Farrow, Lutul D.

ABSTRACT This study aims to develop MRI‐based 3D statistical shape models for patellar dislocation patients and investigate bone shape features that distinguish between single and recurrent dislocation populations, as well as control and patellar dislocation populations. MRIs from 16 single dislocation patients, 17 recurrent dislocation patients, and 20 control subjects were used to build statistical shape models for femur and patella bones. Bone shape features were extracted and tested for statistical significance ( p < 0.05) for distinguishing the single dislocation group from the recurrent dislocation groups, and the control group from the dislocation group. Statistically significant shape features distinguishing the three groups were identified for both bones. A shallower trochlear groove and smaller patellar ridge told the dislocation groups apart from the control group. A prolonged lateral condyle in femur and a laterally shifted ridge and hood shaped lateral facet in patella distinguished the recurrent dislocation group from the single dislocation group. The study's findings from 3D statistical shape modeling of the femur and patella reveal distinct anatomical differences across control, single dislocation, and recurrent patellar dislocation groups. This advanced understanding aids in identifying individuals at higher risk for initial or recurring patellar dislocations, enabling clinicians to tailor treatment and management strategies more effectively to prevent further dislocations and mitigate potential patellofemoral joint damage.

Through a Delphi process, all 33 panelists reached consensus on topics relating to MRI reporting of knee meniscus lesions, demonstrating that interdisciplinary and multi-institutional standardization is possible.

Background: A critical component of conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses is assessing the methodological quality and bias of included studies. Several methodological quality assessment tools have been developed; however, these tools may not be relevant to observational sports medicine research, which carries numerous unique nuances and biases. Purpose: To develop the Sport Publication Observational Research Tool (SPORT), which evaluates and scores the methodological quality of observational sports medicine research. Study Design: Consensus statement. Methods: SPORT was developed through a modified Delphi approach involving members from the Herodicus Society and The FORUM. All active members were invited to participate in the process aimed at building consensus on SPORT content and scoring. After finalizing SPORT, a power analysis led to the independent selection of 55 observational clinical sports medicine studies, which were scored twice by 4 reviewers of varying training levels. Interrater and intrarater reliability for SPORT was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The distribution and percentiles for total SPORT score across the 55 studies were calculated. SPORT was also compared with the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS), a commonly utilized quality assessment tool. Results: A total of 51 members participated and achieved 100%, 100%, 98.0%, and 98.0% completion rates for rounds 1 through 4, respectively. The final SPORT included 19 subscores related to methodological quality and bias and achieved 94% consensus approval. Mean SPORT completion time was 6 minutes and 19 seconds per study, which varied significantly by reviewer training level. The subscore "peer review" demonstrated unacceptable reliability and was removed. The remaining 18 subscores exhibited ICC ranges of 0.599 to 0.955 for interrater reliability and 0.530 to 0.936 for intrarater reliability. Total SPORT score demonstrated excellent agreement, for interrater (ICC, 0.967) and intrarater reliability (ICC, 0.966). Median SPORT score across the 55 studies was 20.0 and skewed toward lower scores. There was a moderate significant correlation between SPORT and MINORS ( r [53] = 0.575; P < .001). Conclusion: An objective tool to assess the methodologic quality of observational sports medicine research (SPORT) was successfully developed through a modified Delphi approach with numerous content experts in the field. This tool may be useful in assessing the methodological quality of primary observational sports medicine studies included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.