Summary Longitudinal plasma cell-free DNA profiling from the phase 3 Alliance A031201 trial revealed divergent resistance trajectories in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Rapid progressors harbored non–androgen receptor (AR) alterations suggesting intrinsic resistance, whereas delayed progressors showed progressive AR amplifications, structural rearrangements, and extrachromosomal DNA–associated evolution. These findings support biomarker-guided strategies targeting AR-dependent and AR-independent disease states. See related article by Valentín López et al., p. 2413
Abstract 1133: Urine cell-free RNA captures tumor-reflective long intergenic noncoding and circular RNA programs in bladder cancer
Cancer Research | April 3, 2026 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 7_Supplement | Pages: 1133-1133
Abstract Introduction: Long intergenic noncoding RNAs (lincRNAs) and circular (circ) RNAs have been shown to play key roles in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Urine represents a promising source of tumor-reflective signals shed directly from the urothelial microenvironment in bladder cancer (BC) patients. Here, we evaluate the urine cell-free (cf) RNA transcriptome in a cohort of 50 patients with localized BC. Methods: A total of 50 localized BC patients and 24 healthy adults were enrolled. Pre-operative urine (collected on the day of radical cystectomy) was processed to isolate cfRNA from urine supernatant. Libraries were prepared using an Illumina tagmentation-based RNA enrichment workflow and sequenced to 100M paired-end reads per sample on a NovaSeq X. FASTQ files were concatenated per sample and QC-checked with RNA-SeQC and Samtools. Reads were aligned to GRCh38/hg38 with STAR, and gene counts were generated using Feature Counts. Linear differential expression analysis (DEA) was performed with DESeq2. For discovery we used random halves of TCGA-BLCA and healthy urine cfRNA samples, alongside a second DEA with random halves of urine BC cfRNA vs. controls; overlapping upregulated genes were validated in the remaining samples. For circular (circ) RNAs, annotations from MiOncoCirc were used; junctions with ≥5 supporting reads were retained, and DEA was conducted with edgeR. Results: In this study, the median age was 68 years, and 80% (40/50) were male. Among the cohort, 66% (33/50) had muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), of whom 54% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Differential expression analysis of TCGA-BLCA tumors and BC urine cfRNA, identified 27 genes commonly upregulated, with 23 of the 27 shared genes strikingly being long intergenic noncoding RNAs (lincRNAs). These BC/urine-specific lincRNAs—including LINC00930, LINC01004, DLG5-AS1, APTR, PSORS1C3, and SERPINB9P1—have known roles in proliferation, EMT, metabolism, and immune signaling. Outside of lincRNAs, tumor-reflective coding transcripts in BC/urine were enriched for autophagy, driven by MAP1LC3B2.TCGA-BLCA survival analysis showed that LINC00930 and PSORS1C3 were associated with worse overall survival. Expanding beyond linear RNA sequences, analysis of urine circRNAs from BC patients revealed a strong cancer-specific dysregulation pattern, with 77 circRNAs significantly upregulated compared with healthy controls. Upregulated urine circRNAs arose from host genes involved in BC-relevant pathways, including invasion (DOCK1, ARHGAP5), autophagy/ER stress (VMP1, ERN1), and luminal differentiation (GRHL2, ESRP1). Conclusion: Cell-free RNA profiling reveals a distinct transcriptomic signature including differential lincRNA- and circRNA-driven autophagy, EMT, proliferation, metabolic, differentiation, and immune signaling programs in the urine of bladder cancer patients. Citation Format: Pradeep Chauhan, Li Lin, Irfan Alahi, Jessica Linford, Lilli J. Greiner, Ayesha Hashmi, Anushka Viswanathan, Nathan Colon, Faridi Qaium, Peter K. Harris, John Sheng, Jacob J. Orme, Eric H. Kim, Zachary L. Smith, Woodson Smelser, Christopher A. Maher, Aadel A. Chaudhuri. Urine cell-free RNA captures tumor-reflective long intergenic noncoding and circular RNA programs in bladder cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1133.
