Citations

AbstractBackgroundPlasma biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) such as phosphorylated tau protein 181 (p‐tau 181), neurofilament light chain (NfL), amyloid‐β 42/40 ratio (Aβ42/40), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) have shown high performance in the discrimination of those with clinical mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia from cognitively unimpaired individuals, but few population‐based autopsy studies have evaluated the neuropathological correlates of plasma biomarkers.MethodWe utilized a population‐based prospective study of 350 participants with autopsy and antemortem plasma biomarker data. Plasma biomarkers Aβ42/40 ratio, p‐tau181, GFAP, and NfL were measured using Quanterix Simoa assays. We predicted AD neuropathological change (ADNC), Braak staging, and neuritic plaque score using these plasma biomarkers and investigated the added utility of cognitive and demographic information. We utilized a variable selection procedure in cross‐validated (CV) logistic regression models by minimizing the Bayesian Information Criterion to identify the best set of predictors for a given outcome among plasma biomarkers, demographic variables, and neuropsychological tests included in the Mayo Clinic Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (Mayo‐PACC).ResultADNC was best predicted with plasma GFAP, NfL, p‐tau181 biomarkers along with APOE ε4 carrier status and Mayo‐PACC cognitive score (CV AUC = 0.821). Braak staging was best predicted using plasma GFAP, p‐tau181, and cognitive scores (CV AUC = 0.788). Neuritic plaque score was best predicted using plasma Aβ42/40 ratio, p‐tau181, GFAP, and NfL biomarkers (CV AUC = 0.778). Inclusion of plasma biomarkers demonstrated significantly better prediction of Braak staging (p<0.01) and neuritic plaque score (p<0.01), but not ADNC (p = 0.13), when compared to models that included only cognitive and demographic information. Univariate models consistently underperformed in comparison to multivariate models.ConclusionPlasma biomarkers can provide valuable predictive information about the presence of AD pathology, which can facilitate earlier recognition and diagnosis of AD. Incorporation of demographic and cognitive variables along with plasma variables in multivariable models will improve prediction accuracy of AD pathology, specifically Braak staging and ADNC.

AbstractBackgroundPlasma biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and neurodegeneration have demonstrated diagnostic utility and associations with AD pathology. Our objective was to map the average trajectories over age of plasma biomarkers and more established biomarkers including cognition, amyloid PET, and hippocampal volume.MethodWe included 1731 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 226 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (mean age of 70.3 years; 46.3% female; 14.8 years of mean education) with one or more measurements of amyloid‐PET, MRI with hippocampal volume measurements adjusted for head size (HVa), and plasma biomarkers (Aβ42/40 ratio, p‐tau181, GFAP, and NfL measured using Quanterix Simoa assays). A global cognitive z‐score was created by averaging the z‐scores of memory, language, executive function, and visuospatial domains. Smoothing spline curves were calculated for the values of each variable over age and placed on the same plot. Since each variable has a different scale, the smoothed curves were centered at the predicted value at age 50 and scaled so that a value of 1 would be one standard deviation of the fitted values from ages 50‐80.ResultAt age 50, GFAP and NfL start to increase, and Aβ42/40 was observed to decrease. At age 55, amyloid‐PET and p‐tau181 had a smooth and upward‐curving increase. After age 70, the average values of p‐tau181 increased at a higher rate. Average cognition started declining after 55 years. HVa began to decline after age 60 and then showed a steeper decline at age 72.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that predicted values of plasma GFAP, NfL, and Aβ42/40 across participants begin to change at younger ages than cognitive decline or increases observed in amyloid PET. The changes observed during middle age in GFAP and NfL likely reflect non‐AD pathologies and aging processes, while Aβ42/40 may be a leading indicator of future cerebral amyloidosis. Predicted plasma neurodegenerative biomarkers (GFAP and NfL) begin to change at younger ages than a traditional biomarker of neurodegeneration (HVa). Predicted ptau181 increases were observed in tandem with amyloid PET likely reflecting current amyloid status.

