Citations

AbstractBackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are commonly associated. Cotreatment with multiple antithrombotic agents can increase the risk of bleeding. We sought to evaluate patient‐centered outcomes in patients with AF on double therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to patients with standard triple therapy, [a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus dual antiplatelet therapy].MethodsWe performed a literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes of patients receiving double therapy with DOACs compared to triple therapy with VKAs in patients with AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patient‐centered outcomes were the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNB), all‐cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke.ResultsFour RCTs (9602 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Compared to VKAs, DOACs were associated with significantly lower ISTH major bleeding/ CRNB (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67‐0.82, P < .00001, I2 = 11%). There were no statistically significant differences in the efficacy outcomes, including myocardial infarction (RR: 0.99, 95% CI :0.79‐1.25, P = .96), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.6‐1.55, P = .89), ischemic stroke (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.5‐1.15, P = .19), all‐cause mortality (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.85‐1.31, P = .61), and MACE (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.91‐1.22, P = .97).ConclusionCompared with triple therapy with VKAS, double therapy with DOACs is associated with a reduced risk of bleeding and is as effective in patients with AF undergoing PCI.

Abstract Background Peripheral arterial disease is a marker of aggressive atherosclerosis. The ankle brachial index (ABI) is a simple and non-invasive tool to diagnose peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Patients with PAD are at increased risk for ischemic strokes and other cardiovascular diseases. Purpose To evaluate the association of abnormal ABI and poorly compressible vessels with ischemic stroke in a large patient cohort. Methods We analyzed lower extremity vascular studies of all patients with ABI measurements at a tertiary care hospital between January 1996 and August 2018. PAD is defined as ABI<1.0, and poorly or non-compressible (PC/NC) arteries as ABI>1.4 while ABI between 1.0–1.4 is normal. Association of these ABIs with new ischemic stroke events post ABI measurement were analyzed after adjusting for high risk confounders such as atrial fibrillation. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using multivariable Cox proportional regression with 95% confidence intervals. Results In total, 38,016 unique patients (mean age 66.1±14.8 years, female 42.3%) were included. Abnormal ABI was found to be more prevalent among elderly male patients compared to patients with normal ABI. In contrast to non-PAD patients, both PAD and PC/NC patients as defined by ABI had a statistically significant risk of ischemic stroke, with PAD conferring the greatest risk compared to PC/NC vessels. The data is summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Unadjusted HR p-value Adjusted HR p-value PAD vs. No PAD 2.77 (2.62, 2.92) <0.001 2.10 (1.98, 2.22) <0.001 PC/NC vs. No PAD 2.11 (1.95, 2.28) <0.001 1.38 (1.26, 1.51) <0.001 PAD vs. PC/NC 1.37 (1.28, 1.46) <0.001 1.37 (1.28, 1.48) <0.001 Adjusted and unadjusted hazard ratios with p-values. HR adjusted for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, chronic heart failure, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. PAD = Peripheral artery disease and PC/NC = poorly compressible/non-compressible. Conclusion This study adds to the growing body of evidence that PAD and poorly-compressible vessels are independently associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. Given the associated risk of cerebrovascular disease, clinicians should aggressively treat to minimize risk factors in those with abnormal ABIs.

Background: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the benefit of patent foramen ovale closure in stroke prevention. Methods: We searched Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane central database for randomized control trials assessing the incidence of recurrent stroke after patent foramen ovale closure when compared to medical therapy. Pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model. The heterogeneity among studies was tested using the χ 2 test and inconsistency was quantified using the I 2 statistic. Results: Our search strategy yielded 71 articles. We included five studies with a total of 3440 patients. Median age in the device group was 45 (43, 5.5) years and in the medical group was 45 (44.5, 46) years; 52% were male, 27.7% of patients had an atrial septal aneurysm, 25% had hypertension, and 20.5% had diabetes mellitus. The median follow-up time was 44 (34.5–50) months. The pooled odds ratio of recurrent stroke, transient ischemic attack and composite end point of stroke + transient ischemic attack + peripheral embolism in the patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy group were 0.4 (95% confidence interval 0.25–0.63, I 2 = 57.5%), 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.61–1.42, I 2 = 0%), and 0.6 (95% confidence interval 0.44–0.82, I 2 = 0%), respectively. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was found to be significantly higher in the patent foramen ovale closure group with odds ratio of 6 (95% confidence interval 3.13–11.4, I 2 = 33.5%). On subgroup analysis, patent foramen ovale closure appeared to benefit males and patients with a large shunt. Number needed to treat to prevent one recurrent stroke with patent foramen ovale closure is 42. Number needed to harm to cause one atrial fibrillation with patent foramen ovale closure is 39. Conclusion: This meta-analysis of randomized trials concludes that percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure is effective in recurrent stroke prevention especially in males and in those with a large shunt.

