Citations

5546 Background: CHFR, an E3 ubiquitin ligase that regulates Aurora A and Pololike Kinase 1, plays a critical role in the cellular response to mitotic stress. In particular, cells containing CHFR arrest in G2 when microtubule dynamics are disrupted. Conversely, low CHFR expression is associated with hypersensitivity to mitotic spindle poisons in breast cancer cell lines. Despite the extensive use of taxanes in front line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), little is known about CHFR expression in this disease. We examined CHFR expression and its relationship with clinical characteristics and outcome in women with EOC. Methods: Pretreatment EOC samples from women enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Biospecimen Resource for Ovarian Cancer Research who underwent initial surgical debulking between 1999-2009 were stained in triplicate with anti-CHFR antibodies. Samples were scored in a blinded fashion for CHFR expression. Associations between CHFR staining and histology, grade, and stage were assessed using chi-squared tests; associations between CHFR and overall survival (OS) or time to disease recurrence (TTR) were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Samples from 354 women were stained; median age at diagnosis was 60.5 (range 21-93). At a median follow-up of 67 months, 221 women (62%) had died. Across all patients, moderate/strong CHFR staining was associated with poor OS (HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.07-1.81, p = 0.015). Moreover, moderate/strong CHFR expression was strongly associated with serous histology (p < 0.0001), high grade (p < 0.0001) and advanced stage (p = 0.0002). To assess whether the association between CHFR expression and OS was related to taxane sensitivity, a subgroup analysis was performed in the subset of patients (N=131) with high-grade serous EOC who received initial platinum/taxane chemotherapy. Moderate/strong CHFR expression failed to correlate with OS (HR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.57-1.45, p = 0.68) or TTR from the start of chemotherapy (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.55-1.31, p = 0.55) in this subset. Conclusions: CHFR expression is associated with poor OS and adverse clinical characteristics in patients with EOC but does not appear to be related to taxane sensitivity in high-grade serous tumors.

Abstract Purpose: Clear cell ovarian carcinoma (CCOC) is an aggressive disease that often demonstrates resistance to standard chemotherapies. Approximately 25% of patients with CCOC show a strong APOBEC mutation signature. Here, we determine which APOBEC3 enzymes are expressed in CCOC, establish clinical correlates, and identify a new biomarker for detection and intervention. Experimental Designs: APOBEC3 expression was analyzed by IHC and qRT-PCR in a pilot set of CCOC specimens (n = 9 tumors). The IHC analysis of APOBEC3B was extended to a larger cohort to identify clinical correlates (n = 48). Dose-response experiments with platinum-based drugs in CCOC cell lines and carboplatin treatment of patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) were done to address mechanistic linkages. Results: One DNA deaminase, APOBEC3B, is overexpressed in a formidable subset of CCOC tumors and is low or absent in normal ovarian and fallopian tube epithelial tissues. High APOBEC3B expression associates with improved progression-free survival (P = 0.026) and moderately with overall survival (P = 0.057). Cell-based studies link APOBEC3B activity and subsequent uracil processing to sensitivity to cisplatin and carboplatin. PDX studies extend this mechanistic relationship to CCOC tissues. Conclusions: These studies demonstrate that APOBEC3B is overexpressed in a subset of CCOC and, contrary to initial expectations, associated with improved (not worse) clinical outcomes. A likely molecular explanation is that APOBEC3B-induced DNA damage sensitizes cells to additional genotoxic stress by cisplatin. Thus, APOBEC3B is a molecular determinant and a candidate predictive biomarker of the therapeutic response to platinum-based chemotherapy. These findings may have broader translational relevance, as APOBEC3B is overexpressed in many different cancer types.

