Citations

Introduction: The performance of automated left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment in patients with altered cardiac chamber geometry, such as those with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), is not well described. Aims: Accurate assessment of LVEF is required for dose titration and continuation of myosin inhibitors in obstructive HCM. From the VALOR-HCM trial (NCT04349072), the agreement of two commercially available software packages was compared with blinded core lab assessment of LVEF. Methods: From baseline and week 16, among 112 patients randomized to either mavacamten or placebo, 178 echocardiograms were analyzed. Representative clips were manually selected, and automated LVEFs were calculated. Comparisons of LVEFs were made using Pearson’s correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: With core lab assessment, the overall median LVEF was 68% (Q1 66%, Q3 70%). The correlation with vendor 1 was moderate (r = 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.58, p <0.001) and weak with vendor 2 (r =0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.35, p =0.004). Correlation was also weak between vendor 1 and 2 (r = 0.14, 95% CI 0.00-0.28, p = 0.06). Vendors 1 and 2 had an underestimation bias of LVEF of 8% (95% CI 6-9%) and 8% (95% CI 7-9%), respectively, compared to core lab LVEF (Figure 1). Conclusions: In VALOR-HCM, the concordance of LVEF between different commercially available software packages with each other and with a core lab assessment was limited. Further study is needed to evaluate and improve the performance of automated LVEF tools in obstructive HCM patients who have altered cardiac chamber geometry.

Abstract Background Isolated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) repair or replacement carries significant operative mortality risk mainly due to delayed referral. We have recently developed the Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes (TRIO) score to assess risk in TR based on 8 simple variables (age, sex, severe TR, creatinine&gt;2 mg/dl, history of heart failure, history of chronic lung disease, AST &gt;40 units/L, heart rate &gt;90). Whether this score can be used in assessment of TR surgical risk and long term outcome is unknown. Purpose To examine the impact of TRIO scores on the postoperative outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve surgery. Methods Adult patients with severe functional TR who underwent isolated tricuspid valve replacement or repair between 2000-2022 were identified. Postoperative outcomes were compared across low (0-3), intermediate (4-6), and high (7-12) TRIO risk score groups. Results 177 patients were included. Mean age was 70.7 ± 12.2 years, 69 (39%) were male, 34 (19%) were low TRIO score, 111 (63%) intermediate score and 32 (18%) high score. Tricuspid repair was performed in 43 (24.3%) and valve replacement in 134 (75.7%), reflecting the advanced disease stages of this patient cohort. At short term, higher TRIO scores were associated with more frequent need for urgent surgery, prolonged ventilation (&gt;72h) and postoperative dialysis (p&lt;0.05 for all). Perioperative 30-day mortality increased with the TRIO risk score (low: 0%; intermediate: 4.5%; high: 9.4%) but differences did not reach statistical significance (p=0.187). Low risk patients had a shorter hospital and ICU stay (Figure 1A-B). During a mean follow-up of 5.2 ± 3.2 years, 98 (55.4%) patients died. At long term follow-up, lower TRIO scores were associated with improved survival after tricuspid surgery (Figure 1C). Conclusions Patients with higher TRIO scores have more postoperative complications, require longer hospital stay and have higher all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up. Our findings suggest that TRIO score may also be used for risk stratification in patients considered for surgical management of isolated functional TR.

