Citations

Abstract INTRODUCTION The locus coeruleus (LC) degenerates early in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the extent of rostrocaudal degeneration across clinicopathologic heterogeneity remains underexplored in AD. METHODS Using digital pathology, we quantified LC neuronal density and area at three neuroanatomic levels in a large AD series. RESULTS Analysis of neuropathologic AD subtypes revealed greater middle LC vulnerability in hippocampal sparing AD compared to typical and limbic predominant AD. Regression analyses identified distinct predictor variables associated with the degeneration of rostral and middle LC. Age at onset predicted 24% of the variability in rostral LC neuronal density, whereas Braak stage, brain weight, Lewy body disease, and age at onset accounted for 15% of the variability in middle LC. Analyses of clinical presentations revealed lower rostral LC neuronal density in non‐amnestic compared to amnestic AD cases. DISCUSSION These insights demonstrate greater LC degeneration in atypical clinicopathologic forms of AD, including hippocampal sparing, young‐onset, and non‐amnestic presentations.

Abstract This publication represents the first part of an update to the clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Diagnosis of GAS pharyngitis by clinician judgment alone is unreliable, and universal testing incurs cost and inconvenience for individuals at low risk of having GAS infection. Clinical scoring systems have been used to quantify the probability of a positive GAS throat culture based on standardized criteria such as the presence of fever, tonsillar enlargement or exudate, tender and enlarged anterior cervical lymph nodes, and the absence of cough. The goal of this manuscript is to review the evidence and provide a recommendation as to whether a scoring system should be used to decide which patients should have a GAS diagnostic test (ie, rapid antigen test [RADT], molecular method, and/or throat culture) performed. We performed a systematic review of randomized and nonrandomized studies that compared the use of a clinical scoring system to clinician judgment alone in predicting the result of a throat culture. Evidence from studies in children and adults suggests the diagnostic accuracy is comparable or slightly higher using a scoring system compared to clinician judgment alone. Although the studies are limited due to small size, lack of uniformity in outcome measures, and incomplete data, the consensus of the panel is that the balance of benefits and harms favors incorporation of a clinical scoring system as part of the evaluation of patients with sore throat and suspected GAS pharyngitis.

Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often complain of dyspnea, raising the question that symptoms could be related to unrecognized heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods We used the HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF algorithm to estimate the probability of undiagnosed HFpEF in CABANA (Catheter Ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy), and its interaction with catheter ablation on quality of life (QOL). Probable HFpEF was defined as patient‐reported dyspnea with HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF probability≥75%. Absence of dyspnea or HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF probability<75% was considered to reflect patients without HFpEF. The effect of randomization to catheter ablation on QOL (Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory questionnaire and EuroQol‐5 Dimension‐3 Level score) was assessed using mixed models. Results Of participants without known HF, 70% (n=1225) had probable HFpEF and the remaining 30% (n=522) did not. Those with probable HFpEF had worse New York Heart Association class, EuroQol‐5 Dimension‐3 Level score, Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory severity, and Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory frequency scores ( P <0.0001 for all), with higher risk of HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19 [95% CI, 1.11–4.31], P =0.01). Ablation resulted in greater improvement in EuroQol‐5 Dimension‐3 Level and Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory severity/frequency scores in probable HFpEF (interactions P =0.005, P =0.05, and P =0.04 respectively). In probable HFpEF, catheter ablation was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular hospitalization (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66–0.92], P =0.003, interaction P =0.03) but not HF hospitalization (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.55–1.64], P =0.84). Conclusions Nearly three quarters of CABANA participants had potentially undiagnosed HFpEF, with worse QOL and risk of HF hospitalization. Catheter ablation in probable HFpEF resulted in greater improvement in QOL, but residual QOL impairment and HF risk remained elevated despite ablation. These data reinforce the importance of diligent consideration of HFpEF among patients with symptomatic AF to ensure optimal use of foundational treatments for HF.

