Citations

Abstract Background Blast transformation (BT) occurs in approximately 15-30% of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and remains a leading cause of death. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently the only treatment modality with the potential to cure the disease or prolong survival. Optimal timing of ASCT is critical for maximizing benefit while minimizing risks. To that end, contemporary risk models have focused on the prognostic relevance of individual, as opposed to concurrent mutations. In the current study, we looked into the possibility of prognostic prominence from concurrent mutations in predicting BT in CMML. Methods CMML diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Arber et al. Blood 2022; 140:1200). A machine-learning hierarchical clustering algorithm was developed and tailored for patient stratification using survival outcomes and co-expression of genomic alterations. To reduce complexity and improve interpretability, we generalized each cluster using existing rule induction algorithms, including the in Trees framework and JRip. The final output was a set of mutation-based cluster definitions, each representing a distinct patient subgroup with similar survival trajectories. Competing risk analysis and cumulative incidence functions were used in downstream evaluation to validate the clinical distinctiveness of the clusters. For all survival analysis, patients were censored at the time of ASCT. Time-to-BT was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of BT or ASCT or last contact. BT-free-survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of BT, ASCT, death, or last contact. Results The core study cohort included 605 patients from the Mayo Clinic, USA, and the external validation cohort 501 patients from Humanitas Cancer Center, Milan, Italy. Using the patient cohort from the Mayo Clinic, machine-learning algorithms identified five molecular clusters with 3-year blast transformation (BT) rates ranging from 0% to 100% (AUC at 3 years 0.78): the order of molecular signature assignment (probability of BT/death from another cause) was i) PHF6MUT/ASXL1WT (0%/17% at 3 years; N=32), ii) NPM1MUT OR BCORMUT/ASXL1MUT OR SETBP1MUT/NRASMUT (48%/30% at 1 year; N=24), iii) RUNX1MUT/ASXL1MUT OR SRSF2MUT/NRASMUT OR EZH2MUT/ASXL1MUT OR SETBP1MUT OR BCORMUT (31%/55% at 3 years; N=132), iv) ASXL1MUT/TET2MUT OR DNMT3AMUT OR JAK2MUT (24%/28% at 3 years; N=123), and v) all other permutations (10%/40% at 3 years; N=294) [Figure 1]. Additional analysis confirmed significant differences in survival between RUNX1MUT/ASXL1MUT vs. RUNX1MUT/ASXL1WT (p<0.01) OR RUNX1WT/ASXL1WT (p<0.01) OR RUNX1WT/ASXL1MUT (p=0.038) [Figure 2]. Similar patterns of differences in survival were also documented for NRAS/SETBP1, ASXL1/EZH2, and NRAS/SRSF2 mutation combinations (Figure 2). A subsequent Cox regression analysis confirmed independent prognostic contributions from “PHF6MUT/ASXL1WT” (HR 5.43e-10; p<0.01), NPM1MUT (HR 26.7; p<0.01), “SETBP1MUT/NRASMUT” (HR 12.7; p<0.01), BCORMUT(HR 5.8; p<0.01), “RUNX1MUT/ASXL1MUT” (HR 2.3, p<0.01), JAK2MUT (HR 2.1; p<0.01), and “ASXL1MUT/TET2MUT” (HR 1.7; p=0.02). The prognostic relevance of “SETBP1MUT/NRASMUT”, “RUNX1MUT/ASXL1MUT”, NPM1MUT, and BCORMUT was validated in the external cohort from Italy (N=501). In the Mayo Clinic cohort, presence of any of the latter mutations was associated with 1-, 3-, and 5-year BT (death from other cause) rates of 27% (21%), 44% (49%), and 44% (51%), respectively (Figure 3). The corresponding values in the absence of high risk mutations were 7% (15%), 15% (37%), and 18% (52%) [Gray's p value <0.01 for both BT and death from another cause; Figure 3]. Similarly, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year BT (death from another cause) rates in the Italian cohort were 21% (19%), 37% (47%), and 42% (54%) in the presence and 8% (14%), 20% (35%), and 24% (45%) in the absence of high-risk mutations (Gray's p value <0.01 for BT and 0.18 for death from another cause; Figure 4). Conclusions In the current study, machine-learning algorithms enabled the discovery of concurrent mutations in CMML that were shown to be prognostically more significant than their individual constituents. Such prognostic interaction might have contributed to some of the discrepancies noted in current literature regarding the prognostic relevance of certain mutations in CMML and should be accounted for in the development of future risk models.

