Citations

Clear

848 citation(s) found for "Erasmus, D".

Abstract 6023: The Need for Blood Transfusion Is an Independent Predictor of Incident Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Mercado, Nestor, Dixon, Simon, Lamos, Pedro, Guarneri, Mimi, Terstein, Paul, Wijns, Williom, Boersma, Eric , Brugts, Jasper Jan , Ix, Joachim H. , Shlipak, Michael G. , Gersh, Bernard J. , O’Neill, William W.

Mayo Clinic

Circulation | July 3, 2021 | Volume: 118 | Issue: suppl_18 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.118.suppl_18.s_1049-a Get It

Periprocedural bleeding is one of the most frequent complications of percutaneours coronary interventions. We assessed the relation between blood transfusion and all-cause mortality or incident cardiovascular events (death, MI, stroke) among 6103 patients of the Evaluation of Oral Xemilofiban in Controlling Thrombotic Events (EXCITE)-trial. Subjects were followed for 7 months after enrollment for the occurrence of events. Multivariate Cox-regression analysis evaluated the independent association of blood transfusion with each outcome adjusted for age, gender, race, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, history of MI, PCI, CABG, heart failure, LVEF<30%, use of beta-blockers, statins, ACE-inhibitors, platelet inhibitors and allocation to treatment with xemolifiban. In addition, propensity score analyses were performed (ROC 0.80). Mean age was 59.2 years, 21.7% were female, and 18.9% had diabetes mellitus. Of the169 patients who received blood transfusion, 14 (8.3%) died and 42 (24.9%) experienced a CVD event. Of the 5934 patients without transfusion, 65 (1.1%) died (p-value: <0.001) and 555 (9,4%) experienced a CVD event (p-value: <0.001) In multivariate analysis, blood transfusion was associated with a 5.3 fold increased risk of mortality (HR 5.3; 95% CI 2.8 –10.2), and a 2.5 fold increased risk of incident CVD (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.7–3.4.) Noteworthy, patients who were US citizens had a higher transfusion rate then non-US citizens (OR 1.45, 95%CI 1.02–2.06) The need of blood transfusion is a strong and independent predictor of all-cause mortality and incident CVD events among patients undergoing PCI.
Abstract P353: Survival after Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Community
McNallan, Sheila M, Weston, Susan A., Killian, Jill M. , Bell, Malcolm R. , Jaffe, Allan S. , Kors, Jan A. , Roger, Véronique L. , Gerber, Yariv , Dunlay, Shannon M. , Chamberlain, Alanna M. , Jaffe, Allan S.

Mayo Clinic

Circulation | July 3, 2021 | Volume: 127 | Issue: suppl_12 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.127.suppl_12.ap353 Get It

Background: Contemporary data on survival after incident acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including both myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina (UA), are limited. Objective: To describe survival after incident ACS, to determine if it differs by ACS type (MI or UA) and to determine whether it has improved over time. Methods: Olmsted County, MN residents hospitalized between 1/1/2005-12/31/2010 were screened for incident ACS. ACS was defined as either MI validated by standard epidemiological criteria or UA validated by the Braunwald classification. Patients were followed for death from any cause. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine whether survival differed by ACS type, while adjusting for year of diagnosis, age, sex and comorbidities. Results: Among 1,160 incident ACS cases (mean±SD age 66.9±14.8, 60% male), 35% were UA and 65% were MI. After a mean (SD) follow up of 3.7 (2.1) years, 274 deaths occurred. The 3-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimate for MI was 79.6% (95% CI: 76.7%-82.6%) and for UA was 84.9% (95% CI: 81.3%-88.6%) (log-rank p=0.011). The association of ACS type with survival differed by age (p=0.056). After adjustment for year of diagnosis, sex and comorbidities, no difference in survival was observed between ACS types among those aged <60 (HR for MI vs. UA: 0.64, 95% 0.29-1.42). By contrast, among patients aged 60-79, those with an MI had 2 times the risk of death compared to those with UA (HR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.24-3.37). Patients aged 80 or older who had an MI had a 40% increased risk of death compared to patients of the same age who had UA (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02-1.98). There was no difference in survival over time (HR for 2010 vs. 2005: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.61-1.36). Conclusions: Survival did not differ between UA and MI patients younger than 60, however among patients 60 or older, survival was worse among those with an MI. Survival after ACS did not change over the study period.
Pregnancy After Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lambertini, Matteo , Blondeaux, Eva , Bruzzone, Marco , Perachino, Marta , Anderson, Richard A. , Azambuja, Evandro de , Poorvu, Philip D. , Kim, Hee Jeong , Villarreal‐Garza, Cynthia , Pistilli, Barbara , Vaz-Luís, Inês , Saura, Cristina , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Franzoi, Maria Alice , Sertoli, Chiara, Azim, Hatem A. , Demeestere, Isabelle , Mastro, Lucia Del , Pagani, Olivia , de Azambuja, Evandro , Ceppi, Marcello , Azim, Hatem A , Amant, Frederic , Demeestere, Isabelle , Del Mastro, Lucia , Partridge, Ann H , Peccatori, Fedro A , Lambertini, Matteo , Saura, Cristina , Villarreal-Garza, Cynthia , Bruzzone, Marco , Amant, Frédéric , Partridge, Ann H.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | July 1, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 29 | Pages: 3293-3305

