Citations

Introduction Treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases through surgical decompression and reconstruction is known to improve quality of life in patients with cancer. However, most studies have been performed on patients with mixed tumor histopathology. We systematically review the literature for prognostic factors specific to the surgical treatment of prostate metastases to the spine to determine the indications and outcomes of the surgical treatment. Material and Methods A systemic review of the literature was conducted to answer the following questions: Q1. Describe the survival and functional outcomes of surgery or vertebral augmentation for prostate metastases to the spine; Q2. Determine whether overall tumor burden, Gleason score, preoperative functional markers, and favorable hormonal naivety for operative intervention; Q3. Establish whether clinical outcomes vary with the evolution of operative techniques. Expert consensus was obtained using a modified Delphi process. Results A total of 16 studies met the preset inclusion criteria. These studies were all retrospective series with a level of evidence of IV. Included studies consistently showed a large effect of hormone naivety on overall survival. In addition, studies consistently demonstrated an improvement in motor function and the ability to maintain/regain ambulation following surgery resulting in moderate strength of recommendation. All other parameters were of insufficient or low strength. Conclusion There is scant literature on the surgical treatment of prostate metastases to the spine, which represents an opportunity for future research. On the basis of the existing evidence, it appears that the surgical treatment of prostate metastases to the spine has consistently favorable results. While no consistent preoperative indicators favor nonoperative treatment, hormone naivety and high Karnofsky Performance Scores have positive effects on survival and clinical outcomes.

SummaryPatients with early stage diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receive RCHOP (rituximab cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) alone or with involved field radiotherapy (IFRT). Anti‐CD20 radioimmunotherapy (RIT) delivers radiation to microscopic sites outside of known disease. This phase II study aimed to achieve a functional complete response (CR) rate of ≥75% to RCHOP and 90Yttrium‐ibritumomab tiuxetan RIT. Patients with stages I/II DLBCL received 4–6 cycles of RCHOP followed by RIT [14·8 MBq/kg (0·4 mCi/kg)]; patients with positron emission tomographypositive sites of disease after RCHOP/RIT received 30 Gy IFRT. Of the 62 patients enrolled; 53 were eligible. 42% (22/53) had stage I/IE; 58% (31/53) stage II/IIE. After RCHOP, 79% (42/53) were in CR/unconfirmed CR. Forty‐eight patients proceeded to RIT. One partial responder after RIT received IFRT and achieved a CR. The best response after RCHOP + RIT in all 53 patients was a functional CR rate of 89% (47/53; 95% confidence interval: 77–96%). With a median follow‐up of 5·9 years, 7 (13%) patients have progressed and 4 (8%) have died (2 with DLBCL). At 5 years, 78% of patients remain in remission and 94% are alive. Chemoimmunotherapy and RIT is an active regimen for early stage DLBCL patients. Eighty‐nine percent of patients achieved functional CR without the requirement of IFRT. This regimen is worthy of further study for early stage DLBCL in a phase III trial.