Importance There is an unmet need for novel medical therapies before recommending invasive therapies for patients with severely symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Mavacamten has been shown to improve left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient and symptoms and may thus reduce the short-term need for septal reduction therapy (SRT). Objective To examine the cumulative longer-term effect of mavacamten on the need for SRT through week 56. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial with placebo crossover at 16 weeks, conducted from July 2020 to November 2022. Participants were recruited from 19 US HCM centers. Included in the trial were patients with obstructive HCM (New York Heart Association class III/IV) referred for SRT. Study data were analyzed April to August 2023. Interventions Patients initially assigned to mavacamten at baseline continued the drug for 56 weeks, and patients taking placebo crossed over to mavacamten from week 16 to week 56 (40-week exposure). Dose titrations were performed using echocardiographic LVOT gradient and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements. Main Outcome and Measure Proportion of patients undergoing SRT, remaining guideline eligible or unevaluable SRT status at week 56. Results Of 112 patients with highly symptomatic obstructive HCM, 108 (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [12.5] years; 54 male [50.0%]) qualified for the week 56 evaluation. At week 56, 5 of 56 patients (8.9%) in the original mavacamten group (3 underwent SRT, 1 was SRT eligible, and 1 was not SRT evaluable) and 10 of 52 patients (19.2%) in the placebo crossover group (3 underwent SRT, 4 were SRT eligible, and 3 were not SRT evaluable) met the composite end point. A total of 96 of 108 patients (89%) continued mavacamten long term. Between the mavacamten and placebo-to-mavacamten groups, respectively, after 56 weeks, there was a sustained reduction in resting (mean difference, −34.0 mm Hg; 95% CI, −43.5 to −24.5 mm Hg and −33.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, −41.9 to −24.5 mm Hg) and Valsalva (mean difference, −45.6 mm Hg; 95% CI, −56.5 to −34.6 mm Hg and −54.6 mm Hg; 95% CI, −66.0 to −43.3 mm Hg) LVOT gradients. Similarly, there was an improvement in NYHA class of 1 or higher in 51 of 55 patients (93%) in the original mavacamten group and in 37 of 51 patients (73%) in the placebo crossover group. Overall, 12 of 108 patients (11.1%; 95% CI, 5.87%-18.60%), which represents 7 of 56 patients (12.5%) in the original mavacamten group and 5 of 52 patients (9.6%) in the placebo crossover group, had an LVEF less than 50% (2 with LVEF ≤30%, one of whom died), and 9 of 12 patients (75%) continued treatment. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this randomized clinical trial showed that in patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM, mavacamten reduced the need for SRT at week 56, with sustained improvements in LVOT gradients and symptoms. Although this represents a useful therapeutic option, given the potential risk of LV systolic dysfunction, there is a continued need for close monitoring. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04349072

Objective: Evaluate the effects of ketamine versus propofol when used for induction of anesthesia in elderly, high-risk cardiac surgical patients on postoperative complications including cognitive dysfunction, delirium, and acute kidney injury. Methods: Prospective, randomized study performed at a tertiary medical center. A total of 52 patients aged ≥70 and older presenting for complex cardiac surgery were randomized to receive either ketamine or propofol for induction of anesthesia. Patients underwent a battery of cognitive testing preoperatively and postoperatively and the incidence of delirium and acute kidney injury were measured. Norepinephrine (NEE) equivalents following induction were assessed for each group. Results: A total of 49 patients were included, 25 in the ketamine group and 24 in the propofol group with 3 patients excluded from the analysis. No difference was found between groups in either postoperative cognitive dysfunction or delirium incidence. Acute kidney injury occurred in 6 (24%) patients in the ketamine group in 12 (50%) patients in the propofol group, but the difference did not meet statistical significance (P = 0.08; Relative Risk = 2.1, 95% CI 0.9–4.7). NEE equivalents were lower in the ketamine group, 9.6 ± 22.2 versus 32.7 ± 46.0, P < 0.03. Conclusions: The use of ketamine versus propofol for induction of anesthesia did not impact the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction or delirium. Twice as many patients in the propofol group developed acute kidney injury, although not reaching statistical significance and warranting further investigation. In elderly, high-risk patients, ketamine was associated with a significantly reduced need for vasopressor support following induction.

Introduction: In the randomized VALOR-HCM study of symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), mavacamten reduced the need for septal reduction therapy at 16 weeks. The current sub-study sought to assess the impact of mavacamten on systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve and associated mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods: Patients on maximally-tolerated medical therapy referred for septal reduction therapy were randomized 1:1 to mavacamten or placebo. Echocardiographic assessment was performed by an independent, blinded core laboratory. SAM was assessed as none, mild (anterior leaflet >/= 1 cm from the septum), moderate (anterior leaflets <1cm from the septum), and severe (anterior leaflet in contact with septum). MR was assessed according to ASE guidelines. Results: Among 112 enrolled patients, 23.2% (n=27) had at least moderate (2+) MR. Most (92.9%, n=104) had at least moderate resting SAM, of whom 55.4% (n = 62) had severe SAM. At 16 weeks, 53.7% of patients treated with mavacamten had at least one level improvement in resting SAM compared to 21.6% of patients treated with placebo ( p = 0.001), and 35.2% had at least a two level improvement in SAM compared with 11.8% of placebo patients ( p = 0.007)(Figure 1A). Similarly, patients treated with mavacamten had an improvement of -36.0 + 28.8 mmHg in resting left ventricular outflow tract gradient at week 16 compared to -1.5 + 26.5 mmHg with placebo (<0.001). At week 16, 48.1% of patients treated with mavacamten had at least a one grade improvement in MR, and 23.1% had at least a two grade improvement compared to 12.2% and 6.1% of patients treated with placebo ( p <0.001 and 0.025, respectively)(Figure 1B). Conclusions: In highly symptomatic patients with oHCM, treatment with mavacamten reduced resting SAM with an improvement in associated MR.