Genomic and Epigenomic Analysis of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Identifies Stemness Features Associated with Worse Survival in Lethal Prostate Cancer
Clinical Cancer Research | August 23, 2024 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 151-163
Abstract Purpose: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) resistant to androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) is often lethal. Liquid biopsy biomarkers for this deadly form of disease remain under investigation, and underpinning mechanisms remain ill-understood. Experimental Design: We applied targeted cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing to 126 patients with mCRPC from three academic cancer centers and separately performed genome-wide cfDNA methylation sequencing on 43 plasma samples collected prior to the initiation of first-line ARSI treatment. To analyze the genome-wide sequencing data, we performed nucleosome positioning and differential methylated region analysis. We additionally analyzed single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing data from 14 and 80 patients with mCRPC, respectively, to develop and validate a stem-like signature, which we inferred from cfDNA. Results: Targeted cfDNA sequencing detected AR/enhancer alterations prior to first-line ARSIs that correlated with significantly worse progression-free survival (P = 0.01; HR = 2.12) and overall survival (P = 0.02; HR = 2.48). Plasma methylome analysis revealed that AR/enhancer lethal mCRPC patients have significantly higher promoter-level hypomethylation than AR/enhancer wild-type mCRPC patients (P < 0.0001). Moreover, gene ontology and CytoTRACE analysis of nucleosomally more accessible transcription factors in cfDNA revealed enrichment for stemness-associated transcription factors in patients with lethal mCRPC. The resulting stemness signature was then validated in a completely held-out cohort of 80 patients with mCRPC profiled by tumor RNA sequencing. Conclusions: We analyzed a total of 220 patients with mCRPC, validated the importance of cell-free AR/enhancer alterations as a prognostic biomarker in lethal mCRPC, and showed that the underlying mechanism for lethality involves reprogramming developmental states toward increased stemness. See related commentary by Nawfal et al., p. 7
Abstract 983: Epigenomic analysis of plasma cell-free DNA identifies stemness features associated with worse prognosis in AR-altered lethal metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
Cancer Research | March 22, 2024 | Volume: 84 | Issue: 6_Supplement | Pages: 983-983
Abstract Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) resistant to androgen receptor (AR)-targeted agents is often lethal. Unfortunately, biomarkers for this deadly disease remain under investigation, and underpinning mechanisms are ill-understood. Here, we applied epigenomic approaches to identify cell-free (cf) DNA features associated with these lethal AR-resistant mCRPC patients. Methods: Plasma from 99 mCRPC patients was collected from two independent institutions, either prior to first-line AR-targeted therapy (n = 63) or during treatment (n = 36). We applied EnhanceAR-Seq to detect alterations in the AR locus including the upstream enhancer. We then applied genome-wide cfDNA epigenomics to 43 pre-treatment plasma samples and performed both fragmentomics and methylation sequencing to delineate the biology of AR/enhancer-altered lethal mCRPC. Finally, we identified stemness genes by applying CytoTRACE to external single-cell RNA-seq data from mCRPC, and applied these to cfDNA via promoter-level methylation analysis. We then assessed these stem-associated genes in tumor bulk RNA-seq data from an independent mCRPC cohort. Results: AR/enhancer alterations were detected in 44% of pre-treatment cfDNA samples and correlated with significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 2.12, P = 0.01) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.48; P = 0.02). AR/enhancer alterations were detected in 19% of on-treatment cfDNA samples and were also associated with profoundly worse PFS (HR = 15.38, P = 0.0003) and OS (HR = 15.53, P = 0.002). Further, genome-wide cfDNA fragmentomic analysis revealed that binding sites for developmentally relevant transcription factors such as FOXA1, NKX-3 and HOXB13 were significantly more accessible in AR/enhancer-altered lethal mCRPC patients. Gene set enrichment analysis of the 20 most accessible transcription factors revealed several pathways associated with stem cell development. Interestingly, the 10 most stem-associated genes obtained using CytoTRACE applied to an external cohort of single-cell RNA-seq data from mCRPC (He et al. 2021) were promoter-hypomethylated in the plasma cfDNA of AR/enhancer-altered lethal mCRPC patients (P = 0.005). Further, metagene analysis of these stem-associated genes revealed worse PFS by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.04), which was confirmed by multivariate cox proportional hazards modeling. Our stemness metagene further stratified overall survival (P = 0.03) when applied to an external cohort of 80 mCRPC patients from Abida et al. 2019. Conclusions: Alterations in AR including the upstream enhancer are remarkably prognostic in mCRPC with pre-treatment predictive potential. The mechanism can be inferred via cfDNA epigenomic analysis and appears to involve increased tumor cell stemness in AR-altered lethal mCRPC. Citation Format: Pradeep Singh Chauhan, Irfan Alahi, Savar Sinha, Ryan Mueller, Alexander L. Shiang, Jace Webster, Ha X. Dang, Debanjan Saha, Lilli Greiner, Breanna Yang, Elisa M. Ledet, Ramandeep K. Babbra, Wenjia Feng, Peter K. Harris, Faridi Qaium, Ellen B. Jaeger, Patrick J. Miller, Sydney A. Caputo, Oliver A. Sartor, Russell K. Pachynski, Christopher A. Maher, Aadel A. Chaudhuri. Epigenomic analysis of plasma cell-free DNA identifies stemness features associated with worse prognosis in AR-altered lethal metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 983.