Abstract Introduction: Somatic mutations in splicing factors (SF) - SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, and ZRSR2 – represent one of the most common drivers of premalignant clonal hematopoesis. While SF mutations are potent drivers of clonal expansion (Fabre et al., Nature 2022), multiple SF mutations are rarely observed in the same individual (negative epistasis). Prior studies have identified rare cases of concurrent SF mutations (<4%) and described specific hotspot combinations that escape negative epistasis (Taylor et al., Blood 2020). We conducted this study to further characterize the frequency and clonal relationship between concurrent SF mutations using a larger patient cohort. Methods: After IRB approval, we assessed 3,369 myeloid next generation sequencing (NGS) results that identified somatic variants in SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, or ZRSR2, in 2,500 adult patients from 08/2015 to 07/2025. Patient demographics, ICD-9/10 codes, and complete blood counts with differentials were obtained, retaining only those datapoints assigned 30 days before or after NGS testing. To allow comparison of clone size between autosomal and the X-linked SF ZRSR2, VAFs were multiplied by two to estimate the cancer cell fraction (CCF), except for ZRSR2 mutations in males. For patients harboring concurrent SF mutations, we categorized them as co-dominant if the difference in respective CCFs was < 10% of the greater CCF. Specific SF variants were categorized into common hotspots (n=13), except for ZRSR2 variants, which do not occur in defined hotspots. Fisher's exact testing was used to assess the enrichment of SF hotspot variants in patients with concurrent SF mutations, as well as combinations of SF variants in patients with co-dominant SF mutations. Results: We identified 2,331 patients with at least 1 pathogenic SF mutation, of which 6.7% (n=156) had > 1 SF mutation (multi-SF MT). The total cohort comprised cases of AML (n=549, 24%), MDS (n=977, 42%), MDS/MPN (n=233, 10%), MPN (n=228,10%), and uncategorized ICD codes (“Other”, n=326), of which the largest category was clonal cytopenia(s). Notably, the prevalence of multi-SF cases was higher than previously described and our cohort included 5 patients with 3 SF mutations and 1 with 4 SF mutations. Of the multi-SF MT patients, we identified 42 (27%) with co-dominant CCFs among their respective SF mutations. Thirty-three multi-SF MT patients had multiple NGS sampling timepoints (median 2, range 2-4) spanning a median of 0.97 years (range 0.06-5.69 years); we found that 17 of these 33 demonstrated correlative SF CCFs over multiple timepoints, suggesting their SF mutations occurred in the same clone (“co-clonal”). Of these 17 patients, 82% had co-dominant CCFs at the single-timepoint level, whereas none of the 16 non-co-clonal demonstrated co-dominance. Thus, we used SF co-dominance as a surrogate for cases likely to be co-clonal. ZRSR2 (p=8.8x10-29), U2AF1Q157 (p=9.4x10-9), SF3B1K666 (p=1.4x10-4) and infrequent SF3B1 (“SF3B1-Other”, p=.0029) mutations were overrepresented in the multi-SF MT cohort compared to patients with a single SF mutation. Within the multi-SF MT cohort, 3 SF mutation combinations showed overrepresentation in codominant cases – SRSF2P95R/H/L+ ZRSR2 (p=0.014), SRSF2P95R/H/L+ SF3B1K666 (p=0.044), and U2AF1S34 + U2AF1Q157 (p=0.024), although not significant after multiple hypothesis correction. Dual ZRSR2 mutations were the most common combination seen in the multi-SF MT cohort but were underrepresented in codominant cases (p=0.025). Although there was no disease subtype uniquely associated with total or co-dominant multi-SF MT cases, occurrence of multiple SF mutations was more common in males (8% vs. 3% in females), an effect driven by ZRSR2 mutations. Hemoglobin and WBC were lower in multi-SF MT cases, with the lower hemoglobin strongly driven by the codominant multi-SF MT cases (median 8.3 g/dL vs 9.4 g/dL, p=0.00046). Conclusions: These findings suggest that SF mutation co-occurrence in myeloid neoplasms is more prevalent than previously estimated (~7%). Furthermore, we identified 6 individuals harboring > 2 SF mutations, which has not been previously described. We validate specific SF variant pairs that appear to exist in the same clone and are working to confirm the clonal architecture and characterize global splicing aberration in selected cases with single-cell studies to fully uncover the mechanism by which negative epistasis is overcome.