AbstractBackgroundKnowledge of the temporal evolution among plasma Alzheimer’s biomarkers and PET will inform disease pathophysiology and appropriate implementation of plasma biomarkers (Therneau, NeuroImage 2021; Betthauser, Brain 2022). This study investigates the relative timing of progression of plasma p‐tau181, p‐tau217, GFAP, and amyloid PET on individual and population levels.MethodWe included 957 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging with clinical diagnoses of cognitively unimpaired (n = 732), MCI (n = 205), and Alzheimer’s clinical syndrome dementia (n = 20). An accelerated failure time (AFT) model was fit with amyloid (PiB) PET, plasma p‐tau217 (Meso Scale Discovery, Lilly), plasma p‐tau181, and GFAP (Simoa, Quanterix HD‐X) as quad‐variate endpoints, and sex, APOE genotype status, and education as covariates. The model output included a per subject adjustment or time‐shift for each biomarker indicating how much earlier or later it was estimated to progress relative to the average participant, the correlation (R) between adjustments for each pair of biomarkers, and the impact of covariates on each biomarker’s timing. Secondly, we estimated progression at a given age for selected cutpoints.ResultTemporal trajectories for each biomarker are shown in Figure 1. Individual‐level adjustments between plasma p‐tau217 and amyloid PET were highly correlated, R = 0.69(0.64‐0.74); how early or late an individual progressed on plasma p‐tau217 explained 48% of the variation in relative timing of amyloid PET progression. Associations of plasma p‐tau181 and GFAP with amyloid PET individual adjustments were moderate and low, respectively (Figure 2). Using the chosen cutpoints, the estimated order of biomarker progression was GFAP, amyloid PET, plasma p‐tau181, and plasma p‐tau217 (Figure 3).ConclusionOn the individual level, the strong association of the relative timing of progression of plasma p‐tau217 and amyloid PET supports that these processes are mechanistically related. The relatively lower associations of the timing of p‐tau181 and GFAP with amyloid PET likely reflect a lower biological association and greater measurement noise for p‐tau181. The individual adjustments, the primary output of this model, are independent of cutpoints. On the population level, relative timing of biomarker change is highly dependent on the cutpoints applied. This true for any analysis that employs cutpoints, regardless of the approach.

AbstractBackgroundPredictive models of tau‐PET accumulation have largely relied on the functional connectome to estimate its spatial patterns in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Patterns of global functional organization represent a promising avenue as they encapsulate many biological properties relevant to neurodevelopment, cognition and degeneration. We compared approaches based on local connectivity (from task‐free fMRI) and global organization (from FDG‐PET) to predict regional tau‐PET across AD phenotypes.MethodWe included 430 cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals (214 A+T‐, 216 A+T+) and 62 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), 64 amnestic AD, 21 dysexecutive AD (dAD), 41 logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) and 49 posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) patients (all A+T+) from the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, and Neurodegenerative Research Groups (referred to as “Mayo cohort”). The connectivity approach consisted of assessing the relationship between a region’s tau level and its functional connectivity to the region of highest tau (epicenter). The global organization approach consisted of 1) performing a principal component analysis on 3000 FDG‐PET images that did not overlap with the Mayo cohort, 2) projecting FDG‐PET images of the Mayo cohort onto the low‐dimensional space generated in Step 1 and extracting corresponding weighted values across the first 100 components, 3) using these weighted values as predictors of regional tau‐PET in a linear model and determining optimal parameters based on predicted R 2 values, and 4) using the parameters from the model built in Step 3 to predict tau‐PET in the ADNI cohort (n = 86) (Fig.2).ResultThe connectivity‐based approach yielded adjusted R 2 values ranging from 0.19‐0.45 across diagnostic groups (Fig.1). The global organization approach yielded averaged adjusted R 2 and predicted R 2 values of 0.71 and 0.63, respectively, in the Mayo cohort. Out‐of‐sample median R 2 in the ADNI cohort was 0.41 (range 0.10‐0.60) (Fig.3).ConclusionAn unbiased approach based on the global functional organization of the brain and using an imaging modality widely used in clinical settings outperformed a connectome‐based one to predict regional tau‐PET across the AD phenotypic spectrum. Patterns of tau accumulation may better relate to the large‐scale physiology of the brain underlying specific mental functions rather than local connectivity factors.

