Deep, Nicholas L.

Abstract Purpose Failed stapes surgery presents a diagnostic challenge requiring high-resolution imaging to guide revision. Energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) is widely used but limited by spatial resolution and metal artifact. Photon-counting CT (PCCT) offers improved spatial resolution and reduced noise, with potential advantages in temporal bone imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare PCCT and EID-CT in identifying etiologies of failed primary stapes surgery, with emphasis on diagnostic accuracy, interobserver agreement, and interpreter confidence Methods In this retrospective study, 38 patients with failed primary stapes surgery who underwent successful revision surgery and pre-revision CT were included; 18 underwent PCCT and 20 underwent EID-CT. Three expert reviewers independently determined the cause of surgical failure, compared against the reference standard of intraoperative findings at revision. Diagnostic accuracy, interobserver agreement (Fleiss kappa), and reader confidence were compared between modalities. Results Overall interobserver agreement was substantially higher with PCCT (κ = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60–0.90) than EID-CT (κ = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30–0.59), with improved agreement observed across etiologies of failure; confidence intervals were non-overlapping for overall agreement and ossicular discontinuity. Consensus diagnostic accuracy was comparable between modalities (88.9% PCCT vs 85% EID-CT; p = 1.00), as was interpreter confidence (4.33 PCCT vs 4.17 EID-CT; p = 0.29). Conclusion In this small cohort, PCCT and EID-CT demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy and reader confidence, whereas PCCT demonstrated significantly higher interobserver agreement, suggesting more reproducible assessment of failed stapes surgery and a potential role in supporting revision surgical planning.

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) amplitude parameters during cochlear implantation (CI) using a novel multi‐frequency ECochG algorithm. Methods A multi‐institutional, prospective cohort study was performed at 18 high‐volume CI centers. The inclusion criteria were adults with sensorineural hearing loss and audiometric thresholds of ≤ 90 dB hearing level at 500 Hz undergoing CI with Advanced Bionics (Valencia, CA) Ultra 3D devices between 2024 and 2025. ECochG recordings were performed with simultaneous multi‐frequency stimulation of four frequencies between 125 and 4000 Hz during cochlear implant insertion. Concurrent multi‐frequency recording allowed extraction of amplitude and phase of each frequency individually. Post hoc analysis was performed to determine the difference in the number of drop alarms between single‐ and multi‐frequency ECochG. An ECochG amplitude drop of 6 dB was defined as a drop alarm. Insertion track patterns were compared between single‐ and multi‐frequency ECochG. Results One hundred ninety‐five ears were included. Mean number of drop alarms for the single‐frequency algorithm was 1.72 (95% CI: 1.52, 1.92; median 1) compared to 0.42 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.53; median 0) for multi‐frequency; p < 0.001. The number of Type C patterns (rise in amplitude during insertion followed by a drop) decreased with the multi‐frequency ECochG algorithm compared to the single‐frequency ECochG algorithm. The number of Type D patterns (no‐response) decreased, indicating that multi‐frequency ECochG generated more responses across the cochlea than single‐frequency ECochG. Conclusions A novel multi‐frequency ECochG algorithm during CI is associated with fewer drop alarms and altered insertion track patterns, which may provide a more accurate assessment of the cochlear microenvironment. Level of Evidence 3.

Abstract Objectives To address the gap between artificial intelligence (AI) model development and clinical implementation by developing a machine-learning model to predict cochlear implant (CI) eligibility based on routine hearing tests, while illustrating 3 practical lessons: reformulation for clinical utility, selection of problem-specific metrics, and handling input data variability. Materials and Methods Data were extracted from adult patients who underwent behavioral audiometric and subsequent CI candidacy testing (Arizona Biomedical and Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant tests) at Mayo Clinic between 2011 and 2023. Regression models were initially developed to predict AzBio and CNC scores using features from routine audiograms. Models were then reformulated into binary classification tasks using clinical thresholds (AzBio ≤60%; CNC &lt;50%) and reported sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Input data variability was assessed by analyzing test-retest differences in isophonemes scores. Results Binary classification models achieved sensitivity of 90.4% with PPV 80.2% at CNC 50/AzBio 60, outperforming referral heuristics (60/60 and 75/40). Applying the models to 50 700 historical audiograms identified 525 patients at PPV 90% (sensitivity 58%), 396 at PPV 94% (sensitivity 44%), and 1582 at PPV 71% (sensitivity 94%). Variability analyses indicated that attainable precision is bounded by noise in key predictors. Conclusion This study demonstrates how AI models can be translated into clinically actionable tools by reformulating regression outputs, selecting metrics aligned with clinical priorities, and addressing data variability. These strategies provide a scalable framework for implementing AI in health care and improving decision-making in diverse clinical contexts.

