Citations

Introduction With the rapidly changing landscape of rectal cancer treatment, it is becoming increasingly challenging for clinicians to interpret and synthesise the vast amount of high-quality evidence being generated. A core outcome set (COS) for clinical trials in rectal cancer would help address issues surrounding outcome selection and reporting. The purpose of this research project is to develop a COS to be used in research comparing different treatment paradigms in the management of rectal cancer. Methods and analysis This will be a mixed-methods project, including a systematic review, semi-structured interviews and a Delphi consensus process. The project was designed in accordance with the COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Handbook, which provides a framework for COS development based on existing evidence. A multidisciplinary Study Advisory Group, composed of rectal cancer providers, methodologists and patients, will oversee the project. A systematic review will be performed to identify an inclusive list of outcomes reported by researchers in previous rectal cancer trials. Outcomes will be collapsed into various core areas and domains according to the OMERACT Filter V.2.0. Semi-structured interviews with rectal cancer survivors and their partners/caregivers will help identify additional patient-centric outcomes not captured in the systematic review. Finally, after a final list of outcomes is generated, patients and healthcare professionals will be invited to participate in a Delphi process to develop the final COS. Ethics and dissemination The study has received full approval with the Research Ethics Committee at the Integrated Health and Social Services Network for West-Central Montreal (health network responsible for the Jewish General Hospital) (REC: 2025-4377) and the Institutional Review Board of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine (IRB: STUDY-25-00515). The results of this study will be presented at national and international meetings and a manuscript will be submitted for publication in a high-impact surgery and/or oncology peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number The study was registered in the COMET database in December 2023 ( https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2941 ). The full systematic review protocol, along with the search strategy and inclusion/exclusion criteria, was registered online in September 2023 (researchregistry.com; reviewregistry1705).

Cholangiocytes are specialized epithelial cells that line the intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary tree and play a critical role in bile modification, liver homeostasis, and response to injury. Cholangiocytes exhibit notable heterogeneity and plasticity, and their dysfunction is central to a spectrum of diseases targeting the bile ducts, collectively called cholangiopathies. These disorders include genetic, infectious, immune-mediated, and malignant diseases, with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) representing one of the most complex and enigmatic of these disorders. PSC is a progressive, fibro-inflammatory disease of the bile ducts that is closely linked to inflammatory bowel disease, carries a heightened risk of cancer, and lacks any approved therapies. This review explores the biology of cholangiocytes, including their development, functional plasticity, and roles in secretion, absorption, and cellular signaling. We provide a detailed examination of cholangiopathies, particularly PSC, a complex cholangiopathy characterized by a paradoxical state of cholangiocyte senescence and hyperproliferation. We describe how immune cell dysfunction, the gut microbiome, genetic predispositions, and environmental factors converge to mediate PSC pathogenesis. We revisit the foundational technologies that empowered early discoveries and shaped the field as we know it today. We also explore how newer techniques such as organoid cultures, single-cell transcriptomics, epigenomics, and spatialomics have transformed our modern understanding of biliary pathophysiology. Finally, we provide an overview of existing rodent models of cholangiopathies and discuss their relevance to human disease. PSC remains therapeutically unaddressed, and thus ongoing multidisciplinary efforts are essential to developing targeted interventions. This review serves as a comprehensive resource for researchers and clinicians navigating the rapidly evolving landscape of cholangiocyte-centered liver disease research.

Circulating extracellular vesicles, proinflammatory/pro-oxidant metabolites, and history of preeclampsia may be used as biomarkers for diagnosis of early CAC in postmenopausal women.

