Citations

Cardiac fibrosis, a hallmark of heart failure and various cardiomyopathies, represents a complex pathological process that has long challenged therapeutic intervention. High-throughput omics technologies have begun revolutionizing our understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving cardiac fibrosis and are providing unprecedented insights into its heterogeneity and progression. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of how techniques—encompassing genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics—are providing insight into our understanding of cardiac fibrosis. Genomic studies have identified novel genetic variants and regulatory networks associated with fibrosis susceptibility and progression, and single-cell transcriptomics has unveiled distinct cardiac fibroblast subpopulations with unique molecular signatures. Epigenomic profiling has revealed dynamic chromatin modifications controlling fibroblast activation states, and proteomic analyses have identified novel biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets. Metabolomic studies have uncovered important alterations in cardiac energetics and substrate utilization during fibrotic remodeling. The integration of these multi-omic data sets has led to the identification of previously unrecognized pathogenic mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets, including cell-type-specific interventions and metabolic modulators. We discuss how these advances are driving the development of precision medicine approaches for cardiac fibrosis while highlighting current challenges and future directions in translating multi-omic insights into effective therapeutic strategies. This review provides a systems-level perspective on cardiac fibrosis that may inform the development of more effective, personalized therapeutic approaches for heart failure and related cardiovascular diseases.

Abstract “Nonclassical” myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPNs) represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies characterized by a wide range of clinical manifestations. Unlike classical MPNs, there is no standardized management approach for these conditions, particularly concerning the indications for and management of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. To address this gap, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Practice Harmonization and Guidelines (PH&G) Committee and the Chronic Malignancies Working Party (CMWP) have collaborated to develop shared guidelines aimed at optimizing the selection and management of patients with these rare forms of neoplasms. A comprehensive review of the literature from the publication of the revised fourth edition of the (2016) World Health Organization classification onward was conducted. A multidisciplinary group of experts in the field convened to produce this document, which was developed through multiple rounds of draft circulation. Key recommendations include the early identification of potential transplant candidates, particularly in cases of chronic neutrophilic leukemia, chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL)/CEL, not otherwise specified (CEL-NOS), myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions with FGFR1, JAK2, ABL1, and FLT3 rearrangements, MDS/MPN with neutrophilia/atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, and MDS/MPN, NOS. For patients with MPN, NOS/MPN unclassifiable, standard recommendations for myelofibrosis should be applied. Similarly, in MDS/MPN with thrombocytosis, transplantation is recommended on the basis of established MDS guidelines. Given the current lack of robust evidence, this document will serve as a valuable resource to guide future research activities, providing a framework for addressing critical unanswered questions and advancing the field.

Importance High-quality evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment in herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) is necessary to guide care. Objective To determine whether suppressive valacyclovir compared with placebo delays the occurrence of new or worsening stromal keratitis (SK), endothelial keratitis (EK), iritis, or dendriform epithelial keratitis (DEK) during 12 months of treatment and if treatment benefit persisted at 18 months (secondary end point). Design, Setting, and Participants The Zoster Eye Disease Study (ZEDS) was a randomized clinical trial conducted in 95 sites from November 2017 to June 2024. Immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with a history of an HZO rash, documented active keratitis or iritis within 1 year, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or greater were eligible. After determined to be eligible, participants were randomized in 4 strata: age at onset (<60 years vs ≥60 years) and disease duration (<6 months vs ≥6 months). Interventions A total of 12 months of double-masked daily valacyclovir, 1000 mg, or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was time to first occurrence within 12 months of new or worsening SK, EK, iritis, or DEK. Results A total of 527 participants (median [IQR] age, 60 [50-68] years; 266 female [50.5%]; 266 in the valacyclovir group; 261 in the placebo group) were randomized in 4 strata; 481 