Citations

e22020 Background: The combination of nab-paclitaxel (NP) and bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with MM has shown promising clinical activity. AB160 is a 160 nm nano-immunoconjugate of NP nanoparticles non-covalently coated with BEV for targeted delivery into high VEGF expressing tissues. Preclinical data showed that AB160 improved tumor targeting/ tumor inhibition more than NP followed by BEV. Methods: A 3+3 phase I trial was conducted in patients (pts) with MM who had prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease to determine the maximum tolerated dose of AB160 administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Dose level 1 (DL1) was 125 mg/m2 NP /50 mg/m2 BEV. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) included grade (G) 4 neutropenia or anemia, PLT < 25,000, serum creatinine ≥ 2 times baseline, G2-4 neurologic toxicity or G3-4 non-hematologic toxicities. Tumor evaluations (RECIST) were conducted every 8 weeks. Treatment continued until progression or intolerability. Results: 21 pts (11 ♀) aged 36-78 years old were enrolled. One of the first 3 pts on DL1 developed a G2 colonic perforation; this was considered a DLT. One of the next 3 pts on DL1 had a DLT: G4 neutropenia. Of the 3 pts on DL-1 (100 mg/m2 NP/40 mg/m2 BEV), 2 had no DLTs and 1 died of sepsis after C1D1 dose. Enrollment was suspended until an amendment modifying the eligibility criteria was approved by the IRB. The trial reopened. One of the 4 pts on DL-1 and 1 of the 5 pts on DL1 had a DLT: G3 pain and G3 fatigue, respectively. Enrollment ended after 2 of the 3 pts on DL2 (150 mg/m2 NP/ 60 mg/m2 BEV) developed G4 neutropenia. Thus, MTD is DL1. A median of 3 cycles was administered. Treatment ended due to progression (9), intolerability (9), refusal (2) and death (1). There were no objective tumor responses. Common G3-4 toxicities were: neutropenia (33%) and thromboembolic events (19%). Conclusions: AB160 was found to have insufficient clinical benefit in patients with previously treated MM to justify further development. However, parallel phase I testing in gynecologic cancers suggests clinical benefit (abstract #300225). Clinical trial information: NCT02020707.

Management of PD-1 blockade resistance in metastatic melanoma (MM) remains challenging. Immunotherapy or chemotherapy alone provides limited benefit in this setting. Chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) has demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profiles in lung cancer. Our pre-clinical study showed that in MM patients who have failed PD-1 blockade, the addition of chemotherapy increases CX3CR1+ therapy-responsive CD8+ T-cells with enhanced anti-tumor activity, resulting in improved clinical response. Here, we examined the clinical outcomes of CIT in MM patients after PD-1 blockade failure and the treatment-related changes in CX3CR1+ therapy-responsive CD8+ T-cells. We reviewed MM patients seen between January 2012 and June 2018 who failed anti-PD-1-based therapy and received subsequent CIT, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or chemotherapy alone. Overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), and toxicities were assessed. Among 60 patients, 33 received CIT upon disease progression on PD-1 blockade. At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, the CIT group had a median OS of 3.5 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–NR] vs. 1.8 years (95% CI 0.9–2; P = 0.002) for those who received subsequent ICI (n = 9) or chemotherapy alone (n = 18), with ORR of 59% vs. 15% (P = 0.0003), respectively. The median EFS was 7.6 months (95% CI 6–10) following CIT vs. 3.4 months (95% CI 2.8–4.1; P = 0.0005) following ICI or chemotherapy alone. Therapy-responsive CX3CR1+CD8+ T-cells showed dynamic increase with successful CIT. CIT showed favorable clinical outcomes and acceptable safety profile in PD-1 blockade-resistant patients. CX3CR1+CD8+ therapy-responsive T-cells can be potentially used for monitoring disease response to CIT.