Background: A critical component of conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses is assessing the methodological quality and bias of included studies. Several methodological quality assessment tools have been developed; however, these tools may not be relevant to observational sports medicine research, which carries numerous unique nuances and biases. Purpose: To develop the Sport Publication Observational Research Tool (SPORT), which evaluates and scores the methodological quality of observational sports medicine research. Study Design: Consensus statement. Methods: SPORT was developed through a modified Delphi approach involving members from the Herodicus Society and The FORUM. All active members were invited to participate in the process aimed at building consensus on SPORT content and scoring. After finalizing SPORT, a power analysis led to the independent selection of 55 observational clinical sports medicine studies, which were scored twice by 4 reviewers of varying training levels. Interrater and intrarater reliability for SPORT was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The distribution and percentiles for total SPORT score across the 55 studies were calculated. SPORT was also compared with the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS), a commonly utilized quality assessment tool. Results: A total of 51 members participated and achieved 100%, 100%, 98.0%, and 98.0% completion rates for rounds 1 through 4, respectively. The final SPORT included 19 subscores related to methodological quality and bias and achieved 94% consensus approval. Mean SPORT completion time was 6 minutes and 19 seconds per study, which varied significantly by reviewer training level. The subscore "peer review" demonstrated unacceptable reliability and was removed. The remaining 18 subscores exhibited ICC ranges of 0.599 to 0.955 for interrater reliability and 0.530 to 0.936 for intrarater reliability. Total SPORT score demonstrated excellent agreement, for interrater (ICC, 0.967) and intrarater reliability (ICC, 0.966). Median SPORT score across the 55 studies was 20.0 and skewed toward lower scores. There was a moderate significant correlation between SPORT and MINORS ( r [53] = 0.575; P < .001). Conclusion: An objective tool to assess the methodologic quality of observational sports medicine research (SPORT) was successfully developed through a modified Delphi approach with numerous content experts in the field. This tool may be useful in assessing the methodological quality of primary observational sports medicine studies included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Abstract Background Artificial intelligence enhanced electrocardiograms (AI-ECG) have matured over the past 10 years. More recently, the AI-ECG estimate of biological sex has shown potential as a novel tool for cardiovascular risk stratification among women. Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality; however, there have been limited approaches for estimating the physiological demands of pregnancy and its impact of maternal cardiovascular outcomes. Purpose To estimate pregnancy-related changes on AI-ECG-based sex and age estimation in a prospective cohort of otherwise healthy, complication free pregnant women. Methods This secondary analysis of the SPEC-AI Nigeria Clinical Trial identified pregnant women without any pregnancy-related complications (at baseline or during follow-up) who had at least two 12 lead ECGs recorded during the study. The ECGs were analyzed with previously-developed algorithms to predict age and biological sex. To address bias in the AI-ECG age estimate, a reference cohort of 25,144 healthy patients was analyzed using quantile regression to estimate the 75th percentile of the reference distribution as a function of age. The estimate of biological sex was used to determine a sex discordance score with a discordance of 0.2 considered clinically relevant. To simplify the trends in the data, the ECGs were categorized as during pregnancy (&lt;=28 days prior to birth), peripartum (+/- 28 days of birth), and postpartum (28+ days after birth), and mixed effects models with a random intercept were used for analysis. Results A total of 207 females with a median age of 31 years (IQR 28 to 36 years) and normal blood pressures (systolic: 110 (IQR 10 to 120); diastolic: 70 (IQR 60-77); mmHg) were included from 5 clinical sites in Nigeria. The majority (73%, 150/207) of participants were in their second trimester at time of enrollment and the median number of ECGs per participant was 3 (max 7). The sex discordance score was elevated in 38% of the women at baseline and this percentage fell to 23% postpartum; which resulted in a decrease in the mean discordance score of 0.03 (95% CI: -0.06 to 0.0; p=0.028). Conversely, the percentage of patients with elevated age prediction increased from 35% to 41% over the course of pregnancy. This resulted in an increase in the bias-corrected AI-ECG age of 3.0 years (95% CI: 1.5 to 4.6 years; p&lt;0.001). Conclusion This study demonstrates the preliminary utility of serial AI-ECG based assessment as a marker for the biological effects of pregnancy. The increase in sex discordance score during pregnancy may be related to changes in cardiac structure, such as increased ventricular mass and chamber dilation which often reverses postpartum. However, the impact on age estimation appeared to persist in the early postpartum period. Further study is warranted to associate any changes observed with long term maternal or fetal outcomes.Figure

Abstract Background Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death among women. Non-obstructive coronary disease (NOCAD), often identified by a positive stress test and negative coronary angiogram result, is linked to adverse outcomes, particularly among women. Purpose This study evaluated the impact of discordant Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) stress test and coronary angiogram results on repeat invasive angiography and survival, while assessing sex-related differences. Methods Data were extracted from a single health system for patients who underwent a SPECT MPI stress test, and invasive coronary angiography performed within 3 months from September 2002 to July 2018. Discordance was defined as: Profile A – a positive stress test with negative angiography (epicardial coronary vessel stenosis &lt;50%); Profile B – a negative stress test with positive angiography (at least one epicardial coronary vessel stenosis &gt;=50%). To assess the association between discordance and all-cause mortality, Cox-proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the most recent stress/angiogram pair (adjusting for race, age, and number of prior angiograms). For repeat invasive angiography, where mortality was considered a competing event, the Fine-Gray proportional hazards model for the sub-distribution of a competing risk was used to analyze the first stress/angiogram pair (adjusting for race and age). Hazard ratios (HRs), sub-distribution hazard ratios (SHRs), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Results 5,179 were included in the final analysis, median age was 67.9 years and 32.7% were female. Approximately 15% and 24% were classified as Profile A and B respectively. Patients with a negative stress/negative angiogram were designated as the reference group. Profile A was not significantly associated with mortality or repeat invasive testing in both sexes. Profile B was associated with the highest risk of death (female aHR: 1.58, P&lt;.001; male aHR: 1.54, P&lt;.001) followed by those with a positive stress/positive angiogram (female aHR: 1.39, P=.009; male aHR: 1.25, P=.05) compared to the reference group. Profile B was significantly associated with repeat invasive testing and a stronger association was seen in females (female aSHR: 9.84, P&lt; .001; male aSHR: 3.42, P&lt;.001). A similar pattern was seen for those with a positive stress/positive angiogram. Conclusion Discordant Profile A showed no significant association with mortality or repeat invasive testing. Discordant Profile B was associated with the highest mortality risk in both sexes and showed a stronger association with repeat invasive testing among females. These findings underscore the importance of careful patient selection for stress testing, the need for improved stress testing options (especially in females), and prompt coronary evaluation in patients with a negative stress test and persistent symptoms or high-risk features.