completed 12 months, and 460 completed 18 months. Data were analyzed by intention to treat. At 12 months, primary end points occurred in 86 participants (33%) assigned to placebo and 74 (28%) assigned to valacyclovir, and at 18 months in 104 participants (40%) assigned to placebo and 86 (32%) assigned to valacyclovir. The hazard ratio (HR) of the primary end point at 12 months was 0.77 for participants taking valacyclovir vs placebo (HR, 0.77; adjusted 95% CI, 0.56-1.05; P = .09) and 0.73 at the secondary end point at 18 months (HR, 0.73; adjusted 95% CI, 0.55-0.97; P = .03). There was a reduction of multiple other secondary end points at 12 months (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.95; P = .02) and 18 months (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance Although the primary outcome did not show a benefit of suppressive valacyclovir treatment, secondary study outcomes showed treatment superiority at the 18-month end point and reduced number of multiple episodes of keratitis or iritis at both 12 and 18 months. These results support consideration of 1 year of suppressive valacyclovir treatment for HZO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196

Importance Evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment on postherpetic neuralgia is necessary to guide care. Objective To test the hypothesis that suppressive treatment with 1000 mg/d of oral valacyclovir for 12 months reduces the prevalence, severity, and duration of postherpetic neuralgia compared with placebo at 12 and 18 months in participants with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial including 527 immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with history of HZO rash, documented keratitis, or iritis within 1 year and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or greater. The study was conducted at 95 participating sites (in Canada, New Zealand, and the US) from November 2017 to June 2024 and participant visits occurred every 3 months. Intervention Treatment with 1000 mg/d of valacyclovir or placebo for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia, severity as determined by pain score (a score of ≥3 on a scale of 1-10), pain duration (≥3 months after HZO onset), and total daily dose of pain medication. Results Of the 527 participants (490 completed 12 months of treatment and 460 completed 18 months), 73 (14%) had postherpetic neuralgia and were analyzed by age at HZO onset (<60 years or ≥60 years) and disease duration (recent [<6 months] or chronic [≥6 months]). Of the 73 participants with postherpetic neuralgia (34 in the valacyclovir group and 39 in the placebo group), the mean age was 62.4 years (SD, 13.6 years), 59% were female, 5% were Black or African American, and 10% were Hispanic. The prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia at 12 months was not reduced by valacyclovir (12/32 [38%]) compared with placebo (14/35 [40%]) (between-group difference, 2.5% [95% CI, −20.8% to 25.8%]; P >.99). The participants who were younger than 60 years at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration had lower pain scores in the valacyclovir group (mean score, 0.3 [SD, 0.9]) vs the placebo group (mean score, 0.8 [SD, 1.9]) at 12 months ( P = .045) and at 18 months (mean score, 0.2 [SD, 0.9] vs 1.0 [SD, 2.3], respectively; P = .02). There was a decrease in pain duration in the valacyclovir group at 18 months (mean, 13.6 [SD, 11.4] months) vs the placebo group (mean, 18.7 [SD, 29.5] months) (linear mixed-effects model between-group difference, −3.39 months [95% CI, −6.73 to −0.04 months]; P = .046). The total daily dose of neuropathic pain medication was lower in the valacyclovir group (mean, 271.4 [SD, 593.8] mg/d) vs the placebo group (mean, 363.4 [SD, 592.2] mg/d) at 12 months (linear mixed-effects model P = .006) and at 18 months (mean, 209.0 [SD, 412.8] mg/d vs 286.2 [SD, 577.9] mg/d, respectively; linear mixed-effects model P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance One year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir was associated with a lower dosage of neuropathic pain medication. Participants in the valacyclovir group, who were younger at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration, had lower pain scores. These secondary outcomes support consideration of 1 year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir to reduce dosage of pain medications and pain due to HZO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196

ABSTRACTCavin‐4 was identified as a potential autoantigen for immune‐mediated rippling muscle disease (iRMD). To validate this, we developed and tested various immunoassays, including a cell‐based assay (CBA), cavin‐4 recombinant protein ELISA, and multi‐peptide ELISA. Among 19 iRMD patients, all exhibited muscle rippling, and 13 had percussion‐induced mounding. All immunoassays demonstrated clinical and analytical specificities greater than 95%. The protein ELISA had the highest sensitivity (94.7%) and specificity (99.9%), outperforming CBA (sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 99.6%) and the multi‐peptide ELISA (sensitivity 79.0%, specificity 97.2%). Our results suggest that the cavin‐4 protein ELISA is a promising tool for high‐throughput clinical testing in iRMD.

