Spratt, Daniel E , Dess, Robert T , Jackson, Will , Hartman, Holly , Morgan, Todd M. , Sandler, Howard M.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | December 4, 2020 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 136-144

10.1200/jco.20.02438 | PMID 33275486 Get It

PURPOSEThere remains a lack of clarity regarding the influence of sequencing of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy (RT) on outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa). Herein, we evaluate the optimal sequencing of ADT with prostate-directed RT in localized PCa.METHODSMEDLINE (1966-2018), Embase (1982-2018), ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference proceedings (1990-2018) were searched to identify randomized trials evaluating the sequencing, but not duration, of ADT with RT. Two randomized phase III trials were identified, and individual patient data were obtained: Ottawa 0101 and NRG Oncology's Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. Ottawa 0101 randomly assigned patients to neoadjuvant or concurrent versus concurrent or adjuvant short-term ADT. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413, a 2 × 2 factorial trial, included a random assignment of neoadjuvant or concurrent versus adjuvant short-term ADT. The neoadjuvant or concurrent ADT arms of both trials were combined into the neoadjuvant group, and the arms receiving adjuvant ADT were combined into the adjuvant group. The primary end point of this meta-analysis was progression-free survival (PFS).RESULTSThe median follow-up was 14.9 years. Overall, 1,065 patients were included (531 neoadjuvant and 534 adjuvant). PFS was significantly improved in the adjuvant group (15-year PFS, 29% v 36%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.25 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.47], P = .01). Biochemical failure (subdistribution HR [sHR], 1.37 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.68], P = .002), distant metastasis (sHR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.95], P = .04), and metastasis-free survival (HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.37], P = .050) were all significantly improved in the adjuvant group. There were no differences in late grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal (2% v 3%, P = .33) or genitourinary toxicity (5% v 5%, P = .76) between groups.CONCLUSIONThe sequencing of ADT with prostate-directed RT has significant association with long-term PFS and MFS in localized PCa. Our findings favor use of an adjuvant over a neoadjuvant approach, without any increase in long-term toxicity.