Abstract Context: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies against checkpoints namely CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1. These can cause pituitary dysfunction due to hypophysitis in addition to other endocrinopathies. While the prevalence and course of hypophysitis have been described extensively, the relationship between hypophysitis and cancer prognosis has only been investigated in melanoma patients on ipilimumab. Additionally, the impact of high dose glucocorticoids for hypophysitis treatment on survival has been unclear. Objective: In order to address these important questions, we aimed to characterize the frequency and course of hypophysitis from various ICIs, and to investigate a possible impact on overall survival in cancer patients.Design and Methods: We conducted a single center retrospective cohort study of adult cancer patients that received an ICI from 1/1/2012 - 12/31/2016, followed for a median of 14.8 months. A total of 896 patients were identified that received ipilimumab alone (n=120); ipilimumab and nivolumab (n=50); ipilimumab followed or preceded by pembrolizumab (n=70), pembrolizumab alone (n=406), and nivolumab alone (n=250). Results: Twenty-six patients (2.9%) developed hypophysitis after a median of 2.3 months (range 0.8 to 11.7). Their median age at initiation of ICI was 57.9 years (range 42.4 to 78.5), 54% were males, and the most common malignancy was melanoma (81%). All had hypopituitarism showing secondary adrenal insufficiency (100%), central hypothyroidism (38.5%) and central hypogonadism (28.5% in men, 25% in premenopausal women). Sixty-four percent demonstrated pituitary enlargement on imaging which resolved on follow-up. Mass effects occurred in 50% and were managed by initial high dose glucocorticoids. Thyroiditis occurred in 19.2% of those with hypophysitis. Occurrence of hypophysitis was associated with better overall survival (median 50.7 vs 16.5 months; p value 0.015) and reduced mortality (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.99; p value 0.036) after adjusting for age, sex and malignancy type. Conclusions: Hypophysitis, usually but not always accompanied by classic MRI features, occurrs within a few weeks in cancer patients most frequently after ipilimumab alone or in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor, rarely after pembrolizumab and never after nivolumab alone. ICI-induced hypophysitis presents as mass effects in half and as hypopituitarism in all patients involving the corticotrophs more commonly than thyrotrophs and gonadotrophs. The improved survival with a 48% lower mortality rate in patients with hypophysitis suggests its possible role as a marker for better efficacy of ICIs against malignancy.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) frequently cause thyroid dysfunction but their underlying mechanism remains unclear. We have previously demonstrated increased circulating natural killer (NK) cells and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR surface expression on inflammatory intermediate CD14 + CD16 + monocytes in programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor-treated patients. This study characterizes intrathyroidal and circulating immune cells and class II HLA in ICI-induced thyroiditis. Methods: This is a single-center prospective cohort study of 10 patients with ICI-induced thyroiditis by flow cytometry of thyroid fine needle aspirates ( n = 9) and peripheral blood ( n = 7) as compared with healthy thyroid samples ( n = 5) and healthy volunteer blood samples ( n = 44); HLA class II was tested in n = 9. Results: ICI-induced thyroiditis samples demonstrated overall increased T lymphocytes (61.3% vs. 20.1%, p = 0.00006), CD4 − CD8 − T lymphocytes (1.9% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.006), and, as a percent of T lymphocytes, increased CD8 + T lymphocytes (38.6% vs. 25.7%; p = 0.0259) as compared with healthy thyroid samples. PD-1 inhibitor-induced thyroiditis had increased CD4 + PD1 + T lymphocytes (40.4% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.021) and CD8 + PD1 + T lymphocytes (28.8% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.038) in the thyroid compared with the blood. Circulating NK cells, certain T lymphocytes (CD4 + CD8 + , CD4 − CD8 − T, gamma – delta), and intermediate monocytes were increased in ICI-induced thyroiditis. Six patients typed as HLA-DR4-DR53 and three as HLA-DR15. Conclusions: ICI-induced thyroiditis is a T lymphocyte-mediated process with intra-thyroidal predominance of CD8 + and CD4 − CD8 − T lymphocytes. The HLA haplotypes may be involved but need further evaluation. These findings expand the limited understanding of ICI-induced thyroiditis, which could be further translated to guide immunomodulatory therapies for advanced thyroid cancer.

