Citations

Key Points Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 is a genetic disorder associated with hepatic oxalate overproduction, kidney failure, and systemic oxalosis. Lumasiran treatment for up to 60 months was associated with sustained reductions in urinary and plasma oxalate and encouraging clinical outcomes. Lumasiran's safety profile was acceptable with mild injection site reactions being the most common adverse events. Background Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is characterized by hepatic oxalate overproduction, kidney stones, and progressive kidney disease. Lumasiran is the first approved treatment for PH1. Methods ILLUMINATE-A (NCT03681184) was a 60-month pivotal, phase 3, multinational clinical trial of lumasiran which consisted of a 6-month double-blind, placebo-controlled period (6M DB), followed by a treatment extension period of up to 54 months in which all patients received lumasiran. Eligible patients were aged ≥6 years with genetically confirmed PH1, eGFR ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , and mean 24-hour urinary oxalate (UOx) excretion ≥0.70 mmol/24 h per 1.73 m 2 . Results Of 39 patients enrolled, 24 of 26 randomized to lumasiran in the 6M DB (lumasiran/lumasiran group) and 13 of 13 randomized to placebo in the 6M DB (placebo/lumasiran group) completed the study. Sustained reductions in 24-hour UOx were observed in both treatment groups. At month 60 relative to study baseline, the mean (SEM) 24-hour UOx percentage reductions were 54 (6) and 54% (8%) in the lumasiran/lumasiran and placebo/lumasiran groups, respectively, and the mean (SEM) plasma oxalate concentrations had decreased by 35 (5) and 38% (7%). eGFR remained stable through the end of the study in both treatment groups. Kidney stone event rates during the study were 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.62) and 0.54 (0.37 to 0.78) per patient-year in the lumasiran/lumasiran group and placebo/lumasiran group, respectively. Medullary nephrocalcinosis grade improved at the end of the study in 21 of 28 (75%) patients with nephrocalcinosis at baseline and an end of study assessment. The safety profile of lumasiran was acceptable. Injection site reactions were the most common adverse events during lumasiran treatment. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Conclusions Lumasiran treatment for up to 60 months in ILLUMINATE-A was associated with sustained reductions in UOx excretion and plasma oxalate concentration, encouraging clinical outcomes including stable eGFR in a population that would be expected to show eGFR decline, reduced kidney stone event rates, improved medullary nephrocalcinosis, and indications of improved health-related quality of life. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03681184. Podcast This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2026_03_18_CJASNMar.21.3.31820.mp3

Abstract Despite concerns about the toxicity of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in older patients, prospective data characterizing prevalence or risk stratification for geriatric morbidity such as disability or frailty are limited. We prospectively assessed the prognostic impact of the novel composite health assessment risk model (CHARM), a score established to predict 1-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM), among 1105 patients aged ≥60 years enrolled on the Bone Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Study 1704. Secondary end points were assessed post-alloHCT at day 100 (D100), D180, and D365 in multivariable models adjusted with predetermined clinical variables. Among alloHCT survivors, the prevalence of disability by instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), frailty by the Physical Frailty Phenotype, and physical function impairment by Patient Reported Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was highest at D100 and lower on D180 and D365. Higher CHARM scores were independently associated with greater disability (coefficient, −0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.85 to −0.43; P< .001), increased frailty (coefficient, 0.19; CI, 0.081-0.31; P< .001), worse PROMIS physical function, greater PROMIS depression, increased serious organ toxicity by D100, more cognitive decline at D100, and higher mortality after acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but not significantly associated with PROMIS anxiety or acute GVHD. Higher CHARM scores predicted worse disability-free survival (odds ratio [OR], 2.03; CI, 1.66-2.48; P< .001) and lower frailty-free survival (OR, 2.00; CI, 1.61-2.49). In summary, CHARM is an independent prognostic scoring system not only for NRM but also for geriatric morbidity and functional limitation–free survival through 1 year after alloHCT. Pre-alloHCT CHARM is a novel tool to aid shared decision-making for older patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03992352.