Abstract The BBB can critically limit the delivery of several molecularly-targeted agents into the brain. The discovery of focal BRAF mutations in melanoma has stimulated the development of specific BRAF inhibitors. MEK is downstream of BRAF in the MAPK pathway, and has been targeted for combination therapy with BRAF inhibition. Trametinib is a MEK1/2 inhibitor that has improved survival in combination with dabrafenib in clinical trials for metastatic melanoma. We have recently shown that BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib and dabrafenib) have limited brain distribution due to active efflux at the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Melanoma metastasizes to the brain and effective treatments require adequate CNS exposure of all drugs used in combination therapy. The study purpose was to investigate mechanisms that influence the CNS distribution of trametinib, particularly focusing on the active efflux transport proteins P-gp and Bcrp in the BBB. Intracellular accumulation and bidirectional flux studies were conducted in polarized MDCKII cells that overexpress human P-gp (MDR1) or murine Bcrp (Bcrp1). The brain and plasma AUCs of trametinib were determined after an intravenous dose of 5 mg/kg in WT, Mdr1a/b (-/-), Bcrp1 (-/-) and Mdr1a/b (-/-) Bcrp1 (-/-) (TKO) mice. The steady-state brain distribution of trametinib was determined using osmotic pumps in WT and Mdr1a/b (-/-) (P-gp KO), Bcrp1 (-/-) (Bcrp KO), and Mdr1a/b (-/-) Bcrp1 (-/-) (TKO) mice. The steady-state brain distribution of a combination of trametinib and dabrafenib were determined in WT and TKO mice. IC50s were determined in patient-derived melanoma cell lines (WT and V600E mutant) using the MTT assay. Intracellular accumulation of trametinib was 45% lower in the MDCKII-MDR1 cells and 81% lower in the MDCKII-Bcrp1 cells as compared to WT. Trametinib permeability was ∼ 2.5 and 3.7-fold greater in the basolateral-to-apical direction as compared to apical-to-basolateral direction in the MDR1 and Bcrp1 cells, respectively. Following a single intravenous dose, the brain-to-plasma AUC ratios were approximately 5-fold greater in P-gp KO and TKO mice as compared to the WT. Interestingly, the brain distribution of trametinib in Bcrp KO mice was no different from WT mice. The steady-state brain to plasma (B/P) ratio of trametinib was 5-fold greater in the TKO mice when compared to the wild-type mice. The B/P ratio of both dabrafenib and trametinib were significantly greater in the TKO mice as compared to WT when dosed simultaneously. The IC50 for trametinib alone was > 10 μM in both the WT (M15) and V600E (M12) mutant cells, while a combination of dabrafenib and trametinib had an IC50 of 2.04 μM in the M12 cells. This study shows that P-gp and BCRP restrict the brain distribution of trametinib with P-gp playing a dominant role in the efflux of trametinib at the blood-brain barrier. These findings are clinically relevant to the efficacy of trametinib in mono or combination therapy for the treatment of melanoma brain metastases. Citation Format: Shruthi Vaidhyanathan, Rajendar K. Mittapalli, Daniel J. Ma, Mark A. Schroeder, Jann N. Sarkaria, William F. Elmquist. Trametinib (Mekinist TM) has limited brain distribution in the mouse model. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 3714. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-3714

Abstract The clinical efficacies of molecularly targeted glioblastomas therapies have been vastly disappointing. The multitudes of resistance mechanisms suggest that glioblastomas possess highly dynamic molecular circuits grounded in functional redundancy. Emerging data suggests that the expression of functionally redundant oncogenes induced similar forms of cellular stress, requiring hyper-activation of common compensatory pathways to ensure cell viability. Targeting these pathways, therefore, afford potential opportunities for tumor ablation while by-passing the redundancy of oncogenic circuitry. To explore this paradigm, we carried out a siRNA screen to identify synthetic lethal partners of the oncogenic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) in glioblastoma cells and identified Polo-Like Kinase 1 (PLK1). Treatment using a PLK1 inhibitor, BI2536, or siRNAs induced preferential toxicity to the EGFRvIII expressing glioblastoma cells in multiple in vitro (serum and neurosphere lines) and in vivo