Citations

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is an under-recognised cause of chronic diarrhoea in patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). If left untreated or undertreated, PEI can lead to complications such as oxalate nephropathy (ON), which may result in loss of kidney function and potentially limit oncologic treatment options, including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). We present a man in his late 60s with a small bowel NET who developed persistent, uncontrolled diarrhoea for several years. The diarrhoea was attributed to multiple factors, including secretory NET (ie, carcinoid syndrome), bile acid diarrhoea and PEI secondary to somatostatin analogue therapy. Due to financial constraints, the patient was unable to consistently take pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). Years after the diagnosis of NET, the patient developed a new onset worsening of kidney function. Further work-up, including a kidney biopsy, confirmed ON, which significantly limited subsequent treatment options, including PRRT. Routine screening for PEI and early initiation of PERT should be considered in all NET patients with chronic diarrhoea to prevent ON and preserve future treatment options.

Background Large language models (LLMs) are entering clinical workflows, yet their alignment with medical-ethical principles is unclear. Objective To evaluate how LLMs reconcile deontological and utilitarian reasoning in medically adapted “Trolley dilemma” scenarios. Methods We tested 14 LLMs, including GPT-o1-preview and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama, using five medically adapted Trolley dilemmas sourced from philosophical and real-world scenarios. Each model generated 10 independent answers per case (overall 700 responses). Responses were forced to “yes” (utilitarian) or “no” (deontological). The primary outcome was the proportion of utilitarian choices. χ 2 tests compared models. Results LLM responses varied. Some models, such as GPT-4 and Gemma, selected the utilitarian option in 20% of cases, while others, like Qwen-2-7B, reached 80% ( p < .001). GPT-o1-preview and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama selected utilitarian responses in 44% and 38% of cases, respectively. Some models selected the consequence-maximizing option in vignettes where doing so required overriding consent or endorsing intentional harm within the scenario framing. Seven of the fourteen models tested recommended impermissible medical actions, including nonconsensual limb amputation, killing a healthy person for organ harvesting, and transferring a patient to hospice against their wishes, in 44 of 700 outputs (6.3 %). Conclusions In this constrained forced-choice stress test, models occasionally endorsed boundary-violating actions within the vignette framing. These results do not generalize to routine clinical decision-making, but motivate further benchmarked evaluation of refusal behavior and boundary constraints in ethically sensitive medical contexts. We must carefully define how these models influence clinical decisions, establish robust ethical guidelines for their use, and ensure that fundamental ethical norms are not compromised.

Abstract Objectives Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma (sUC) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Herein, we evaluated clinicopathologic features (including PD-L1 expression) for institutional cases. Methods Sixty-five patients with sUC treated by radical cystectomy were matched for age, sex, and pathologic stage to 190 patients with pure urothelial carcinoma (UC). Outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) results for tumor-specific PD-L1 expression in sUC were quantified using H-scores (range, 0-300). Cases with constitutive PD-L1 expression (cPD-L1; H-score ≥240) were evaluated for amplification events using fluorescence in situ hybridization (n = 28), mate-pair sequencing (Mpseq; n = 6), RNA sequencing (n = 5), and targeted next-generation sequencing (n = 8). PD-L1 regulatory pathways were evaluated using gene set enrichment analysis in the Cancer Hallmark dataset. Results Most patients with sUC had advanced disease (≥pT2, 62/65, 95%), without significant differences in overall and cancer-specific survival, when matched to pure UC. Median PD-L1 H-scores using different clones were 100 (SP142), 120 (SP263), and 195 (22C3). cPD-L1 was seen in 43% (28/65) of cases of sUC that were enriched for TP53, TERT, and CDKN2A/B alterations. PD-L1 amplification was identified in 7 (of 28, 25%) of these cases. Bionformatics analysis consistently identified IL6-JAK-STAT3 and interferon α/γ signaling in sUC with cPD-L1 expression. Conclusions Our results suggest that cPD-L1 expression in most sUC occurs secondary to IL6-JAK-STAT3 and interferon α/γ signaling. This provides a biologic rationale for evaluating response to immunotherapy in this patient population.

PURPOSE The continuous development of new imaging approaches, molecular phenotyping, genetic subtypes, prognosis assessments, and effective therapies across a range of disease states has created a need to redefine terminology and best practices for clinical trial conduct in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Methods We convened an international expert committee of diverse working groups, the Prostate Cancer Working Group 4 (PCWG4), between 2016 and 2025. Our objective was to formulate updated criteria based on emerging evidence and clinical trial data in a biomarker context to provide guidance for clinical trial design, eligibility, and end point assessments for patients with advanced prostate cancer. RESULTS PCWG4 redefines terminology around the disease state and previous therapies in a patient-centric context and terminology focused on androgen pathway modulation. We consider imaging, with a particular focus on positron emission tomography (PET)–defined disease. New recommendations are provided for disease state terminology, defining eligibility criteria, response and delay/prevent end points, intervals for reassessments including imaging, and patient-reported outcome determination. We provide recommendations in a biomarker-based context of use for the intended indication, reflective of patient benefit for specific interventions. We emphasize the need for development of validated PET imaging and molecular and phenotypic criteria as well as trial designs to appropriately risk stratify patients, predict and assess benefit, and measure post-treatment outcomes reliably in a trial framework. CONCLUSION PCWG4 updates recommendations on patient and tumor characterization, therapy development, and imaging criteria and extends guidance into earlier androgen pathway modulator–naïve/sensitive disease states to reflect an evolving, heterogeneous, and diverse patient population to optimize treatment benefits for all patients.

Daptomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (DRE) poses an increasing therapeutic challenge, particularly in immunocompromised patients and solid organ transplant recipients. Surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that approximately 6.5% of E. faecium isolates are daptomycin-resistant, underscoring the need for heightened clinical vigilance, particularly for prompt identification and treatment. In this case series, three patients with advanced liver disease, including two status post orthotopic liver transplantation, are described who developed DRE during treatment for bloodstream infection. These cases illustrate the dynamic nature of antimicrobial susceptibility under daptomycin exposure and highlight the contributions of persistent source control issues, intravascular infection, and altered host factors to treatment failure. All patients were successfully managed by escalating to combination therapy with high-dose daptomycin and ceftaroline, alongside appropriate source control. This series emphasizes the importance of periodic susceptibility reassessment during daptomycin therapy and cautions clinicians against assuming sustained susceptibility in patients with prolonged bacteremia or complex infections. Early recognition of evolving resistance and timely therapeutic adjustment may improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Background/Objectives: Streptococcus intermedius, a member of the Streptococcus anginosus group, is characterized by a marked propensity for abscess formation but only rarely causes native-joint septic arthritis. Involvement of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is particularly uncommon. We describe a case of native AC joint septic arthritis due to S. intermedius in a patient with multiple predisposing factors and highlight diagnostic and management considerations. Methods: We report the clinical course of a 72-year-old man with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who presented with progressive right shoulder pain, erythema, and swelling following recurrent minor skin abrasions from a newly adopted dog. Initial management for presumed inflammatory shoulder pathology included brief systemic corticosteroids and an ultrasound-guided intra-articular ketorolac injection. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed after symptom progression. The patient underwent operative irrigation and debridement with collection of synovial fluid and deep tissue cultures. Blood cultures and transthoracic echocardiography were obtained to evaluate for systemic involvement. Results: MRI demonstrated multiloculated periarticular abscesses and osteolysis centered on the AC joint. Operative cultures yielded high colony counts of S. intermedius from synovial fluid and deep tissues. Blood cultures and echocardiography were negative. The patient required multiple operative debridements with irrigation, adjunctive local antibiotic therapy, and prolonged targeted β-lactam treatment. Clinical and radiographic improvement was achieved following surgical source control and antimicrobial therapy. Conclusions: Native AC joint septic arthritis due to S. intermedius is rare. Older age, uncontrolled diabetes, recent intra-articular intervention, and possible zoonotic inoculation from canine wound licking may represent contributory risk factors. Early imaging, prompt surgical source control, and guideline-concordant antimicrobial therapy are essential when bone and soft tissue involvement is present.

The expanding application of spinal stimulation therapies in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation necessitates a critical reexamination of cardiovascular (CV) responses to these interventions. A key question arises: How should blood pressure (BP) responses to stimulation be interpreted, and does the conventional definition of autonomic dysreflexia (AD) adequately capture these phenomena? Researchers remain divided—some classify BP elevations during stimulation as AD, while others attribute them to intentional neuromodulation targeting sympathetic preganglionic neurons. This review scrutinizes the various AD definitions in the literature, including the conventional threshold (systolic BP increase >20 mmHg), revealing substantial limitations in research contexts. While symptomatic AD occurs in only 4-7% of stimulation study participants, asymptomatic BP increases are considerably more frequent. This established threshold lacks robust physiological rationale and creates significant interpretive challenges, particularly when evaluating interventions designed to modulate BP responses. The current limitations of guideline-based definitions of AD challenge research interpretation and clinical translation. Although several publications describe AD as “unregulated” or “uncontrolled,” it has not yet been incorporated into formal guideline definitions. This review underscores the need for a collaborative effort to refine AD definitions in research, particularly in the context of spinal stimulation. Future consensus development should address whether uniform thresholds should apply across different contexts, how to integrate heart rate dynamics and absolute BP values alongside symptomatic status, and how to meaningfully distinguish therapeutic BP modulation from adverse autonomic responses. This is essential for standardizing research approaches, optimizing stimulation parameters, and ensuring efficacy and safety as spinal stimulation technologies advance clinically.

The intensive care unit (ICU) is a highly disease-focused environment where patients are often perceived primarily through their diagnoses rather than as individuals. The Get-To-Know-Me Board (GTKMB) was introduced as a humanizing tool to highlight patients’ personal attributes and foster person-centered care. Despite being found valuable in supporting humanized caring and fostering communication, completion rates at our institution remained low. Through a stakeholder-driven quality improvement initiative, we tested sequential interventions including reminders and checklists, visual magnets, and educational pamphlets to improve and increase the use of the GTKMB. These measures produced modest gains, with reminders and checklists yielding the most notable improvement. Barriers to using the GKTMB included unclear ownership, timing, and inconsistent integration into workflow. Our experience underscores both the promise and limitations of humanizing interventions in critical care. Sustainable implementation requires multidisciplinary buy-in and integration into daily routines. Whereas humanizing tools such as the GTKMB should be evaluated for their impact on meaningful patient outcomes, such outcomes are not clearly established; therefore, we embark on the necessary first step of a method of implementation.