10.1200/jco.21.00535 | PMID 34197218 Get It

PURPOSE Many patients and physicians remain concerned about the potential detrimental effects of pregnancy after breast cancer (BC) in terms of reproductive outcomes and maternal safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at providing updated evidence on these topics. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies including patients with a pregnancy after BC (PROSPERO number CRD42020158324). Likelihood of pregnancy after BC, their reproductive outcomes, and maternal safety were assessed. Pooled relative risks, odds ratios (ORs), and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated using random effects models. RESULTS Of 6,462 identified records, 39 were included involving 8,093,401 women from the general population and 112,840 patients with BC of whom 7,505 had a pregnancy after diagnosis. BC survivors were significantly less likely to have a subsequent pregnancy compared with the general population (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.49). Risks of caesarean section (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.25), low birth weight (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.73), preterm birth (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.88), and small for gestational age (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.33) were significantly higher in BC survivors, particularly in those with previous chemotherapy exposure, compared with the general population. No significantly increased risk of congenital abnormalities or other reproductive complications were observed. Compared to patients with BC without subsequent pregnancy, those with a pregnancy had better disease-free survival (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.89) and overall survival (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68). Similar results were observed after correcting for potential confounders and irrespective of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, pregnancy outcome, and timing of pregnancy. CONCLUSION These results provide reassuring evidence on the safety of conceiving in BC survivors. Patients' pregnancy desire should be considered a crucial component of their survivorship care plan.
Characteristics of Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer
Collaborative, REACCT, Zaborowski, Alexandra , Abdile, Ahmed, Adamina, Michel , Aigner, Felix , d’Allens, Laura, Allmer, Caterina, Álvarez, Andrea, Anula, Rocío, Atallah, S. , Bach, Simon P. , Barussaud, Marie, Baušys, Augustinas , Bebington, Brendan , Beggs, Andrew D. , Bellolio, Felipe, Bennett, Melissa-Rose , Berdinskikh, Anton, Bevan, Vicki, Bislenghi, Gabriele , Bludau, Marc , Boutall, Adam , Brouwer, Nelleke P.M. , Bruns, Christiane J. , Burger, Jacobus W. A. , Бурлов, Никита , Campanelli, Michela , Capdepont, Maylis, Carvello, Michele , Chew, Hwee-Hoon, Christoforidis, Dimitri, Clark, David A. , Climent, Marta, Cologne, Kyle G. , Contreras, Tomás, Croner, Roland S. , Daniels, I. R. , Delrio, Paolo , Deutsch, Michael , D’Hoore, André , Drozdov, E. S. , Duek, Daniel, Dunlop, Malcolm G. , Edmundson, Aleksandra , Efetov, Sergey , El‐Hussuna, Alaa , Elliot, Brodie, Espín, Eloy , Faes, Seraina , Faiz, Omar , Frasson, Matteo , Figueiredo, Nuno , Forgan, Tim , Frizelle, Frank , Gadaev, Shamil, Gellona, José, Glyn, Tamara , Gong, Jianping, Barisic, Goran, Greenwood, Emma, Guren, Marianne G. , Guillon, Stephanie, Gutlic, Ida , Hanly, Ann, Hasegawa, Hirotoshi , Iversen, Lene Hjerrild , Hill, James , Hoch, Jiří, Hoffmeister, Michael , Hompes, Roel , Hurtado‐Pardo, Luis , Iaquinandi, Fabiano , Imbrasaitė, Ugnė , Jafari, Mehrenah Dorna, Kanemitsu, Yukihide , Karimuddin, Ahmer , Keller, Deborah S. , Kelly, Justin, Kennelly, Rory , Khrykov, Gleb , Kocián, Petr , Koh, Cherry , Kok, N. F. M., Knight, Katrina , Knol, Joep, Kontovounisios, Christos , Kørner, Hartwig , Kronberger, Irmgard, Kroon, Hidde M. , Kural, Said , Lakkis, Zaher , Lankov, Timur , Larson, Dave, Lázár, György , Lee, Kai-Yin , Lepistö, Anna , Loi, Lynette , Lynch, Craig, Maillou‐Martinaud, Helene, Maroli, Annalisa , Martling, Anna , Matzel, Klaus E. , Mayol, Julio , McDermott, Frank , Meurette, G. , Mitteregger, Martin , Моисеенко, А С, Monson, John R.T. , Moritani, Konosuke , Munini, Martino , Nahas, Caio Sérgio Rizkallah , Negoi, Ionuţ , Novikova, A , Ocares, Misael, Olkina, Alexandra, Oñate‐Ocaña, Luis F. , Otero, Jaime, Özen, Cihan , Pace, Ugo , Julião, Guilherme Pagin São , Panaiotti, Lidiia , Panís, Yves , Papamichael, Demetris , Uriburu, Juan C Patrón , Pera, Miguél , Perez, Rodrigo Oliva , Pfeffer, F. , Phang, P. Terry , Poškus, Tomas , Pringle, Heather , Proud, David , Raguz, Ivana , Rama, N. , Rasheed, Shahnawaz, Raval, Manoj J. , Reißfelder, Christoph , Meneses, Juan Carlos Reyes , Ris, Frédéric , Riss, Stefan , Rodríguez‐Zentner, Homero , Saklani, Avanish , Salido, Andrea Jiménez, Sammour, Tarik , Saraste, Deborah , Schneider, Martin , Seishima, Ryo , Sekulic, Aleksander , Seppälä, Toni T. , Sheahan, Kieran , Shine, Rebecca , Shlomina, Alexandra , Sica, Guiseppe S., Singnomklao, T, Siragusa, Leandro , Spinelli, Antonino , Staiger, Roxane D. , Stamos, Michael J. , Sunderland, Michael, Tan, Ker‐Kan , Tanis, Pieter J. , Tekkis, Paris, Teklay, Biniam, Tengku, Sabrina , Jiménez‐Toscano, Marta , Turina, Matthias , Ulrich, Alexis , Vailati, Bruna Borba , Harten, Meike van, Warrier, Satish K. , Wexner, Steve, Wilt, Hans De, Xynos, Evangelos , You, Nancy, Zakharenko, Alexander, Zeballos, Justino, Winter, D. C. , Wexner, Steven D. , Hoffmeister, Michael , Seppälä, Toni T , Spinelli, Antonino , Wexner, Steven D , Ris, Frederic , Collaborative, REACCT, Andric, Mihailo , Bala, Miklosh , Biondo, Sebastiano , Brown, Carl James , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Buchwald, Pamela , Dapri, Giovanni , Davies, Justin , Denost, Quentin , Dias, André Roncon , Dziki, Adam Janusz , Emile, Sameh Hany , Evans, Martyn D. , Fleming, Fergal J. , Foppa, Caterina , Fowler, G , Gong, Jianping, Greenwood, Emma, Hahnloser, Dieter , Hampel, Heather , Hill, Andrew Graham , Islam, Rumana, Jafari, Mehrenah D, Карачун, А. М. , Krivokapić, Zoran , Kryžauskas, Marius , Kusters, Miranda , Lee, Suk-Hwan , Lefèvre, Jérémie H. , Lieu, Christopher H. , Martin, Sean, Millán, Mónica , Morărașu, Ștefan , Möslein, Gabriela , Nahas, Sérgio Carlos , Okabayashi, Koji , Олькина, Александра Юрьевна , Park, Jason , Patel, Swati , Petrov, Alexei, Rega, Daniela , Roxburgh, Campbell S.D. , Smart, Neil James , Solis, Alejandro, Steele, Scott R. , Владимирович, Царьков Петр , Verhoef, Cornelis , Weinberg, Benjamin A. , Wells, Cameron I. , Wolthuis, Albert M.