Objective: Auditory nerve monitoring through electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAP) can be used to assess cochlear neural integrity during vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection. Herein, we report on 5 cochlear implant (CI) patients who underwent VS resection with present eCAP responses both intraoperatively and postoperatively. Patients either did not perceive any sound through their CI or rapidly adapted to electrical stimulation, suggesting that the presence of eCAP does not guarantee auditory nerve function in patients with VS resection. Patients: Five patients who underwent simultaneous VS translabyrinthine resection and cochlear implantation. Interventions: Simultaneous cochlear implantation and translabyrinthine microsurgical VS resection. Main outcome measure: Electrically evoked compound action potential. Results: All patients had eCAP responses present during their VS resection and for at least 50 days post-surgery. Three of the 5 patients did not perceive any sound with their cochlear implant. This shows that the presence of an eCAP alone does not guarantee a functional auditory nerve or auditory perception. The other 2 patients could hear non-speech sounds, but these sounds quickly became inaudible, indicating that their auditory nerve lacked the ability to integrate the electrical stimulus over time. Conclusions: The presence of an eCAP response does not guarantee auditory sensation through a CI. Although eCAP measurements provide insight into the function of the distal end of the nerve, it does not ascertain integrity or function of the larger auditory nerve pathway. Therefore, eCAPs should not be used in isolation to monitor auditory nerve function during VS resection.

Objectives To compare electrical stimulation and speech perception in vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients across treatment modalities and standard cochlear implant (CI) patients. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Tertiary academic center. Patients Sixty-seven CI ears consisting of 23 standard CI controls and 44 VS patients with ipsilateral CI. VS patients were separated by treatment modality: 24 microsurgical resection, 15 radiation therapy, and 5 observation. Eleven VS patients with CI did not receive auditory sensation from electrical stimulation. Interventions VS microsurgical resection, radiation therapy, and observation. Main Outcome Measures Threshold (T-levels), comfort (C-levels), consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word score, and AzBio sentence recognition scores. Results Patients who underwent microsurgical resection required significantly higher (p < 0.001) T-levels and C-levels compared with the standard CI group. Stimulation levels in the VS radiation therapy and observation groups were higher but not significantly different compared with standard CI controls. Overall rate of CI nonstimulation across all VS patients was 25%: 38% for microsurgery and 13% for radiation. Average CNC score for microsurgery group was 18% compared with 44% for radiation, 55% for observation, and 68.5% for standard CI controls. CNC word and AzBio scores were significantly lower (p < 0.001) for the microsurgery group compared with standard CI group. Conclusions Resection may negatively affect auditory nerve function, leading to higher stimulation levels, increased risk of nonstimulation, and poorer postoperative CI speech outcomes compared with observation or radiosurgery. When medically appropriate, nonsurgical VS management may be used to allow for optimization of CI programming and postoperative hearing outcomes.

Objective To assess integration of a single-use robotic-assisted cochlear implant (RA-CI) electrode array insertion system into surgical workflows, identify potential challenges, and inform best practices. Study Design Survey. Setting Survey data from 16 surgeons across 10 US hospitals. Patients CI candidates 12 years and older with radiographically normal cochleae. Intervention CI surgery with single-use RA-CI insertion system during electrode array insertion. Main Outcome Measures Number of RA-CI to achieve proficiency, estimated additional time for RA-CI, and best practices to successfully incorporate the RA insertion system into CI surgery. Results A total of 121 RA-CI cases were performed. All surgeons completed the survey. Most surgeons (62.5%) reported they would feel comfortable using the device within five cases. Eight (50%) reported use of the RA system added 5 to 10 minutes to the case, and seven (44%) reported an added 10–15 minutes. Providing adequate incision size to secure the unit base superior to the temporal line and maximizing exposure of the facial recess were the most recommended best practices. Additional recommendations included pulling the receiver/stimulator forward within the pocket to facilitate a full electrode array insertion and considering drive head placement and mastoidectomy size to maximize overall visibility during electrode array insertion. Conclusions Proficiency with an RA electrode array insertion system during CI surgery can be achieved with minor adjustments to the surgical approach, within relatively few use cases (generally <5) and with minimal time addition (between 5 and 15 min). Training to specific best practices is important before initial clinical use.

