Citations

The major barrier to clinical translation of αCD137 immunotherapy is separating antitumor efficacy from hepatotoxicity driven by IFN-γ–producing CD8 T cells. We propose a strategy to limit toxicity by promoting contraction of excessively expanded CD8 T cells. We identify CD11c + KLRG1 + effector CD8 T cells (CD11c + T E ) as the primary source of IFN-γ, recirculating between blood and secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs), where they undergo apoptosis during contraction. We show that lymphotoxin β receptor (LTβR) signaling restrains this contraction. Mechanistically, lymphotoxin-expressing B cells activate LTβR in fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs), suppressing apoptosis of CD11c + T E cells in the spleen and sustaining their systemic circulation and liver infiltration. Pharmacological LTβR blockade abrogates hepatotoxicity by reducing the accumulation of IFN-γ–producing CD11c + T E cells while preserving tumor-specific CD8 T cell responses. These findings identify LTβR as a key regulator of effector CD8 T cell persistence and support the use of LTβR antagonists to improve the safety of αCD137-based immunotherapy.

Abstract Solitary bone plasmacytoma (SBP) and SBP with minimal marrow involvement (SBPmm) are treated similarly with definitive radiation therapy (RT) followed by observation. However, differences in the natural disease course after RT between the two, are not well described. We performed a multicenter study assessing outcomes after RT in 141 patients with SBP and 102 with SBPmm diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2024. About 92% of patients with SBPmm progressed to multiple myeloma (MM) vs 76% of those with SBP (P = .01). Among patients with SBP, 21% progressed with a second solitary bone lesion vs 4% with SBPmm (P< .01). Patients with longer time to progression (TTP) after initial RT could achieve durable responses with RT to a second solitary plasmacytoma in the absence of other myeloma-defining events (MDE). Multifocal lytic bone lesions were the most common MDE, occurring in 89% and 81% of patients with SBPmm and SBP, respectively. Patients with SBPmm had a median TTP of 15 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14-21) compared to 43 months (95% CI, 34-55) for those with SBP (P< .0001); 67% with SBPmm progressed within 2 years of diagnosis. Del(17p) and 1q+ (gain or amplification) were associated with shorter TTP to MM in SBPmm, with 2-year progression rates of 100% and 82%, respectively. We report significant differences in risk and modes of progression between SBP and SBPmm. Patients with SBPmm are at particularly high risk for early progression to MM, with most developing bone disease as the MDE. These findings support prospective studies incorporating frontline systemic therapy for SBPmm.

ABSTRACT Immediate early genes (IEGs) encode master transcription factors, including EGR1 , FOS , JUN , and MYC genes that drive robust transcription in the G1 phase of cell cycle. Our previous studies indicate that topoisomerase IIβ (TOP2B) critically regulates IEG transcription and that the activities of TOP2B are dynamically controlled through post-translational modifications by BRCA1-BARD1 and ERKs. Here, we show that two E2 enzymes, UBCH5b and UBC13/MMS2, differentiate the effects and functions of TOP2B ubiquitination by BRCA1-BARD1. Comprehensive transcriptomics, proteomics, and biochemical and molecular cellular analyses revealed a close relationship between BARD1 and key mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway genes and identified activated ERK2 as a novel kinase that phosphorylates BARD1 at S391, a previously reported mitotic phosphorylation site, whose genetic mutation has been linked to tumorigenesis. Mechanistically, the catalytic activity of ERK2 stimulates TOP2B ubiquitination mediated by BRCA1-BARD1 in complex with UBCH5b and UBC13/MMS2, which controls the binding and function of TOP2B and BARD1 for transcriptional activation at representative IEGs. Taken together, our data propose that there is a functional regulatory circuit involving TOP2B, BARD1, and ERK2, three key transcriptional activators for IEG transcription, in which the gene association and catalytic activity of TOP2B are regulated through E2-differentiated ubiquitination by BRCA1-BARD1 and the phosphorylation of BARD1 by ERK2 for productive transcription.

Purpose: Significant variation is observed in diagnostic assessments for individuals with acquired apraxia of speech (AOS). The lack of consistency across research related to AOS impacts the comparison of intervention outcomes. This extends to diagnostic criteria, assessment, and the inclusion of patient demographics. This viewpoint examines outcomes related to the consistency in diagnostic tool use and collection of demographic information and introduces a template to support researchers and clinicians conducting diagnostic evaluations. Materials include guidelines for a thorough case history, current diagnostic characteristics, and diagnostic assessment tools available for describing AOS. The template illustrates how such materials can be structured and applied in research and clinical practice. Method: The recommendations provided in this viewpoint are part of a recent systematic review about AOS treatment outcomes. Trained raters extracted data from a comprehensive literature search from 1951 to April 2024 using a consensus protocol. Results: Of the 92 studies included in data extraction, demographic information such as age, gender, etiology, and months post-onset was commonly reported, and information about race and ethnicity (described in 15% of studies), socioeconomic status (0%), current/previous occupation (8%), language history (10%), and education (59%) was described less frequently. Reported diagnostic characteristics varied across studies, reflecting differences in using discriminatory versus nondiscriminatory features. Concomitant diagnoses, such as aphasia severity (37%) and presence of dysarthria (32%), were not consistently reported or described. Conclusion: A template with specific criteria and assessments can support research replication, raise awareness of diagnostic strategies, and offer a structured framework for investigators and clinicians. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32012346

Introduction Sepsis is a global health priority with nearly 50 million cases annually. Cardiovascular dysfunction is common, frequently manifesting as hypotension that persists despite fluid resuscitation. Most affected patients require the use of intravenous (IV) vasoactive agents, typically necessitating intensive care unit (ICU)-level monitoring, invasive interventions and contributing substantially to healthcare costs. Midodrine, an oral alpha-1 agonist approved for orthostatic hypotension, has increasingly been used off-label as a vasopressor-sparing (reducing IV vasopressor use) strategy in sepsis, despite limited and inconsistent evidence. This pragmatic, randomised, open-label trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of midodrine in patients with sepsis-associated hypotension. We hypothesise that, compared with standard care, midodrine administration will reduce the duration of IV vasopressor use. Methods and analysis A total of 308 adult patients with sepsis-associated hypotension will be enrolled (154 per arm). The intervention group will, in addition to standard of care, receive enteral midodrine 10 mg three times daily. Outcomes will be ascertained pragmatically via electronic health record-based data retrieval and adjudicated by research coordinators blinded to treatment assignment. The primary outcome is time alive and off IV vasopressors in the first 28 days (in hours) after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include cumulative vasopressor exposure; use and duration of central venous access; cumulative fluid balance over the first 48 hours and up to 7 days of ICU stay; ICU and hospital length of stay; and ICU-, hospital-, and organ support-free days through day 28. Safety outcomes include adverse events potentially attributable to midodrine during hospitalisation including acute kidney injury. Primary analyses will follow an intention-to-treat framework, including all randomised participants according to their assigned treatment groups. Primary and secondary outcomes will be compared using a van Elteren test stratified by randomisation factors. A predefined secondary Bayesian analysis of the primary outcome will provide complementary estimates of treatment effect. Safety outcomes will be summarised descriptively without formal between-arm hypothesis testing. Ethics and dissemination The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board approved this protocol and required written informed consent from all participants (IRB# 24–0 00 121). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and international conference presentations. Trial registration number NCT06319248 .