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Surgery | June 30, 2021 | Volume: 156 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 865

10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2380 | PMID 34190968 Get It

Rare Copy Number Variants (CNVs) and Breast Cancer Risk
Dorling, Leila , Bola, Manjeet, Wang, Qin , Andrulis, Irene L. , Antonenkova, Natalia, Aronson, Kristan J. , Freeman, Laura Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bojeson, Stig, Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Collaborators, NBCS, Collée, J. Margriet, Evans, D. Gareth , Fasching, Peter A. , Flyger, Henrik, Hahen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A. , Hoppe, Reine, Investigators, ACTB, Investigators, kConFab, Jager, Agnes , Johnson, Nichola , Keeman, Renske , Ko, Yon‐Dschun, Kosma, Veli‐Matti , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Kubelka‐Sabit, Katerina , Kurian, Alison, Larson, Nicole L. , Linet, Martha S. , Łukomska, Alicja, Mannermaa, Arto , Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Park‐Simon, Tjoung‐Won , Peterlongo, Paolo , Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Sawyer, Elinor J. , Schmutzler, Rita K., Shibli, Rana , Soucy, Penny, Tomlinson, Ian , Vachon, Celine M. , Wendt, Camilla, Yang, Xiaohong R. , Easton, Douglas F. , Peterlongo, Paolo , Evans, D Gareth , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Sawyer, Elinor J , Dennis, Joe , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Walker, Logan C. , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Ahearn, Thomas U. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Arndt, Volker , Behrens, Sabine , Benı́tez, Javier , Bermisheva, Marina , Bojesen, Stig E. , Brenner, Hermann , Castelao, Jose E. , Clarke, Christine L. , Couch, Fergus J. , Cox, Angela , Cross, Simon S. , Czene, Kamila , Devilee, Peter , Dörk, Thilo , Dossus, Laure , Eliassen, A. Heather , Eriksson, Mikael , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Fletcher, Olivia , Fritschi, Lin , Gabrielson, Marike , Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Giles, Graham G. , González‐Neira, Anna , Guénel, Pascal , Hall, Per N , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Hoppe, Reiner , Hopper, John L. , Howell, Anthony , Jakubowska, Anna , John, Esther M. , Jones, Michael E. , Jung, Audrey , Kaaks, Rudolf , Хуснутдинова, Э. К. , Kitahara, Cari M. , Koutros, Stella , Kraft, Peter , Lambrechts, Diether , Manoukian, Siranoush , Margolin, Sara , Milne, Roger L. , Muranen, Taru , Murphy, Rachel A. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Olson, Janet E. , Olsson, Håkan , Perou, Charles M. , Pylkäs, Katri , Rennert, Gad , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Sandler, Dale P. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Smeets, Ann , Southey, Melissa C. , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Taylor, Jack A. , Teras, Lauren R. , Terry, Mary Beth , Troester, Melissa A. , Truong, Thérèse , Vachon, Celine M. , Wendt, Camilla, Winqvist, Robert , Wolk, Alicja , Zheng, Wei , Ziogas, Argyrios , Simard, Jacques , Dunning, Alison M. , Pharoah, Paul D.P.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | June 22, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-602209/v1 Get It

