Citations

Abstract INTRODUCTION Immunotherapy has not improved survival in recurrent GBM (rGBM). Indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), highly expressed in ~90% of patients with malignant glioma, is a rate-limiting enzyme that catabolizes tryptophan (Trp) into kynurenine (Kyn) and enables immune escape. METHODS We hypothesized combining therapies targeting immunosuppressive pathways with cytotoxic and antiangiogenic therapies would overcome tumor-related immunosuppression. This was an open-label Phase II study of two regimens: Arm A consisted of retifanlimab (anti-PD1, 500mg IV Q4W) + bevacizumab (10mg/kg IV Q2W) + HFRT (3.5Gy/day x 10) in patients with IDH1/2-WT rGBM. Regimen B added the IDO inhibitor, epacadostat (400mg po BID), initiated prior to HFRT. Key inclusion criteria included dexamethasone ≤ 4 mg/day. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 9 months (OS-9). 24 evaluable patients were required to detect an OS-9 of 60% with 80% power, compared to 38% in historical controls (bevacizumab alone) by 1-sided 1-sample log rank test at alpha=0.1. RESULTS We previously reported Arm A. Here, we present results from Arm B. 25 of the 27 patients enrolled to regimen B were evaluable: median age 58years (23-71); 28% female; 23% MGMT promotor methylated; median KPS 90 (70 - 100); a median of 6 cycles of epacadostat as of May 2024 (1 - 13). 18 of 25 died with a median follow up 9.23 months. Median PFS was 7.52 months (95%CI: 5.52-9.43). Median OS was 9.5 months (95%CI 8.08-11.96). Regimen B met its primary endpoint with OS-9 of 61.07% (95%CI: 38.23-77.65%). There were 5 possible immune-related grade 3+ toxicities to date (2 ALT/AST increase; 3 rash). CONCLUSIONS Retifanlimab, epacadostat, HFRT, and bevacizumab in rGBM is well-tolerated, with encouraging OS and PFS at the time of submission. Arm B met its primary endpoint. Further studies are warranted to identify biomarkers to predict long-term responders.

Importance The prognosis for patients with glioblastoma is poor following standard therapy with surgical resection, radiation, temozolomide, and tumor-treating fields. Objectives To evaluate the combination of veliparib and temozolomide in glioblastoma based on preclinical data demonstrating significant chemosensitizing effects of the polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase 1/2 inhibitor veliparib when combined with temozolomide. Design, Setting, and Participants Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with MGMT promoter hypermethylation who had completed concomitant radiation and temozolomide were enrolled between December 15, 2014, and December 15, 2018, in this Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology trial. The data for this analysis were locked on April 21, 2023. Interventions Patients were randomized and treated with standard adjuvant temozolomide (150-200 mg/m 2 orally, days 1-5) combined with either placebo or veliparib (40 mg orally, twice daily, days 1-7) for 6 cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point for the phase 3 portion of the trial was overall survival (OS). Results There were 322 patients randomized during the phase 2 accrual period and an additional 125 patients randomized to complete the phase 3 accrual, for a total of 447 patients in the final phase 3 analysis. The median (range) age for patients was 60 (20-85) years and 190 patients (42.5%) were female. The median OS was 24.8 months (90% CI, 22.6-27.7) for the placebo arm and 28.1 months (90% CI, 24.3-33.3) for the veliparib arm ( P = .17). The difference in survival did not meet the prespecified efficacy end point. However, there was a separation of the survival curves that favored the veliparib arm over 24 to 48 months of follow-up. The experimental combination was well tolerated with an acceptable elevation in grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance This trial found that adding veliparib to adjuvant temozolomide did not significantly extend OS in patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT -hypermethylated glioblastoma. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02152982