Objective To evaluate cochlear implant speech perception among patients with sporadic inner ear schwannoma who underwent ipsilateral implantation. Study Design Retrospective multi-institutional cohort study. Setting Eleven tertiary academic medical centers across Germany, Denmark, and the United States. Patients One hundred six patients with sporadic inner ear schwannoma who received an ipsilateral cochlear implant from 2011 to 2022. Interventions Ipsilateral cochlear implantation with observation, stereotactic radiosurgery, or microsurgery for tumor management. Main Outcome Measures Monosyllabic speech perception testing scores and rates of open-set speech perception. Results Among 106 patients studied, 101 (95%) achieved open-set speech perception with a median of 24 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12–42 mo) of audiometric follow-up. Median ipsilateral monosyllabic speech perception testing achieved was 72% (IQR 54–85%), and median ipsilateral AzBio in quiet was 75% (IQR 46–90%). Most (91 of 106 [86%]) underwent microsurgery for tumor control, with cochlear implantation performed simultaneously in 98% (89 of 91) of these patients. The ability to achieve gross total resection significantly differed by tumor complexity, with 97% of low-complexity tumors, 100% of intermediate complexity, and 0% of high-complexity tumors undergoing gross total resection (p < 0.001). However, among patients managed with microsurgery, there was not a statistically significant difference in post-cochlear implantation monosyllabic speech perception scores across complexity groupings, with median scores of 75 and 70% for patients with tumors of low or intermediate complexity and those with tumors of high complexity, respectively (p = 0.5). Eight of 102 patients (8%) assessed experienced deterioration in cochlear implant performance over time. Among the subset of 39 patients with available MRI to review, the region of surveillance interest could be visualized postoperatively on MRI in all cases. Conclusions Open-set speech perception is achieved in most patients with inner ear schwannoma undergoing ipsilateral cochlear implantation. Although cochlear implantation in high-complexity inner ear schwannomas is only possible with incomplete tumor resection, long-term open-set speech perception outcomes are similar to lower-complexity tumors.

Objective To compare cochlear implant (CI) speech perception outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) managed with observation, radiosurgery, or microsurgery. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Eleven tertiary academic medical centers. Patients One hundred patients with sporadic VS who received an ipsilateral CI. Interventions Ipsilateral cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measures Pure-tone thresholds, monosyllabic speech perception testing scores, and rates of open-set speech acquisition. Results Of the 100 patients studied, 54 underwent microsurgery, 26 underwent radiosurgery, 19 continued observation, and 1 underwent multimodal therapy. Among all patients, the median post-implantation pure-tone average was 31 dB (interquartile range [IQR] 25–39 dB) and the median monosyllabic speech perception score was 30% (IQR 0–60%) at a median of 12 months (IQR 5–25 months) post-implantation. Patients who were managed with microsurgery (median speech perception score 11%, IQR 0–52%) exhibited poorer implant outcomes overall compared with those managed with observation (median speech perception score 52%, IQR 40–72%) or radiosurgery (median speech perception score 30%, IQR 16–60%). Open-set speech perception was achieved in 61% of patients managed with microsurgery, 100% with observation, and 80% with radiosurgery. In a multivariable setting, those managed with observation (p = 0.02) or who underwent radiosurgery (p = 0.04) were significantly more likely to achieve open-set speech perception compared with patients who underwent microsurgery. Conclusions Cochlear implants offer benefit in selected patients with sporadic VS. Although achieved in over half of people after microsurgery, open-set speech perception is more reliably attained in patients who are treated with observation or radiosurgery compared with microsurgical resection. These data may inform patient counseling and VS tumor management in people who may benefit from implantation.

AbstractObjectiveThis study investigated the comparative performance of ear, nose, and throat (ENT) physicians in correctly detecting ear abnormalities when reviewing digital otoscopy imaging using 3 different visualization methods, including computer‐assisted composite images called “SelectStitch,” single video frame “Still” images, and video clips. The study also explored clinicians' diagnostic confidence levels and the time to make a diagnosis.Study DesignClinician diagnostic reader study.SettingOnline diagnostic survey of ENT physicians.MethodsNine ENT physicians reviewed digital otoscopy examinations from 86 ears with various diagnoses (normal, perforation, retraction, middle ear effusion, tympanosclerosis). Otoscopy examinations used artificial‐intelligence (AI)‐based computer‐aided composite image generation from a video clip (SelectStitch), manually selected best still frame from a video clip (Still), or the entire video clip. Statistical analyses included comparisons of ability to detect correct diagnosis, confidence levels, and diagnosis times.ResultsThe ENT physicians' ability to detect ear abnormalities (33.2%‐68.7%) varied depending on the pathologies. SelectStitch and Still images were not statistically different in detecting abnormalities (P > .50), but both were different from Video (P < .01). However, the performance improvement observed with Videos came at the cost of significantly longer time to determining the diagnosis. The level of confidence in the diagnosis was positively associated with correct diagnoses, but varied by particular pathology.ConclusionThis study explores the potential of computer‐assisted techniques like SelectStitch in enhancing otoscopic diagnoses and time‐saving, which could benefit telemedicine settings. Comparable performance between computer‐generated and manually selected images suggests the potential of AI algorithms for otoscopy applications.