Abstract BackgroundCopy number variants (CNVs) are pervasive in the human genome but potential disease associations with rare CNVs have not been comprehensively assessed in large datasets. We analysed rare CNVs in genes and non-coding regions for 86,788 breast cancer cases and 76,122 controls of European ancestry with genome-wide array data.ResultsGene burden tests detected the strongest association for deletions in BRCA1 (P= 3.7E-18). Nine other genes were associated with a p-value < 0.01 including known susceptibility genes CHEK2 (P= 0.0008), ATM (P= 0.002) and BRCA2 (P= 0.008). Outside the known genes we detected associations with p-values < 0.001 for either overall or subtype-specific breast cancer at nine deletion regions and four duplication regions. Three of the deletion regions were in established common susceptibility loci.ConclusionsThis is the first genome-wide analysis of rare CNVs in a large breast cancer case-control dataset. We detected associations with exonic deletions in established breast cancer susceptibility genes. We also detected suggestive associations with non-coding CNVs in known and novel loci with large effects sizes. Larger sample sizes will be required to reach robust levels of statistical significance.
Autoimmune Neurology
Abbatemarco, Justin , Rodenbeck, Stefanie, Day, Gregory S. , Titulaer, Maarten J. , Yeshokumar, Anusha K. , Clardy, Stacey , Abbatemarco, Justin R , Rodenbeck, Stefanie J, Clardy, Stacey L , Day, Gregory S , Titulaer, Maarten J

Mayo Clinic

Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation | June 16, 2021 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/nxi.0000000000001033 | PMID 34131068 Get It

Breast cancer screening for carriers of ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants: A comparative modeling analysis.
Lowry, Kathryn P. , Geuzinge, H. Amarens , Stout, Natasha K. , Hampton, John M. , Schecter, Clyde, Sprague, Brian L. , Tosteson, Anna N.A. , Ravesteyn, Nicolien van, Yaffe, Martin D., Mandelblatt, Jeanne S. , Alagöz, Oğuzhan , Kerlikowske, Karla , Miglioretti, Diana L. , Trentham‐Dietz, Amy , Yaffe, Martin, Yeh, Jennifer M. , Couch, Fergus J. , Kraft, Peter , Polley, Eric C. , Kurian, Allison W. , Robson, Mark E.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 2, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 10500-10500

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.10500 Get It

10500 Background: Inherited pathogenic variants in ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 confer moderate to high risks of breast cancer. The optimal approach to screening in these women has not been established. Methods: We used two simulation models from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) and data from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility consortium (CARRIERS) to project lifetime breast cancer incidence and mortality in ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 carriers. We simulated screening with annual mammography from ages 40-74 alone and with annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) starting at ages 40, 35, 30, and 25. Joint and separate mammography and MRI screening performance was based on published literature. Lifetime outcomes per 1,000 women were reported as means and ranges across both models. Results: Estimated risk of breast cancer by age 80 was 22% (21-23%) for ATM, 28% (26-30%) for CHEK2, and 40% (38-42%) for PALB2. Screening with MRI and mammography reduced breast cancer mortality by 52-60% across variants (Table). Compared to no screening, starting MRI at age 30 increased life years (LY)/1000 women by 501 (478-523) in ATM, 620 (587-652) in CHEK2, and 1,025 (998-1,051) in PALB2. Starting MRI at age 25 versus 30 gained 9-12 LY/1000 women with 517-518 additional false positive screens and 197-198 benign biopsies. Conclusions: For women with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants, breast cancer screening with MRI and mammography halves breast cancer mortality. These mortality benefits are similar to those for MRI screening for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and should inform practice guidelines.[Table: see text]
CNS activity of poziotinib in NSCLC with exon 20 insertion mutations.
Le, Xiuning , Tchekmedyian, Nishan , Molina, Julian R. , Baik, Christina S. , Leu, Sharon, Dreiling, Lyndah , Lebel, François , Clarke, Jeffrey , Garassino, Marina Chiara , Cornelissen, Robin , Socinski, Mark A.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 2, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 9093-9093