Abstract AIMS Methods for disease monitoring in glioma are currently limited. Liquid biopsies are of increasing interest within the field but have been challenging due to the blood-brain barrier. To bypass this challenge, we aimed to assess the technical and clinical feasibility of obtaining intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for disease monitoring via cell-free DNA (cfDNA). METHOD Adults with gliomas were recruited for longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via CSF access devices, including Ommaya reservoirs in four patients and an existing VP shunt in one patient. cfDNA was then extracted and analyzed using two sequencing platforms, PredicineCARE for cancer variant profiling and PredicineSCORE for low-pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS). This analysis generated genomic aberration profiles and genome wide copy number burden (CNB) score. RESULTS Across five patients, thirty-five CSF samples were obtained (median volume: 3.80 mL; 0.5-5 mL), with 30 samples (85.7%) yielding sufficient cfDNA. Tumor fraction increased by 6.28x and 2.87x in two patients with radiographic disease progression and decreased by 0.08x and 0.04x in another two after chemoradiation. In another patient with pseudoprogression, tumor fraction decreased from 0.26 after resection to unmeasurable levels. Patient specific tumor-associated variant allelic frequencies (VAFs), including TP53, PTEN, and TERT, decreased within individual patients after resection and chemoradiation. In two patients with IDH-mutant gliomas, IDH1 VAF after resection correlated with decreased CSF D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) levels (0.64x and 0.62x, respectively, for the first patient, and 0.01x and 0.07x for the other patient). Both IDH1 VAF and D-2-HG increased in a patient with radiographic progression (2.56x and 9.21x, respectively). CNB decreased below the limit of quantification during treatment and increased above the limit at progression. CONCLUSION Longitudinal CSF cfDNA can feasibly be obtained via CSF access devices in patients with gliomas during their disease course. Further sample collection and analysis are ongoing to determine the thresholds of change indicative of treatment response and progression.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Despite an established standard of care including surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, GBM unfortunately is associated with a dismal prognosis. Therefore, researchers are extensively evaluating avenues to expand GBM therapy and improve outcomes in patients with GBM. In this review, we provide a broad overview of novel GBM therapies that have recently completed or are actively undergoing study in clinical trials. These therapies expand across medical, surgical, and radiation clinical trials. We additionally review methods for improving clinical trial design in GBM.

2053 Background: Current methods for glioma treatment response assessment are limited. This study aimed to assess the technical and clinical feasibility of molecular profiling using intracranial CSF from patients with gliomas during their disease course. Methods: Adults with gliomas were recruited for longitudinal intracranial CSF collection using 1) Ommaya reservoirs, from which CSF would be sampled on at least two separate occasions, or 2) CSF collection from other clinically indicated CSF access devices, such as ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts. Patients were followed until their last visit or present time for ongoing participants. For this initial cfDNA feasibility study, CSF was collected from Ommaya reservoirs in four patients and from an existing VP shunt in one patient. cfDNA was then extracted and analyzed using two sequencing platforms, PredicineCARE for cancer variant profiling and PredicineSCORE for low-pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS). This analysis generated genomic aberration profiles and genome-wide copy number burden (CNB) score. Results: Five patients (2 females, 3 males; median age: 40 years, range 32-64 years) underwent longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via Ommaya reservoirs (n=4) or VP shunt (n=1). In total, thirty-five CSF samples were obtained (median volume: 3.80 mL; 0.5-5 mL), with 30 samples (85.7%) yielding sufficient cfDNA for variant profiling and LP-WGS. Our initial findings suggest that tumor fraction increased by 6.28x and 2.87x with radiographic progression in two patients. Tumor fraction decreased by 0.08x and 0.04x in two patients with paired immediate pre-versus-post chemoradiation samples. Despite ongoing pseudoprogression in one patient, tumor fraction decreased to unmeasurable levels from a post-resection baseline of 0.26. Patient-specific tumor-associated variant allelic frequencies (VAFs), including TP53, PTEN, TERT, and CDKN2A/B, decreased within individual patients after resection and chemoradiation. In two patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas, decreasing IDH1 VAF after resection correlated with decreased CSF D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) levels (0.64x and 0.62x, respectively, for the first patient, and 0.01x and 0.07x for the other patient). Both CSF IDH1 VAF and CSF D-2-HG increased in the patient who had radiographic progression (2.56x and 9.21x, respectively). Moreover, CNB decreased below the limit of quantification during treatment and increased above the limit at progression. Conclusions: Longitudinal CSF cfDNA can feasibly be obtained via CSF access devices in patients with gliomas during their disease course. Ongoing studies will evaluate hypotheses generated in this case series regarding how longitudinal CSF cfDNA could be utilized to sensitively detect changes in disease burden. Clinical trial information: NCT04692337 ; NCT04692324 .