Background: The clinical benefit of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) for recurrent stroke prevention has been a subject of extensive debate. Prior clinical trials failed to show superiority of PFO closure versus medical therapy. Meta-analyses suggested a possible benefit of PFO closure in select patients. Objective: The objective of this study was to critically assess current evidence regarding the efficacy of PFO closure compared with medical therapy for recurrent stroke prevention in patients with CS. Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a structured critically appraised topic. This included a clinical scenario with a clinical question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, medical librarian, and vascular neurology and interventional cardiology content experts. Results: A randomized, controlled trial was selected for critical appraisal. This trial compared the efficacy of PFO closure and medical therapy in recurrent stroke prevention. A total of 663 patients who had a recent CS attributed to PFO, with a large interatrial shunt or with an associated atrial septal aneurysm were included. No stroke occurred among the 238 patients in the PFO closure group, whereas 14 of the 235 patients in the antiplatelet therapy group had recurrent strokes. Conclusions: Among patients who had a recent CS attributed to PFO with a large interatrial shunt or with an associated atrial septal aneurysm, the rate of stroke recurrence was lower among those assigned to PFO closure combined with antiplatelet therapy than among those assigned to antiplatelet therapy alone.

ObjectivesLeft ventricular (LV) septal hypertrophy in aortic stenosis raises diagnostic and therapeutic questions. However, the etiology and clinical consequences of this finding have not been well studied. The aim of this study was to perform a morphologic evaluation of the LV in aortic stenosis and to investigate the contributing factors and consequences of septal hypertrophy.MethodsPatients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis were prospectively enrolled. Patients with previous myocardial infarction, wall motion abnormalities, at least moderate valvular regurgitation, known cardiomyopathy, an LV ejection fraction of less than 50%, and age younger than 65 years were excluded.ResultsForty‐one patients underwent a final analysis. Septal hypertrophy (LV septal wall thickness ≥15 mm) was confirmed in 21 of 41 patients. The septal hypertrophy group had higher peak aortic valve velocity, a higher diabetes mellitus rate, and a higher rate and longer duration of hypertension than those without septal hypertrophy. The peak aortic valve velocity (odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.4–37.1) and diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–46.2) were the significant factors associated with septal hypertrophy by multivariate analysis. Intraventricular conduction disturbance on electrocardiography was more frequent in the septal hypertrophy group (P = .021).ConclusionsLeft ventricular septal hypertrophy was commonly observed in elderly patients with aortic stenosis, and a higher aortic valve velocity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were associated factors. Intraventricular conduction disturbance occurred more often in patients with septal hypertrophy than those without, which implies the pathophysiologic consequence. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of septal hypertrophy and intraventricular conduction disturbance on the prognosis of patients after aortic valve interventions.