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.9093 Get It

9093 Background: Treatment addressing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations remains an unmet need. These tumors are associated with a high incidence of CNS metastases and unfavorable survival rates. Poziotinib is a potent, irreversible, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with a structure that can overcome the steric hindrance of the exon 20 limited binding pocket. Preclinical data suggest poziotinib CNS penetration, and here we show meaningful poziotinib CNS activity in patients with NSCLC harboring exon 20 insertion mutations in an ongoing multi-cohort, multi-center Phase 2 study (ZENITH20; NCT03318939). Methods: ZENITH20 enrolled previously treated and naïve patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC and EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations in several cohorts: Cohort 1 (C1) EGFR previously treated; Cohort 2 (C2) HER2 previously treated and Cohort 3 (C3) EGFR treatment-naïve. All patients with stable CNS metastases at baseline were included. Poziotinib (16 mg) was administered orally QD, with follow-up for up to 24 months. The primary endpoint was Objective Response Rate (ORR) evaluated centrally using RECIST v1.1 by an independent image review committee. Secondary endpoints included Disease Control Rate (DCR), Duration of Response (DOR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and safety. Primary efficacy results have been previously released. Intracranial response was determined based on the modified RECIST criteria. Results: A total of 284 patients across 3 cohorts (C1 n=115; and C2 n=90; and C3 n=79) with a median age of 60.5 years were enrolled. The median follow-up was 7.3, 8.3, and 9.2 months for all patients in C1, C2, and C3, respectively. In NSCLC patients that had baseline CNS lesions (N=36), the analysis showed a patient-based ORR of 22.2% (8/36) and a DCR of 88.9% (32/36). One patient in each cohort had a complete intracranial response and stable disease was 80.6% across 3 cohorts and 92.9% in C2. Two patients each in C1 and C3 had progressive disease (PD) and none had CNS progression in C2 (Table). Conclusions: Poziotinib exhibited clinically meaningful CNS activity in patients with EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations in ZENITH20 Cohorts 1-3. The majority of the patients had no CNS progression and 3/36 patients had intracranial complete responses. The preliminary data suggest that poziotinib may provide a meaningful treatment alternative for patients with NSCLC that harbor EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations and who present with CNS metastases that have poor prognosis. Clinical trial information: NCT03318939. [Table: see text]
INTENSIVE: InterNaTional rEgistry oN Sars-cov-2 posItiVe nEuroendocrine neoplasm patients.
Spada, Francesca , Capdevila, Jaume , Hofland, Johannes , Koumarianou, Anna, Rossi, Maura , Boselli, S., Tamayo, Darina, Laffi, Alice , Rubino, Manila , Hofland, Johannes , Gervaso, Lorenzo , Salvia, Anna La , García‐Carbonero, Rocio , Hernando, Jorge , Herder, Wouter W. de , Bagnardi, Vincenzo , Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam , Fazio, Nicola , Hálfdánarson, Þorvarður R.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 2, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e16205-e16205