9073 Background: An accumulating body of evidence suggests that the outcome of early-stage melanoma is influenced by endocrine and menopausal status. However, it remains controversial as to whether the superior female melanoma-specific survival (MSS) is restricted to early stage disease or if it also pertains to patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). Methods: We analyzed data from the 13 registries that participate in the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. We identified all cases of primary invasive melanoma diagnosed between 1992 and 2009; none of the patients had a prior history of another cancer. MSS was compared between males and females, stratified by stage of disease. Age groups were defined as 18-45y, 46-54y, 55-64y, 65+y as a proxy of female menopausal status. Results: The study population included 87,165primary invasive melanoma cases (unstaged n=2834). MSS was significantly poorer for males compared to females for localized (n=72,456) and regional (n=8,945) disease for all age groups (Hazard ratio (HR) ranging from 1.21 to 2.09, all p<0.001). MSS was not significantly different between males and females for patients with distant disease at diagnosis (n= 2930; HR 0.99, 0.92, 1.11, 1.07 for each age group) and remained non-significant after adjusting for Breslow thickness, histologic subtype, anatomic site, and age group (adjusted HR 1.04 males vs. females; 95% CI 0.95-1.14; p=0.41). Conclusions: While our results were consistent with earlier reports that women have higher MSS rates compared to men for early (stage I-III) melanoma, the intriguing finding of this study was that the female survival advantage does not vary with age or menopausal status as compared to men, which is contrary to previously published reports. Furthermore, we found that the difference in survival was no longer significant for patients with MM, suggesting that sex may influence local and regional, but not distant cancer progression.

9048 Background: Brain metastases continue to be the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with metastatic melanoma. The impact of BRAF mutations and effectiveness of BRAF inhibitors on the brain metastases in these patients is lacking. Methods: Preclinical studies were conducted to assessthe steady-state brain and plasma distribution of vemurafenib, a BRAF inhibitor in FVB wild-type and Mdr1a/b-/-Bcrp1-/- mice deficient in the drug efflux transporters, p-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistant protein (BCRP). A retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic melanoma treated at University of Minnesota from August 2011 to December 2012 was conducted. A similar analysis of cases treated at Mayo Clinic is underway. Results: The preclinical studies in mice show that both P-gp and BCRP play a significant role in limiting the brain distribution of vemurafenib. Retrospective analysis was performed on 57 patients with Stage IIIc /IV cutaneous and mucosal melanoma. Patients with BRAF mutation had a higher incidence rate of brain metastases compared to patients without BRAF mutation, although it was not statistically significant (Incidence ratio=1.56; 95% CI=0.70-3.48; P=0.27). Vemurafenib neither reduced the incidence of brain metastases (Incidence ratio = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.30-2.60; P=0.83) nor made significant difference in overall survival. It was observed that treatment with BRAF inhibitor led to improvement in extracranial disease but did not affect progression of intracranial disease. Conclusions: In concordance with preclinical data which indicates that P-gp and BCRP play a significant role in limiting the brain distribution of vemurafenib, the retrospective analysis shows that there is improvement in extracranial disease but progression in intracranial disease with treatment with BRAF inhibitor in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma with BRAF mutation. Development of BRAF inhibitors that are not substrates for P-gp and BCRP or concomitant use of P-gp and BCRP inhibitors with vemurafenib, may be needed in order to control or prevent intracranial disease in these patients. Further analysis to improve statistical power of our observation is underway.

