Citations

AbstractBackgroundUp to 30% of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cases are due to known pathogenic mutations (f‐FTD). Little is known about the factors that predict who will choose to learn their results. Upcoming clinical trials in f‐FTD may require disclosure prior to enrollment, even before symptom onset, and thus characterizing this sample is important. Furthermore, understanding the mood impacts of genetic disclosure may guide genetic counseling practice.MethodF‐FTD participants (n=568) from families with a known pathogenic mutation (MAPT, C9orf72, GRN) were enrolled through the ARTFL/LEFFTDS Longitudinal FTD Study (ALLFTD) and provided the opportunity for disclosure. Independent‐sample t‐tests compared demographic and psychosocial factors between participants who did and did not receive their results. In participants who were asymptomatic at baseline and follow up (n=199,177 with follow‐up), linear mixed effects modeling was used to investigate pre‐ to post‐disclosure changes in the 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).ResultOf participants from families with a known pathogenic genetic mutation, 47% received genetic disclosure. Of the asymptomatic subset (n=386), 36% know their mutation status. Of these asymptomatic learners, 46% received disclosure through the study, and the remainder learned their genetic status prior to study enrollment. None of the analyzed demographic or psychosocial factors (i.e., sex, age, education, having children) differed between learners and non‐learners (p’s > 0.05). In the longitudinal analysis of asymptomatic participants, learners showed a pre‐ to post‐increase of 0.31 GDS points/year (95%CI: ‐0.08, 0.69, p = 0.12), whereas non‐learners showed a slight decline (‐0.15 points/year, 95%CI: ‐0.36, 0.06, p = 0.16). This difference between slopes was statistically significant (0.46, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.89, p=0.04) but represents a small clinical effect. In asymptomatic learners, slopes did not differ based on mutation status (0.28, 95%CI: ‐0.66, 1.20, p=0.55). Conclusions were based on the estimates and full range of confidence intervals.ConclusionThe majority of asymptomatic research participants do not know their genetic status, which will be a consideration for clinical trials that require disclosure. No considered demographic factors were strongly associated with the decision to receive disclosure. The findings suggest that disclosure in asymptomatic participants has minimal impact on depressive symptoms regardless of genetic results.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) refers to a group of neurodegenerative conditions, affecting the frontal and/or temporal lobes. Ongoing research has provided insight into developing clinical trials for FTLD and key clinical measures such as structural MRI. To inform clinical trial design and optimize participation, it is imperative to explore facilitators and barriers for potential candidates.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to explore facilitators and barriers to participating in future clinical trials for FTLD.MethodsAdvancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects (LEFFTDS) are observational studies focused on characterizing FTLD syndromes in preparation for clinical trials. The 584 participants enrolled across 18 research sites in the United States and Canada completed a survey assessing interest in clinical trial participation.Results29% of respondents self‐reported as patients (63±10 years), 26% self‐reported as caregivers answering on behalf of patients (65±10 years), and 45% self‐reported as healthy but at risk for FTLD (48±14 years). Travel reimbursement was the most common factor reported to positively influence participation (≧66%), with the healthy but at risk group showing the strongest endorsement (83%). Cost and time involved in travel were possible barriers for about half of the patients (48%) and healthy but at risk respondents (53%). The respondents value receiving feedback on the study findings (≧80%) and being informed of their individual disease progression (≧75%). Particularly, keeping participation confidential was very important for the healthy but at risk group (62%). In regard to research assessments, most participants demonstrated a high interest in physical and neurological exams at a research center (≧87%) whereas only half were interested in doing more invasive procedures such as the lumbar puncture (≧52%). Overall, respondents showed a positive attitude and support for research participation (≧77%) and trusted that their health information would remain confidential in a clinical trial (≧53%).ConclusionsFavorable attitudes and interest towards medical research exist among participants. To optimize participation, clinical trials should allocate funding for travel and involve participants in feedback about study results and their disease progression. Alternatives to invasive assessments may increase participation.