models (heterotopic and orthotopic xenograft models). Consistent with the heightened PLK1 requirement, EGFRvIII expressing glioblastomas harbored increased levels of the p-Thr210 PLK1 (an activated form of PLK1). Inhibition of PLK1 by BI2536 treatment induced an increase in the proportion of cells that co-stained for p-Histone H3 and γH2AX foci, suggesting accumulation of mitotic DNA damage. This effect was exacerbated by EGFRvIII expression, implicating induction of mitotic DNA damage as a major contributor to the observed synthetic lethality. Consistent with this observation, EGFRvIII expression induced the formation of aberrant mitosis as well as prolonged mitotic progression. Further supporting an essential role for PLK1 in suppressing DNA damage accumulation, BI2536 treatment significantly enhanced the tumoricidal effect of the DNA damaging chemotherapy, temozolomide. Mechanistically, inhibition of PLK1 suppressed the expression of Rad51, the accumulation of pS14 Rad51 (an active form of Rad51), as well as overall homologous recombination efficiency in vitro. We validated the clinical pertinence of these results using three clinically annotated glioblastoma databases (TCGA, REMEBMRANDT, CGGA). In all three datasets, increased expression of a PLK1 signature consistently associated with increased expression of HR genes and lowered gene expression signature associated with DNA damage accumulation. Supporting our proposed paradigm, the tumoricidal effect of BI2536 was universally observed in a panel of eight murine ink4a/arf (-/-) EGFRvIII expressing glioblastoma clones that developed resistance to EGFR inhibitors by distinct and independent mechanisms. In aggregate, our results support the essential role of PLK1 in suppressing mitotic DNA damage and provide a novel framework for glioblastoma therapy. Citation Format: Ying Shen, Masayuki Nitta, Jie Li, Diahnn Futalan, Tyler Steed, Zack Taich, Jeffrey M. Treiber, Deanna Stevens, Mark A. Schroeder, Jann N. Sarkaria, Hong-Zhuan Chen, Tao Jiang, Bob S. Carter, Fumiko Esashi, Jill Wakosky, Frank Furnari, Webster K. Cavenee, Arshad Desai, Clark C. Chen. Modulation of mitotic DNA damage as a paradigm for glioblastoma therapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2737. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2737

Abstract GNE-317 is a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor with excellent blood-brain barrier penetration. In this study, the efficacy of GNE-317 was evaluated in the Mayo panel of primary glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) xenografts. Based on the concept of oncogene addiction, we hypothesized that GNE-317 would be most efficacious in EGFR-hyper-activated and/or PTEN-deficient lines. In a CyQUANT cell proliferation assay, the inhibitory concentration of 50% cell number (IC50) for GBM6, 10, 22, and 84 were 0.59±0.50, 0.72±0.40, 0.26±0.14, and 3.49±1.64 microM, respectively. In these selected lines, there was a poor correlation between EGFR or PTEN status and in vitro response. The efficacy of GNE-317 also was evaluated in 10 lines in an orthotopic xenograft model. Mice with established tumors were randomized to daily dosing with GNE-317 (30 mg/kg) or placebo until moribund. Similar to in vitro data, there was a spectrum of response to GNE-317 (Table 1). The survival benefit ratio (ratio of median survival) did not correlate with EGFR amplification (P=0.78), EGFR mutation (P=0.25), or PTEN (P=0.55) status when analyzed singly. However, GNE-317 did extend survival in 4 of 5 lines in which either EGFR or PTEN were deregulated. To evaluate potentially clinically relevant combinations, the efficacy of GNE-317 combined with bevacizumab (BEV) was tested in the same orthotopic model in GBM8, 10, and 59. In GBM10, GNE-317/BEV provided a significant increase in survival compared to the most effective single agent (P<0.0001). In GBM8, 10, and 59, the ratio of median survival for GNE-317/BEV vs. placebo were 1.47, 1.75, and 1.74, respectively (all P≤0.01). In conclusion, there may be a correlation between deregulation of the EGFR/PTEN signaling network and GNE-317 efficacy, and the efficacy of GNE-317 in some models can be extended when combined with bevacizumab. Table 1:Molecular Characteristics and Efficacy of GNE-317 in Mayo Primary GBM XenograftsEGFR AmplifiedEGFR vIII MutatedPTEN MutatedGNE-317 Responder*Benefit Ratio** of GNE-317GBM6YesYesWTYes1.35GBM8YesNoYes, HDYes1.19GBM10NoNoYes, HDYes1.47GBM22NoNoWTNo0.85GBM59YesYesYes, HDYes1.27GBM84YesNoYes, del Exon 1No1.02GBM115NoNoTBDNo0.86GBM116NoNoTBDNo1.05GBM117NoNoTBDYes1.38GBM122YesNoTBDNo0.99Abbreviations: HD=homozygous deleted; del=deletion in; TBD=to be determined; WT=wild type.