Citations

Abstract Modern radiation therapy (RT) technologies allow for improved sparing of normal tissues, decreasing the risk of both acute and long-term toxicities. Existing RT dose constraints for prospective trials within the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) were formulated in the context of solid malignancies. As patients with hematologic malignancies are often treated with lower RT doses and are usually younger with more favorable prognoses, customized dose constraints are needed. The NRG Oncology Hematologic Malignancies Working Group (NRG HEME) commissioned a review of existing organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints from published primary literature, the NRG Center for Innovation in Radiation Oncology (CIRO), and national guidelines. Customized constraints were developed by iterative review by NRG HEME. Final recommendations were approved by radiation oncology representatives from all the lymphoma NCTN groups (NRG Oncology, Children’s Oncology Group, Alliance, ECOG-ACRIN, SWOG, Canadian Cancer Trials Group). For 49 OARs, a strict recommended constraint was determined, of which 20 were not present in CIRO. Of the remaining 29 constraints, 20 were lower, 2 were the same, and 5 used different metrics; 2 were higher than at least 1 CIRO trial constraint. Acceptable variations were determined and unacceptable variations were added for select critical OARs for plan scoring. While doses to OARs without explicit unacceptable variations should not exceed acceptable variations, violations should not be considered for plan quality assessment on trials. This consensus list of standard OAR constraints should be incorporated for all future NCTN trials in hematologic malignancies. Strict dose constraints will minimize long-term toxicities in this patient population.

Abstract Purpose: This multicenter, multi-surgeon retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following endonasal resection of craniopharyngioma, while evaluating the "perception gap" through a surgeon survey. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 416 patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) for craniopharyngioma from 20 institutions. Factors were compared between patients with and without postoperative CSF leak, and between Early (2007-2015) and Late (2016-2025) Epochs. Complementing the clinical data, a survey of 19 neurosurgeons captured expert perspectives on risk stratification and management strategies. Results: Overall postoperative CSF leak rate was 13.5% (56/416 patients). Univariate analysis identified predominantly cystic tumors (34% vs. 21%, p = 0.034)and intraoperative lumbar drain (LD) use ( p < 0.028) as associated with postoperative CSF leak. BMI ( p = 0.587), prior surgery ( p = 0.576), and tumor size ( p = 0.363) were not significant. In the multivariable analysis, LD use was associated with a higher postoperative CSF leak rate (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.06–3.46; p = 0.030). Between Epochs, nasoseptal flap (NSF) utilization increased from 70.7% to 87.6% ( p <0.001). NSF was protective (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07–0.92; p = 0.037) in the Early Epoch; no factors were significant in the Late Epoch. The surgeons’ survey identified prior surgery and intraoperative high flow leaks as primary risks; however, their LD protocols diverged from clinical data. Conclusion: Despite increased use of NSF, CSF leak persists. The study highlights a significant divergence between expert perception and clinical data regarding lumbar drains.

Measuring intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) has been proposed as a means to help maintain optimal ultrafiltration and prevent complications such as hernias, peritoneal leaks, and gastroesophageal reflux, which are linked with high IPP levels. The Durand method is a commonly accepted method for measuring IPP; however, it is cumbersome and not routinely used in clinics due to its complexity. Here we report the outcome of a pilot study that evaluated the agreement between IPP measured using an in-line pressure transducer and IPP measured using the Durand method during in-clinic automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) therapy. This was an exploratory, descriptive, early feasibility study conducted among patients with a diagnosis of kidney failure who were on APD therapy. IPP was continuously measured using an investigational device (x-MIP transducer) and at fixed timepoints using the Durand method. The study included 10 patients with a median age of 47.0 years and a median body mass index of 28.1 kg/m 2 . The study population was predominantly female, comprising 70% of the participants. The transducer IPP showed a moderate agreement with manual IPP, as most differences in measurements were within ±3 cmH 2 O. Overall, IPP did not correlate with fill-volume. However, when examined on a per-patient level, six patients showed stronger correlations ( ρ > 0.7) between IPP and fill-volume, while the remaining four patients had weaker correlations ( ρ < 0.5). No safety concerns were identified in the study. In summary, this study indicates that a transducer-based IPP measurement device could serve as an alternative to the Durand method.