Andersen, Katherine M.

Abstract Background Imaging-based glioma monitoring is confounded by treatment-related changes. D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG), produced by the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, is detectable in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which can be sampled from cranial or lumbar compartments. We evaluated CSF D-2-HG as a serially accessible biomarker for IDH-mutant gliomas, including the optimal compartment for longitudinal sampling. Methods Lumbar and cranial CSF samples were collected from patients with IDH-mutant gliomas or IDH-wild-type central nervous system pathologies via surgical field collection, lumbar punctures, and CSF access devices. CSF D-2-HG was quantified via our CLIA-certified gas chromatography mass spectrometry assay. Results D-2-HG was significantly higher in cranial than lumbar CSF from IDH-mutant glioma patients. Consistent with low D-2-HG abundance in lumbar CSF, lumbar samples could not discriminate IDH-mutant gliomas from IDH-wild-type lesions. In contrast, cranial CSF D-2-HG was significantly higher in IDH-mutant gliomas than wild-type lesions, providing an adequate baseline for initial evaluations of monitoring capabilities. Across 75 samples from 7 consecutive patients with grade 4 IDH-mutant astrocytomas, serial cranial CSF D-2-HG decreased with cytoreduction, remained unchanged with stable disease, and increased with disease progression, but not pseudoprogression. Conclusions Serial cranial CSF D-2-HG shows promise as a monitoring biomarker for IDH-mutant gliomas.

Abstract Background While serial sampling of glioma tissue is rarely performed prior to recurrence, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an underutilized longitudinal source of candidate glioma biomarkers for understanding therapeutic impacts. However, the impact of key variables to consider in longitudinal CSF samples for monitoring biomarker discovery, including anatomical location and post-surgical changes, remains unknown. Methods Aptamer-based proteomics was performed on 147 CSF samples from 74 patients; 71 of whom had grade 2–4 astrocytomas or grade 2–3 oligodendrogliomas. This included pre- versus post-resection intracranial CSF samples obtained at early (1–16 days; n = 20 patients) or delayed (86–153 days; n = 11 patients) time points for patients with glioma. Paired lumbar versus intracranial glioma CSF samples were also obtained (n = 14 patients). Results Significant differences were identified in the CSF proteome between lumbar, subarachnoid, and ventricular CSF in patients with gliomas. Importantly, we found that resection had a significant, evolving longitudinal impact on the CSF proteome, with distinct sets of proteins present at different time points since resection. Our analysis of serial intracranial CSF samples suggests the early potential for disease monitoring and evaluation of pharmacodynamic impact of targeted therapies, such as bevacizumab and immunotherapies. Conclusions The intracranial glioma CSF proteome serves as a rich and dynamic reservoir of potential biomarkers that can be used to evaluate the effects of resection and other therapies over time. All data within this study, including detailed individual clinical annotations, are shared as a resource for the neuro-oncology community to collectively address these unanswered questions and further understand glioma biology through CSF proteomics.

Abstract Purpose: Current methods for glioma response assessment are limited. This study aimed to assess the technical and clinical feasibility of molecular profiling using longitudinal intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients with gliomas. Experimental Design: Adults with gliomas underwent longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via Ommaya reservoirs or ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted and analyzed using PredicineCARE for cancer variant profiling and/or PredicineSCORE for low-pass whole-genome sequencing. Results: Five patients (two females and three males; median age, 40 years; range, 32–64 years) underwent longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via Ommaya reservoirs (n = 4) or ventriculoperitoneal shunts (n = 1). In total, 47 CSF samples were obtained (median volume, 4.00 mL; 0.5–5 mL). Forty-one samples (87.2%) yielded sufficient cfDNA for testing. Patient-specific tumor-associated variant allelic frequencies (VAF), and thus tumor fraction, decreased in pre- versus postchemoradiation samples, including through pseudoprogression. These also increased with radiographic progression in three patients, although identifying the time of definitive disease progression from MRIs was a significant limitation. In two patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutant gliomas, decreasing IDH1 VAF after resection and chemoradiation correlated with decreased CSF D-2-hydroxyglutarate levels (0.64× and 0.62×, respectively, for the first patient and 0.01× and 0.07× for the other patient), although D-2-hydroxyglutarate and IDH1 VAF were not concordant in one patient thereafter. Moreover, the copy-number burden decreased below the limit of quantification during treatment and increased above the limit at progression. Conclusions: Longitudinal intracranial CSF cfDNA can be obtained in patients with gliomas during their disease course. However, before deploying this technique, numerous questions and challenges should be answered.

2053 Background: Current methods for glioma treatment response assessment are limited. This study aimed to assess the technical and clinical feasibility of molecular profiling using intracranial CSF from patients with gliomas during their disease course. Methods: Adults with gliomas were recruited for longitudinal intracranial CSF collection using 1) Ommaya reservoirs, from which CSF would be sampled on at least two separate occasions, or 2) CSF collection from other clinically indicated CSF access devices, such as ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts. Patients were followed until their last visit or present time for ongoing participants. For this initial cfDNA feasibility study, CSF was collected from Ommaya reservoirs in four patients and from an existing VP shunt in one patient. cfDNA was then extracted and analyzed using two sequencing platforms, PredicineCARE for cancer variant profiling and PredicineSCORE for low-pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS). This analysis generated genomic aberration profiles and genome-wide copy number burden (CNB) score. Results: Five patients (2 females, 3 males; median age: 40 years, range 32-64 years) underwent longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via Ommaya reservoirs (n=4) or VP shunt (n=1). In total, thirty-five CSF samples were obtained (median volume: 3.80 mL; 0.5-5 mL), with 30 samples (85.7%) yielding sufficient cfDNA for variant profiling and LP-WGS. Our initial findings suggest that tumor fraction increased by 6.28x and 2.87x with radiographic progression in two patients. Tumor fraction decreased by 0.08x and 0.04x in two patients with paired immediate pre-versus-post chemoradiation samples. Despite ongoing pseudoprogression in one patient, tumor fraction decreased to unmeasurable levels from a post-resection baseline of 0.26. Patient-specific tumor-associated variant allelic frequencies (VAFs), including TP53, PTEN, TERT, and CDKN2A/B, decreased within individual patients after resection and chemoradiation. In two patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas, decreasing IDH1 VAF after resection correlated with decreased CSF D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) levels (0.64x and 0.62x, respectively, for the first patient, and 0.01x and 0.07x for the other patient). Both CSF IDH1 VAF and CSF D-2-HG increased in the patient who had radiographic progression (2.56x and 9.21x, respectively). Moreover, CNB decreased below the limit of quantification during treatment and increased above the limit at progression. Conclusions: Longitudinal CSF cfDNA can feasibly be obtained via CSF access devices in patients with gliomas during their disease course. Ongoing studies will evaluate hypotheses generated in this case series regarding how longitudinal CSF cfDNA could be utilized to sensitively detect changes in disease burden. Clinical trial information: NCT04692337 ; NCT04692324 .