An increasing number of patients have refractory angina despite optimal medical therapy and are without further revascularization options. Preclinical studies indicate that human CD34 + stem cells can stimulate new blood vessel formation in ischemic myocardium, improving perfusion and function. In ACT34-CMI ( N = 167), patients treated with autologous CD34 + stem cells had improvements in angina and exercise time at 6 and 12 months compared to placebo; however, the longer-term effects of this treatment are unknown. ACT34 was a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial comparing placebo, low dose (1 × 10 5 CD34/kg body weight), and high dose (5 × 10 5 CD34/kg) using intramyocardial delivery into the ischemic zone following NOGA ® mapping. To obtain longer-term safety and efficacy in these patients, we compiled data of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; death, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, or heart failure hospitalization) up to 24 months as well as angina and quality of life assessments in patients who consented for 24-month follow-up. A total of 167 patients with class III–IV refractory angina were randomized and completed the injection procedure. The low-dose-treated patients had a significant reduction in angina frequency ( p = 0.02, 0.035) and improvements in exercise tolerance testing (ETT) time ( p = 0.014, 0.017) compared to the placebo group at 6 and 12 months. At 24 months, patients treated with both low-and high-dose CD34 + cells had significant reduction in angina frequency ( p = 0.03). At 24 months, there were a total of seven deaths (12.5%) in the control group versus one (1.8%) in the low-dose and two (3.6%) in the high-dose ( p = 0.08) groups. At 2 years, MACE occurred at a rate of 33.9%, 21.8%, and 16.2% in control, low-, and high-dose patients, respectively ( p = 0.08). Autologous CD34 + cell therapy was associated with persistent improvement in angina at 2 years and a trend for reduction in mortality in no-option patients with refractory angina.

ObjectiveOptimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), defined as use of both aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, after implantation of drug eluting stents (DES) is still subject of ongoing debate. We systematically review efficacy and safety of ≤6 months versus ≥12 months DAPT after implantation of DES.MethodsPubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for studies published until 30th November 2013. The studies were limited to randomized clinical trials. Independent observers abstracted the data on outcomes, characteristics, and qualities of studies included. Random effect model was employed for meta‐analysis. Heterogeneity of studies included was analyzed using I2 statistics.ResultsIn four randomized clinical trials published involving 8,163 patients with DES, 4,081 patients were randomized to shorter and 4,082 patients to longer duration DAPT. The P2Y12 receptor inhibitor used in all four studies was clopidogrel. Longer duration of DAPT did not reduce risk of all cause mortality (pooled OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.67–1.17, P = 0.4, I2 = 0%), myocardial infarction (pooled OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.85–1.57, P = 0.35, I2 = 0%) cardiac death (pooled OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.61–1.25, P = 0.47, I2 = 0%), stent thrombosis (pooled OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.76–2.21, P = 0.35, I2 = 0%) or cerebrovascular accidents (pooled OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.41–1.27, P = 0.26, I2 = 0%). Longer duration of DAPT was associated with increased risk of TIMI major bleeding (pooled OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29–0.89, P = 0.02, I2 = 0%).ConclusionThere was no difference in efficacy outcomes between ≤6 months of DAPT and ≥12 months of DAPT in patients with coronary artery disease and DES implantation. Moreover, longer duration of DAPT is associated with increased risk of bleeding complications. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Aim The benefit of preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been shown in randomised trials. However, all the randomised trials are underpowered to detect benefit in cardiac death. We aim to systematically review evidence on the cardiac mortality benefit of preventive PCI in patients presenting with acute STEMI in randomised patient populations. Methods PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for studies published until 30 September 2013. The studies were limited to randomised clinical trials. Independent observers abstracted the data on outcomes, characteristics and qualities of studies included. Fixed effect model was employed for meta-analysis. Heterogeneity of studies included was analysed using I2 statistics. Results In three randomised clinical trials published, involving 748 patients with acute STEMI and multivessel disease, 416 patients were randomised to preventive PCI and 332 to culprit-only PCI. Patients undergoing preventive PCI had significant lower risk of cardiovascular deaths (pooled OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.83, p=0.01, I2=0%), repeat revascularisation (pooled OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.44, p=0.00001, I2=0%) and non-fatal myocardial infarction (pooled OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.75, p=0.005, I2=0%) compared with culprit-only revascularisation. Conclusions In patients presenting with acute STEMI and significant multivessel coronary artery disease, based on our data, preventive PCI is associated with lower risk of cardiovascular mortality compared with primary PCI of only the culprit artery. This finding needs to be confirmed in larger adequately powered randomised clinical trials.