AbstractBackgroundWhite matter (WM) plays an important role in cognitive function and undergoes substantial changes due to aging and increase in AD and AD related dementia (AD/ADRD) pathologies. While recent work proposed measurement of global WM changes from diffusion MRI as biomarkers for Cerebrovascular disease (CVD) such as PSMD and free water, there needs to be a better understanding of WM changes due to AD/ADRD pathologies. The goal of our recent work was to understand white matter changes with CVD and AD – common pathologies in AD/ADRD ‐ utilizing data from Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and Mayo ADRC.MethodUsing diffusion MRI (dMRI) in 718 participants from Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (mean age = 71.1 years, 56% male), we investigated relationships between commonly used dMRI measures and vascular risk as well as global amyloid PET. In a subset of 233 participants who were amyloid‐PET positive and also competed Tau‐PET (flortaucipir) from Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and Mayo ADRC, we investigated associations between regional flortaucipir SUVRs in Braak stages and regional WM changes.ResultsWe found greater frontal lobe WM damage with increasing vascular risk across all dMRI measures. We previously validated the strong relationship between the genu of the corpus callosum (anterior interhemispheric connections) dMRI measurements made on antemortem scans and cerebrovascular pathology observed on postmortem tissue (Nguyen et. al. Acta Neuropathologica 2022) supporting the utility of genu of the corpus callosum dMRI measures as a potential CVD biomarker. Also, we found greater posterior WM damage with increasing amyloid burden. Among the 233 amyloid positive participants, we found spatially dependent WM degeneration associated with regional flortaucipir SUVRs in Braak stages with greater extent of posterior WM damage. Further, dMRI measurements of the WM damage provided complementary information about disease staging and progression of AD in addition to flortaucipir SUVR measurements.ConclusionsAnterior WM measurements may be more specific to CVD and posterior WM changes are seen with increasing AD pathological burden. Our results suggest that WM changes observed with CVD and typical AD may be different and have clinical utility for differential diagnosis and disease staging.

AbstractBackgroundInter‐cellular communication within the gliovascular unit (GVU) is critical for cerebral blood flow regulation, and maintenance of the blood‐brain‐barrier (BBB) properties. The breakdown of BBB in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is well‐established, but precise underlying molecular changes remain unclear. Additionally, whether GVU molecular alterations observed in AD brains are also detected in blood from living patients is unknown. Further, these GVU molecular perturbations require further investigation in different model systems to identify both human brain‐specific and cross‐species conserved alterations. In this study, we investigated prioritized GVU molecules altered in AD brains for their conservation in blood and cross‐species model systems.MethodsWe performed single nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) of temporal cortex tissue in AD and control brains. We analyzed this data to detect cell‐specific GVU molecular perturbations and their interactions. We investigated molecular interactions between vascular and astrocyte clusters, the major cell types of the GVU of the BBB. To determine whether GVU transcriptional alterations detected in the brain are preserved in the blood, existing blood expression, genetic, and neuroimaging data from two longitudinal antemortem cohorts were analyzed. Using model systems, including mouse, drosophila, and zebrafish, we evaluated the cross‐species conservation of the top GVU alterations detected in AD brains.ResultsBrain snRNAseq revealed transcriptional profiles of 6,541 astrocytes and 2,210 vascular cells. The latter formed three distinct vascular clusters characterized as pericytes, endothelia and perivascular fibroblasts. We identified differentially expressed genes and their enriched pathways within these clusters and observed the highest levels of transcriptional changes within pericytes. Vascular targets that interact with astrocytic ligands have biological functions in cell signaling, angiogenesis, amyloid ß metabolism, and cytoskeletal architecture. We discovered that genetic variants influencing blood expression levels of some of the prioritized GVU genes were associated with neuroimaging burden of cerebrovascular disease in living human cohorts. Our ongoing studies in model systems revealed conservation of some of the top prioritized molecular perturbations across species.ConclusionOur findings prioritized by multiscale, cross‐tissue human data revealed GVU perturbations within interacting pericyte and astrocyte molecules, which are conserved across multiple cross‐species models. These results nominate new molecular targets and mechanistic insights for BBB disruptions in AD.