Abstract Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are frequently implicated in the development of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In a recent study (Salman MY, Blood Adv 2025), it was reported that IDH2 mutation subtypes, R140 and R172, may respond differently to intensive chemotherapy. In this study, we evaluated mid-cycle and end-of-cycle bone marrow blast responses in AML patients with IDH2 R140, IDH2 R172, and IDH1 R132 mutations, aiming to determine whether these subtypes exhibit different response dynamics. Methods: We reviewed the charts of AML patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between the years 2016 - 2023 that had available next generation sequencing (NGS) data. Institutional review board approval was obtained. All data were recorded at the time of AML diagnosis. Patients without molecular data or not treated with intensive chemotherapy (7+3 or CPX-351) were excluded from this study. Bone marrow blast percentages were assessed at mid-induction (days 14-21) and end of cycle (counts recovery). Blast clearance dynamics and complete remission rates were compared across IDH mutation subgroups and correlated with outcomes. GraphPad Prism 10.0.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Out of 381 AML patients, 31 had IDH2 mutations (23 with R140 and 8 with R172), and 8 had IDH1 mutations (all R132). Among patients with IDH2 mutations, those with R172 had numerically higher median mid-cycle bone marrow blast percentage compared to R140 (10% vs. 4%, p = 0.37). There was no significant difference in mid-cycle blast percentages between patients with IDH1 and IDH2 mutations (4.5% vs. 4%, p = 0.8). At mid-cycle, 68% of patients with IDH2 R140 had blast counts <5%, compared to 38% of those with IDH2 R172, suggesting a trend for faster mid-cycle clearance in the R140 group, though not statistically significant (OR 3.57, p = 0.2). In a broader comparison, 60% of IDH2-mutated patients and 50% of IDH1-mutated patients achieved blast clearance (blasts <5%) at mid-cycle, though not statistically significant (p = 0.7). At the end of the induction, patients with IDH2 R140 had significantly lower median bone marrow blast percentages compared to those with R172mutations (2% vs. 4%, p = 0.01). Similarly, patients with IDH1 mutations showed low blast counts compared to the IDH2 group (1.5% vs. 3%, p = 0.1). A higher proportion of IDH2 R140 patients achieved blast clearance compared to those with R172 mutations (100% vs. 75%, p = 0.06), while proportion of patients who achieved blast clearance were similar between IDH1 and IDH2 patients (87.5% vs 93.1%, P = 0.5). Analysis of overall complete remission rates (including both complete remission [CR] and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]) within the IDH2-mutated group showed a higher rate in patients with the R140 mutation compared to those with R172 (87% vs. 75%), though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.5). When comparing IDH1- and IDH2-mutated patients, overall complete remission rates were 75% and 84%, respectively, with no significant difference observed (p = 0.6). Kaplan–Meier analysis of time to end-of-induction blast clearance revealed no statistically significant difference between IDH2 R140 and R172 patients (median time to clearance: 31 vs. 37 days, p = 0.3). Similarly, no difference was observed between IDH1 and IDH2-mutated patients (33 vs. 31 days, p = 0.9). Overall survival analyses showed no significant difference between IDH2 R140 and R172 groups (median 66.8 months vs not reached, P = 0.4). Likewise, no difference was observed between IDH1 and IDH2 patients (44.4 months vs not reached, P = 0.7), indicating similar overall survival across mutation subtypes. Conclusion: IDH2-R140 was associated with more effective blast cytoreduction following intensive induction compared to IDH2-R172. Although not statistically significant, IDH2 R172consistently showed trends toward higher blast percentages, delayed response, and lower overall complete remission rates. These findings align with the recent study reporting significantly slower blast reduction and delayed response in R172-mutated AML. Also, no significant differences were found between IDH1- and IDH2-mutated patients in terms of response kinetics or overall survival. Together, these findings highlight potential biological differences among IDH mutation subtypes that may impact treatment response and require further investigation in larger prospective cohorts.