Background: Extracranial metastases occur in <2% of cases of glioblastoma (GBM). When metastases do occur, bone is the most common destination. Herein, we review clinical characteristics of GBM patients with osseous metastases and evaluate both potential risk factors and prognostic significance. Methods: Using an institutional database, we identified and retrospectively analyzed 6 patients with both GBM and osseous metastases. We collected data on patient demographics, tumor genetics, clinical courses, and outcomes. Given the rarity of metastatic GBM, we conducted historical comparisons using previously published literature. Results: Five patients with osseous metastases (83%) were male, with a median age of 46 years at GBM diagnosis (range: 20–84). All patients had IDH -wildtype, MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM and 5 (83%) had alterations in TP53 . All patients underwent surgical resection for GBM followed by radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Four patients (67%) received bevacizumab prior to bone metastasis diagnosis. Bone metastases were discovered at a median of 12.2 months (range: 5.3–35.2) after GBM diagnosis and 4.8 months after starting bevacizumab (range: 3.5–13.2). Three patients (50%) received immunotherapy. After osseous metastasis diagnosis, the median survival was 25 days (range: 13–225). Conclusion: In our cohort, most patients were male and young at the time of GBM diagnosis. All patients had IDH -wildtype, MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM, and most had alterations in TP53 , which may be important for osseous metastasis. Most patients received bevacizumab, which has been associated with earlier metastasis. Osseous metastases of GBM occur and portend a dismal prognosis in an already aggressive malignancy.

TPS1647 Background: The majority of patients with primary and secondary central nervous system (CNS) malignancy develop cognitive impairment, fatigue, and mood-related symptoms. Radiotherapy has been shown to contribute to symptom burden often limiting quality of life and functional status. The development of interventions mitigating neurocognitive toxicity requires an accurate assessment of function and symptom burden. Formal neuropsychological evaluation is resource and time intensive, and often challenging to incorporate in routine clinical practice. There is a critical need to accurately assess cognition without causing undue burden to cancer patients while evaluating the efficacy of interventions that can be scaled and implemented at a population level. Methods: To adequately assess the neurocognitive function and related symptoms in patients with CNS malignancy we have designed an open-label decentralized clinical trial that will randomize patients who received intracranial radiation for primary or metastatic brain tumors in a 1:1 allocation to a therapy targeting radiation-related toxicity (metformin shipped to patient home) plus health promotion with a wearable device vs. health promotion with a wearable device alone. Participants will be stratified based on tumor type (glioblastoma vs. other glioma vs. brain metastases vs. meningioma) and age (<70 vs. 70+ years). Participants will be provided a wearable device for monitoring health status. Participants will undergo serial remote cognitive assessments with the Mayo Test Development Through Rapid Iteration, Validation and Expansion platform (Mayo Test Drive). Remote reported symptom collection via patient surveys and remote neurologic examination by telehealth will also be incorporated. Cognitive assessments and symptom surveys will be designed for completion on a smartphone, tablet, or computer device. Health data will be collected from the wearable device, including the number of steps per day and sleep quality/duration. Participants receiving metformin will utilize device apps to report medication adherence and adverse events. Study-related laboratory assessments will be completed remotely and transmitted electronically. This decentralized clinical trial will provide real-world cognitive and quality-of-life data for patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors while providing preliminary data on the effectiveness of device-based health promotion with or without metformin for treating radiation-related cognitive decline. Results gained from this study will guide future trials in neuro-oncology and other fields. This study is expected to open in March 2024.

2598 Background: GI-102 (CD80-IL2v3) is a novel immunocytokine designed to direct IL-2v3 to immune cells and tumor cells. IL-2v3 of GI-102 abolished affinity to IL-2Rα minimizing the impact of IL-2 on Treg cells. Preferential targeting of immune cells and further inhibition of CTLA-4 and PD-L1 via CD80 synergize with potent activity of IL-2v3, resulting in robust proliferation and activation of CD8+ T and NK cells. Here we report preliminary safety and efficacy data of GI-102 from a phase 1/2a trial in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Methods: NCT05824975 is an ongoing, dose escalation (3+3 design) and expansion study to evaluate safety, tolerability, PK, PD and anti-tumor activity of GI-102. Each dose level allows to enroll additional 7 patients to fully inform the safety, PK and PD at that dose level. GI-102 was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Disease was assessed every 6 weeks using RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 12 Jan 2024, 32 patients were treated in dose escalation: 8 at dose level 0.06 mg/kg, 10 at 0.12 mg/kg, 9 at 0.24 mg/kg and 5 at 0.45 mg/kg. Patients had received median of 3 [1-7] prior lines of therapy, including 25.0% (8/32) who had received ≥ 5 lines and 68.8% (22/32) had experienced immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed until the highest dose of 0.45 mg/kg Q3W. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, ≥ 10%) were pyrexia [43.8%] and chills [34.4%]. 5 patients [15.6%] had ≥ Grade 3 TRAEs and no patient reported TRAEs leading to discontinuation of GI-102. In 23 patients (7 cutaneous melanoma, 4 non-small cell lung cancer, 3 ovarian cancer and others) who had at least 1 post-treatment tumor assessment, objective responses were observed in 17.4% (4/23). In patients with metastatic melanoma who previously experienced ICB, overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 42.9% (3/7) and 85.7% (6/7), respectively, including 3 confirmed partial responses (cPR). The median time to response (TTR) was 6 weeks and duration of response (DoR) was 6.0+, 2.4+ and 1.7+ month, respectively. In patients with metastatic ovarian cancer, ORR and DCR were 33.3% (1/3) and 66.7% (2/3), respectively, including 1 cPR [TTR of 6 weeks; DoR 1.9+ month]. Preliminary PK profile showed target-mediated drug disposition with a half-life of ~48 hours. 0.24 mg/kg of GI-102 resulted in a significant expansion of peripheral lymphocytes, CD8+ T cells (effector & memory) and NK cells, by 4.4 [2.1-9.6], 3.9 [2.0–5.7] and 20.4 [9.5–32.6]-fold change from baseline, respectively. There was no meaningful increase in Treg cells. Conclusions: GI-102 was well tolerated up to dose of 0.45 mg/kg Q3W with meaningful monotherapy activity, regardless of previous ICB experience, in patients who failed on standard of care. The dose-escalation is currently ongoing to identify RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT05824975 .