AbstractBackgroundIncreasing evidence suggests that transactive response DNA‐binding protein 43 (TDP‐43) pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), or AD‐TDP, can be diffuse or limbic‐predominant. Understanding whether diffuse AD‐TDP has genetic, clinical, and pathological features that differ from limbic AD‐TDP could have clinical and research implications. We aimed to better characterize the clinicopathologic features of diffuse AD‐TDP and differentiate it from limbic‐predominant AD‐TDP pathology.MethodThree hundred sixty‐three participants were prospectively recruited and followed in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, and Neurodegenerative Research Group and died between May 1999 and August 2021. All underwent genetic, clinical, neuropsychologic, and neuropathologic evaluations. At postmortem evaluation, they showed Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic changes and TDP‐43‐immunoreactive inclusions. The distribution of TDP‐43 pathology was assessed using the Josephs 6‐stage scheme. Participants with TDP‐43 stages 1‐3 were classified as Limbic, while those with stages 4‐6 were classified as Diffuse. Neuropathologically defined frontotemporal lobar degeneration cases were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify clinicopathological features that predicted diffuse TDP‐43 pathology at postmortem. We hypothesized that the Diffuse group would show impairment in cognitive domains beyond episodic memory and more hippocampal sclerosis.ResultsThe cohort was 61% female and old at onset (median:76 years [IQR:70‐82]) and death (median:88 years [IQR:82‐92]). Fifty‐four percent (n = 197) were classified as Limbic and 46% (n = 166) as Diffuse. A “clinical” multivariate logistic regression fit to 85 participants with all clinical variables of interest showed that later age at onset (OR:1.09, 95%CI:1.01‐1.19;P = 0.03), longer disease duration (OR:1.17, 95%CI:1.02‐1.36;P = 0.03) and higher Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores (OR:1.14, 95%CI:1.01‐1.28;P = 0.03) all independently increased the odds of being Diffuse, while higher Trails Making Test‐B (OR:0.99, 95%CI:0.98‐0.99;P = 0.02) and Block Design Test scores (OR:0.91, 95%CI:0.85‐0.99;P = 0.023) independently decreased the odds of being Diffuse. A “pathology” multivariate logistic regression fit to 233 cases with all neuropathological data revealed that widespread amyloid‐β pathology corresponding to Thal phases 3‐5 all significantly decreased the odds of diffuse pathology by 80‐90%, while hippocampal sclerosis increased it sixfold (OR:6.18, 95% CI:2.93‐13.03;P<0.001).ConclusionsDiffuse AD‐TDP shows clinicopathological features that differ from Limbic AD‐TDP, which could have public health implications relating to treatment and research on AD and dementia.

AbstractBackgroundStructural variants range from simple loss or gain of genetic material to complex events that restructure entire chromosomes. This heterogeneity coupled with variant size greater than sequencing read‐length makes structural variant mapping from short‐read sequencing data difficult and error‐prone. Consequently, the role of structural variants is poorly explored in many phenotypes, including dementia.MethodWe used the GATK‐SV pipeline that combines four external structural variant mapping algorithms with machine‐learning to build high‐quality consensus structural variant calls. We applied GATK‐SV to short‐read whole‐genome sequencing data of 2,601 frontotemporal dementia‐amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spectrum (FTD/ALS) patients, 2,612 Lewy body dementia (LBD) patients, and 4,132 neurologically unaffected participants.ResultAfter stringent quality‐control, we performed genome‐wide association studies on 2,307 ALS/FTD patients versus 3,677 controls with 4,699 common structural variants and 2,355 LBD patients versus 3,700 controls with 4,889 common structural variants. In the FTD/ALS cohort, we identified well‐known risk variants at the C9orf72 (p‐value = 4.99×10‐18, OR = 14.47, 95% CI = 7.90–26.49) and MAPT loci (p‐value = 3.48×10‐6, OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.68–0.86) corroborating the ability of our pipeline to identify disease‐associated structural variants. Moreover, we discovered, replicated, and validated TPCN1 as a novel risk locus for LBD (p‐value = 9.18×10‐6, OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.22–1.67). Further, we identified rare exonic variants with known pathogenic or likely pathogenic effects, such as an SNCA gene duplication in LBD and a deletion of exons 1 and 2 in CHCHD10 in FTD/ALS. We additionally observed structural variants in regulatory regions, e.g. a deletion of a key PSEN2 enhancer, which resulted in an approximate 0.70 fold‐change in PSEN2 expression in LBD. Finally, we built an interactive web app where structural variants can be visualized and explored (https://ndru-ndrs-lng-nih.shinyapps.io/non_ad_dementias_sv_app/).ConclusionCommon and rare structural variants play a role in LBD and FTD/ALS. Our structural variant resource is publicly available and can be used to further explore the role of structural variants in LBD and FTD/ALS.