8600 Background: The prognosis of stage IV melanoma patients remains poor. Published results have suggested that components of the complete blood count have significant prognostic value in several malignancies. Among the most studied were the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), and absolute monocyte count (AMC) on clinical outcomes of patients with lymphoid malignancies. Thus, we sought to investigate if the pre-operative ALC (ALC-PO), AMC (AMC-PO) and ALC/AMC ratio (ALC/AMC-PO) affects the risk of disease recurrence and survival after complete surgical resection of metastatic melanoma. Methods: We studied 66 stage IV, resected melanoma patients followed at Mayo Clinic from 2000 to 2010. Log rank chi-square analysis was used to determine the best cut-off values for each pre-operative variable, while proportional hazards models were used to compared survival. Results: The median follow-up of the cohort was 24 months (range: 2.3 – 117 months). ALC-PO, AMC-PO and ALC/AMC-PO, as continuous variables, were all identified as prognostic factors for both relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The best cut-off values for ALC-PO, AMC-PO and ALC/AMC-PO were 1.9; 0.62; and 2.05, respectively. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with an ALC-PO ≥ 1.9 x 109/L experienced superior OS and RFS compared with ALC-PO < 1.9 x 109/L patients [median OS of 58 months vs. 34 months, p < 0.04; median RFS of 14 months vs. 5 months, p < 0.009]. Conversely, a low AMC-PO (<0.62 x 109/L) was associated with better OS and RFS compared with higher AMC-PO (≥ 0.62 x 109/L): [median OS of 47 months vs. 14 months, p < 0.007; median RFS of 9 months vs. 5 months, p < 0.02]. When the ALC-PO and AMC-PO were combined as an ALC/AMC ratio, the group with an ALC/AMC-PO ≥ 2.05 experienced a superior OS and RFS compared to patients with ALC/AMC-PO < 2.05: [median OS of 49 months vs. 12 months, p < 0.0001; median RFS of 10 months vs. 4 months, p < 0.0001]. Multivariate analysis showed ALC/AMC-PO to be an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS (HR = 0.32, p < 0.003; HR = 0.23, p < 0.002). Conclusions: Our study showed, that ALC/AMC-PO ratio is an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS in patients undergoing resection of metastatic (stage IV) melanoma.

1557 Background: Peripheral neuropathy (PN), a common and intrusive side effect of chemotherapy in clinical trials, has been assessed via the clinician-rated common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) and/or patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (Morton, ASCO, 2005). We assessed the relative sensitivity of CTCAE and PRO measures for evaluating interventions for preventing and ameliorating CIPN. Methods: Data from285 patients in two prevention trials (N05C3, N04C7) and 432 patients from three intervention trials (N00C3, N01C3, N06CA) were analyzed separately. CTCAE version 3.0 item for neuropathy was compared to 2 NCCTG numerical analogue CIPN items, 6 EORTC CIPN20 individual items, 2 McGill Pain Questionnaire items, and one Brief Pain Inventory item. The sample size provided over 80% power to detect a true Spearman rank correlation of 0.15 assessed the relationship between CTCAE and PRO measures. Results: Results from both the prevention and treatment trials were similar in terms of the relationship between the CTCAE and PRO measures. No correlation coefficients between the CTCAE and any of the PRO items at baseline were above 0.35, with the majority around 0.2. Higher scores for the numbness items were observed than for the CTCAE in 47% of the patients at baseline and 39% during treatment in the treatment trials. Many patients had severe numbness PRO scores but mild CTCAE scores (12%) at baseline and (8%) during treatment in the treatment trials. Results for the numbness and tingling PRO measures were redundant. The correlations of the CTCAE with pain were weak, all below 0.35 at baseline with differences as much as 29 points on average on a 0-100 transformed scale. Conclusions: The CTCAE and PRO measures of PN measure different constructs. The CTCAE includes both functional and ADL/motor aspects which may or may not be related to the singular constructs of pain, numbness, tingling, or adjectival characteristics of pain assessed by the PRO measures. The two measures cannot be used in place of each other.