PURPOSE The likelihood of finding a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)–matched unrelated donor (MUD) for hematopoietic cell transplantation can be predicted using a donor search prognosis score. Patients without a MUD may use alternative donors (haploidentical related, mismatched unrelated, or umbilical cord blood). METHODS This multicenter biological assignment trial was conducted by the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN 1702). Eligibility criteria were broad to mirror clinical practice. The primary end point was 2-year survival from evaluability and compared between those Very Likely (>90%) and Very Unlikely (<10%) to find a MUD. All other patients, Less Likely to find a MUD, were enrolled in an observational arm. Transplant outcomes were compared for all three groups. RESULTS A total of 1,751 evaluable patients at 47 centers were Very Likely (54.7%), Less Likely (29.5%), and Very Unlikely (15.8%) to identify a MUD. Survival did not differ in univariate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.21]; P = .98) or multivariate (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.86 to 1.33]; P = .56) analyses between the Very Unlikely and Very Likely groups, measured through 2 years from the beginning of a search for a MUD or alternative donor. Of the transplanted patients (n = 1,179), MUD was used for 94% of the Very Likely, 38% of Less Likely, and 9% of Very Unlikely patients. Multivariate analyses showed no differences in relapse, treatment-related mortality, disease-free survival, and acute and chronic graft-versus-host diseases for the three search prognosis groups after transplantation. CONCLUSION Using a donor search prognosis strategy to prioritize an alternative donor for patients Very Unlikely to find a MUD resulted in survival and transplant outcomes that were not statistically different compared with those Very Likely to find a MUD.

OBJECTIVE: To identify distinct phenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developing after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), using routinely available clinical data at ICU admission. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study using latent class analysis. SETTING: ICUs across three Mayo Clinic campuses (Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona). PATIENTS: A total of 166 adult patients who developed ARDS within 120 days following HCT (96 allogeneic, 70 autologous). INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Model selection was based on multiple metrics including Bayesian information criteria, entropy, and Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio testing. A two-class model optimally described the cohort. Class 1 (n = 81) was characterized by worse hypoxemia (P/F ratio 157 vs. 210, p = 0.002), higher Pco 2 (41 vs. 36 mm Hg, p < 0.001), and higher bilirubin (1.4 vs. 0.9 mg/dL, p < 0.001) compared with class 2 (n = 85). Both classes included a mix of transplant types, transcending a simple autologous/allogeneic dichotomy, although class 1 had more allogeneic recipients (70.4% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.001). Although time-from-transplant was not a class-defining variable, class 1 occurred later after transplant (30.0 vs. 11.9 d, p < 0.001) with higher frequency of idiopathic pneumonia syndrome (14.8% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.004). Class 2 had more frequent neutropenia (leukocytes 0.4 vs. 5.9 × 109, p < 0.001) and higher frequency of peri-engraftment respiratory distress syndrome (29.4% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.005). Outcomes were significantly worse for class 1 (90-d mortality: 72.8% vs. 48.2%, p = 0.001). An exploratory parsimonious model had good classification accuracy (0.90) using just six variables: leukocyte count, platelet count, bilirubin, Pco 2, body mass index, and temperature. CONCLUSIONS: ARDS after HCT comprises two distinct phenotypes with distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes. These phenotypes align with recognized post-HCT lung injury syndromes and may reflect different underlying biological processes. This framework provides a foundation for investigating targeted therapeutic approaches.

Neurologic complications associated with regional anesthesia and pain medicine practice are extremely rare. The ASRA Practice Advisory on Neurologic Complications in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine addresses the etiology, differential diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of these complications. This Advisory does not focus on hemorrhagic and infectious complications, because they have been addressed by other recent ASRA Practice Advisories. The current Practice Advisory offers recommendations to aid in the understanding and potential limitation of neurologic complications that may arise during the practice of regional anesthesia and pain medicine.