AbstractBackgroundTwo major risk factors of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are advanced age and the APOE‐ε4 risk allele. However, despite having these risk factors, some individuals escape from developing AD or have slower cognitive decline. In this study we hypothesized that “resilient” individuals, defined as those who remain cognitively normal despite being >80 years‐old and carrying at least one copy of the APOE‐ε4 allele, have concerted changes in their blood transcriptomes that are associated with resilience to AD.MethodWe generated blood RNA‐sequence data from 105 APOE‐ε4 carriers from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) who remained cognitively normal after age 80 (resilient), or who developed mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD (non‐resilient). Weighted gene co‐expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to evaluate the association of the blood co‐expression network with primary phenotypes of resilience and memory scores. To validate our findings, we constructed a consensus co‐expression network using both MCSA and a replication cohort of blood microarray data from 91 Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study participants who had a similar demographic profile. We annotated the consensus modules for their enrichment of cell types, biological processes, genes within previously published genome‐wide significant (GWS) AD‐associated loci, and genes that reside in consensus modules built from seven brain regions across three different autopsy cohorts. To identify genetic variants regulating blood consensus module co‐expression, we performed module quantitative trait locus (modQTL) analysis.ResultWe found co‐expression modules significantly (q<0.05) correlated with the memory phenotype, logical memory delayed recall, across both MCSA and ADNI cohorts. Some of these modules were enriched with blood cell types and biological processes, including telomere maintenance, mitochondrial functions, and immune response. We found 1 module significantly (q<0.05) enriched with genes near GWS AD‐associated loci and 4 modules with genes in brain consensus modules. Lastly, we found 8 modQTLs significantly (Bonferroni‐p<0.05) associated with the co‐expression of 5 different modules.ConclusionWe identified blood co‐expression modules, biological pathways and specific genetic variants associated with cognitive resilience in the presence of AD risk factors. This study provides novel insights into the potential role of peripheral blood in the development of and resilience to AD.

Abstract Background Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is crucial for ensuring patients have timely access to essential care. Given the symptoms of early AD are often subtle, it is important that both primary care physicians (PCPs) and neurologists are able to diagnose their patients. Several sources of evidence have indicated that most PCPs and neurologists lack knowledge, competence, and confidence regarding recognition of early forms of AD. To address the clinical practice gaps, a series of CME‐certified programs covering the symptoms, assessment, and diagnosis of early forms of AD were developed. Method The data presented here are based on outcomes from four online CME‐certified multimedia programs housed on a single destination page. Each CME‐certified program utilized expert physicians to educate learners on recognizing early forms of AD. Each CME program asked a series of pre‐post questions designed to assess immediate changes in knowledge, competence, or confidence. The questions were grouped into clinically relevant themes. The educational effect for all of the programs was determined by using a paired‐samples t‐test to identify significant differences between pre‐ and post‐assessment responses for each question. Data across all four programs were collected from February 2022 through December 2022. All four programs were promoted to an audience of US‐ and ex‐US physicians. Result Participation across the four programs ranged from 543 to 2,510 PCPs and 256 to 1,025 neurologists. PCPs and neurologists demonstrated significant (P<0.05) pre‐vs post education improvements on the following themes: biomarkers in AD, clinical trial outcomes, cognitive assessment scales, diagnosis of AD, diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and symptoms differentiating AD from MCI. Participation in the education also significantly (P<0.001) improved confidence in the identification of early forms of AD among PCPs and neurologists. No substantial differences in knowledge, competence, or confidence were seen for either clinician group based on geographic location of the learner. Conclusion The results indicated that clinicians who participated in CME‐certified curriculum‐based education in multiple formats were better prepared to recognize early forms of AD. Future education should continue to discuss the use of clinical strategies to recognize early forms of AD.