* If in vivo survival difference reached P<0.05 by Log-rank Kaplan-Meier method between the GNE-317 treated and placebo groups, the GBM line was classified as a responder to GNE-317.** The benefit ratio equals to median survival of the GNE-317 treated group, divided by that of the placebo group. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Terence T. Sio, Jenny L. Pokorny, Ann C. Mladek, Brett L. Carlson, Mark A. Schroeder, Dennis O. Iyekegbe, Katrina Bakken, Laurent Salphati, Heidi Phillips, Jann N. Sarkaria. Preclinical efficacy of GNE-317, a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, with or without bevacizumab in EGFR and/or PTEN-mutated glioblastoma multiforme. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2617. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2617

Abstract Background. We recently identified an in-frame ESR1 translocation in a tumor and PDX pair from a patient with endocrine therapy resistant advanced disease. The fusion gene preserved the N-terminal 365aa of ESR1 containing the intact activation function 1 (AF1), DNA-binding domain (DBD) and hinge, followed by the C-terminal transactivation domain of YAP1. The ESR1-365>YAP1 fusion drove estrogen-independent and anti-estrogen-resistant tumor cell growth (Cell Reports 4:1116, 2013). We therefore sought to further investigate the role of ESR1 fusion genes in breast cancer. Methods. 711 cases from TCGA, 82 ER+ cases from neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trials and 25 ER+ systemic relapse samples were screened for fusion genes using RNAseq. Fusion genes involving ESR1 were subsequently assayed for estrogen response element (ERE)-mediated transcriptional activity and ability to drive estradiol independent breast cancer cell growth. Results. Multiple ESR1 fusions were identified in mostly luminal B cancers. ESR1 fusions resulted most frequently from rearrangements involving another gene on Chromosome (Chr) 6 but also fusions with genes on other chromosomes. The fusions involving partners on Chr6 that retained an intact N terminal AF1 and DNA binding domain (DBD) of ESR1 (≥1-253aa) included an Out-of-Frame (OF) fusion event with CCDC170 (a gene immediately centromeric to ESR1), POLH (in-frame or IF), AKAP12 (IF), PCMT1 (OF), SYNE1 (OF) and GPR126 (OF). Also identified were inter-chromosomal translocations involving Chr12p-NOP2 (IF) and ChrX-PCDH11X (IF) and Chr7q-AKR1D1 (OF). The ESR1 fusions with transcriptional potential (because of a retained DNA binding domain) included variable 5’ ESR1 exons that preserved 253aa, 365aa, 412aa or 458aa of ESR1 sequence: in all cases disrupting ligand binding though loss of C terminal sequence. The effect of the IF and OF 3’ sequences on the transcriptional activity of the relevant ESR1 fragment was highly variable. The most transcriptionally active fusion (more active than the relevant ESR1 fragment alone) was the ESR1-365>YAP1 as well as ESR1-365>PCDH11X and ESR1-253>CCDC170. This is remarkable since PCDH11X is not considered a transcription factor and the CCDC170 sequence was OF – in both cases suggesting the activity of the fusion was due to "neomorphic" properties. Two fusions, NOP2 and POLH were inactive in the ERE reporter assay, yet both stimulated estradiol independent growth. In these cases we suggest that the ESR1 locus can function as a "promoter trap" which allows the identification of genes with previously unknown functions in endocrine therapy resistance. Conclusions: In luminal-type breast cancer the ESR1 gene was fused to multiple 3’ partners with remarkably heterogeneous functions. The two most transcriptionally active, ESR1-365>YAP1 and ESR1-365>PCDH11X, were both identified in endocrine therapy refractory advanced disease – suggesting a role in fatal disease progression. Citation Format: Jieya Shao, Jin Zhang, Robert J Crowder, Rodrigo Goncalves, Chanpheng Phommaly, Breast AWG and Network, Charles M Perou, Christopher A Maher, E Aubrey Thompson, Matthew J Ellis. ESR1 gene fusions implicated in endocrine therapy resistance of ER+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-4.