Objective: Robust disease and syndromic surveillance tools are underdeveloped in the United States, as evidenced by limitations and heterogeneity in sociodemographic data collection throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. To monitor the COVID-19 pandemic in Minnesota, we developed a federated data network in March 2020 using electronic health record (EHR) data from 8 multispecialty health systems. Materials and Methods: In this serial cross-sectional study, we examined patients of all ages who received a COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction test, had symptoms of a viral illness, or received an influenza test from January 3, 2016, through November 7, 2020. We evaluated COVID-19 testing rates among patients with symptoms of viral illness and percentage positivity among all patients tested, in aggregate and by zip code. We stratified results by patient and area-level characteristics. Results: Cumulative COVID-19 positivity rates were similar for people aged 12-64 years (range, 15.1%-17.6%) but lower for adults aged ≥65 years (range, 9.3%-10.7%). We found notable racial and ethnic disparities in positivity rates early in the pandemic, whereas COVID-19 positivity was similarly elevated across most racial and ethnic groups by the end of 2020. Positivity rates remained substantially higher among Hispanic patients compared with other racial and ethnic groups throughout the study period. We found similar trends across area-level income and rurality, with disparities early in the pandemic converging over time. Practice Implications: We rapidly developed a distributed data network across Minnesota to monitor the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings highlight the utility of using EHR data to monitor the current pandemic as well as future public health priorities. Building partnerships with public health agencies can help ensure data streams are flexible and tailored to meet the changing needs of decision makers.

AbstractSkeletal muscle‐related symptoms are common in both acute coronavirus disease (Covid)‐19 and post‐acute sequelae of Covid‐19 (PASC). In this narrative review, we discuss cellular and molecular pathways that are affected and consider these in regard to skeletal muscle involvement in other conditions, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, critical illness myopathy, and post‐viral fatigue syndrome. Patients with severe Covid‐19 and PASC suffer from skeletal muscle weakness and exercise intolerance. Histological sections present muscle fibre atrophy, metabolic alterations, and immune cell infiltration. Contributing factors to weakness and fatigue in patients with severe Covid‐19 include systemic inflammation, disuse, hypoxaemia, and malnutrition. These factors also contribute to post‐intensive care unit (ICU) syndrome and ICU‐acquired weakness and likely explain a substantial part of Covid‐19‐acquired weakness. The skeletal muscle weakness and exercise intolerance associated with PASC are more obscure. Direct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS‐CoV)‐2 viral infiltration into skeletal muscle or an aberrant immune system likely contribute. Similarities between skeletal muscle alterations in PASC and chronic fatigue syndrome deserve further study. Both SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific factors and generic consequences of acute disease likely underlie the observed skeletal muscle alterations in both acute Covid‐19 and PASC.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarkers can be broadly considered to inform upon regional or global changes occurring in‐vivo. Investigation of neuropathologic underpinnings of regional and global biomarker measures may require differing strategies to validate in the postmortem brain. The goal of this presentation will be to discuss potential neuropathologic strategies to validate AD biomarkers and consider how we may leverage our understanding of the biology to inform upon disease stages.MethodA neuropathologic overview of amyloid‐β composition, neurofibrillary tangle maturity, and glial activation will be provided in a didactic format with an emphasis on disease spectrum. The relevant AD biomarker literature with neuropathologic validation will be highlighted.ResultRegional AD biomarker measures can be visualized and quantified using positron emission tomography (PET). Neuropathologic validation is performed using PET‐to‐autopsy studies or via autoradiographic studies in the postmortem brain tissue. Global AD biomarker measures can be assessed using PET, or fluid biomarkers that include cerebrospinal fluid and blood. Interpretation of these global AD biomarker measures can be further examined in individuals followed to autopsy, which enables a direct comparison with global neuropathologic staging scales (e.g. Braak stage, Thal phase). Neuropathologic validation of global measures and disease stage may be especially useful in identifying contributors to biomarker variability owing to the presence of multiple comorbidities that are a common finding in the AD brain.ConclusionThe direct target of AD biomarkers (e.g. N‐terminal tau phosphorylation) may impact the sensitivity to early or advanced disease stages, both of which may be critical for disease monitoring depending upon the setting or study question. Quantitative digital pathology studies investigating regional, global, or disease stages measured by PET and fluid biomarkers provide an invaluable opportunity to inform upon the neuropathologic underpinnings of longitudinal biomarker changes.

