Citations

Clear

588 citation(s) found for "Uy, Geoffrey".

Abstract LB-343: Development of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assays for early cancer detection: first insights from the Circulating Cell-Free Genome Atlas Study (CCGA)
Aravanis, Alexander A., Oxnard, Geoffrey R. , Maddala, Tara, Venn, Oliver, Jamshidi, Arash , Shen, Ling , Amini, Hamed , Beausang, John F., Betts, Craig, Civello, Daniel, Davydov, Konstantin , Fazullina, Saniya, Filippova, Darya , Gnerre, Sante, Gross, Samuel, Hou, Chenlu, Jiang, Roger, Jung, Byoungsok , Melton, Collin, Nautiyal, Shivani , Newman, Joshua, Nicolaou, Cosmos , Rava, Richard P., Sakarya, Onur, Satya, Ravi Vijaya, Shojaee, Seyedmehdi, Steffen, Kristan K., Valouev, Anton, Xu, Hui , Yue, Jeanne, Baselga, José, Lapham, Rosanna L., Davis, Daron G., Richards, Donald, Seiden, Michael V., Yeatman, Timothy J. , Tibshirani, Robert , Curtis, Christina , Plevritis, Sylvia K. , Williams, Richard T. , Hartman, Anne‐Renee , Liu, Minetta C. , Aravanis, Alexander M. , Hubbell, Earl , Davydov, Konstantin, Gross, Samuel, Jiang, Roger, Kurtzman, Kathryn N. , Newman, Jonathan D , Newman, Joshua, Zhang, Nan , Smith, David A. B. , Swanton, Charles , Klein, Eric A.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | August 17, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: LB-343-LB-343

