Citations

Data on pre-implant hemodynamic optimization before continuous flow left ventricular assist device placement (CF-LVAD) with respect to patient-centered outcomes remain limited. Consecutive patients undergoing CF-LVAD implant between 2007 and 2017 were identified. Hemodynamic variables, trends, and laboratory studies were evaluated pre-LVAD implant in a logistic regression model to identify predictors of the primary composite endpoint: the need for right ventricular assist device therapy, the requirement for hemodialysis at 90 days, and 30-day mortality. Multivariate modeling identified three variables significantly associated with the primary endpoint: right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI), right atrial pressure (RAP), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN); all immediately pre-LVAD, p < 0.01. Optimal dichotomization points were 500 mmHg*ml*m−2, 12 mmHg, and 40 mg/dL. The three-component model identified an AUC of 0.77 (p < 0.0001) for the composite endpoint. Optimization of 2/3 parameters, 1/3, and 0/3 was associated with odds ratios of 3.5 (95% CI, 1.1−11.7), 7.2 (95% CI, 2.1−24.2), and 20.6 (95% CI, 5.3−80.6), respectively, relative to those patients who were fully optimized (3/3 parameters). The number of optimized parameters was also associated with 1-year overall survival (p = 0.02). Low RVSWI, high RAP, and high BUN were independently associated with adverse outcomes after the CF-LVAD implant, demonstrating a stepwise association with severe postimplant adverse events.

A 77 year old man previously implanted with a HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as destination therapy and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator presented with a left upper lobe squamous cell lung cancer. Oncology determined that proton beam therapy was indicated for treatment, and a multidisciplinary team of radiation physicists, radiation oncologists, and LVAD providers developed a protocol to proceed safely. He was successfully treated with combined proton beam radiation therapy and reduced dose chemotherapy. This case demonstrates feasibility and considerations of proton beam therapy for malignancy relevant to patients with implantable cardiac devices including LVADs.

Abstract Background Sarcoidosis is an infiltrative inflammatory condition affecting multiple organs, with cardiac involvement designated as cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). It has been proposed that inflammatory conditions like sarcoid increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), defined as pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) due to the hypercoagulable environment created by inflammation. Purpose Although previous studies have demonstrated an association with sarcoidosis and VTE, these studies failed to account for steroid use (crucial for sarcoid treatment) as an important confounder. Also, no major studies have been done previously assessing the risk of VTE in CS specifically. The objective of this investigation is to determine the association between CS, steroid treatment for CS, and VTE. Methods Patients referred to our institution with concern for sarcoid/CS were retrospectively assessed. Specific variables of interest including general baseline characteristics and those specific to CS were analyzed for their association with VTE development. Results Using Heart Rhythm Society guidelines, 649 patients were split into three categories: 235 with no sarcoid (NS), 91 with extra-cardiac sarcoid (ECS) only, and 323 with CS. In univariate analysis, 39 (12%) CS patients developed a PE vs 9 (4%) NS patients (OR 3.44, p=0.0003) and 44 (14%) CS patients developed DVT vs 18 (8%) NS patients (OR 1.90, p=0.02). In multivariate regression analysis however, neither CS nor ECS was an independent risk factor for VTE (p&gt;0.05) but steroid use was a strong predictor of VTE (HR 3.12, p=0.007 for PE, HR 6.17, p&lt;0.0001 for DVT). Also, steroid dose was found to be an independent predictor for both PE (p=0.001) and DVT (p=0.007) in a Cox proportionate hazards model (significance appeared at &gt;17.5 mg daily on a receiver operating characteristic curve). Conclusion Contrary to previous studies, the current study found that neither sarcoidosis nor CS is an independent risk factor for VTE. Rather, steroid therapy for CS treatment leads to an increased prevalence of VTE, specifically at a dose above 17.5 mg daily. More research is required to clarify this relationship and assess the importance of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy and potentially VTE prophylaxis in CS management. Steroid use and time to PE/DVT Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

To our knowledge, natural history has not been reported for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) diagnosed by pathologic evaluation of the apical core at left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation or cardiac transplantation. We retrospectively identified 232 consecutive patients meeting CS criteria. Of these patients, 54 were diagnosed by pathologic confirmation of CS, 10 after evaluation of the apical core (LVAD implant) or explanted heart (transplant). We compared clinical characteristics at initial evaluation and outcomes for these 10 patients with those of 10 patients with known CS before LVAD implant/transplant. In the study group, five patients (50%) had confirmed extracardiac sarcoidosis before LVAD implant/transplant; five had not been diagnosed with sarcoidosis. Mean (standard deviation) left ventricular ejection fraction at initial evaluation was 23% (16%), and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension was 61 (10) mm. Four patients died during follow-up; however, no survival difference was found for the 10 patients diagnosed incidentally and the group with a previous diagnosis or institutional LVAD/transplant cohorts. Patients diagnosed with CS on pathological examination of the apical core/explanted heart may have severe dilated cardiomyopathy as the initial presentation. Outcomes for patients with CS after advanced heart failure therapies may be comparable with those of non-CS patients.