Abstract Background: Although the spectrum of genomic alterations in primary, treatment-naïve breast tumors has been described, the genomic landscape of HER2+ MBC remains underexplored. Furthermore, tumor genomic alterations that arise after progression on anti-HER2 therapy are largely unknown. Methods: We prospectively collected metastatic tumor biopsies from patients (pts) enrolled on TBCRC003 (NCT00470704), a phase II study evaluating the combination of lapatinib (L) and T in pts with HER2+ MBC who had varying degrees of prior T exposure. We performed WES on baseline metastatic biopsies and normal DNA from 57 pts. In 36 pts, we also performed WES on pre-treatment primary tumors. Tumors were analyzed for point mutations, insertions/deletions, and copy number alterations. Results: Total accrual was 116 pts. 87 pts were registered in one of two efficacy cohorts: Cohort 1 included pts w no prior T for MBC. Pts with prior adjuvant T were included if the interval from last T to 1st recurrence > 12 months. Cohort 2 included pts with 1-2 prior lines of T for MBC or recurrence within 12 months of adjuvant T. An additional 29 pts were enrolled in a biomarker cohort (Cohort 3). Per-protocol efficacy analyses for 85 pts deemed evaluable are shown below: Objective Response RateClinical Benefit RateMedian Time to ProgressionCohort 150% (90% CI 33.8-66.2%)57.5% (95% CI 40.9-73.0)7.4 monthsCohort 222.2% (90% CI 11.2-37.1%)42.2% (95% CI 27.7-57.8)5.3 months As we previously reported (Wagle et al, ASCO 2014), across 57 metastatic tumors, significant recurrently mutated genes were TP53 (n=30; 53%) and PIK3CA (n=19; 33%). The frequency of mutant TP53 and PIK3CA was not significantly different from 119 primary, treatment-naïve HER2+ tumors sequenced in the TCGA study (50%, p=0.8 and 27%, p=0.5, respectively). Recurrent copy number alterations were also similar to TCGA data. Comparing the 38 pts who received any prior T with the 19 pts who did not, there was no significant difference in the incidence of mutant TP53 (53% vs 53%, p=1.0) and PIK3CA (37% vs 26%, p=0.6). We identified mutations in the HER2 kinase domain in 4/38 pts who received prior T (11%), as compared to 0/19 T-naïve pts. HER2 kinase domain mutations have been identified in ∼2% of HER2-negative cancers but <1% of primary HER2+ cancers. 3 of the mutations were L755S, which has been shown to be resistant to L and sensitive to irreversible HER2 inhibitors. The 4th mutation was D742N, a novel kinase domain mutation. None of the 4 pts with HER2 kinase domain mutations had an objective response, though 1 pt had stable disease for 29 weeks. An analysis comparing paired archival primary tumors and baseline metastatic biopsies from 36 pts to identify genomic alterations acquired or enriched in the metastatic tumors will be presented. Conclusions: We present an analysis of the genomic landscape of HER2+ MBC, including comparisons between matched primary tumors and metastatic biopsies. Somatic HER2 kinase mutations in pts with HER2+ MBC treated with prior T suggests that these mutations may be involved in resistance to T, and may predict poor response to additional anti-HER2 therapy with combined L and T. Novel therapeutic approaches may be required for these pts. Citation Format: Nikhil Wagle, Nancy U Lin, Andrea L Richardson, Ignaty Leshchiner, Ingrid A Mayer, Andres Forero-Torres, Timothy J Hobday, Elizabeth C Dees, Rita Nanda, Mothaffar F Rimawi, Hao Guo, William T Barry, Ron Bose, Wei Shen, Antonio C Wolff, Stacey B Gabriel, Levi A Garraway, Eric P Winer, Ian E Krop. Whole exome sequencing (WES) of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from patients with or without prior trastuzumab (T): A correlative analysis of TBCRC003 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-5.