10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-lb-343 Get It

Abstract CCGA [NCT02889978] is the largest study of cfDNA-based early cancer detection; the first CCGA learnings from multiple cfDNA assays are reported here. This prospective, multi-center, observational study has enrolled 10,012 of 15,000 demographically-balanced participants at 141 sites. Blood was collected from participants with newly diagnosed therapy-naive cancer (C, case) and participants without a diagnosis of cancer (noncancer [NC], control) as defined at enrollment. This preplanned substudy included 878 cases, 580 controls, and 169 assay controls (n=1627) across 20 tumor types and all clinical stages. All samples were analyzed by: 1) Paired cfDNA and white blood cell (WBC)-targeted sequencing (60,000X, 507 gene panel); a joint caller removed WBC-derived somatic variants and residual technical noise; 2) Paired cfDNA and WBC whole-genome sequencing (WGS; 35X); a novel machine learning algorithm generated cancer-related signal scores; joint analysis identified shared events; and 3) cfDNA whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS; 34X); normalized scores were generated using abnormally methylated fragments. In the targeted assay, non-tumor WBC-matched cfDNA somatic variants (SNVs/indels) accounted for 76% of all variants in NC and 65% in C. Consistent with somatic mosaicism (i.e., clonal hematopoiesis), WBC-matched variants increased with age; several were non-canonical loss-of-function mutations not previously reported. After WBC variant removal, canonical driver somatic variants were highly specific to C (e.g., in EGFR and PIK3CA, 0 NC had variants vs 11 and 30, respectively, of C). Similarly, of 8 NC with somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) detected with WGS, 4 were derived from WBCs. WGBS data revealed informative hyper- and hypo-fragment level CpGs (1:2 ratio); a subset was used to calculate methylation scores. A consistent “cancer-like” signal was observed in <1% of NC participants across all assays (representing potential undiagnosed cancers). An increasing trend was observed in NC vs stages I-III vs stage IV (nonsyn. SNVs/indels per Mb [Mean±SD] NC: 1.01±0.86, stages I-III: 2.43±3.98; stage IV: 6.45±6.79; WGS score NC: 0.00±0.08, I-III: 0.27±0.98; IV: 1.95± 2.33; methylation score NC: 0±0.50; I-III: 1.02±1.77; IV: 3.94±1.70). These data demonstrate the feasibility of achieving >99% specificity for invasive cancer, and support the promise of cfDNA assay for early cancer detection. Additional data will be presented on detected plasma:tissue variant concordance and on multi-assay modeling. Citation Format: Alexander A. Aravanis, Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Tara Maddala, Earl Hubbell, Oliver Venn, Arash Jamshidi, Ling Shen, Hamed Amini, John A. Beausang, Craig Betts, Daniel Civello, Konstantin Davydov, Saniya Fazullina, Darya Filippova, Sante Gnerre, Samuel Gross, Chenlu Hou, Roger Jiang, Byoungsok Jung, Kathryn Kurtzman, Collin Melton, Shivani Nautiyal, Jonathan Newman, Joshua Newman, Cosmos Nicolaou, Richard Rava, Onur Sakarya, Ravi Vijaya Satya, Seyedmehdi Shojaee, Kristan Steffen, Anton Valouev, Hui Xu, Jeanne Yue, Nan Zhang, Jose Baselga, Rosanna Lapham, Daron G. Davis, David Smith, Donald Richards, Michael V. Seiden, Charles Swanton, Timothy J. Yeatman, Robert Tibshirani, Christina Curtis, Sylvia K. Plevritis, Richard Williams, Eric Klein, Anne-Renee Hartman, Minetta C. Liu. Development of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assays for early cancer detection: first insights from the Circulating Cell-Free Genome Atlas Study (CCGA) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-343.
Agnostic Pathway/Gene Set Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Data Identifies Associations for Pancreatic Cancer
Walsh, Naomi , Hyland, Paula L. , Yang, Qi , Childs, Erica J., Collins, Irene , Wang, Zhaoming , Arslan, Alan A. , Bracci, Paige M. , Brennan, Paul , Canzian, Federico , Gallinger, Steven , Goodman, Gary E. , Goodman, Phyllis J. , Hung, Rayjean J, Kurtz, Robert C. , Scélo, Ghislaine , Shu, Xiao Ou , Visvanathan, Kala , consortia, PanScan and PanC4, Andreotti, Gabriella , Babić, Ana , Berndt, Sonja I. , Borgida, Ayelet , Bueno‐de‐Mesquita, Bas , Buring, Julie E. , Chaffee, Kari G. , Foretová, Lenka , Fuchs, Charles S. , Gaziano, J. Michael , Giovannucci, Edward, Hackert, Thilo , Haiman, Christopher A. , Hartge, Patricia, Hasan, Manal , Helzlsouer, Kathy J., Herman, Joseph M. , Holly, Elizabeth A., Hoover, Robert N. , Hung, Rayjean J, Janout, Vladimí­r , Klein, Eric A. , Laheru, Daniel A. , Lee, I‐Min , Oberg, Ann L. , Patel, Alpa V. , Peters, Ulrike , Porta, Miquel , Real, Francisco X. , Rothman, Nathaniel , Sesso, Howard D. , Strobel, Oliver , Thornquist, Mark, Wactawski‐Wende, Jean , Wareham, Nick, Weiderpass, Elisabete , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Wheeler, William, Zeleniuch‐Jacquotte, Anne , Kraft, Peter , Li, Donghui , Jacobs, Eric J. , Petersen, Gloria M. , Wolpin, Brian M. , Rabe, Kari G. , Hung, Rayjean J. , Cleary, Sean, Weiderpass, Elisabete , Arslan, Alan A , Canzian, Federico , Hung, Rayjean J , Wactawski-Wende, Jean , Wang, Zhaoming , Visvanathan, Kala , Klein, Eric A , Strobel, Oliver , Kraft, Peter , Porta, Miquel , Real, Francisco X , Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne , Zhang, Han , Mocci, Evelina , Zhang, Mingfeng , Freeman, Laura E. Beane , Duell, Eric J. , Giles, Graham G. , Goggins, Michael , Hung, Rayjean J, Kooperberg, Charles , Malats, Núria , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Neale, Rachel Ε. , Olson, Sara H. , Van Den Eeden, Stephen K , White, Emily , Zheng, Wei , consortia, PanScan and PanC4, Albanes, Demetrius , Bamlet, William R. , Boutron‐Ruault, Marie‐Christine , Brais, Lauren K , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Cleary, Sean P. , Cotterchio, Michelle , Holcátová, Ivana , Hung, Rayjean J, Lu, Lingeng , Männistö, Satu , Milne, Roger L. , Orlow, Irene , Rothman, Nathaniel , Severi, Gianluca , Silverman, Debra T. , Sund, Malin , Tobias, Geoffrey S. , Wareham, Nick, Yu, Kai , Risch, Harvey A. , Ámundadóttir, Laufey T. , Yu, Kai , Klein, Alison P. , Stolzenberg‐Solomon, Rachael Z.