9513 Background: The need for more research in N/V control is exemplified by agents that are costly, interfere with cytochrome P450 metabolism, and inadequately address delayed N/V. Based on pilot data, there was justification for evaluating whether gabapentin could improve the prevention of delayed N/V from highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Methods: Patients (pts) about to receive HEC were randomized to prophylactic treatment with 20 mg of dexamethasone (dex) and a 5HT3 receptor antagonist (RA) on the day of chemotherapy, followed by either gabapentin (gaba) 300 mg BID and dex or placebo (plac) and dex. Gaba/plac was started the evening of the day of chemotherapy and continued through day 5 of the first chemotherapy cycle. Dex was given at 8 mg BID days 2-3, then 4 mg BID for day 4, in both arms. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no emesis and no rescue medications day 2-6, using a nausea and vomiting diary. The percent of CR were compared in each group by Fisher’s exact test. Secondary outcomes included the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE), satisfaction, and a side effect questionnaire. Results: 430 pts were enrolled in this study between 5/2009 and 2/2011. 47% of pts in the gaba arm and 41% in the plac arm had a CR (p=.23). At some time during days 2-6, 30% in the gaba and plac arms experienced emesis, and 45% and 53% in the gaba and plac arms, respectively, took rescue medication. Mean diary nausea scores over days 2-6 ranged from 0.9 – 1.2 (gaba arm) and 1.0-1.3 (plac arm)(7 = the worst); mean number of diary emetic episodes ranged from 0.1 -0.3 (gaba arm) and 0.1-0.2 (plac arm). The FLIE was not significantly different between arms. Mean vomiting satisfaction was 9.1 in both arms and for nausea was 8.3 for gaba, 8.1 for plac (10= totally satisfied). There were no significant differences in toxicities by CTCAE provider grading or by self-report. Conclusions: In this study, gaba did not improve delayed N/V. Overall, there was little emesis and nausea severity was low. Patients were satisfied with the control of their N/V, irrespective of arm. The use of standard prophylactic guidelines that include a 5HT3RA and dex provided good control of N/V for most patients. Clinical trial information: NCT00880191.

9116 Background: Hot flashes affect 75 % to 90 % of women transitioning to menopause and are a major cause of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Levetiracetam, a popular anticonvulsant, is a centrally active agent that anecdotally appeared to reduce hot flashes in clinical practice. This phase II trial sought to evaluate the efficacy of levetiracetam in reducing hot flashes among women with a history of breast cancer or women who did not wish to take estrogen therapy for fear of an increased risk of breast cancer. Methods: Women who were experiencing bothersome hot flashes (≥ 14 times per week, for ≥ 1 month) were eligible. A single arm pilot study design based on previous work was used with a planned sample size of 30 patients. The patients did not receive any study medication during the first week (baseline week). At the beginning of the second week, patients were started on levetiracetam (500 mg), and were to increase the dose by 500 mg each week to a goal of 1,000 mg twice daily. Hot flash diaries were completed daily. The primary endpoint was hot flash score (frequency times average severity). The change from week 1 (baseline) to week 5, the last treatment week, was analyzed by paired t-test and related Wilcoxon procedures. Results: A total of 30 women were enrolled onto this study in eight months. All patients were eligible. 19 women completed all 4 weeks of the study treatment and provided complete data. After treatment with levetiracetam for 4 weeks, mean hot flash scores were reduced by 57% (95% CI 39%-75%), while mean hot flash frequencies were reduced by 53% (95% CI 38%-68%), reductions being greater than what would be expected with a placebo. There were significant improvements, compared to baseline week data, in sweating, hot flash distress, and satisfaction with hot flash control. Eight subjects stopped the study drug due to treatment related adverse events (grade I/II), with the most frequently reported being somnolence, fatigue and dizziness. Conclusions: While levetiracetam appears to be a promising therapy for the treatment of hot flashes, further study is needed to better substantiate the toxicity and efficacy of this drug before it can be more definitively recommended for use in clinical practice. No significant financial relationships to disclose.