Importance Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) demonstrated superior outcomes over medical therapy in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in the Edwards EVOQUE Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Pivotal Clinical Investigation of Safety and Clinical Efficacy Using a Novel Device II (TRISCEND II) randomized clinical trial, and received regulatory approval in the US in 2024. Contemporary real-world data on its effectiveness and safety remain limited. Objective To evaluate 30-day clinical, echocardiographic, and health status outcomes of TTVR in real-world use. Design, Setting, and Population Retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients who underwent TTVR in the US from February 2024 through March 2025 in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. Patients had symptomatic, severe TR despite optimal medical therapy and TTVR was deemed appropriate by a heart team. Statistical analysis was conducted from September 2025 to February 2026. Exposure Device-enabled TTVR. Main Outcomes and Measures Thirty-day event rates (all-cause death, stroke, bleeding, new cardiac implantable electronic device [CIED] implantation, heart failure hospitalizations), TR reduction, and changes in health status (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary [KCCQ-OS] score) are reported. Subgroup analyses examined the impact of baseline CIED status on outcomes. Results Among 1034 attempted procedures at 82 centers (mean [SD] age, 77.1 [10.6] years; 69.1% female; 73.2% NYHA functional class III/IV), a valve was successfully implanted in 1017 patients (98.4%). Mild or less TR was achieved in 98.4% of patients post procedure and in 97.7% at 30 days. At 30 days, all-cause mortality was 3.1%; stroke, 0.2%; bleeding, 7.9%; new CIED, 15.9% in CIED-naive patients; and heart failure hospitalization, 3.1%. There were significant improvements in NYHA functional class (class I/II, 82.7%; P < .001) and mean KCCQ-OS score (22.4 points; P < .001) from baseline to 30 days. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality ( P = .47), heart failure hospitalization ( P > .99), and functional outcomes ( P = .55) when patients were stratified by baseline CIED status. Conclusions and Relevance Early US real-world experience with TTVR confirms safety and effectiveness in patients with severe TR. Thirty-day outcomes are consistent with the TRISCEND II pivotal trial, demonstrating acceptable safety, near-complete TR elimination, and significant health status improvements in an older, comorbid population. Rates of new CIED implantation and bleeding were lower than randomized clinical trial experience.

OBJECTIVE This study investigated the relationship between diabetes and the incidence of postoperative dysphagia following cervical spine surgery (CSS). METHODS A prospectively collected multi-institutional quality registry was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent CSS were categorized on the basis of diabetes status, and correlations with preoperative and postoperative Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) dysphagia questionnaire scores were assessed. Mixed-effects logistic regressions were performed to examine the impact of preoperative diabetes on postoperative dysphagia. RESULTS Of the 2001 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 400 (20%) had diabetes. Baseline dysphagia rates were not significantly different between groups (18% vs 14%, p = 0.08). Patients with diabetes had a significantly higher incidence of dysphagia at 1 month (66% vs 54%, p = 0.002), 3 months (39% vs 26%, p < 0.001), and 12 months (33% vs 24%, p = 0.004) after surgery compared to patients without diabetes. Including baseline dysphagia as a fixed effect, multivariable analysis indicated that diabetes was a significant predictor of postoperative dysphagia at 1 month (OR 1.46, p = 0.041) and 3 months (OR 1.63, p = 0.001) but not at 12 months (OR 1.21, p = 0.3). In patients with no baseline dysphagia, those with diabetes (329 of 400 [82.3%]) had a significantly higher incidence of new dysphagia than nondiabetics at 1 month (62% vs 50%, p = 0.003), 3 months (34% vs 21%, p < 0.001), and 12 months (27% vs 18%, p = 0.001). The mean change in EAT-10 scores between baseline and 12 months was significantly worse in patients with preoperative diabetes (2.440 ± 5.013 vs 1.688 ± 4.139, p = 0.025). Multivariable analysis indicated that diabetes was a significant predictor of new postoperative dysphagia at 1 month (OR 1.49, p = 0.040) and 3 months (OR 1.81, p < 0.001) but not at 12 months (OR 1.31, p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS Diabetes is a significant risk factor for experiencing postoperative dysphagia following CSS. Diabetes correlated with higher incidence of dysphagia at all postoperative time points and was a strong independent predictor of postoperative dysphagia at 1 and 3 months.

Background: Rib remodeling, particularly targeting ribs 11 and 12, is gaining popularity in aesthetic body contouring to reduce waist circumference. Although rib manipulation techniques have been applied in other surgical fields, their use in plastic surgery has focused on achieving aesthetic goals. This study investigates the complications associated with rib remodeling techniques to enhance waistline contouring. Methods: A global cross-sectional survey was conducted among board-certified plastic surgeons who perform rib remodeling. Data from 2351 patient records (2018–2024) were collected, including demographic details, surgical information, and complications. Rib remodeling techniques assessed included surgical greenstick fracture modification and osteosynthesis. Results: The overall complication rate was 3.7% (86 of 2351 patients). Hyperpigmentation (17.4%), nonconsolidation (15.1%), burns (12.7%), and corset-related pressure ulcers (12.7%) were the most common complications. Major complications such as pneumothorax were rare (0.17%) and occurred only in RibXcar cases. Rib extraction/removal techniques had no reported complications, whereas Riboss had the lowest complication rate (1.96%) due to the use of osteosynthesis material for fracture stabilization. Conclusions: The incidence of complications related to the rib remodeling procedures in our study was 3.7%. However, some procedure-related complications—such as pneumothorax and hemothorax—can pose serious risks to the patient’s life. Nevertheless, when performed by a well-trained surgeon with an adequate learning curve, these procedures can be considered safe.