Citations

Abstract Anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCLs) are CD30+ T-cell lymphomas that share pathologic features but differ in presentation, outcome, and genetics. Current classification incorporates clinical presentation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) status but inadequately addresses molecular heterogeneity and therapeutic vulnerabilities. We studied 689 patients with ALCL in the LLMPP (Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project) and performed expert consensus review, genetic subtyping (ALK, DUSP22, TP63, and triple negative), and immunohistochemistry for phosphorylated STAT3Tyr705. RNA sequencing with unsupervised gene expression profiling in 393 patients identified 2 main molecular types of ALCL that could be predicted with 91% accuracy based on the presence (type I) or absence (type II) of phosphorylated STAT3Y705 expression. Type I ALCLs included ALK+ ALCL and a subset of triple-negative ALCLs (TN-I); type II ALCLs included tumors with DUSP22 and/or TP63 rearrangements and the remaining triple-negative ALCLs (TN-II). Type I ALCLs were enriched for JAK-STAT3, whereas type II ALCLs were enriched for non–tyrosine kinase pathways, particularly epigenetic regulators such as EZH2. Immunohistochemistry showed overexpression of EZH2 and its trimethylated substrate H3K27. Prognosis in systemic ALCL was favorable for DUSP22-rearranged ALCL (5-year overall survival, 95%) and ALK+ ALCL (88%), intermediate for triple-negative ALCL (TN-I, 52% and TN-II, 37%), and poor for TP63-rearranged ALCL (0%). We introduce an integrated molecular classification that preserves currently diagnosed ALCL entities but identifies 4 molecularly distinct ALK− ALCL subtypes (DUSP22-rearranged, TP63-rearranged, TN-I, and TN-II). This classification can be easily implemented on paraffin tissue in routine practice or clinical trials, and stratifies ALCL into diagnostically, prognostically, biologically, and potentially therapeutically relevant subtypes.

Abstract Description A subset of follicular lymphoma patients has an early relapse with a poor outcome. We showed that this unfavorable group displays increased expression of IRF4, dysregulated immune signaling and an immunosuppressive microenvironment. However, little is known on the molecular mechanisms whereby IRF4 controls the crosstalk between B and T cells. To this aim, we leveraged Cγ1cre;irf4fl/fl mice that yield conditional deletion of irf4 (cKO) in germinal center B cells (GCB). After 10 days of immunization, cKO GCB showed significant increase of HLA-DR and CD40 expression, a skewed LZ:DZ ratio towards increased DZ, and suppression of plasma cells compared to WT. Upon irf4 deletion, we also found a significant increase of total CD4 and TFH cells and a decrease in Treg cells. To test if this effect was antigen-dependent, we cocultured sorted GCB from NP-OVA-immunized cKO and WT mice with CSFE-labeled OVA-specific OT-II CD4 T cells at a ratio of 2:1 for 5 days. We observed increased antigen specific proliferation of CD4 T cells with cKO GCB compared to WT. We then performed seahorse assay and mass spectrometry of the same GCB to define if IRF4-dependent B cell metabolic reprogramming influences immune responses. GCB cKO had lower glycolytic ECAR and increased intracellular glucose and non-essential amino acids than WT cells, suggesting a metabolic shift from glycolysis to the TCA cycle. Thus, IRF4 controls immune and metabolic signaling with functional effects on the B-T cell crosstalk. Funding Sources NCI K08CA279652, LRF Clinical Investigator Award (CDA 1020588), the Gerstner Family Career Development Award, the ASH Junior Faculty Scholar Award. Topic Categories Tumor Immunology: Cellular Responses and Tumor Microevironment (TIME)

Abstract Description Signal regulatory protein-α (SIRPα) is a key member of the “do-not-eat-me” signaling pathway and is expressed on intratumoral monocytes/macrophages in lymphoma. In this study, we found that SIRPα is also expressed by a subset of malignant B cells in lymphoma. SIRPα+ B cells have a memory phenotype with germinal center (GC) dark-zone features, and RNA velocity analysis showed that SIRPα+ B cells exhibit higher spliced transcripts confirming a more mature phenotype. SIRPα expression is substantially upregulated by treating lymphoma B cells with LPS or CpG and SIRPα+ B cells showed increased proliferation when compared to SIRPα- B cells, which was associated with reduced cellular autophagy. SIRPα+ B cells exhibited increased expression of BAFF signaling pathway molecules as the likely mechanism of increased proliferation and survival. Furthermore, in co-culture, SIRPα+ lymphoma B cells suppressed T-cell function and blocking SIRPa/CD47 signaling reversed T cell inhibition. Clinically, we found that a greater number of SIRPα+ B cells present in the diagnostic tumor biopsies of FL patients was associated with a significantly poorer overall survival. We conclude that SIRPα+ lymphoma B cells are a proliferative component of indolent lymphomas, are associated with T-cell suppression, and increased prevalence of these cells is associated with a poor prognosis. Targeting SIRPα+ B cells in lymphoma may therefore be a promising therapeutic strategy. Topic Categories Tumor Immunology: Cellular Responses and Tumor Microevironment (TIME)

