Citations

2517 Background: Approximately 50% to 60% of pts with r/r LBCL will either not achieve a complete response (CR) or will relapse with current treatments and require additional therapy. Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) therapies have revolutionized the care of patients whose disease progresses following standard therapies, but patient-specific manufacturing processes and long wait times to treatment present challenges for their broad clinical use. Allogeneic (healthy-donor-derived), off-the-shelf, anti-CD19 (CAR T) treatment promises broader and more rapid access to one-dose treatment with curative intent. Initial phase 1 data for the anti-CD19 AlloCAR T cell product ALLO-501 (NCT03939026) and successor, ALLO-501A (NCT04416984), demonstrated a manageable safety profile with no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and efficacy comparable to autologous CAR T therapy in pts with r/r LBCL who were autologous CAR T-naïve. This update provides additional follow up and a focus on participants who received the conditioning regimen and cells made with an optimized manufacturing process currently under study in the first potentially pivotal trial for an allogeneic CAR T product. Methods: In these two multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase 1 trials, a cohort of autologous CAR T-naïve pts with r/r LBCL underwent 3-day lymphodepletion (LD) with FCA90, fludarabine (F, 30 mg/m2/day), cyclophosphamide (C, 300 mg/m2/day), and ALLO-647 (A [anti-CD 52 mAb] 30 mg/day; total dose: 90 mg) followed by a single dose of ALLO-501 or ALLO-501A produced by the Alloy manufacturing process. Results: As of Jan 26, 2023, 12 pts received the FCA90 LD regimen and CAR T therapy with 100% receiving product per specifications with a median time from enrollment to LD of 3 days. Median follow-up time (actual) was 7.1 months (range: 1.4, 36.0). No DLTs, severe (Gr3+) cytokine-release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), or graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) events occurred. An overall response rate and a CR rate of 66.7% and 58.3%, respectively, were observed. Median DOR was 23.1 months. Among 8 pts with the opportunity to be followed for 6 months, 5 (62.5%) had achieved CR and 4 (50.0%) sustained CR through 6 months. Analyses of vector copy number pharmacokinetics at Days 28 and 56 documented substantial and sustained expansion of CAR T cells. Conclusions: A one-time dose of allogeneic CAR T therapy following LD with FCA90 provided durable responses with a manageable safety profile in patients with r/r/ LBCL comparable to those treated with autologous CAR T cells. This treatment enables rapid access to off-the-shelf treatment with a median time from trial enrollment to treatment of 3 days. These findings support broader evaluation of ALLO-501A in the ongoing, first potentially pivotal phase 2 trial (ALPHA2) of off-the-shelf allogeneic CAR T cells. Clinical trial information: NCT03939026 .

Abstract The prognostic relevance of diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is unknown. Hence, we sought to evaluate the impact of DTI on outcomes in MCL using 3 large datasets (1) the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Specialized Program of Research Excellence Molecular Epidemiology Resource, (2) patients enrolled in the ALL Age Asthma Cohort/CALGB 50403, and (3) a multisitecohort of patients with MCL. Patients were a priori divided into 2 groups, 0 to 14 days (short DTI) and 15 to 60 days (long DTI). The patients in whom observation was deemed appropriate were excluded. One thousand ninety-seven patients newly diagnosed with MCL and available DTI were included in the study. The majority (73%) had long DTI (n=797). Patients with short DTI had worse eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS ≥2), higher lactate dehydrogenase, bone marrow involvement, more frequent B symptoms, higher MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI ≥6.2), and were less likely to receive intensive induction therapy than long DTI group. The median progression-free survival (2.5 years vs 4.8 years, p<0.0001) and overall survival (7.8 years vs. 11.8 years, p<0.0001) were significantly inferior in the short DTI group than the long DTI cohort and remained significant for progression-free survival and overall survival in multivariable analysis. We show that the DTI is an important prognostic factor in patients newly diagnosed with MCL and is strongly associated with adverse clinical factors and poor outcomes. DTI should be reported in all the patients newly diagnosed with MCL who are enrolling in clinical trials and steps must be taken to ensure selection bias is avoided.