Abstract Background: The Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) is a method to predict outcome after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy that integrates Ki67, estrogen receptor (ER) analysis and pathological stage from the surgical specimen (Ellis, JNCI 100:1380, 2008). We sought to further develop the PEPI for use in clinical trials by: a) establishing an efficient SOP for Ki67 analysis, b) determining the effect of simplifying the score by removing the ER component (modified "mPEPI") and c) independent validation of mPEPI in the ACOSOG (Alliance) Z1031 neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor trial (Ellis, M, JCO 29:234, 2011). Methods: Ki-67 assay development focused on reproducing a 2.7% Ki-67 cut point (CP) required for PEPI. Ventana Image analysis (IA) to replace labor-intensive visual point counting (VPC) was assessed to increase scoring efficiency. Discordant scores led to a triage approach where cases with complex histological features that could not be resolved by IA were flagged for VPC. The Ki-67 scoring approach was preliminarily validated on T1/2 N0 cases from the P024 and POL trials (SABCS 2013, abstract P3-05-190). Models with and without ER suggested ER was dispensable. A locked SOP for mPEPI was subsequently applied to the Z1031A trial. The primary endpoint was time from the date of surgery to local, regional, or distant recurrence in the mPEPI-0 group (T1/2 N0, Ki67 <2.7%) versus the mPEPI>0 group. Results. mPEPI by IA was evaluated on 202 of 377 (53%) patients enrolled into Z1031A (6% of IA results were triaged to VPC). All patients have been followed a minimum of 2 years (median: 5 years; max: 7 years). Only 10 patients in the mPEPI-0 group (22.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, versus 78 in the mPEPI>0 group (49.4%). Time to breast cancer recurrence was decreased among those with mPEPI>0 status relative to those with mPEPI-0 status (log rank p=0.012). Only one disease event among 44 (2%) cases with mPEPI-0 was observed versus 26 of 158 cases with mPEPI>0 (16.5%) Conclusions. mPEPI-0 status can identify patients at low risk of relapse after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: therefore mPEPI-0 status has operational characteristics similar to pCR after chemotherapy for ER-negative disease. mPEPI is undergoing prospective validation in the Alliance ALTERNATE trial that will assess whether Fulvestrant increases the mPEPI-0 rate and also will prospectively determine whether patients with mPEPI-0 status can safely be managed without adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. Citation Format: Souzan Sanati, Vera J Suman, Rodrigo Goncalves, Katherine DeSchryver, Cynthia X Ma, Jeremy Hoog, Erika Crouch, Michael Barnes, Gary Unzeitig, A Marilyn Leitch, Kelly K Hunt, Matthew J Ellis. Validation of the preoperative endocrine prognostic index in the ACOSOG (Alliance) Z1031 neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-13.

Abstract Background NSABP B-36 compares 6 cycles of FEC-100 with 4 cycles of standard AC in pts with node-negative breast cancer. As reported separately, no significant differences between the two treatment arms were observed in the primary endpoint of disease-free survival or in the secondary endpoints of overall survival, recurrence-free, or distant recurrence-free intervals. Greater toxicity was reported in pts who received FEC compared to AC. We present here the results of the QOL and MH studies obtained prospectively in conjunction with the treatment study. We hypothesized that pts on FEC would experience greater treatment toxicity in the first 12 months of the study, and would have greater rates of amenorrhea at 18 months compared to pts on AC. Methods Among the 1,357 pts enrolled in the QOL study, 1,332 (675 AC, 657 FEC) submitted the baseline form and had QOL follow-up (fup) information. Pts completed: 1) the FACT-B instrument; 2) a symptom checklist; and 3) the SF-36 Vitality Scale, all at baseline, day 1 of cycle 4, and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after random assignment. FACT-B Trial Outcome Index (TOI), symptom severity, and vitality scores were compared between the two treatment arms using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis with adjustment for the baseline scores, type of surgery, and hormone receptor status, examining the first 12 months and the later time points separately. Menstrual status was collected at baseline for all enrolled pts, with subsequent assessments on day 1 of cycle 4, and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months for pts with menstrual bleeding within 12 months prior to random assignment and not having had a hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy (1, 096 pts). Post-chemotherapy amenorrhea was defined as the lack of menstrual periods during the 12 months preceding the 18-month fup evaluation. Data from 921 pts (475 AC, 446 FEC) were available for analysis. Logistic regression, adjusted for type of surgery and hormone receptor status, was used to test for association of amenorrhea status and treatment. Results Both TOI and vitality scores were worse for pts on FEC compared to those on AC at 6 months (p<0.01) with no significant difference at 12 months and beyond. No significant differences in symptom severity between the two treatment arms were observed. The rates of post-chemotherapy amenorrhea were significantly different between FEC and AC (66.8% vs. 58.7%, p=0.01) with positive hormone receptor status as an independent risk factor (p=0.03). Conclusions Women receiving FEC had diminished QOL at 6 months after random assignment, but no difference at 12 months or later. Premenopausal women receiving FEC experienced a higher rate of post-chemotherapy amenorrhea than women receiving AC. Support NCI grants U10-CA-12027, -37377, -69974, -69651 and -44066-26, and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, a subsidiary of Pfizer, Inc. Citation Format: Patricia A Ganz, John W Wilson, Hanna Bandos, André Robidoux, Alexander HG Paterson, Johnathan Polikoff, Luis Baez-Diaz, Adam M Brufsky, Louis Fehrenbacher, Aroop Mangalik, Patrick J Ward, Louise Provencher, John T Hamm, Philip J Stella, Robert L Carolla, Richard G Margolese, Henry R Shibata, Edith A Perez, Norman Wolmark. Impact of treatment on quality of life (QOL) and menstrual history (MH) in the NSABP B-36: A randomized phase III trial comparing six cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) to four cycles of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-01.

