Citations

Clear

526 citation(s) found for "To, Harrison".

Experiences with Ureteral Carcinoma in Situ Detected During Operations for Vesical Neoplasm
Culp, Ormond S., Utz, David C., Harrison, Edgar G.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Urology | July 11, 2017 | Volume: 97 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 679-682

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)63097-0 | PMID 6022433 Get It

Carcinoma of the Penis: A Clinicopathologic Study
Hanash, Kamal A., Furlow, William L., Utz, David C., Harrison, Edgar G.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Urology | July 10, 2017 | Volume: 104 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 291-297

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)61721-x | PMID 5448905 Get It

Effect of Ureteral Reanastomosis by Stapling on Ureteral and Renal Function
Hacker, Philip K., Wakim, Khalil G., Utz, David C., Harrison, Edgar G.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Urology | July 10, 2017 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 598-604

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)62579-5 | PMID 5682532 Get It

Primary Localized Amyloidosis of the Bladder
Kinzel, Raymond C., Harrison, Edgar G., Utz, David C.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Urology | June 30, 2017 | Volume: 85 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 785-795

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)65426-0 | PMID 13756175 Get It

Bilateral Ureteral and Vesical Carcinomas Occurring Asynchronously: Report of a Case
Utz, David C., Brunsting, Carl D., Harrison, Edgar G.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Urology | June 30, 2017 | Volume: 88 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 488-493

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)64831-6 | PMID 13995586 Get It

Medical Students Call for Single-Payer National Health Insurance
Harrison, Andrew M. , Harrison, Andrew Marc

Mayo Clinic

Academic Medicine | May 31, 2017 | Volume: 92 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 735-735

10.1097/acm.0000000000001699 | PMID 28557929 Get It

Low rates of contralateral neck failure in unilaterally treated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with prospectively defined criteria of lateralization
Hu, Kenneth S. , Gamez, Mauricio E. , Safdieh, Joseph, Lin, Wilson, Jacobson, A. , Urken, Mark L. , Culliney, B., Li, Zujun, Tran, Theresa , Schantz, Stimson P., Chadha, Juskaran , Harrison, Louis B., Hu, Kenneth Shung , Gamez, Mauricio , Mourad, Waleed Fouad , Persky, Mark Stephen

Mayo Clinic

Head & Neck | May 5, 2017 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1647-1654

10.1002/hed.24806 | PMID 28474380 Get It

AbstractBackgroundUnilateral radiotherapy (RT) of oropharyngeal carcinomas is accepted for patients with lateralized primary and low‐volume nodal disease. Utilizing prospectively defined criteria of laterality and staging positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, we studied outcomes in patients with advanced‐stage oropharyngeal cancer undergoing unilateral RT.MethodsThirty‐seven patients with oropharyngeal tumors >1 cm from midline regardless of node status underwent unilateral RT and were followed prospectively. Patient characteristics: T1 = 11; T2 = 22; T3 = 4; N0 = 3; N1 = 9; N2a = 3; N2b = 21; and Nx = 1. Dosimetry were determined and weekly National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) distress thermometer data were collected.ResultsAt median follow‐up of 32 months, 3‐year locoregional control, contralateral regional failure, distant metastasis‐free survival, and disease‐free survival were 96%, 0%, 7%, and 93%, respectively.ConclusionLow rates of contralateral neck failure are demonstrated utilizing prospectively defined criteria for unilateral RT. The tolerances of contralateral organs are respected and patients report low to moderate levels of distress throughout treatment.
Transscrotal Near Infrared Spectroscopy as a Diagnostic Test for Testis Torsion in Pediatric Acute Scrotum: A Prospective Comparison to Gold Standard Diagnostic Test Study
Schlomer, Bruce J., Keays, Mélise , Grimsby, Gwen M. , Granberg, Candace F. , DaJusta, Daniel , Menon, Vani S. , Ostrov, Lauren , Sheth, Kunj , Hill, Martinez, Sanchez, Emma, Harrison, Clanton B., Jacobs, Micah A. , Huang, Rong , Burgu, Berk , Hennes, Halim , Baker, Linda A.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Urology | April 6, 2017 | Volume: 198 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 694-701