Summary The prognosis of relapsed/refractory (R/R) anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is poor. Large studies evaluating outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo‐HCT) in systemic R/R ALCL are not available. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we evaluated outcomes of 182 adults (aged ≥18 years) with R/R ALCL undergoing allo‐HCT between 2008 and 2019. Non‐relapse mortality (NRM), disease relapse/progression (REL), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were modelled using Cox proportional hazards models. The median (range) follow‐up of survivors was 62 (3–148) months. The 1‐year NRM was 18%. The 5‐year REL, PFS and OS were 32%, 41% and 56% respectively. On multivariable regression analysis African American race (hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–4.8; p < 0.001) and refractory disease at allo‐HCT (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6–6.2; p < 0.001) were predictive of inferior OS. Similarly, African‐American race (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3–3.4; p = 0.003), other minority race (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2–5.3; p = 0.02) and refractory disease (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2–4.3; p = 0.01) were predictive of inferior PFS. These data, demonstrate that allo‐HCT can result in durable disease control in a sizable proportion of patients with R/R ALCL. Refractory disease and racial minority status predicted inferior allo‐HCT outcomes. Whether the inferior outcomes of racial minorities with R/R ALCL after allo‐HCT are driven by differences in disease biology or disparities in post allo‐HCT care, or both, requires further investigation.

Abstract Background: Disease relapse is common with peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) or cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL). Adoptive immunotherapy with CD19 directed CAR-T cells is a standard option for B cell lymphoid malignancies in the relapsed setting. This study assesses the safety and preliminary efficacy of CD4 targeting autologous CAR-T, LB1901, in patients (pts) with CD4+ relapsed or refractory (R/R) TCL. A pre-clinical study showed LB1901 exhibited potent anti-tumor activity without off-target effects (Zeng 2021). Methods: This is a phase 1, open-label, multicenter, multicohort study of LB1901 (NCT04712864; currently enrolling). Eligible pts are ≥18 years with histologically confirmed CD4+ PTCL-NOS (not otherwise specified); or CD4+ AITL (angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma); or CD4+ CTCL (either MF [mycosis fungoides] or SS [Sézary syndrome]). In Part A (dose escalation), pts with SS must have ≤2,000 circulating Sézary cells/µL to ensure safety of pts with higher disease burden. In Part B, pts with &gt;2,000 Sézary cells/µL is allowed. CD4 expressed on tumor cells must be confirmed within 3 months prior to apheresis. Other inclusion criteria include: R/R disease with ≥2 prior lines of systemic antineoplastic therapy; for pts with PTCL-NOS or AITL, ≥1 measurable lesion according to IWG Response Criteria (Cheson 2014) and for pts with CTCL, ≥stage IIB on TNMB-ISLC/EORTC staging system; identified HSCT donor available prior to enrollment (in the event of severe recurrent infections and prolonged lymphopenia for which pt may need an allogeneic HSCT as a safety rescue); and ECOG status of 0 or 1. Response will be evaluated based on IWG response criteria for PTCL and Global Composite Response for CTCL (Olsen 2007). The study will be conducted in 2 parts (Part A: dose escalation and Part B: dose expansion). Three dose levels (0.3 X 106, 1.0 X 106, and 3.0 X 106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) will be evaluated (N=3-6 for each dose level) with an optional dose level minus 1 (0.1 X 106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg). Part B will include 2 cohorts, PTCL and CTCL (N=12-20 for each), after the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) has been identified in Part A. Enrolled pts will undergo apheresis for PBMC collection. LB1901 will be manufactured from autologous CD8+ T cells. Pts may receive optional bridging therapy and receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy with fludarabine 30mg/m2/day and cyclophosphamide 300mg/m2/day (Flu-Cy), for 3 days followed by LB1901. Primary endpoints are incidence, duration, and severity of AEs and laboratory abnormalities (Parts A and B) and DLT at each dose level (Part A). Secondary endpoints include overall response rate; duration of response; CAR-positive T cell counts and CAR transgene level in blood; and presence of anti-CAR antibody response. Exploratory endpoints include preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and CD4+ T cell counts. Citation Format: Swaminathan P. lyer, David G. Maloney, Nora Bennani, Auris Huen, Muhammad Akram, Soo Kim, Chuan Wang, Zhiyin Liang, Henry Castro, Lida Pacaud, Mehdi Hamadani. LB1901: A phase 1, open-label, multicenter, multicohort study of CD4-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CD4-CAR-T) in relapsed or refractory T-cell lymphoma (TCL) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT215.