AbstractBackgroundAdvancing age is an important risk factor for dementia and cancer. An inverse association between these conditions has been described, yet caution from potential biases/confounders is warranted. Dementia and cancer may represent a spectrum of opposing dysregulated degenerative (apoptosis) and growth (proliferative) pathways respectively (Driver, 2014). Risk or resiliency factors affecting these pathways may influence cognitive outcomes in the oldest‐old. We sought to investigate demographics, clinical characteristics, and the impact of medical comorbidity on possible risk‐resiliency factors for neurodegeneration in nondemented and demented oldest‐old who died and underwent autopsy.MethodMedical records of 161 decedents (female n=134) from the Mayo Clinic 95+ year‐old cohort (age range 95‐106 years‐old) were reviewed. Groups consisting of nondemented (n=72) and demented (n=89) decedents were stratified and compared according to demographics and clinical variables, including history of cancer. Autopsy and neuropathologic evaluation was also conducted.ResultAge at death, sex, race, and education showed no differences between nondemented and demented decedents. History of cancer was higher in nondemented (57%) compared to demented decedents (30%) (p=0.002). APOE ε4 allele presence did not differ amongst groups, while APOE ε2 allele was more common in the nondemented group (p=0.026). History of coronary artery disease was higher in the nondemented (p=0.033). No differences were observed in other vascular risk factors, alcohol use, or depression. Smoking history approached significance and was higher in nondemented compared to demented (p=0.068). MMSE scores were higher in the nondemented group (p<0.001). Neuropathology findings included a lower Braak tangle staging in nondemented (median=III) compared to demented (median=V) groups (p<0.001) and less frequent diffuse plaques observed in the nondemented (67%) compared with those demented (93%) (p<0.001).ConclusionDementia is less frequent among cancer survivors in the 95+ oldest‐old. Disease‐related mechanisms associated with malignancy and surviving it may be protective against neurodegeneration in the oldest old.

High-resolution 3D images of organelles are of paramount importance in cellular biology. Although light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) have provided the standard for imaging cellular structures, they cannot provide 3D images. However, recent technological advances such as serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) and focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) provide the tools to create 3D images for the ultrastructural analysis of organelles. Here, we describe a standardized protocol using the visualization software, Amira, to quantify organelle morphologies in 3D, thereby providing accurate and reproducible measurements of these cellular substructures. We demonstrate applications of SBF-SEM and Amira to quantify mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) structures.

Abstract Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions (FTLD-TDP) is a complex heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder for which mechanisms are poorly understood. To explore transcriptional changes underlying FTLD-TDP, we performed RNA-sequencing on 66 genetically unexplained FTLD-TDP patients, 24 FTLD-TDP patients with GRN mutations and 24 control participants. Using principal component analysis, hierarchical clustering, differential expression and coexpression network analyses, we showed that GRN mutation carriers and FTLD-TDP-A patients without a known mutation shared a common transcriptional signature that is independent of GRN loss-of-function. After combining both groups, differential expression as compared to the control group and coexpression analyses revealed alteration of processes related to immune response, synaptic transmission, RNA metabolism, angiogenesis and vesicle-mediated transport. Deconvolution of the data highlighted strong cellular alterations that were similar in FTLD-TDP-A and GRN mutation carriers with NSF as a potentially important player in both groups. We propose several potentially druggable pathways such as the GABAergic, GDNF and sphingolipid pathways. Our findings underline new disease mechanisms and strongly suggest that affected pathways in GRN mutation carriers extend beyond GRN and contribute to genetically unexplained forms of FTLD-TDP-A.

ABSTRACTObjective:The aim of our study was to assess the response to hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination and the risk of HBV infection in patients with celiac disease (CD).Patients and Methods:We performed a cross‐sectional study using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database (2009–2014) to assess the rate of HBV vaccination, immune response, and HBV infection risk in patients with and without CD. We also determined the rate of HBV infection via retrospective analysis of two cohorts: patients seen at Mayo Clinic (1998–2021), and a stable longitudinally observed cohort, the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP; 2010–2020).Results:Based on the NHANES data, the rate of HBV infection in the United States was 0.33% (95% confidence interval 0.25–0.41). Of 93 patients with CD, 46 (49%) were vaccinated for HBV and of the remaining 19,422 without CD, 10,228 (53%) were vaccinated. Twenty‐two (48%) vaccinated patients with CD had HBV immunity and 4405 (43.07%) vaccinated patients without CD had HBV immunity, which was not statistically different. In NHANES data, there were no cases of HBV infection in patients with CD. During the study period, 3568 patients with CD were seen at Mayo Clinic and 3918 patients with CD were identified using the REP database. Of those patients with CD, only four (0.11%) at Mayo Clinic and nine (0.23%) of the REP patients had HBV infection.Conclusion:The rate of HBV vaccination and immunity was similar in individuals with and without CD. Predictably, no increased risk of HBV infection was detected in CD patients. These results do not support screening and revaccination practice for HBV immunity in patients with CD within the United States.