Abstract Introduction: The ZRSR2 gene, located at Xp22.2, encodes a protein component of the RNA spliceosome. Alterations in ZRSR2 have been reported in various myeloid neoplasms (MN) and their precursors. They are frequently accompanied by other co-mutations, most commonly TET2. Isolated ZRSR2 mutations, however, are less commonly encountered and their clinicopathologic features have not been well documented. Aim: To describe the clinicopathologic features of MN and their precursors with isolated ZRSR2 mutations. Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) samples from patients with confirmed/suspected MN using a 35-47 gene MN-targeting NGS panel. MN and clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) cases with isolated likely pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P) ZRSR2 mutations were identified. Pathology diagnoses were rendered following the 2022 WHO/ICC classification and the slides were reviewed by three pathologists. Electronic medical records were reviewed for collection of relevant laboratory data. This study was approved by our institution's Institutional Review Board. Results: Of 164 ZRSR2-mutated cases, 10 cases with isolated LP/P mutations in ZRSR2 were identified. Patients were all male, with a median age 69.5 years. Three patients were diagnosed with CCUS, five with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), one with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML, MDS/MPN) and one with mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL). Six patients had additional variants of undetermined significance (VUS) detected in ASXL1, CALR, EZH2, IDH2 and TET2. The other four patients had no additional variants identified by NGS but had cytogenetic abnormalities. One patient with MPAL had MECOM and IGH gene rearrangements detected on cytogenetic analysis. All patients had macrocytic anemia. One CMML patient with accompanying VUS in TET2 also had absolute monocytosis. BM cellularity and erythroid and granulocytic morphology were variable, ranging from unremarkable to left-shifted and dysplastic morphology. Nine (90%) cases showed atypical megakaryocyte morphology, characterized by hypolobated forms and osteoclast-like forms with separated and eccentrically located nuclear lobes. Interestingly, this megakaryocytic morphology was also observed in CCUS cases, albeit with lower frequency, below the 10% threshold necessary for the diagnosis of MDS. Megakaryocyte distribution was normal. Conclusions: Isolated LP/P ZSRS2 mutations are seen in a spectrum of myeloid neoplasms, including CCUS. They show a strong association with macrocytic anemia and megakaryocytic atypia/dysplasia. The presence of additional cytogenetic alterations and variants of undetermined significance is a confounding factor in determining the role of ZRSR2 mutations in driving the pathogenesis and morphologic features of these diseases.

Abstract Introduction Venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents (VEN/HMA) is an approved frontline induction therapy for older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, data comparing its efficacy and safety to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in intermediate-risk AML—characterized by molecular and cytogenetic heterogeneity—remain limited. Methods This multicenter, real-world retrospective study analyzed newly diagnosed intermediate-risk AML patients who received either VEN/HMA or IC. We evaluated composite complete remission (CRc) rates, transfusion and infection rates, long-term outcomes including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and performed subgroup analyses to identify mutation-specific predictors of treatment response. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Results A total of 229 intermediate-risk AML patients were included. VEN/HMA achieved a comparable CRc rate to IC (75.3% vs. 63.4%) with lower transfusion needs and fewer infections. Patients harboring FLT3-ITD, DNMT3A, or TET2 mutations showed greater benefit from VEN/HMA, while KIT-mutated patients responded more favorably to IC. Among patients who did not undergo allo-HSCT, VEN/HMA significantly improved 3-year OS (P = 0.001) and PFS (P = 0.008). No significant OS or PFS difference was observed in the allo-HSCT subgroup. In MRD-negative patients without transplant, those treated with VEN/HMA had superior OS compared to IC. Multivariable analysis identified VEN/HMA (HR = 0.613, P = 0.038) and allo-HSCT (HR = 0.11, P = 0.001) as independent predictors of better survival. Conclusions VEN/HMA is a safe and effective induction strategy for intermediate-risk AML, particularly in patients with BCL-2 inhibitor–sensitive mutations (FLT3-ITD, DNMT3A, TET2). These findings support a genotype-guided treatment approach in AML, complementing current risk stratification frameworks and informing individualized induction therapy decisions.

Abstract Background Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is an easily accessible diagnostic test that is underutilized as a prognostic marker, despite substantial supporting evidence in cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and helathy individuals (Pilling et al. PLoS One 2028;13:e0203504). The association between increased RDW and incident acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has long been suggested in healthy volunteers (Abelson et al. Nature 2019;559:400). We looked into a similar phenomenon in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET) in large discovery and validation cohorts. Methods A machine learning (ML) approach was used to identify baseline clinical and laboratory parameters that were predictive of leukemic transformation (LT) and develop a predictive model in a large discovery cohort of PV and ET, obtained from electronic medical records of the Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS; Tel-Aviv, Israel). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized to determine the optimal cutoff points for RDW and other continuous variables. Mayo Clinic databases (Rochester, MN, USA) for patients with PV and ET were utilized as validation cohorts. Identification of study patients in the latter was according to the International Consensus Classification (Arber et al. Blood 2022; 140:1200) while in the discovery cohort was based on presence of ICD-9 codes associated with documentation of disease-specific driver mutations or treatment records that are consistent. Statistical analyses were performed using the R statistical software 4.4.2 (November, 2024) (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) or JMP Pro 18.0.0 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Results The discovery cohorts from Israel included 4,592 patients with PV (median age 63 yesrs; 53% males) and 5,968 with ET (median age 61 yesrs; males 40%). The validation cohorts from the Mayo Clinic included 633 PV (median 65 years; 51% males) and 634 ET (median 60 years; females 64%) patients that were informative for RDW. In the discovery cohorts, median follow-up (incident AML) was 6.1 years (N=186; 4.1%) in PV and 6.1 years (N=85; 1.4%) in ET. The corresponding values for the validation cohorts were 6.6 years (N=24; 3.8%) in PV and 7.0 years (N=22; 3.5%) in ET. Discovery cohort analyses Covariate-adjusted Cox regression analysis was utilized to estimate associations between LT and several clinical variables followed by machine learning pipeline to predict LT in a given timeframe. Conversion from continuous to binary variables was accompliched by ROC analysis. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) application enabled selection of top-ranked features that included RDW >15.5 (HR 3.2, 1.1-9.5; p=0.03), age >60 years (HR 2.9, 1.4-5.9; p<0.01), and LDH >1.5 x UNL (HR 4.0 (1.6-10.0; p<0.01). A similar analysis in ET also identified RDW >15.5 (p<0.01), age >60 years (p=0.01) as well as male sex (p=0.03) as independent risk factors for LT. Subseqent risk models based on these risk factors were externally validated and enabled robust risk stratification with 10-20 year AUCs rangening from 0.75 to 0.81. Validation cohorts analyses The indpendent predictive value of increased RDW observed in the discovery cohort was confirmed in the validation cohorts for both PV and ET and further gender-specified: female/male RDW ≥16.4/15.8 in PV (HR 7.9, 1.9-33.8) and ≥16.1/14.4 in ET (HR 5.1, 2.2-11.9). Also confirmed were the additional prognostic contributions of age ≥60 years (HR 3.8, 1.3-10.9) and LDH >1.5 x UNL (HR 3.9, 1.6-9.4), in PV, while no other clinical risk factor showed RDW-independent prognostic relevance in ET. The prognostic impact of RDW in ET was most apparent in females (p<0.01), as opposed to males (p=0.32) while the effect was equally significant in PV. In multivariable analysis that included previously recognized high risk mutations in PV (SRSF2) and ET (SF3B1), both RDW and mutations sustained significance (p<0.05). Conclusion The current study identifies higher RDW as a key risk factor for LT in both PV and ET, independent of other clinical or genetic risk factors. Possible underlying mechanisms include increased RDW as a marker of long-term pre-leukemic clones with sub-clinical ineffective erythropoiesis or an associated pro-leukemic inflammatory state.

Abstract Background Although myeloproliferative neoplasm-unclassifiable (MPN-U) stands as a distinct entity in the International Consensus Classification (ICC) for myeloproliferative neoplasms, its diagnosis and management remain challenging due to the overlapping clinico-pathological characteristics with other MPNs. In the current study, we describe a well-defined cohort of patients with MPN-U and compare their presentation and outcome with those of a separate cohort with essential thrombocythemia (ET). Methods Diagnostic criteria were according to the ICC (Blood 2022; 140:1200). Non-driver mutations were screened by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and were available for subsets of patients with MPN-U or ET. Conventional statistical methods were employed, using JMP Pro 18.0.0 software SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA. Results Thirty Mayo Clinic patients who met the ICC criteria for MPN-U (median age 64 years; range 33-94; 60% males) and 658 with ET (median age 60 years; range 18-90; 36% males) were included in the current study. Table 1 outlines a comparative list of presenting characteristics (including mutations), clinical outcomes, and treatment details between patients with MPN-U vs. ET. JAK2 mutations were significantly more prevalent in MPN-U cohort (87% vs. 63% in ET; p<0.01) and CALR mutations less common (3% vs. 25%; p<0.01). Other somatic mutations, including ASXL1, SRSF2, and EZH2 were more frequently observed in the MPN-U group (p<0.05 in all). Abnormal karyotype was reported in 14% of patients with MPN-U vs. 8% with ET (p=0.3). Compared to patients with ET, those with MPN-U were more likely to be males (60% vs. 36%; p<0.01) and, as expected from disease presentation and indications for diagnostic work up of suspected cases, present with venous thrombosis (43% vs. 10%; p<0.01) and palpable splenomegaly (40% vs. 8.5%; p<0.01). Similarly, they were less likely to display thrombocytosis or leukocytosis (p<0.01 for both). Portal, superior mesenteric, and hepatic vein thromboses constituted 77% (vs. 27% in ET; p<0.01) of the venous events in MPN-U; in contrast, the incidences of pre-diagnosis arterial events were similar between the two groups (10% vs. 12%; p=0.7). At a median follow-up of 2.8 years in the MPN-U cohort, 6 (20%) deaths and 1 (3%) leukemic transformation were documented while 3 (10%) patients progressed to meet the diagnostic criteria for polycythemia vera. Four (13%) patients with MPN-U experienced venous thrombo-embolic events (VTEs) including 