Mayo Clinic

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | August 15, 2018 | Volume: 111 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 557-567

10.1093/jnci/djy155 | PMID 30541042 Get It

Addition of Vincristine and Irinotecan to Vincristine, Dactinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide Does Not Improve Outcome for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From the Children’s Oncology Group
Hawkins, Douglas S. , Chi, Yueh-Yun, Anderson, James R. , Tian, Jing , Arndt, Carola A.S., Bomgaars, Lisa , Donaldson, Sarah S. , Hayes‐Jordan, Andrea , Mascarenhas, Leo , McCarville, Mary Beth, McCune, Jeannine S. , McCowage, Geoffrey , Million, Lynn , Parham, David M. , Rodeberg, David A. , Rudzinski, Erin R. , Shnorhavorian, Margarett , Spunt, Sheri L. , Skapek, Stephen X. , Teot, Lisa A., Yock, Torunn I. , Meyer, William H. , McCowage, Geoff, Morris, Carol D. , Hawkins, Douglas S , Spunt, Sheri L , Donaldson, Sarah S , Mascarenhas, Leo , McCarville, Mary Beth, Wolden, Suzanne L.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | August 9, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 27 | Pages: 2770-2777

10.1200/jco.2018.77.9694 | PMID 30091945 Get It

Purpose Intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) includes patients with either nonmetastatic, unresected embryonal RMS (ERMS) with an unfavorable primary site or nonmetastatic alveolar RMS (ARMS). The primary aim of this study was to improve the outcome of patients with intermediate-risk RMS by substituting vincristine and irinotecan (VI) for half of vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) courses. All patients received a lower dose of cyclophosphamide and earlier radiation therapy than in previous trials. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned at study entry to either VAC (cumulative cyclophosphamide dose, 16.8 g/m 2 ) or VAC/VI (cumulative cyclophosphamide dose, 8.4 g/m 2 ) for 42 weeks of therapy. Radiation therapy started at week 4, with individualized local control plans permitted for patients younger than 24 months. The primary study end point was event-free survival (EFS). The study design had an 80% power (5% one-sided α-level) to detect an improved long-term EFS from 65% (with VAC) to 76% (with VAC/VI). Results A total of 448 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. At a median follow-up of 4.8 years, the 4-year EFS was 63% with VAC and 59% with VAC/VI ( P = .51), and 4-year overall survival was 73% for VAC and 72% for VAC/VI ( P = .80). Within the ARMS and ERMS subgroups, no difference in outcome by treatment arm was found. Severe hematologic toxicity was less common with VAC/VI therapy. Conclusion The addition of VI to VAC did not improve EFS or OS for patients with intermediate-risk RMS. VAC/VI had less hematologic toxicity and a lower cumulative cyclophosphamide dose, making VAC/VI an alternative standard therapy for intermediate-risk RMS.
Normal Variant Occipital Pneumatization
Tomblinson, Courtney M. , Deep, Nicholas L. , Fletcher, Geoffrey P. , Nelson, Kent D., Patel, Ameet C. , Weindling, Steven M. , Lane, John I. , Hoxworth, Joseph M.

Mayo Clinic

Otology & Neurotology | August 5, 2018 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 9 | Pages: e872-e875

10.1097/mao.0000000000001947 | PMID 30080763 Get It

Objective: Evaluate prevalence and pattern of occipital pneumatization (OP). Patients: Individuals with imaging evidence of OP on computed tomography (CT). Intervention(s): High resolution CT scans of the temporal bone. Main Outcome Measure: The prevalence and pattern of OP on 1000 CT scans performed at a large academic healthcare system. Results: OP had a prevalence of 11.8% (n = 118) while occipital condyle pneumatization occurred in only 0.3%. Occipital air cells were right-sided in 27.1% (n = 32), left-sided in 51.7% (n = 61), and bilateral in 21.2% (n = 25), and OP was contiguous with the occipitomastoid suture. In cases of unilateral OP, the contralateral jugular foramen demonstrated relative enlargement ( p = 0.006), but a direct association could not be established. Conclusions: The occipital bone is an accessory site of skull base pneumatization in 11.8% of the population undergoing temporal bone CT, while air cell extension into the occipital condyle occurs more rarely. These occipital air cells have a left-sided predilection and are always in direct proximity to the occipitomastoid suture, suggesting developmental egress from the mastoid. OP is a normal variant and lacks features of craniocervical pneumatization, which is a rare disorder.
AHNS Series: Do you know your guidelines? Optimizing outcomes in reoperative parathyroid surgery: Definitive multidisciplinary joint consensus guidelines of the American Head and Neck Society and the British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons
Stack, Brendan C. , Tolley, Neil , Bartel, Twyla B. , Bilezikian, John P. , Bodenner, Donald, Camacho, Pauline M., Cox, Jeremy, Dralle, Henning , Jackson, James E. , Palazzo, Fausto , Scott‐Coombes, David , Steward, David L. , Terris, David J. , Thompson, Geoffrey B. , Thompson, Geoffrey, Morris, John C., Orloff, Lisa A. , Ridge, John Andrew , Randolph, Gregory William