In patients with advanced heart failure (HF), temporary mechanical circulator support (TMCS) is used to improve hemodynamics, via left ventricular unloading, and end-organ function as a bridge to definitive therapy. While listed for cardiac transplantation, use of TMCS may be prolonged, preventing adequate mobility. Here, we describe the technique for placement of a percutaneous axillary intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) using single-site arterial access to facilitate ambulation and subsequent safe removal without surgery or a closure device. Retrospective review of the experience with this approach at a single institution between September 2017 and February 2020 documented feasibility and safety. Baseline demographics, hemodynamic data, and clinical outcomes were collected. Thirty-eight patients had a total of 56 IABPs placed. There were no significant access site or cerebrovascular complications. One fifth of IABPs (21.4%) had balloon failure or migration, requiring placement of a new device, though no patients had significant complications from balloon failure. The majority (81.6%) of patients in the cohort on axillary IABP support were ambulatory and ultimately received the intended therapy (63.2% transplant, 13.2% durable left ventricular assist device, 5.3% other cardiac surgery). Percutaneous, axillary IABP is feasible and associated with an acceptable complication rate as a bridge to definitive therapy.

AbstractA combined right and left‐sided heart catheterization (RHC/LHC) protocol was recently reported to optimize patients supported by left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Using this platform, we sought to evaluate the prognostic significance of several hemodynamic indices, including left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and transaortic gradient (peak aortic pressure ‐ peak left ventricular pressure in systole, TAG). We evaluated all patients undergoing RHC/LHC at our institution from 2015 through 2018, and comprehensive clinical data were obtained. Primary end points were (1) a composite outcome that included hospitalization or death and (2) 1‐year overall survival after catheterization. Forty‐two patients were included in the analysis. Optimization resulted in normalization of hemodynamic parameters; all variables were significantly improved from baseline (P ≤ .05). On univariate modeling, final LVEDP was associated with the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR], 1.2 per 1‐mm Hg increase; 95% CI, 1.1‐1.3; P = .002). After adjusting for LVAD speed, TAG, and cardiac index in a multivariate model, the association between LVEDP and the composite end point remained significant (HR, 1.2 per 1‐mm Hg increase; 95% CI, 1.1‐1.4; P = .001). In the setting of LVAD support, inadequate LV unloading was a significant marker of poor outcomes with time, suggesting that LVEDP is a central prognostic marker in this population.

There is a paucity of data describing the invasive assessment of afterload and influence on cardiac output in patients supported on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. From 2015 to 2018, patients on LVAD therapy were evaluated with simultaneous left/right heart catheterization ramp study for speed optimization. Hemodynamic parameters from 31 patients without significant aortic insufficiency were analyzed. Mean central aortic pressure (MAP) was elevated at 87 ± 13 mm Hg at baseline. No direct association between MAP and cardiac index (CI) was found (r = 0.11, p = 0.20). However, variable MAP provided vastly different patterns of cardiac output response to speed increments (positive correlation, p = 0.047 for MAP <80 mm Hg; negative trend, p = 0.25 for MAP > 100 mm Hg). Patients noted to be hypertensive (MAP > 90, n = 8) received nitrate therapy and experienced both improvement in biventricular filling pressures and a mean increase in CI from 2.4 to 2.9 L/min/m2 (+22%, p = 0.04) at a fixed revolutions per minute. High afterload is common in patients on LVAD therapy, is associated with poor response to ramp, and is ameliorated by nitrates. These findings serve as a foundation to evaluate the dynamic effects of high afterload and chronic vasodilator therapy in patients with durable LVADs.

Utilization of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is expanding, but dual VA-ECMO circuits to treat cardiogenic shock with refractory hypoxemia is unreported. We describe the case of combined cardiogenic and distributive shock due to necrotizing pulmonary blastomycosis. After initial central VA-ECMO cannulation, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with increasing shunt resulted in significant central hypoxemia due to progressive ventilation-perfusion mismatch. An additional circuit provided complete oxygenation of the high circulating volume. After 4 months on support, he underwent successful heart-lung-kidney transplantation. Dual ECMO circuits are technically feasible and may be advantageous in specific circumstances of high pulmonary shunting resulting in excessive hypoxemia unbalanced with appropriate oxygen delivery.