Abstract 5240: Functional and therapeutic significance of ESR1 gene fusions in breast cancer
Cancer Research | August 17, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 5240-5240
Abstract RNA sequencing detects estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) fusion transcripts in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer but their role in disease pathogenesis remains unclear. Herein we examined multiple in-frame and out-of-frame ESR1 fusions and found only two, both identified in advanced endocrine treatment resistant disease, encoded stable and functional in-frame fusion proteins. In both examples, ESR1-e6>YAP1 and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X, the N-terminal, DNA binding and dimerization motifs encoded by exons 2-6 were fused to C-terminal sequences from the partner gene. Functional properties included estrogen-independent growth, constitutive expression of ER target genes, anti-estrogen resistance, induction of cellular motility in vitro and the development of lung metastasis in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and RNA sequencing experiments showed both fusions uniquely activated a metastasis-associated transcriptional program. ESR1-e6>YAP1 and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X-induced growth remained sensitive to a CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, and a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) expressing the ESR1-e6>YAP1 fusion was also responsive. Transcriptionally active ESR1 fusions therefore trigger both endocrine therapy resistance and metastatic progression explaining the association with fatal disease progression, although CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment is predicted to be effective. Citation Format: Jonathan T. Lei, Jieya Shao, Jin Zhang, Michael Iglesia, Doug W. Chan, Jin Cao, Meenakshi Anurag, Purba Singh, Xiaping He, Yoshimasa Kosaka, Ryoichi Matsunuma, Robert Crowder, Jeremy Hoog, Chanpheng Phommaly, Rodrigo Goncalves, Susana Romalho, Raquel M. Peres, Nindo Punturi, Cheryl Schmidt, Alex Bartram, Eric Jou, W V. Lai, Oliver Hampton, Anna Rogers, Ethan Tobias, Poojan Parikh, Sherri R. Davies, Shunqiang Li, Cynthia X. Ma, Vera Suman, Kelly K. Hunt, Mark A. Watson, Katherine A. Hoadley, E A. Thompson, Xi Chen, Shyam M. Kavuri, Chad J. Creighton, Christopher A. Maher, Charles M. Perou, Svasti Haricharan, Matthew J. Ellis. Functional and therapeutic significance of ESR1 gene fusions in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5240.
Abstract PD6-4: ESR1 gene fusions implicated in endocrine therapy resistance of ER+ breast cancer
Cancer Research | May 4, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 9_Supplement | Pages: PD6-4-PD6-4
Abstract Background. We recently identified an in-frame ESR1 translocation in a tumor and PDX pair from a patient with endocrine therapy resistant advanced disease. The fusion gene preserved the N-terminal 365aa of ESR1 containing the intact activation function 1 (AF1), DNA-binding domain (DBD) and hinge, followed by the C-terminal transactivation domain of YAP1. The ESR1-365>YAP1 fusion drove estrogen-independent and anti-estrogen-resistant tumor cell growth (Cell Reports 4:1116, 2013). We therefore sought to further investigate the role of ESR1 fusion genes in breast cancer. Methods. 711 cases from TCGA, 82 ER+ cases from neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trials and 25 ER+ systemic relapse samples were screened for fusion genes using RNAseq. Fusion genes involving ESR1 were subsequently assayed for estrogen response element (ERE)-mediated transcriptional activity and ability to drive estradiol independent breast cancer cell growth. Results. Multiple ESR1 fusions were identified in mostly luminal B cancers. ESR1 fusions resulted most frequently from rearrangements involving another gene on Chromosome (Chr) 6 but also fusions with genes on other chromosomes. The fusions involving partners on Chr6 that retained an intact N terminal AF1 and DNA binding domain (DBD) of ESR1 (≥1-253aa) included an Out-of-Frame (OF) fusion event with CCDC170 (a gene immediately centromeric to ESR1), POLH (in-frame or IF), AKAP12 (IF), PCMT1 (OF), SYNE1 (OF) and GPR126 (OF). Also identified were inter-chromosomal translocations involving Chr12p-NOP2 (IF) and ChrX-PCDH11X (IF) and Chr7q-AKR1D1 (OF). The ESR1 fusions with transcriptional potential (because of a retained DNA binding domain) included variable 5’ ESR1 exons that preserved 253aa, 365aa, 412aa or 458aa of ESR1 sequence: in all cases disrupting ligand binding though loss of C terminal sequence. The effect of the IF and OF 3’ sequences on the transcriptional activity of the relevant ESR1 fragment was highly variable. The most transcriptionally active fusion (more active than the relevant ESR1 fragment alone) was the ESR1-365>YAP1 as well as ESR1-365>PCDH11X and ESR1-253>CCDC170. This is remarkable since PCDH11X is not considered a transcription factor and the CCDC170 sequence was OF – in both cases suggesting the activity of the fusion was due to "neomorphic" properties. Two fusions, NOP2 and POLH were inactive in the ERE reporter assay, yet both stimulated estradiol independent growth. In these cases we suggest that the ESR1 locus can function as a "promoter trap" which allows the identification of genes with previously unknown functions in endocrine therapy resistance. Conclusions: In luminal-type breast cancer the ESR1 gene was fused to multiple 3’ partners with remarkably heterogeneous functions. The two most transcriptionally active, ESR1-365>YAP1 and ESR1-365>PCDH11X, were both identified in endocrine therapy refractory advanced disease – suggesting a role in fatal disease progression. Citation Format: Jieya Shao, Jin Zhang, Robert J Crowder, Rodrigo Goncalves, Chanpheng Phommaly, Breast AWG and Network, Charles M Perou, Christopher A Maher, E Aubrey Thompson, Matthew J Ellis. ESR1 gene fusions implicated in endocrine therapy resistance of ER+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-4.