3084 Background: Homologous recombination (HR) is an essential, high-fidelity mechanism to repair DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in cancer cells. CYT-0851 inhibits HR leading to an accumulation of unrepaired DSBs and tumor cell death. We are reporting the completed Phase 1 dose-escalation results and RP2D selection to support ongoing development of CYT-0851. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced hematologic and solid tumors were treated with continuous 28-day cycles of increasing doses of CYT-0851 following a 3+3 design. The primary objective was determining the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary objectives included safety, pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor activity. Results: As of a 15 Nov 2021 data cutoff (DCO), 73 pts with advanced cancers (NHL n = 18; Sarcoma n = 16; Pancreas n = 11; Breast n = 8; HNSCC n = 6; Ovarian n = 4; SCLC n = 4; Other n = 4; Myeloma n = 2) were treated in 12 cohorts (total daily doses: 30 mg to 1200 mg). One pt experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of reversible metabolic acidosis at 1200 mg. Two of 3 pts at 800 mg experienced reversible DLT-like events in Cycle 2 of Gr3 dry skin and Gr3 myalgia and polyarthritis, respectively. Three of 10 pts treated at 600 mg experienced DLT-like events in Cycle 1: 1 pt experienced an SAE of Gr3 anorexia with Gr3 stomatitis, vomiting, and dehydration and 2 pts had Gr3 fatigue. No DLTs occurred at 400 mg daily which was selected as the RP2D. 42 pts (57.5%) experienced a CYT-0851-related adverse event (AE), including 12 (16.4%) with a Gr3/4 AE. There were no treatment-related deaths. AE leading to CYT-0851 withdrawal were reported in 2 pts (2.7%) treated with 600 and 800 mg. The most common CYT-0851-related AEs were primarily Gr1/2 and included fatigue (20.5%), hyperuricemia (11%), nausea (11%), alopecia (9.6%), constipation (8.2%) and headache (8.2%). CYT-0851 exposure was approximately dose-proportional across the evaluated doses with an effective half-life of ̃3 days. Exposure at 400 mg daily was consistent with efficacy in preclinical models. 46 pts were evaluable for response at the DCO. 12 pts with NHL were evaluable by Lugano and included 1 CR in FL and 1 PR in DLBCL treated for 393+ and 244 days respectively. 34 pts with solid tumors were evaluable by RECIST v1.1 with 1 PR in a pt with myxofibrosarcoma treated for 313 days and 16 pts with stable disease. Fifteen pts were treated for 100+ days and 5 for 180+ days. Conclusions: CYT-0851 has demonstrated promising and broad clinical activity in a Ph 1 population of pts with advanced cancers. The safety profile is favorable as characterized by events that were infrequent, primarily Gr1/2, and reversible. Six expansion cohorts (DLBCL, Follicular Lymphoma, Myeloma, Pancreatic, Ovarian and Sarcoma) are enrolling to characterize activity at the RP2D. Ph 1 evaluation of CYT-0851 in combination with 3 chemotherapy backbones is also ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03997968.

Immunoproliferative small intestinal disease (IPSID) is an uncommon disease with a higher prevalence in the developing world. IPSID diagnosis relies mainly on a tissue biopsy and a high index of suspicion. Treatment options are variable; however, they mainly include anthracycline-based chemotherapy with or without antibiotics in advanced stages. Because of the paucity of IPSID, our perception of the disease remains narrow, and investigating the optimal lines of therapy and prevention without a complete comprehension of the disease is challenging. In our review, we explore the expansion of knowledge about IPSID, which has been developing over the years, to help increase the detection of IPISD cases and further research the most appropriate lines of therapy and prevention.

SummaryThere have been no large studies comparing reduced‐intensity/non‐myeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA) to myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens in T‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (T‐NHL) patients undergoing allogeneic transplant (allo‐HCT). A total of 803 adults with peripheral T‐cell lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma and angioimmunoblastic T‐cell lymphoma (age 18–65 years), undergoing allo‐HCT between 2008–2019 and reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research with either MAC (n = 258) or RIC/NMA regimens (n = 545) were evaluated. There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in terms of patient sex, race and performance scores. Significantly more patients in the RIC/NMA cohort had peripheral blood grafts, haematopoietic cell transplantation‐specific comorbidity index (HCT‐CI) of ≥3 and chemosensitive disease compared to the MAC cohort. On multivariate analysis, overall survival (OS) was not significantly different in the RIC/NMA cohort compared to the MAC cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.79–1.29; p = 0.95). Similarly, non‐relapse mortality (NRM) (HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.61–1.19; p = 0.34), risk of progression/relapse (HR = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.98–1.70; p = 0.07) and therapy failure (HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.92–1.41, p = 0.23) were not significantly different between the two cohorts. Relative to MAC, RIC/NMA was associated with a significantly lower risk of grade 3–4 acute graft‐versus‐host disease (HR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.46–0.99, p = 0.04). Among chemorefractory patients, there was no difference in OS, therapy failure, relapse, or NRM between RIC/NMA and MAC regimens. In conclusion, we found no association between conditioning intensity and outcomes after allo‐HCT for T‐cell NHL.