Citations

The Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) Centers of Excellence (COE) Program, launched by the Polycystic Kidney Disease Foundation in 2022, aims to bridge the gap in specialized care for individuals with ADPKD. This program seeks to enhance the availability of specialized clinicians and simplify the process for patients seeking expert care. It is founded on three pillars: improving care for all individuals with ADPKD, educating and empowering the community, and advancing polycystic kidney disease research. The program draws inspiration from successful models in other diseases, such as cystic fibrosis and muscular dystrophy, which have demonstrated the effectiveness of standardized care centers in improving patient outcomes. Patient and clinician stakeholder interviews have identified key areas where a national program could make a significant effect, including the need for a core care team with defined referral processes, mentorship and shared care models, patient navigation services, and education around expert consensus and care guidelines. The program introduces two designations to accommodate diverse care settings and enhance patient access to specialists: COE and Partner Clinic. The Partner Clinic designation ensures that patients in smaller community practices have access to specialized care through mentorship and guidance from experts at COE. The program also emphasizes the importance of specialized services, especially in underserved communities experiencing health disparities, to manage the complexities of ADPKD care. Patient focus groups have highlighted the need for care navigation services, centralized sources of knowledge, and access to local care. The program aims to address these needs by providing a structured framework for care coordination, enhancing patient self-advocacy, and improving overall outcomes for individuals with ADPKD. Key Points The Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Centers of Excellence Program aims to improve specialized care for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients. It introduces two designations to accommodate diverse care settings and enhance patient access to specialists: Center of Excellence and Partner Clinic. The program draws inspiration from successful models in other diseases, such as cystic fibrosis and muscular dystrophy, which have demonstrated the effectiveness of standardized care centers in improving patient outcomes. Key needs and programmatic goals identified through patient and clinician stakeholder interviews include establishing a core care team with defined referral processes, implementing mentorship and shared care models, providing patient navigation services, and offering education on expert consensus and care guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The EXCELLENT registry aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the EMBOTRAP Revascularization Device in an all-comer population in a real-world setting, with a focus on the composition of retrieved clots. METHODS: EXCELLENT is a prospective, global registry of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with EMBOTRAP as the first-line mechanical thrombectomy device conducted at 34 sites (25 sites contributing clot) from September 2018 to March 2021, utilizing core imaging and central histology laboratories blinded to clinical data, independent 90-day modified Rankin Scale assessment and Clinical Events Committee. RESULTS: After screening 3799 patients, a total of 997 subjects (mean age, 70.0±14.2 years; 51.8% women; 19.7% non-White) were included. The first-pass modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥2b rate was 64.5% (623/966), first-pass mTICI ≥2c was 39.1% (378/966), and final mTICI ≥2b was 94.5% (931/985). A total of 427/912 (46.8%) patients achieved a 90-day modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 2 or ≤baseline. Embolization to a new territory occurred in 0.2% (2/984), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours in 1.6% (16/997). The 90-day mortality was 19.1% (175/918). Device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse events occurred in 5.9% (54/912) through 90 days. The mean RBC percentage of retrieved clots was 45.62±21.372. Among patients who achieved mTICI ≥2b with the first pass, 15.7% (52/331) and 9.7% (32/331), respectively, had RBC-poor (<25%) and RBC-rich (>75%) clots. Patients with no clot retrieved in any procedural pass had a lower percentage of hyperdense or susceptibility vessel sign on baseline imaging (58.9% versus 74.7%; P <0.001), pointing to a potential preprocedure indicator of challenging clot. CONCLUSIONS: The EXCELLENT registry informs real-world practices in mechanical thrombectomy and sheds light on the range of clots effectively retrieved by current technology. This is the first report of detailed patient characteristics where mechanical thrombectomy maneuvers failed to remove any clot material. Although the composition of nonretrievable clots cannot be assessed histologically, the results support the notion that no retrieval may be correlated with imaging findings suggesting clots lower in RBC. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03685578.

Abstract Lessons learned Intravenous paricalcitol did not improve the efficacy of pembrolizumab, likely related to the short half-life. Background Immunotherapy has limited benefit in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with the tumor microenvironment playing a key role in immune resistance. In preclinical studies, vitamin D receptor (VDR) agonists have been shown to sensitize pancreatic tumors to PD-1 blockade. Methods This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase II trial to evaluate pembrolizumab with or without paricalcitol as maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Participants were ≥18 years; histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic PDAC showing no disease progression after frontline systemic therapy, and achieving maximal cytoreduction (eg, with no further antitumor effect), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status of 0 or 1; adequate organ function. Study treatment included: pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks and either paricalcitol 25 mcg IV 3 times per week or placebo. The primary objective was to evaluate 6-month progression free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include evaluating the toxicity of the combination and overall survival (OS). Results There was no significant difference in 6-month PFS, median PFS, median OS, nor treatment-related AEs between the 2 arms. Conclusions and relevance Paricalcitol did not improve the efficacy of pembrolizumab likely related to its short half-life of only 5-7 hours. Microbiome analysis revealed significant difference between long-term (&gt;12 weeks) and short-term (&lt;12 weeks) survival groups across treatment arms. Modulation of the tumor microenvironment will likely require more sustained VDR activity. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT03331562.