Mayo Clinic

Head & Neck | August 5, 2018 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1617-1629

10.1002/hed.25023 | PMID 30070413 Get It

Abstract Background Revision parathyroid is challenging due to possible diagnostic uncertainty as well as the technical challenges it can present. Methods A multidisciplinary panel of distinguished experts from the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) Endocrine Section, the British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons (BAETS), and other invited experts have reviewed this topic with the purpose of making recommendations based on current best evidence. The literature was also reviewed on May 12, 2017. PubMed (1946‐2017), Cochrane SR (2005‐2017), CT databases (1997‐2017), and Web of Science (1945‐2017) were searched with the following strategy: revision and reoperative parathyroidectomy to ensure completeness. Results Guideline recommendations were made in 3 domains: preoperative evaluation, surgical management, and alternatives to surgery. Eleven guideline recommendations are proposed. Conclusion Reoperative parathyroid surgery is best avoided if possible. Our literature search and subsequent recommendations found that these cases are best managed by experienced surgeons using precision preoperative localization, intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH), and the team approach.
The 2018 Revision to the Process of Care Model for Evaluation of Erectile Dysfunction
Mulhall, John P. , Giraldi, Annamaria , Hackett, Geoff , Hellstrom, Wayne J.G. , Rubio‐Aurioles, Eusebio , Trost, Landon , Hassan, Tarek A. , Hackett, Geoffrey , Jannini, Emmanuele A. , Hassan, Tarek A.

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Sexual Medicine | July 26, 2018 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1280-1292

10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.06.005 | PMID 30057280 Get It

Abstract Background Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common condition that may affect men of all ages; in 1999, a Process of Care Model was developed to provide clinicians with recommendations regarding the evaluation and management of ED. Aim To reflect the evolution of the study of ED since 1999, this update to the process of care model presents health care providers with a tool kit to facilitate patient interactions, comprehensive evaluation, and counseling for ED. Methods A cross-disciplinary panel of international experts met to propose updates to the 1999 process of care model from a global perspective. The updated model was designed to be evidence-based, data-driven, and accessible to a wide range of health care providers. Outcomes This article summarizes the resulting discussion of the expert meeting and focuses on ED evaluation. The management of ED is discussed in an article by Muhall et al (J Sex Med 2018;15:1280-1292). Results A comprehensive approach to the evaluation of ED is warranted because ED may involve both psychological and organic components. The updated process of care model for evaluation was divided into core and optional components and now focuses on the combination of first-line pharmacotherapy and counseling in consideration of patient sexual dynamics. Clinical Implications Patient evaluation for ED should encompass a variety of aspects, including medical history, sexual history, physical examination, psychological evaluation, laboratory testing, and possibly adjunctive testing. Strengths & Limitations This update draws on author expertise and experience to provide multi-faceted guidance for the evaluation of ED in a modern context. Although a limited number of contributors provided input on the update, these experts represent diverse fields that encounter patients with ED. Additionally, no meta-analyses were performed to further support the ED evaluation guidelines presented. Conclusion Comprehensive evaluation of ED affords health care providers an opportunity to address medical, psychological/psycho-social, and sexual issues associated with ED, with the ultimate goal being effective management and possibly resolution of ED. While some or all techniques described in the updated model may be needed for each patient, evaluation should in all cases be thorough.
The 2018 Revision to the Process of Care Model for Management of Erectile Dysfunction
Mulhall, John P. , Giraldi, Annamaria , Hackett, Geoff , Hellstrom, Wayne J.G. , Rubio‐Aurioles, Eusebio , Trost, Landon , Hassan, Tarek A. , Hackett, Geoffrey , Jannini, Emmanuele A. , Hassan, Tarek A.

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Sexual Medicine | July 26, 2018 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1434-1445

10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.021 | PMID 30057278 Get It