10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.134 | PMID 28392394 Get It

Comparison of methods of alert acknowledgement by critical care clinicians in the ICU setting
Harrison, Andrew M. , Aakre, Christopher A. , Jeng, Jack Y., Dziadzko, Mikhail , Pickering, Brian W. , Herasevich, Vitaly , Dziadzko, Mikhail A, Thongprayoon, Charat , Gajic, Ognjen , Harrison, Andrew Marc , Herasevich, Vitaly

Mayo Clinic

PeerJ | March 14, 2017 | Volume: 5 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: e3083

10.7717/peerj.3083 | PMID 28316887 Get It

Background Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based sepsis alert systems have failed to demonstrate improvements in clinically meaningful endpoints. However, the effect of implementation barriers on the success of new sepsis alert systems is rarely explored. Objective To test the hypothesis time to severe sepsis alert acknowledgement by critical care clinicians in the ICU setting would be reduced using an EHR-based alert acknowledgement system compared to a text paging-based system. Study Design In one arm of this simulation study, real alerts for patients in the medical ICU were delivered to critical care clinicians through the EHR. In the other arm, simulated alerts were delivered through text paging. The primary outcome was time to alert acknowledgement. The secondary outcomes were a structured, mixed quantitative/qualitative survey and informal group interview. Results The alert acknowledgement rate from the severe sepsis alert system was 3% ( N = 148) and 51% ( N = 156) from simulated severe sepsis alerts through traditional text paging. Time to alert acknowledgement from the severe sepsis alert system was median 274 min ( N = 5) and median 2 min ( N = 80) from text paging. The response rate from the EHR-based alert system was insufficient to compare primary measures. However, secondary measures revealed important barriers. Conclusion Alert fatigue, interruption, human error, and information overload are barriers to alert and simulation studies in the ICU setting.
Abstract A10: Correlating magnetic resonance and molecular imaging using three dimensional untreated virtual control
Jacobs, Joshua, Hawkins-Darrud, Andrea, Johnston, Sandra K. , Swanson, Kristin R. , Harrison, Robert F. , Kinahan, Paul E. , Swanson, Kristin R

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | March 1, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 2_Supplement | Pages: A10-A10

10.1158/1538-7445.epso16-a10 Get It

Abstract With mean survival from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) barely edging over 15 months, it become imperative to develop novel tools informing on both progression and treatment efficacy. As the aggressive growth of GBM outstrips available resources, regions of hypoxia develop. Hypoxia can be clinically assessed through [18F]-flouromisonidazole (FMISO) PET. However, PET imaging suffers from low resolution and reconstruction artifact. We present the comparative and predictive results of a multi-stage model utilizing the mathematical biology of cancer and the physics of PET imaging. Our mathematical model of GBM characterizes cancer cells into the interacting phenotypes of normoxic, hypoxic, and necrotic cells supported by vasculature. The pharmacokinetic activity of FMISO is induced in the simulated tissue then acquired and reconstructed by an analytic simulator of the PET process. This multi-stage process creates a patient-specific virtual PET images with characteristic of the clinical PET scan. Extending previous work, we model the full three-dimensional dynamics of tumor progression, pharmacokinetic activity, and FMISO PET for the tumor kinetics of six GBM patients. Virtual and clinical FMISO PET images are compared. Overall hypoxic burden and spatial distribution show strong correspondence between virtual and clinical FMISO PET images for all six patients. Simulated FMISO PET dynamics, with tumor kinetics derived from routine clinical MRI scans, provide a unique and evolving tool giving insight into the biological connections between magnetic resonance and molecular imaging. Citation Format: Joshua Jacobs, Andrea Hawkins-Darrud, Robert Harrison, Sandra Johnston, Paul Kinahan, Kristin Swanson. Correlating magnetic resonance and molecular imaging using three dimensional untreated virtual control. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Engineering and Physical Sciences in Oncology; 2016 Jun 25-28; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A10.