Lin et al. report the long‐term follow‐up of a phase II trial involving 95 adult patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), investigating the combination of methotrexate and cytarabine (MA). After a median follow‐up of 6.5 years, the study showed high response rates, with 90% overall response; 55% of patients free from an event such as disease progression, poor response or death; and 93% of patients were alive, though nearly half experienced febrile neutropenia. This prospective study helps fill gaps in understanding adult LCH treatment, indicating that fixed‐duration chemotherapy can yield durable responses despite its associated risks. It emphasizes the importance of personalized treatment decisions, considering both fixed‐duration chemotherapy and continuous targeted agents based on patient and disease‐specific factors.Commentary on: Lin et al. Long term follow‐up of methotrexate and cytarabine in adult patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Br J Haematol 2025; 206:576‐584.

AbstractBackground and AimsPhysical activity (PA) is associated with higher gait speed. We aimed to examine the associations between PA and change in spatial and temporal gait measures as well as fall risk in community‐dwelling individuals free of dementia.MethodsLongitudinal study among 4173 individuals aged ≥50 years (mean age 71 years; 2078 males; median follow‐up 4 years) enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Self‐reported late‐life PA was used to calculate overall PA and moderate‐vigorous PA (MVPA) scores. Gait was assessed using GAITRite® and Zeno™ systems. Incident falls information was based on diagnostic codes retrieved from medical records. We ran linear mixed effects models to examine associations between z‐scored PA variables and longitudinal gait parameters, adjusted for age, sex, education, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, and including interactions between PA and time since baseline. In secondary analyses, we calculated Cox Proportional hazard models with age as time scale predicting incident falls by PA, adjusting for sex, education, BMI, medical comorbidities, and falls history.ResultsAt baseline, higher PA was associated with higher velocity (overall PA: estimate 2.9935; MVPA: 2.2961; p < 0.001), higher cadence (overall PA: 1.0665; MVPA: 0.9073; p < 0.001), greater stride length (overall PA: 2.0805; MVPA: 1.4726; p < 0.001), shorter double support time (overall PA: −0.0257; MVPA: −0.0205; p < 0.001), and lower stance time variability (overall PA: −0.0204, p < 0.001; MVPA: −0.0152; p = 0.006). Overall PA was longitudinally associated with less decline in cadence, and MVPA with less increase in intraindividual stance time variability. Overall PA (Hazard ratio 0.892, 95% confidence interval 0.828–0.961, p = 0.003) and MVPA (HR 0.901; 95% CI 0.835–0.973, p = 0.008) were associated with a decreased risk of incident falls.ConclusionLate‐life PA was associated with favorable gait outcomes and decreased risk of incident falls. Thus, late‐life PA may help to maintain gait performance and decrease fall risk in old age.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This investigation evaluates the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) vs observation for Koos grade I vestibular schwannomas (VS). METHODS: In a multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed data of patients with Koos grade I VS who underwent SRS (SRS group) or were observed (observation group). Propensity score matching was used to equilibrate demographics, tumor size, and audiometric data across groups. The outcome analyzed included tumor control, preservation of serviceable hearing, and neurological function. RESULTS: The study matched 142 patients, providing a median follow-up period of 36 months. SRS significantly enhanced tumor control compared with observation, with a 100% control rate at both 5- and 8-year marks in the SRS group vs 48.6% and 29.5% in the observation group at the same time intervals, respectively ( P < .001). Preservation of serviceable hearing outcomes between groups showed no significant difference at 5 and 8 years, ensuring a comparable quality of auditory function (SRS 70.1% vs observation 53.4% at 5 years; P = .33). Furthermore, SRS was associated with a reduced likelihood of tinnitus (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, P = .04), vestibular dysfunction (OR = 0.17, P = .002), and overall cranial nerve dysfunction (OR = 0.49, P = .03) at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: SRS management of patients with Koos grade I VS was associated with superior tumor control and reduced odds for cranial nerve dysfunction, while not compromising hearing preservation compared with observation. These findings support the safety and efficacy of SRS as a primary care approach for this patient population.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in comparison with watchful waiting for managing Koos grade II vestibular schwannomas (VS). METHODS: A retrospective, multicentric analysis was conducted, focusing on patients with Koos grade II VS who either received SRS (SRS group) or were observed (observation group). To ensure comparability between groups, propensity score matching was used, including factors such as demographic characteristics, tumor dimensions, and hearing assessments. The primary end points examined were tumor control, maintenance of serviceable hearing, and neurological outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were equally matched across both cohorts, with a median follow-up of 37 months for the SRS group and 27.5 months for those observed. The SRS cohort exhibited superior tumor control over observation across 3, 5, and 8 years, achieving a 100% control rate vs 47.9%, 40.1%, and 34.3% for the observation group at these time intervals, respectively ( P < .001). Serviceable hearing preservation rates were comparable between the 2 groups throughout 3, 5, and 7 years (72.9% for SRS vs 65.4% for observation at 3 years; P = .86). Moreover, SRS management correlated with a lower incidence of vestibular symptoms (odds ratio = 0.11, P = .002), with no significant disparity in the deterioration of cranial nerve (CN) V or CN VII functions. Notably, the likelihood of experiencing any CN impairment was significantly diminished in the SRS cohort (odds ratio = 0.47, P = .04). CONCLUSION: For patients with Koos grade II VS, SRS offers superior tumor control rate and a lower risk of CN dysfunction without sacrificing hearing preservation.