Abstract Introduction Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common condition the treatment of which over the years has expanded from specialty care settings to various other clinical settings. A Process of Care Model was developed in 1999 to provide primary care physicians with guidance in the diagnosis and management of ED. Aim This update to the Process of Care Model aims to reflect current ED management practices, because the study of ED has changed since 1999. Methods Updates to the Process of Care Model were developed during a meeting of international experts from diverse disciplines. The updated model is data-driven, evidence-based, and relevant to a wide range of healthcare providers. Main Outcome Measures This article summarizes the results of the expert meeting and focuses on ED management. The evaluation of ED is discussed in a separate article. Results The updated model presents modification of risk factors and correction of comorbidities frequently associated with ED as critical parts of patient management. Patients should be encouraged to make positive lifestyle changes such as improving diet and increasing physical exercise. Lifestyle changes may be accompanied by the first-line medical therapies of sexual counseling and therapy, which takes into consideration patient sexual dynamics and pharmacotherapy with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is). Clinical Implications The updated model provides guidance regarding risk factors associated with ED, their modification, sexual counseling, and PDE5I selection, dosing, and patient education. Strengths and Limitations This update leverages the extensive clinical expertise and experience of the authors to provide updated, comprehensive guidance for ED management. The model reflects the views and experiences of a limited number of contributors; however, these authors draw upon a diverse array of clinical specialties and are regarded as experts in their fields. Additionally, no meta-analyses were performed to further support the ED evaluation guidelines presented. Conclusion Effective management of ED may be achieved through a combination of patient risk factor modification and first-line therapy, taking into consideration any patient comorbidities known to be associated with ED. Treatment goals should be individualized to restore sexual satisfaction to the patient and/or couple and improve quality of life based on the patient’s expressed needs and desires.
In Reply to Geoffrey Baird on: Utility of Antinuclear Antibody Screening by Various Methods in a Clinical Laboratory Patient Cohort
Crowson, Cynthia S. , Moder, Kevin G., Snyder, Melissa R.

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine | July 23, 2018 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 320-321

10.1373/jalm.2016.021600 | PMID 33626848 Get It

Clinical PET/MRI: 2018 Update
Goenka, Ajit H. , Kemp, Bradley J. , Johnson, Geoffrey B. , Johnson, Geoffrey B , Broski, Stephen M.

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Roentgenology | June 27, 2018 | Volume: 211 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 295-313

10.2214/ajr.18.20001 | PMID 29949413 Get It

Genome-wide sequencing for early stage lung cancer detection from plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA): The Circulating Cancer Genome Atlas (CCGA) study.
Oxnard, Geoffrey R. , Maddala, Tara, Aravanis, Alex, Venn, Oliver, Valouev, Anton, Shen, Ling , Patel, Shilpen, Jamshidi, Arash , Jagadeesh, Karthik A. , Gross, Samuel, Filippova, Darya , Beausang, John F., Liu, Minetta C. , Richards, Donald , Plevritis, Sylvia K. , Williams, Richard T. , Hartman, Anne‐Renee , Hubbell, Earl , Aravanis, Alexander M. , Zhang, Nan , Swanton, Charles

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 7, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: LBA8501-LBA8501

10.1200/jco.2018.36.18_suppl.lba8501 Get It

LBA8501 Background: Plasma cfDNA genomic analysis is used widely for the care of advanced lung cancer, but its suitability for early stage lung cancer detection is not well established. CCGA (NCT02889978) is a prospective, multi-center, observational study launched for the development of a noninvasive assay for cancer detection. Methods: Blood was prospectively collected (N = 1627) from 749 controls (no cancer diagnosis) and 878 participants (pts) with newly-diagnosed untreated cancer in this preplanned substudy, including 127 pts with lung cancer. Three prototype sequencing assays were performed: paired cfDNA and white blood cell (WBC) targeted sequencing (507 genes, 60,000X) for single nucleotide variants/indels; paired cfDNA and WBC whole genome sequencing (WGS) for copy number variation (30X); and cfDNA whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) for methylation (30X). For each assay, a classification model using 10-fold cross-validation was developed for all pts with cancer, then evaluated in the pts with lung cancer; sensitivity was estimated at 95% specificity. Results: We evaluated pts with lung cancer (127) and a subset of controls (580) with similar ages (mean±SD yrs: 67±9, 60±13), 85% and 43% were ever-smokers, and 46% and 22% were men, respectively. Of 3055 nonsynonymous mutations detected across 122 evaluable pts with lung cancer, > 50% were detected in WBC consistent with clonal hematopoiesis (CH). Accounting for CH, sensitivity in 63 stage I-IIIA pts evaluable across all 3 assays was 48% (35-61, targeted), 54% (41-67, WGS), and 56% (43-68, WGBS); in 54 stage IIIB-IV pts it was 85% (73-93, targeted), 91% (80-97, WGS), and 93% (82-98, WGBS) . Similar sensitivities were observed across histological subtypes (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, small cell). Comparison to tumor WGS and multi-assay classification will be reported. Conclusions: Early stage lung cancers are detectable in cfDNA using a genome-wide sequencing approach. For lung cancer detection using targeted assays, CH must be accounted for to minimize false positives. Assay optimization is ongoing to allow further clinical development in the intended use population. Clinical trial information: NCT02889978.