2 with recurrent VTEs, despite active therapy with systemic anticoagulation and aspirin. The ET cohort was followed for a median of 7.3 years with 161 (24%) deaths, 23 (3%) leukemic transformations, and 66 (10%) VTEs. Among the latter, 27 (41%) had recurrent episodes despite treatment with systemic anticoagulation, aspirin, and/or cytoreductive drugs. Notably, patients with MPN-U were less likely to receive aspirin and cytoreductive therapy during the clinical course (77% vs. 91% and 37% vs. 79%; p<0.01 for both, respectively). Long-term survival rates were similar between MPN-U and ET (15-year survival 70% vs. 65%; p=0.1). Consistent with previous associations seen in ET, patients with JAK2-mutated MPN-U were more likely to be males (58% vs. 30%; p<0.01, Table 2), and display a lower platelet and leukocyte count at the time of diagnosis (p<0.01 for both). These patients were also more likely to present with venous thrombosis (50% vs. 12% in JAK2 wild-type cases; p<0.01) and palpable splenomegaly (46% vs. 9%; p<0.01). Of note, the incidences of pre- and post-diagnosis arterial and post-diagnosis venous events were similar between JAK2-mutated MPN-U vs. JAK2-mutated ET patients (12% vs. 14%; p=0.7, 4% vs. 12.5%; p=0.1, and 15% vs. 12%, p=0.6, respectively). Similarly, long-term outcomes including deaths (15% vs. 26%; p=0.2), leukemic transformations (4% vs. 4%; p=0.9), and 15-year survival rates (78% vs. 60%; p=0.9) were also comparable between the two groups. Conclusion The findings from the current study were not unexpected and underline the ongoing challenges that face formal classification systems in formulating accurate diagnostic criteria for patients with MPN-U whose clinical presentation is biased by disease definitions. Regardless, it is comforting to document a favorable long-term outcome that appeared to be similar to that of ET while venous thrombosis remains a treatment challenge in both groups.

Abstract Introduction: Only 30% of patients (pts) presenting with abnormal bleeding symptoms receive a clear diagnosis, with many classified as having bleeding disorder of unknown cause, or BDUC (Baker et al. 2021). Currently, the recommended diagnostic workup for BDUC by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) includes plasmatic assays for coagulation factors, von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen/activity, and platelet function testing (PFT), specifically platelet function analyzer-100 (PFA-100) and light transmission aggregometry (LTA). However, PFTs are not widely available and cannot be mailed to reference laboratories. We studied the diagnostic yield of an expanded testing panel which includes quantitative platelet glycoprotein flow cytometry (GpFL) and platelet electron microscopy (PTEM), which we have optimized for specimen mailing. Methods: We conducted a minimal risk, retrospective study by reviewing the electronic health records of pts (18 years and older) who were seen in the Coagulation Clinic of a tertiary academic medical center for evaluation of a bleeding disorder between October 2017 and June 2025. Testing included plasma-based assays including PT, APTT, vWF assay, FVIII, FIX, FXIII screen, and thrombin time (and additional reflex assays as needed). At the discretion of the treating clinician, PFTs (PFA-100 and LTA), GpFL, PTEM, and fibrinolysis assays (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen [PAI-1 Ag] and alpha-2 plasmin inhibitor) were included. We abstracted clinical data on pt demographics, ISTH bleeding scores, and the results of coagulation testing. Pts with an established diagnosis of a bleeding disorder, underlying malignancy, and those who did not have plasma-based coagulation testing were excluded from this study. Results: 109 pts met study criteria, and 82.6% were females (n = 90) with a median age of 45 years (range = 18-88 years). The median ISTH-BAT score was 7 (range: 2-21). About half of the pts, 49.5% (n = 54), had normal coagulation profiles and PFTs. All 54 had PTEM performed, of which 14.8% (n = 8) were abnormal (alpha and/or dense granule deficiencies). 85.2% (n = 46) had GpFL testing performed, with one showing reduced Gp2b/CD42 and Gp3a/CD61 expression, four showing reduced Gp1a/CD49b expression, and three showing reduced GpVI expression. Half of the pts, 50.5% (n = 55) had an abnormal coagulation profile from plasma and/or PFTs, of which 20% (n = 11) had a clinically significant coagulation factor deficiency (FV, FVII, FX). Roughly 9.1% (n = 5) had type 1 vWD of which 1 also had PAI-1 deficiency. One pt had isolated PAI-1 deficiency. Abnormal coagulation profiles were noted in 53 pts who had PFA-100 and LTA done, and both tests were normal in 22.6% (n = 12). Within the abnormal coagulation profile group, 10.9% (n = 6) had ultrastructural abnormalities on PTEM (dense and alpha granule abnormalities). Majority of the pts (n = 46) had GpFL done, and one had abnormal reductions in Gp1b-aCD42b, three in Gp1aCD49b, and seven in GPVI. Comparison of the ISTH BAT score between the normal and abnormal coagulation profiles/PFTs groups by non-parametric (Mann-Whitney U test) and parametric (Welch's t-test) showed no significant difference (p = 0.56 and p = 0.87) respectively. Conclusion: In this cohort of pts with abnormal bleeding, standard recommended testing resulted in a diagnosis in 66.4% pts. The remainder would have been classified as BDUC. The addition of GpFL and PTEM resulted in establishing a diagnosis that explains the bleeding phenotype in 14.8% of pts with an otherwise normal coagulation profile and PFT. Although abnormal PFTs indicate a platelet function defect, GpFL and PTEM may further define the abnormalities particularly differentiating syndromic from non-syndromic inherited platelet disorders. Additional studies are needed to confirm our findings and explore the possibility of addition of GpFL and PTEM for patients with BDUC.