Abstract Description The efficacy of immunotherapy for splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) remains limited due to the strong immune suppression present in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Tregs play a key role in maintaining TME homeostasis by suppressing effector T cells and malignant B cells. Previously, we identified two Treg subsets CD26+ and CD161+ in SMZL. CD161+ Tregs were more effective at suppressing both CD8+T cells and malignant B cells, whereas CD26+Tregs primarily inhibited CD8+T cells. Patients with higher levels of CD26+ Tregs and fewer CD161+ Tregs tend to have worse outcomes. In this study, we found that cytokine-inducible SH2-containing protein (CISH), a known negative regulator of immune activation, is highly expressed in CD26+Tregs compared to CD161+ Tregs. Co-culturing B cells enhanced the expression of CISH and CD26 in CD4+CD25- Treg cells, knockdown of CISH in Tregs reduced CD26 expression and their immune suppression activity of CD8+T cells, while CRISPR knockout of CISH in Karpas 299 cells led to higher expression CD70, a molecule associated with less immunesuppression. Our findings suggest that increased CISH expression in Tregs could result in increased immune suppression and unfavorable outcome in SMZL, suggesting CISH is a potential therapeutic tagrget in SMZL by dempening immunosuppressive property of the Treg cells hence boosting the antitumor immunity. Topic Categories Tumor Immunology: Cellular Responses and Tumor Microevironment (TIME)

Abstract Description Follicular Lymphoma (FL) is a germinal center-derived malignancy representing approximately 20% of all non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Despite a relatively indolent disease course, FL is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease which poses significant clinical challenges due to its propensity for relapse and transformation into aggressive and untreatable forms of lymphoma. Here, we have leveraged computational techniques with WES, RNA-sequencing, and immune profiling data from FL tumors to gain further insight into the biologic basis for FL heterogeneity. We performed computational reconstruction of the B cell receptor repertoire on B cell sorted RNA-sequencing data from normal lymph nodes (n = 5) and FL tumors (n = 89). To gain a better understanding of FL B cell biology at the single cell level, we further investigated the clonal architecture of dominant malignant clonotypes in FL tumors using computational analysis of paired single cell V(D)J and 5’ GEX sequencing data from FL tumors (n = 21) and non-malignant lymph nodes (n = 3), allowing us to characterize the germinal center programs in malignant versus non-malignant B cells. Our data suggest that a subset of FL tumors consist of complex polyclonal B cell populations, some of which represent a pre-malignant FL precursor. Our data provide a deepened understanding of FL biology, including precursor cells, and contributes a refined transcriptomic characterization of malignant and non-malignant B cells in Follicular Lymphoma. Funding Sources This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA212162-01A1 to A.J.N and J.R.C., and P50 CA097274 to J.R.C., and A.J.N) Topic Categories Computational and Systems Immunology (COMP)