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e16205 Get It

e16205 Background: Data about neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) patients with SARS-CoV-2 are scanty and specific indications for clinical practice are missing. Our aim is to create an international registry about NENs patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 positivity to give a worldwide representation of the situation. Methods: This is an observational retrospective/prospective multicenter survey based on a direct email invitation. All types of NEN are eligible except SCLC and MiNEN. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria from March 1st, 2020 up to the end pf pandemic will be recruited. Electronic CRFs are filled out using the REDCap database. Local Institutional Review Board approval is required before data entry. Results: Eighty-one centers, 24 in and 57 outside Italy, representing 39 countries and 5 continents, were contacted. Fourteen centers did not respond and 15 declined the invitation. Among the remaining 52, 6 centers are currently recruiting and 8 are active but not recruiting yet. As of the current abstract submission deadline, 67 patients have been included, mostly GEP-NET (75%), non-functioning (86%), metastatic (85%) and on active treatment [47% somatostatin analogs (SSAs), 10% everolimus, 12% tirosin-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), 10% peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), 15% chemotherapy]. Median age at NEN diagnosis was 57 years whilst the median age at SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was 62 years. Almost all patients reported COVID-19-related symptoms, more commonly fever (67% of patients), cough (55%) and dyspnea (51%), in 28% of cases exertional and in 22% at rest. More than one third of patients (n, 24) had a pneumonia. The most common therapies for COVID-19 were antibiotics, steroids and hydroxychloroquine. Eleven patients (16%) needed oxygen therapy, three (4%) sub-intensive care and none intensive care. Fifty-six patients (84%) clinically recovered, six (9%) with sequelae, whereas five (7%) died. Among these latter 4 had a NET and 1 a NEC, and no patients have been receiving chemotherapy. With regard to the anti-tumor therapy no change occurred in 66% of patients, temporary interruption in 30%, and definitive discontinuation in 3%, 2% missing. Conclusions: Most of the NEN patients completely recovered from COVID-19, in many cases without any anti-tumor therapy adjustment. No clear correlations were observed with type, primary site and treatment of NEN. The recruitment is ongoing.
Digital measurement of functional status of patients with glioblastoma.
Damestani, Yasaman, Colman, Howard , Bent, Martin J. van den , Groot, John Frederick De, Lassman, Andrew B. , Duic, J. Paul, Tang, Shijie , Tamir, Sharon , Shacham, Eran, Shah, Jatin J., Shacham, Sharon, Wen, Patrick Y. , van den Bent, Martin J , Mehta, Minesh P. , Colman, Howard , Camphausen, Kevin , Weller, Michael , Galanis, Evanthia , Hottinger, Andreas Felix , Nabors, Burt , Li, Kai shang , Liu, Yang , Wen, Patrick Yung

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 2, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 2016-2016

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.2016 Get It

2016 Background: Among the primary aims of new therapies for glioblastoma (GBM) are the reduction of morbidity and restoration or preservation of quality of life (QoL). Selinexor (SEL) is a first-in class, oral, selective inhibitor of nuclear export which blocks exportin 1 (XPO1), forcing the nuclear retention and reactivation of tumor suppressor proteins, ultimately causing cell death in cancer cells. SEL is approved for the treatment of previously treated multiple myeloma and DLBCL. XPORT-GBM-029 (NCT04421378) is a phase 1 dose finding study followed by an open-label randomized phase 2, 3-arm trial to evaluate SEL in combination with standard therapies for newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM: Arm A (ndGBM, uMGMT) – radiation +/- SEL; Arm B (ndGBM, mMGMT) – radiation and temozolomide +/- SEL; Arm C (rGBM) – lomustine +/- SEL at first relapse. We look to identify sensitive, reliable, and clinically meaningful digital assessments of the functional status of ndGBM and rGBM patients via a patient-centric approach. Methods: XPORT-GBM-029 incorporates standard clinical and imaging evaluations of GBM progression with novel digital tools that objectively measure motor and cognitive function. The study is conducted at 50 sites globally with the aim of enrolling 350 patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. Following discussions with KOLs and patient advocacy partners at EndbrainCancer, we surveyed GBM patients and their caregivers to identify disease manifestations critical to patients’ QoL. The survey revealed four key areas impacting patients’ QoL that can be affected by GBM therapies and can be objectively monitored: cognitive function, lateralization, fatigue, and sleep. In this trial we use objective measurements to evaluate SEL’s effects on GBM patients’ QoL. Patients wear inertial sensors to measure their activity and sleep and complete a cognitive battery at baseline and before each MRI. Results: Associations between objective digital measures of activity, gait, fatigue, sleep, and cognition will be examined with respect to clinical assessments including physical examinations, modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (mRANO), Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO), Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) QoL questionnaires. Descriptive summary statistics and plots are employed in exploratory data analysis, and other advanced data mining methods may also be considered. Conclusions: XPORT-GBM-029 trial is probably the first large, prospective, longitudinal study in GBM patients employing digital markers and may provide useful information regarding the utility of wearable and mobile devices for measuring functional outcomes in clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT04421378.