Abstract Background: Intravenous (IV) isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-Pd) is approved for treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on the ICARIA-MM study. Subcutaneous (SC) administration of Isa offers potential advantages such as shorter administration duration and greater patient comfort compared with IV routes. Isa SC via an on-body injector (OBI), an investigational wearable bolus injector, demonstrated safety and efficacy in a Phase 1b study in patients with RRMM. The IRAKLIA trial (NCT05405166) was the first Phase 3 trial evaluating the non-inferiority of Isa-Pd SC via an OBI vs Isa-Pd IV in patients with RRMM. Here, we report the findings of the IRAKLIA trial in the East Asian subgroup with RRMM. Methods: This global, multicenter, open-label study enrolledpatients aged ≥18 years with RRMM who had received ≥1 prior line of therapy (LOT) including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (PI). Patients were randomized 1:1 to Isa SC (1400 mg) or Isa IV (10 mg/kg) weekly in Cycle (C)1, then every 2 weeks in addition to P (4 mg orally daily, Day [D]1-21) and d (40 mg orally [20 mg if age ≥75 years] weekly). Treatment was administered in 4-week cycles and continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Co-primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and observed Isa concentration before dosing (Ctrough) at steady state (predose at C6D1). Key secondary endpoints included rate of very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), Ctroughlevel Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1), infusion reaction incidence, and patient satisfaction rate based on the patient experience and satisfaction questionnaire (PESQ) at C5D15. Results: The East Asian subgroup consisted of 105 patients from China (Mainland, n=82 and Taiwan, n=1) and Japan(n=22) (SC, n=50; IV, n=55). Baseline characteristics of the East Asian subgroup were generally balanced between the two arms and generally comparable to the overall global population (median age 62 years; median 2 prior LOT; 29.5% high-risk cytogenetics; 82.9% refractory to lenalidomide; 7.6% prior exposure to daratumumab). After a median of 13.0 months follow-up, ORR in the SC and IV arm was 74.0% and 70.9%, respectively (relative risk [95% CI] = 1.044 [0.815 – 1.335]). The mean (SD) of Ctroughat C6D1 was 502 (232) µg/mL for SC arm and 282 (123) µg/mL for IV arm. The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) comparing SC to IV for Ctrough at steady state was 1.756 (1.346 – 2.290). The ≥VGPR rates were 58.0% for SC and 50.9% for IV (relative risk [95% CI] = 1.139 [0.798 – 1.631]). The mean(SD) of C2D1 Ctroughlevel was 420 (161) µg/mL for the SC arm and 262 (111) µg/mL for IV arm. The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) comparing SC to IV for Ctrough at C2D1 was 1.673 (1.321 to 2.120). The infusion reaction incidence was 0% and 21.8% for SC and IV, respectively. Grade ≥3treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 82.0% and 87.3% of patients in the SC and IV arms, respectively. Treatment discontinuation rates were 6% for the SC arm and 12.7% for the IV arm. Injection site reactions (ISRs) occurred in 4% (2/50) of patients in the SC arm and in 0.21% (2/964) of SC injections (all Grade 1), with 99.3% of SC injections completed successfully. Isa SC patients expressed higher satisfaction with their injection method, with 64.0% of patients reporting “satisfied” or “very satisfied” vs 52.7% of Isa IV patients (odds ratio [95% CI] = 1.594 [0.728 – 3.489]). Conclusions: The efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic results between Isa SC vs IV + Pd in the East Asian population from the IRAKLIA study were consistent with the results of the overall global population, in which non-inferiority of ORR, Ctrough at C6D1, ≥VGPR and Ctrough at C2D1 was demonstrated and statistically significantly fewer infusion reactions and higher patient satisfaction were also noted for SC vs IV. These results support the potential use of Isa SC delivered via OBI in East Asian patients and demonstrate the potential of this delivery method to improve patient experience and practice efficiency.