Abstract Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (pts) with locally advanced estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) improves breast conservation rate, and importantly offers an opportunity for individualized assessment of tumor responsiveness to ET to guide subsequent treatment. Previous neoadjuvant ET trials demonstrated that pathologic tumor size (pT), axillary lymph node status (N), and tumor Ki67 value at surgery predicted risk of relapse. Preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) was therefore developed to assign risk scores based on these factors. Modified PEPI 0, defined by pT1-2 N0 Ki67< 2.7%, was associated with extremely low risk of recurrence without adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, high Ki67 post 2-4 weeks (wks) of neoadjuvant ET identified resistant tumors with poor outcome. ALTERNATE trial is a three-arm phase III neoadjuvant/adjuvant ET trial designed to achieve two primary objectives. The first is to prospectively validate that modified PEPI 0 predicts > 95% relapse-free survival (RFS). The second is to determine whether fulvestrant (F), or fulvestrant (F) plus anastrozole (A), is superior to A in inducing a higher rate of modified PEPI 0. Secondary objectives include assessing RFS for pts with endocrine resistant tumor, defined by Ki67 > 10% at 4 or 12 wk, disease progression, or modified PEPI non-0, and pathologic responses of resistant tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Correlative studies include degrees of Ki67 suppression and ER level post treatment. In addition, ongoing research sequencing studies of DNA and RNA will be performed to contrast sensitive vs resistant tumors. During the first phase of the trial, 1200 pts are randomized 1:1:1 to the F, A or F/A. This provides an 82% chance, 1-sided alpha 0.025 chi-square test to detect at least 10% difference in modified PEPI 0 rate comparing F or F/A with A. While waiting for result of analysis, the A arm will continue for the 2nd phase enrollment. Only the F-containing arm(s) superior over A will be continued to the 2nd phase. During the 2nd phase, an additional 540 pts in each arm is estimated to obtain 317 pts with PEPI score 0. This will have a 90% chance, with a one-sided alpha=0.025 nonparametric Brookmeyer-Crowley type one sample survival test, rejecting that 5 year RFS rate is 95%. The maximum sample size is 2820 pts. Eligible pts include postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed clinical stage II or III ER+ (Allred score 6-8) HER2- BC. Tumor biopsy is required at baseline, 4 wk, and surgery for central Ki67 analysis. Treatment decision is individualized based on 4 wk Ki67 and modified PEPI score. Pts with Ki67 > 10% at 4 wk are switched to chemotherapy. Pts with a modified PEPI score of 0 are recommended not to receive chemotherapy, but continue the assigned ET for 1.5 years followed by 3 years of A. This trial is currently accruing pts through CTSU. This research is supported in part by NCI BIQSFP, and grants from Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Genentech, and the Investigator-Sponsored Study Program of AstraZeneca. The Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588. Citation Format: Cynthia X Ma, Vera Suman, A Marilyn Leitch, Souzan Sanati, Katherine DeSchryver, Gary W Unzeitig, Paul Haluska, Mark Watson, Olwen Hahn, Jo Anne Zujewski, Kelly Hunt, Eric P Winer, Cliff A Hudis, Matthew J Ellis. Alliance A011106: ALTernate approaches for clinical stage II or III Estrogen Receptor positive breast cancer NeoAdjuvant TrEatment (ALTERNATE) in postmenopausal women: A phase III study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-1-04.