Abstract Background Although 20 pancreatic cancer susceptibility loci have been identified through genome-wide association studies in individuals of European ancestry, much of its heritability remains unexplained and the genes responsible largely unknown. Methods To discover novel pancreatic cancer risk loci and possible causal genes, we performed a pancreatic cancer transcriptome-wide association study in Europeans using three approaches: FUSION, MetaXcan, and Summary-MulTiXcan. We integrated genome-wide association studies summary statistics from 9040 pancreatic cancer cases and 12 496 controls, with gene expression prediction models built using transcriptome data from histologically normal pancreatic tissue samples (NCI Laboratory of Translational Genomics [n = 95] and Genotype-Tissue Expression v7 [n = 174] datasets) and data from 48 different tissues (Genotype-Tissue Expression v7, n = 74–421 samples). Results We identified 25 genes whose genetically predicted expression was statistically significantly associated with pancreatic cancer risk (false discovery rate &lt; .05), including 14 candidate genes at 11 novel loci (1p36.12: CELA3B; 9q31.1: SMC2, SMC2-AS1; 10q23.31: RP11-80H5.9; 12q13.13: SMUG1; 14q32.33: BTBD6; 15q23: HEXA; 15q26.1: RCCD1; 17q12: PNMT, CDK12, PGAP3; 17q22: SUPT4H1; 18q11.22: RP11-888D10.3; and 19p13.11: PGPEP1) and 11 at six known risk loci (5p15.33: TERT, CLPTM1L, ZDHHC11B; 7p14.1: INHBA; 9q34.2: ABO; 13q12.2: PDX1; 13q22.1: KLF5; and 16q23.1: WDR59, CFDP1, BCAR1, TMEM170A). The association for 12 of these genes (CELA3B, SMC2, and PNMT at novel risk loci and TERT, CLPTM1L, INHBA, ABO, PDX1, KLF5, WDR59, CFDP1, and BCAR1 at known loci) remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. Conclusions By integrating gene expression and genotype data, we identified novel pancreatic cancer risk loci and candidate functional genes that warrant further investigation.

Background Poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors exhibit promising activity against ovarian cancers, but their efficacy can be limited by acquired drug resistance. This study explores the role of autophagy in regulating the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to PARP inhibitors. Methods Induction of autophagy was detected by punctate LC3 fluorescence staining, LC3I to LC3II conversion on Western blot analysis, and electron microscopy. Enhanced growth inhibition and apoptosis were observed when PARP inhibitors were used with hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine (CQ), or LYS05 to block the hydrolysis of proteins and lipids in autophagosomes or with small interfering RNA against ATG5 or ATG7 to prevent the formation of autophagosomes. The preclinical efficacy of the combination of CQ and olaparib was evaluated with a patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) and the OVCAR8 human ovarian cancer cell line. Results Four PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib) induced autophagy in a panel of ovarian cancer cells. Inhibition of autophagy with CQ enhanced the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to PARP inhibitors. In vivo, olaparib and CQ produced additive growth inhibition in OVCAR8 xenografts and a PDX. Olaparib inhibited PARP activity, and this led to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and an accumulation of γ‐H2AX. Inhibition of autophagy also increased ROS and γ‐H2AX and enhanced the effect of olaparib on both entities. Treatment with olaparib increased phosphorylation of ATM and PTEN while decreasing the phosphorylation of AKT and mTOR and inducing autophagy. Conclusions PARP inhibitor–induced autophagy provides an adaptive mechanism of resistance to PARP inhibitors in cancer cells with wild‐type BRCA, and a combination of PARP inhibitors with CQ or other autophagy inhibitors could improve outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer.

Abstract BRCA1 plays a key role in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. Accordingly, changes that downregulate BRCA1, including BRCA1 mutations and reduced BRCA1 transcription, due to promoter hypermethylation or loss of the BRCA1 transcriptional regulator CDK12, disrupt HR in multiple cancers. In addition, BRCA1 has also been implicated in the regulation of metabolism. Here, we show that reducing BRCA1 expression, either by CDK12 or BRCA1 depletion, led to metabolic reprogramming of ovarian cancer cells, causing decreased mitochondrial respiration and reduced ATP levels. BRCA1 depletion drove this reprogramming by upregulating nicotinamide N-methyltransferase (NNMT). Notably, the metabolic alterations caused by BRCA1 depletion and NNMT upregulation sensitized ovarian cancer cells to agents that inhibit mitochondrial metabolism (VLX600 and tigecycline) and to agents that inhibit glucose import (WZB117). These observations suggest that inhibition of energy metabolism may be a potential strategy to selectively target BRCA1-deficient high-grade serous ovarian cancer, which is characterized by frequent BRCA1 loss and NNMT overexpression. Significance: Loss of BRCA1 reprograms metabolism, creating a therapeutically targetable vulnerability in ovarian cancer.