Introduction: In the randomized VALOR-HCM study of symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), mavacamten reduced the need for septal reduction therapy at 16 weeks. Because mavacamten is a cardiac myosin inhibitor that may improve ventricular compliance, this sub-study hypothesized that mavacamten would favorably impact diastolic function. Methods: Symptomatic patients on maximally-tolerated medical therapy referred for septal reduction therapy were randomized 1:1 to mavacamten or placebo. Echocardiographic assessment was performed by an independent, blinded core laboratory. Diastolic grade was determined according to ASE guidelines. Between-group comparisons were made from baseline to week 16. Results: Among 112 enrolled patients, baseline left atrial volume index (LAVi) was similar (Table). At 16 weeks, mavacamten treatment resulted in a significant reduction in LAVi (-5.2 vs -0.5 with placebo, p = .003). Similarly, although lateral E/e’ and septal E/e’ were comparable at baseline, patients treated with mavacamten demonstrated a significant reduction at week 16 (lateral E/e’: -3.5 vs 0.7, p <0.001; septal E/e’: -3.3 vs 0.7, p < 0.001)(Table). Patients treated with mavacamten were also more likely to improve their diastolic dysfunction grade (31.4% vs 12.8%, p = 0.032) (Figure). Conclusions: After only 16 weeks of therapy, in a highly symptomatic oHCM population with echocardiographic-guided drug titration, mavacamten improved measures of diastolic function.

Background Left (LAAA) and right atrial appendage aneurysms (RAAA) are rare entities, and their natural history, management, and long-term outcomes are not well studied. Methods This retrospective review includes all patients from 2000 to 2021 with atrial appendage aneurysms at our institution identified using an electronic search tool. LAAA and RAAA were confirmed using multimodality imaging and intraoperative findings. Results We identified 13 (87%) patients with LAAA and 2 (13%) with RAAA. At diagnosis, 11 (73%) were female, mean age was 51.4 ± 18.8 years, and ejection fraction 56.5 ± 13.1%. Three (20%) patients had congenital heart disease including 2 (13%) with atrioventricular septal defects and 1 (7%) with congenitally corrected transposition. LAAA/RAAA was diagnosed due to new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in 6 (40%) patients and embolic stroke in 2 (13%). Ten patients had preexisting AF diagnosed 2.9 ± 1.4 years earlier at a mean age of 50.2 ± 15.5 years. Thrombus within the aneurysm was identified in 2 (15%) LAAA patients. All patients were on anticoagulation and follow-up of the cohort from diagnosis was 7.1 ± 6.2 years. Eleven (73%) patients were surgically managed with 7 (64%) lesions excised, 1 (9%) stapled, and 3 (27%) ligated. Postoperative complications occurred in 2 (18%) patients with 1 (7%) developing tricuspid regurgitation and another with pericardial effusion and tamponade. Conclusions Atrial appendage aneurysm is a rare disease and nearly half of patients present with AF. Surgical treatment with concomitant AF ablation is a reasonable and safe management option.

Abstract OBJECTIVES Delayed sternal closure (DSC) after cardiac surgery is a temporizing measure to address coagulopathy or haemodynamic instability after cardiac surgery. We sought to study: (i) indications and temporal trends for DSC, (ii) factors associated with time to chest closure and (iii) its impact on short-term and long-term outcomes. METHODS From January 2007 to December 2017, 494 patients (median age 67 years, 66% males) required DSC after cardiac surgery. Medical records were reviewed for indications, risk factors, time to DSC and outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression via landmark analysis of 486 5-day survivors was used to investigate the impact of time to chest closure on early and late survival. RESULTS Coagulopathy and haemodynamic instability were the most common indications. Median time to chest closure was 2 days. Pre-/intraoperative extracorporeal membranous oxygenation, severe right ventricular dysfunction and diabetes mellitus were associated with longer time to chest closure. Longer time to closure was associated with increased risk of operative complications and operative mortality, but did not have a statistically significant association with late mortality. Increasing age, pulmonary hypertension and a greater number of prior sternotomies were also found to be associated with overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS While longer time to chest closure was associated with increased rates of operative complications and operative mortality, it did not reveal a statistically significant association with long-term survival.