207 Background: CAR-T & bispecific antibodies (BsAb) for large B-cell lymphoma offer deep responses, but have unique toxicities requiring close monitoring. Different practice settings have varied strategies for managing these toxicities, leading to increased costs, healthcare resource use, & reduced quality of life. With no direct comparison, rationale for therapy selection may vary. This study explores provider choices, sequencing strategies & access barriers. Methods: A survey of US-based Hematologists was conducted on practice demographics, therapy availability, preferences, & barriers in LBCL. Responses were analyzed across clinical scenarios. Results: Responses were received from 45 physicians. Availability of CAR-T & BsAb varied with 75% prescribing both, & only BsAb being available at 9% of providers’ centers. There was a strong preference for CAR-T over BsAb—higher among academic vs. nonacademic providers (96% vs. 78%; p = 0.03) & at CAR-T vs. non-CAR-T centers (100% vs. 72%; p = 0.001). Even at BsAb-only centers, preference leaned toward CAR-T, though notably lower compared to CAR-T centers. Among centers without either, 86% preferred CAR-T. Practice volume had no impact. Reasons for favoring CAR-T included perceived better outcomes (55%), shorter treatment (26%), center choice (19%), more experience (48%), & curative potential (21%). BsAb selection was driven by CAR-T unavailability & logistical barriers (distance to specialized center, insurance delays, referral complexity, manufacturing time, & hospitalization needs). Axi-cel was preferred by 69% ( p = 0.0001) vs. other CAR-T for third-line or later due to experience with use, response rates, center choice, & logistical ease. Liso-cel (26%) & Tisa-cel (2%) were chosen for perceived favorable toxicity over Axi-cel. Axi-cel was also preferred second-line vs. Liso-cel (73% vs. 24%; p < 0.0001) for similar reasons. Among BsAb, Epcoritamab was favored by 56% for administration ease (subcutaneous), experience, & center preference; Glofitamab by 42% for shorter duration, experience, & center preference. There was no difference by academic vs nonacademic practice & volume for both CAR-T & BsAb. In patients with prior non-CAR-T anti-CD19 therapy, providers chose CD19 CAR-T over CD20 BsAb (80% vs. 18%; p < 0.0001). For relapse after second-line CAR-T, 78% providers preferred BsAb as the next line over other options ( p < 0.0001) due to more favorable response rates, toxicity profile, & experience with use. Providers prioritized response rates, survival, & toxicity profile in their treatment decisions. Logistics, duration, frequency, & cost were less important. There were no differences based on practice setting & CAR-T experience. Conclusions: Despite higher preference for CAR-T due to perceived superior outcomes, access barriers exist. Efforts to streamline referral pathways, logistics, & expand availability are crucial to improve outcomes.

ABSTRACT Anaplastic lymphoma kinase‐positive large B‐cell lymphoma (ALK+ LBCL) is a rare, aggressive subtype of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma with poor outcomes using standard chemotherapy. In this multi‐institutional retrospective study, we analyzed 39 cases of ALK+ LBCL identified at six US academic centers from 2002 to 2024, with treatment including conventional cytotoxic regimens in frontline and biologically informed and nonchemotherapy‐based strategies in the relapsed setting. Ninety‐two percent of patients received frontline anthracycline‐based chemotherapy; 43% received intensified regimens, and 15% underwent upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Despite these approaches, outcomes remained poor. At a median follow‐up of 5.4 years, median event‐free survival (EFS) was 0.6 years (95% CI, 0.4–0.9), and median overall survival (OS) was 1.5 years (95% CI, 1.3–NR). One‐ and five‐year EFS rates were 28% and 17%, while corresponding OS rates were 72% and 42%, respectively. Advanced stage and high IPI scores were associated with inferior outcomes. Twelve patients received ALK inhibitors, with alectinib showing more durable responses than crizotinib. Lenalidomide and immune checkpoint inhibitors also demonstrated activity, including durable complete responses. Five patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation, with three achieving sustained remission. In conclusion, our findings highlight the limited benefit of chemotherapy, even when intensified or followed by ASCT, and support the integration of biologically targeted therapies, which may have contributed to improved OS in our cohort compared to historical outcomes. Prospective, collaborative studies are needed to better understand disease biology and define optimal use of modern therapies in this rare lymphoma.

Abstract Outcomes in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have steadily improved; however, additional therapies are needed for patients who relapse or do not respond to novel agents. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of camidanlumab tesirine (Cami), an anti-CD25 antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with relapsed/refractory cHL after brentuximab vedotin/programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor therapies from the phase 2 ADCT-301-201 study. Eligible patients were adults with cHL who had received ≥3 previous lines of systemic therapy (or ≥2 if ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant). Patients received 45 μg/kg Cami (IV, once every 3 weeks) in cycles 1 to 2, followed by 30 μg/kg IV once every 3 weeks for ≤1 year. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) per 2014 Lugano classification. Secondary end points included complete response rate (CRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). In total, 117 patients were enrolled with a median age of 37.0 years (range, 19-87). The ORR was 70.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.9-78.2), with a CRR of 33.3% (95% CI, 24.9-42.6). The median PFS was 9.13 months (95% CI, 5.3-15.0); median OS was not reached. Thirty-three (28.2%) patients discontinued treatment because of treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common reasons were skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (n = 10 [8.5%] patients), infections and infestations (n = 5 [4.3%]), and nervous systems disorders (n = 5 [4.3%]). Guillain-Barré–type or polyradiculopathy-type events occurred in 8 (6.8%) patients. Cami was efficacious in this heavily pretreated population; however, the efficacy was overshadowed by substantial issues with the safety profile. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04052997.