Abstract Background: The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS; Cervantes et al. Blood 2009;113) and dynamic IPSS (DIPSS; Passamonti et al. Blood 2010;115:1703) were developed about 15 years ago, based on 5 clinical risk factors: age >65 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dl, white blood cell count (WBC) >25 x 109/L, peripheral blood (PB) blasts ³1%, and constitutional symptoms. DIPSS-independent genetic risk factors have since been incorporated into molecular risk models with higher predictive accuracy (Guglielmelli et al. JCO 2018;36:310; Tefferi et al JCO 2018;36:1769). Because of its accessibility, DIPSS is often preferred for use in patient selection for clinical trials. The objective of the current study was to revise DIPSS by incorporating new and refined clinical risk variables and excluding those that are subjective (e.g., symptoms) or could exaggerate the need for therapy for older adults (e.g., age). Methods: Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Arber et al. Blood 2022; 140:1200). Severity of anemia was adjudicated by the Revised International Working Group-European LeukemiaNet criteria (Blood 2024; 144:1813). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was utilized to determine the optimal cutoff points for age, WBC, PB blast percentage, absolute monocyte count (AMC), and platelet count. Data were collected retrospectively corresponding to the time of first referral, which, in the majority of cases, coincided within one year of initial diagnosis and before initiation of cytoreductive therapy. Survival analysis was censored for allogenic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Time-specific AUC was computed at pre-defined landmark time points and used to compare model performance between DIPSS and the revised model (DIPSS-R). Results: The discovery cohort from the Mayo Clinic included 1,073 patients (median age 65 years; 61% males) and the validation cohort from Italy 635 patients (median age 63 years; 60% males). In the discovery cohort, median follow-up (% deaths, AML, ASCTs) was 45 months (49%, 10%, 17%) and in the validation cohort 60 months (42%, 11%, 5%). In univariate analysis, the following correlated with inferior survival, in both the discovery and validation cohorts, with significance confirmed by multivariable analysis (MVA) in the discovery cohort: severe anemia (transfusion-dependent or hemoglobin level <8 g/dL in women or <9 g/dL in men), moderate anemia (hemoglobin level 8 to <10 in women or 9 to <11 in men), marked leukocytosis (WBC ≥25 x 109/L), moderate leukocytosis (WBC 11 to <25 x 109/L), age >65 years, PB blast ≥2%, AMC ≥1 x 109/L, platelet count <150 x 109/L, constitutional symptoms, and male sex. After excluding age, sex, and constitutional symptoms, MVA-derived HRs (95% CI) were 3.5 (2.8-4.4) for severe anemia, 2.0 (1.5-2.5) moderate anemia, 2.4 (1.8-3.3) marked leukocytosis, 1.5 (1.2-1.9) moderate leukocytosis, 1.7 (1.4-2.1) PB blast ≥2%, 1.5 (1.2-2.0) AMC ≥1 x 109/L, and 1.5 (1.2-1.8) platelet count <150 x 109/L. An HR-weighted risk model was subsequently developed (Figure 1) and validated (Figure 2) using the discovery and validation cohorts, respectively: low risk (0 points; N=205; median survival 226 months), intermediate-1 risk (1 point; N=253; 131 months), intermediate-2 risk (2-3 points; N=457; 62 months), and high risk (4-7 points; N=153; 31 months); the corresponding median survival estimates in the validation cohort were “not reached”, 205 months, 96 months, and 44 months (inter-risk category p values <0.01 in all instances). Ten-year predictive accuracy was comparable between DIPSS-R (AUC 0.78) and DIPSS (AUC 0.78), despite the exclusion of age and constitutional symptoms, as risk variables, from the revised model. Furthermore, predictive performance was superior for DIPSS-R vs. DIPSS when analysis was stratified by age: >65 years (AUC 0.77 vs. 0.74) and ≤65 years (AUC 0.71 vs. 0.66). MVA that included high (ASXl1, SRSF2, U2AF1) and low (CALR type 1/like) risk mutations, karyotype, and DIPSS-R variables showed independent prognostic contribution from all except thrombocytopenia (p=0.2; Figure 3). Conclusion: DIPSS-R utilizes disease-related, as opposed to host-related, predictors of survival whose prognostic contribution was independent and complementary to genetic risk factors. The model preserves global applicability and allows for a more accurate assessment of disease severity for practice and research purposes.