Background We undertook this study to evaluate the efficacy of an on-table extubation protocol and to assess the magnitude of benefits when implemented as a routine practice in a developing country. Methods This prospective observational study at a single tertiary care referral hospital was designed to determine the efficacy of an on-table extubation protocol when applied to children undergoing cardiac surgery in the developing world. The study included 226 patients who were 1 month to 18 years of age undergoing cardiac surgery (including grown-up congenital heart disease [GUCHD] patients). Patients with RACHS score ≥ 4, neonates, preoperatively ventilated children, and emergency surgeries were excluded from the study. All pediatric elective cardiac surgical patients belonging to RACHS 1, 2, and 3 categories were considered as potential candidates for on-table extubation. Trial registration: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2020/07/026567). Results Among the 226 children who underwent elective cardiac surgeries, we were able to extubate 142 patients (62.83%) in the operating room. This included 46.6% (54/116) infants, 80.8% (38/47) children less than 5 years of age, 79.3% (46/58) children between 5 years to 18 years age, and 80% (4/5) GUCHD. The duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, and hospital cost were significantly less in the on-table extubation group (23 [20, 26] hours; 102 [97, 125] hours; INR 2,09,011 [181032, 244298]) as compared with those patients extubated in the ICU within 6 hours (28 [22, 46] hours; 122 [100, 168] hours; INR 2,25,430 [162203, 273831]) and beyond 6 hours (71 [45, 121] hours; 184 [127, 243] hours; INR 2,53,541 [226838, 306871]). Conclusions This protocol shows a significant reduction in ICU stay, hospital stay, and total hospital cost when compared with either extubation within 6 h in the ICU or delayed extubation (beyond 6 h) in patients undergoing pediatric cardiac surgery.

Background: PV is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that leads to excessive production of erythrocytes and increased platelet and leukocyte counts. The current standard of care is to use therapeutic phlebotomy (TP) with or without cytoreductive therapy (CRT) to treat PV. Over time, the CRT dose often needs to be increased to treat PV progression. Preliminary results from the phase 2 REVIVE study (NCT04057040) demonstrated that rusfertide was superior to placebo in achieving hematocrit (Hct) levels <45% and reducing or eliminating the need for TP in patients who were phlebotomy-dependent prior to study entry (Kremyanskaya et al. EHA2023. [Abstract LB2710]; Kremyanskaya et al. New Engl J Med 2024;390:723-35).Final data from REVIVE will be presented. Methods: In Part 1 (Weeks 1-29), subcutaneous rusfertide (starting dose: 20 mg q1w) was initiated and titrated to control Hct to <45%. In Part 2 (Weeks 29-41; blinded randomized withdrawal phase), patients were randomized to receive rusfertide or placebo. Randomized patients were eligible to participate in the open-label extension (OLE) portion of the study (Part 3), in which all patients could receive rusfertide and investigators could make CRT dose adjustments. Results: In Part 1, 70 patients were enrolled; 59 were randomized in Part 2. Fifty-eight patients continued to Part 3. As of 9 July 2024, 50 (71.4%), 37 (52.9%), and 17 (24.3%) patients received rusfertide for ≥2, ≥2.5, or ≥3 years, respectively.Overall, median (range) patient age was 57.5 years (27-77); the majority were male (70%) and had high-risk disease (55.7%). Overall, 52.9% and 47.1% of patients were