e17039 Background: Treatment strategies are needed for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is associated with poor prognosis in ovarian cancer. GR signaling inhibits chemotherapy-induced cell death via transcriptional regulation of anti-apoptotic proteins. Non-selective (mifepristone) and selective GR antagonists (Relacorilant, Corcept Therapeutics) are under clinical development (eg. NCT02046421, NCT03776812). We hypothesized that GR antagonism would improve chemotherapy sensitivity in ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Methods: Five PDX models were selected based on GR expression above median RNA seq levels. Tissues were transplanted into 300 female SCID-Bg mice at the Mayo Clinic. Once tumor diameter reached 0.2 cm, mice were randomized into treatment arms (2-25 mice per arm) and treated intraperitoneal (i.p): control (9% saline, CTL) on day 0 (D0), 1, 7, 8, 14, 15, 21, 22; mifepristone (MIF), 15 mg/kg D0, 1, 7, 8, 14, 15, 21, 22; relacorilant (134), 20 mg/kg D0, 1, 7, 8, 14, 15, 21, 22; carboplatin (CBDCA) at the MTD, 51 mg/kg D1, 8, 15, 22; CBDCA + MIF; CBDCA + 134. Tumor area was measured by ultrasound weekly (D0-D28), and the ratio calculated relative to D0. Tumor growth curves were compared between arms for each PDX via a linear mixed effects regression test of coincident curves. Time to progression was also evaluated and will be presented. Results: In 1/5 models (PH160), CBDCA + MIF significantly suppressed tumor growth compared to CBDCA alone (p < 0.05, Table 1). Addition of 134 to CBDCA did not suppress tumor growth compared to CBDCA alone in any model. In the 2 models with no difference of CBDCA versus CTL (PH160, PH454), addition of a GR antagonist to CBDCA suppressed tumor growth versus CTL. Conclusions: Addition of GR antagonists can improve response to chemotherapy. Work is ongoing to identify the GR transcriptional network, tumor, and host characteristics which predict responses to GR antagonists. [Table: see text]

e17038 Background: Carcinosarcomas (CS) are aggressive gynecologic malignancies defined by a biphasic tumor histology of carcinomatous and sarcomatous components. High expression of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is associated with aggressive tumor biology in triple-negative breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancers. GR activation results in transcriptional regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) genes. Therefore, we hypothesized that the sarcomatous component of Müllerian CS may be associated with relatively higher GR expression compared to the carcinomatous portion. Methods: Müllerian CSs from the University of Chicago tissue bank diagnosed from 5/19/2009 – 8/25/2014 were identified and pathology confirmed (RL). In addition, we evaluated GR expression in a mouse PDX CS model. Immunohistochemical expression of nuclear estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), androgen (AR), and GR was quantified using the H-score. Scores between the sarcomatous and carcinomatous components were compared using a paired t-test. Results: Mean GR H-score was relatively higher in the sarcomatous vs carcinomatous component, overall (144.44 vs 38.89, P = 0.0014). Mean H-score also differed between sarcomatous and carcinomatous components for ER (3.06 vs 63.06, P = 0.016), PR (1.67 vs 47.22, P = 0.004), and AR (0 vs 2.78, P = 0.056). The significantly higher sarcomatous GR expression was replicated in IHC evaluation of the mouse PDX model. Conclusions: GR expression is significantly higher in the sarcomatous than the carcinomatous component of Müllerian CS, while ER, PR, and AR expression is significantly lower. Recent data suggest that an EMT gene signature is more prominently expressed in the sarcomatous versus carcinomatous component. We hypothesize that GR expression and activity may mediate EMT gene expression and represent a therapeutic target for CS. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth-leading cause of cancer death in both men and women in the United States. The currently identified common susceptibility loci account for a small fraction of estimated heritability. We sought to estimate overall heritability of pancreatic cancer and partition the heritability by variant frequencies and functional annotations. Methods: Analysis using the genome-based restricted maximum likelihood method (GREML) was conducted on Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PanC4) genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from 3,568 pancreatic cancer cases and 3,363 controls of European Ancestry. Results: Applying linkage disequilibrium- and minor allele frequency-stratified GREML (GREML-LDMS) method to imputed GWAS data, we estimated the overall heritability of pancreatic cancer to be 21.2% (SE = 4.8%). Across the functional groups (intronic, intergenic, coding, and regulatory variants), intronic variants account for most of the estimated heritability (12.4%). Previously identified GWAS loci explained 4.1% of the total phenotypic variation of pancreatic cancer. Mutations in hereditary pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes are present in 4% to 10% of patients with pancreatic cancer, yet our GREML-LDMS results suggested these regions explain only 0.4% of total phenotypic variance for pancreatic cancer. Conclusions: Although higher than previous studies, our estimated 21.2% overall heritability may still be downwardly biased due to the inherent limitation that the contribution of rare variants in genes with a substantive overall impact on disease are not captured when applying these commonly used methods to imputed GWAS data. Impact: Our work demonstrated the importance of rare and common variants in pancreatic cancer risk.