2015 Background: Effective treatments for recurrent meningiomas following radiation therapy (RT) are limited. Inhibitors of the programmed-death-1 (PD-1) or programmed-death ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathway have shown modest activity for these tumors in single-arm phase 2 studies. This study aims to evaluate the immunological effects of combining anti-PD-L1 (avelumab) with proton beam therapy (PBT) for recurrent radiation-relapsed meningiomas. Methods: Recurrent grade 1-3 meningiomas that failed prior surgery and RT were treated with neoadjuvant avelumab (10 mg/kg IV biweekly for 6 doses) plus hypofractionated PBT (20 Gy over 5 fractions), followed by surgery and additional adjuvant avelumab (up to 6 doses). Blood samples were collected pre-avelumab, at week 4, and before surgery. Eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, KPS ≥ 60, surgery suitability, dexamethasone dose ≤ 4mg daily, normal organ function; no prior anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy, and absence of autoimmunity. RNA-sequencing (RNAseq) and multiplex immunofluorescence (MxIF) were performed on pre- and post-avelumab tumor tissues; blood samples underwent multiplex flow cytometry (MxFC). Results: Between March 2018 to March 2023, 9 patients (22% grade 1, 56% grade 2, and 22% grade 3) were enrolled in the study. All completed neoadjuvant therapy, one forwent surgery due to dramatic radiological response, and two did not complete adjuvant avelumab (due to patient preference and infusion reaction). There was no dose-limiting toxicity or unexpected toxicity. After a median follow-up of 43.0 month and a minimum follow-up of 21.7 months, 8 patients have progressed, and 2 patients with progression have died. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.1 months (95% CI: 15.2-23.0), with the median overall survival not yet reached. Three patients demonstrated notably prolonged PFS (37.7, 58.5 months, and ongoing). RNAseq showed significant increase in T-cell and macrophage gene expression in post-treatment tissues compared to pre-treatment. MxIF revealed a marked increase in T-cell and CD68+ macrophage infiltration in the long-PFS patients’ post-treatment tissues, a pattern not observed in the short-PFS patients. Particularly, the long-PFS patients’ post-treatment tissues displayed increased infiltration of CD68+HLADR+ macrophages, likely of M1-phenotype. In contrast, the pre- and post-treatment tissues from the short-PFS patients predominantly featured CD206+ macrophages, likely of M2-phenotype. A trend towards increased number of primed T cells in the peripheral blood was observed in the long-PFS patients at week 4. Conclusions: Avelumab combined with RT may induce an immunological response in some radiation-relapsed meningioma patients, leading to prolonged remission. Further investigations with larger prospective studies and predictive biomarkers are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03267836 .

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent malignant tumor of the central nervous system. The prognosis of GBM is grim, with a median overall survival of 14.6 months and only 6.9% of patients surviving 5 years after the initial diagnosis. Despite poor outcomes, standard therapy of surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and tumor-treating fields has remained largely unchanged. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has been a paradigm shift in oncology, with efficacy across a broad spectrum of cancer types. Nonetheless, investigations of ICIs in both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM have thus far been disappointing. This lack of clinical benefit has been largely attributed to the highly immunosuppressive nature of GBM. However, immunotherapy still holds promise for the treatment of GBM, with combinatorial strategies offering hope for potentially overcoming these current limitations. In this review, we discuss the outcomes of clinical trials employing ICIs in patients with GBM. Afterward, we review ICI combination strategies and how these combinations may overcome the immunosuppressive microenvironment of GBM in the context of preclinical/clinical evidence and ongoing clinical trials.