treated with TP alone or TP plus CRT, respectively. Prior to enrollment, the estimated average (mean) phlebotomy rate (EAPR) in patients who enrolled on study was 8.5/year, which was reduced to <1.0/year in Part 1. In Part 2, the EAPR was <1.0/year and 6.6/year in the rusfertide and placebo groups, respectively. For patients who continued onto Part 3 and received rusfertide, the EAPR remained at <1.0/year. In Parts 1, 2, and 3, the mean (SD) weekly average rusfertide dose was 30.7 mg (12.2), 38.5 mg (21.3), and 44.9 mg (20.3), respectively. Rusfertide consistently maintained Hct <45%, including in patients receiving therapy for ≥3 years. Platelets increased following initiation of rusfertide therapy and stabilized over time; mean leukocyte counts remained stable. Prior to enrollment, iron-related parameters were consistent with systemic iron deficiency. Throughout the study, rusfertide resulted in the normalization of mean serum ferritin levels, increased mean transferrin saturation, and increased mean serum iron levels. Overall, mean corpuscular volume increased slightly over the duration of the study. Throughout the study, there was no evidence of increased markers of inflammation (eg, C-reactive protein or interleukin 6). The most common (≥20%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were injection site reactions (85.7%), fatigue (38.6%), COVID-19 (32.9%), pruritus (34.3%), arthralgia (30.0%), dizziness (30.0%), nausea (24.3%), headache (24.3%), and anemia (21.4%). Grade 3 TEAEs occurred in 25.7% of patients.There were no Grade 4 or 5 TEAEs. One patient developed acute myeloid leukemia after treatment discontinuation. After more than 150 patient-years of rusfertide exposure, malignancies (most of which were skin cancers) were reported in 11 patients (all had risk factors that may have contributed to the development of these malignancies). There was no obvious correlation between increasing exposure to rusfertide and malignancies reported. Six thrombotic events (5 arterial and 1 venous) occurred in 5 patients with high-risk PV. Conclusions: In REVIVE, rusfertide added to TP with or without CRT provided long-term durable control of Hct and decreased the need for TP. Patients are eligible to roll over to the phase 2 THRIVE OLE study (NCT06033586), which will continue to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of rusfertide for a total period of up to 5.8 years. The randomized phase 3 VERIFY study (NCT05210790) is ongoing and will evaluate rusfertide vs placebo in PV patients.

Introduction: Somatic mutations in RAS pathway genes are present in ~30% of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and are usually associated with myeloproliferative features. Whether mutations in distinct RAS pathway genes share similar genomic context and have similar implications remains unknown. Such an understanding might inform future studies evaluating genotype-specific therapies (RAS-codon specific and pan-RAS inhibitors) or cooperative leukemogenic mechanisms. This multicenter study examines the landscape of RAS pathway mutations (RASMT) in CMML. Methods: Newly diagnosed CMML patients evaluated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (n=449, 54%) and Mayo Clinic (n=383, n=46%) were included after IRB approval. Clonal relationships were tested using Pearson goodness-of-fit. Clones with the highest variant allele frequency (VAF), or with VAF close to 40% were defined as dominant, and those present at VAF <20% in the presence of another dominant clone were defined as subclonal. RASMT genes included NRAS, KRAS, BRAF, CBL, CBLC, PTPN11 and NF1. Standard statistical measures were applied. Results: Among 832 CMML patients (median age 71 years, 68% male) 387 (47%) had myeloproliferative (MP) and 445 (53%) had myelodysplastic (MD) CMML. A total of 350 (42%) patients had RASMT with higher prevalence among MP-CMML compared to MD-CMML (55% vs 31%, p<0.001). Among patients with RASMT, 262 (32%), 59 (7%), 20 (2%), 6 (<1%) and 3 (<1%) had 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 distinct RASMT, respectively. Importantly, 17 patients harbored a RASmt as the only detectable somatic mutation, with KRASMT being the most frequent (n=10, 59%), including 3 (18%) patients with >1 RASMT. Among RASMT patients, a trend for higher hemoglobin (12.7 vs 10.8 g/dL, p=0.054) was observed in NF1MT CMML and lower WBC (14.4 vs 27.9 x109/L, p=0.067) values in CBLMT CMML. In total, 479 somatic mutations in RAS pathway genes were identified the most frequent involving NRAS (n=169, 35%) followed by CBL (n=120, 25%), KRAS (n=102, 21%), PTPN11 (n=38, 8%), NF1 (n=34, 7%), BRAF (n=11, 2%) and CBLC (n=5, 1%). Most frequently involved codons for each RAS pathway gene were as follows: G594 (n=3) for BRAF, R420 (n=22) and C404 (n=15) for CBL, G12 (n=41; G12D: 13, G12C: 3) and A146 (n=16) for KRAS, G12 (n=116; G12D: 74, G12C: 5) for NRAS and A72 (n=8) for PTPN11. CBLMT CMML had higher ASXL1 (58% vs 44%, p=0.011), BRAF (8% vs 4%, p=0.017), IDH2 (10% vs 4%, p=0.024), KIT (5% vs 1%, p=0.038), SRSF2 (54% vs 40%, p=0.004), TET2 (59% vs 47%, p=0.019) and ZRSR2 (10% vs 4%, p=0.014) co-mutation frequency. Of note, DNMT3A mutations were mutually exclusive of CBLMT CMML (0% vs 7%, p=0.007), and multihit TET2 was more common among TET2MT/CBLMT vs TET2MT/CBLWT CMML (82% vs 67%, p =0.039). CMML with NF1 mutations had higher BCORL1 (8% vs 0%, p=0.005), PTPN11 (15% vs 3%, p=0.014) and SETBP1 (23% vs 8%, p=0.022) mutational cooccurrences. NRASMT CMML was enriched for ASXL1 (53% vs 43%, p=0.042), ETNK1 (5% vs 1%, p=0.004), GATA2 (4% vs 1%, p=0.034) and STAG2 (4% vs 1 %, p=0.023) mutations but had lower JAK2 (1% vs 6%, p=0.036) and TP53 (1% vs 5%, p=0.022) mutational frequency. PTPN11 mutations were associated with higher NF1 (29% vs 7%, p=0.014), SETBP1 (27% vs 9%, p=0.01) and WT1 (6% vs <1%, p=0.014) mutational cooccurrences and lower SRSF2 (23% vs 42%, p=0.05) frequency. We evaluated RAS mutant clonal dominance in 253 (72%) RASMT patients. NRAS (63% vs 38%), KRAS (63% vs 38%) and CBL (65% vs 35%) mutations were more frequently observed as dominant clones while PTPN11 (44% vs 56%), BRAF (25% vs 75%) and NF1 (35% vs 65%) mutations were more frequently subclonal events, particularly of TET2, ASXL1 or SRSF2 mutant clones. Presence of a RAS pathway mutation was associated with shorter LFS (36 vs 53 months, HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.2, p=0.020), with presence of multiple RAS mutations shortening LFS further (53, 43, 27 months for 0, 1 and >1, p=0.017). PTPN11 mutations predicted for shorter OS (18 vs 39 months, HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.8, p=0.035) and LFS (14 vs 36 months, HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-2.9, p=0.008). Presence of >1 RAS pathway mutation was associated with shorter OS in ASXL1MT/TET2MT CMML compared to those with no RAS mutations (24 vs 53 months, HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.6-10.8, p=0.004). Conclusions: RAS mutations exhibit distinct genomic features and clonal hierarchy in CMML and cooperate with other somatic mutations to drive clinical outcomes. This study forms the foundation for assessment of novel RAS pathway inhibitors in CMML.