Citations

AbstractBackgroundGastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF‐LVADs) is often related to GI angiodysplasia (GIAD). We previously reported data on VEGF inhibition with IV bevacizumab in the treatment of LVAD‐associated GIAD bleeding, and now present follow‐up data on patients treated with IV bevacizumab and/or low‐dose oral pazopanib.MethodsAll consecutive adult patients with LVAD‐associated GIB from GIAD treated with bevacizumab or pazopanib, from July 20, 2017 to June 22, 2022, were included in the analysis. Data on hospitalizations, GI endoscopic procedures, and blood transfusions were obtained from first admission for GIB up to a median of 35.7 months following treatment initiation (range 1.3–59.8 months).ResultsEleven patients (91% male, mean 69.5 ± 8.9 years) were included. Eight patients (73%) received IV bevacizumab, two patients (18%) received oral pazopanib, and one patient (9%) received bevacizumab followed by pazopanib therapy. We observed a significantly decreased number of annualized hospitalizations for GIB (median difference − 2.87, p = 0.002), blood transfusions (median difference − 20.9, p = 0.01), and endoscopies (median difference − 6.95, p = 0.007) in patients pre‐ and post‐anti‐angiogenic therapy (bevacizumab and/or pazopanib). Similarly, a significant improvement in these clinical outcomes was noted in the bevacizumab group with decreased annualized hospitalizations (median difference − 2.75, p = 0.014), blood transfusions (median difference − 24.5, p = 0.047), and number of endoscopies (median differences −6.88, p = 0.006).ConclusionAnti‐angiogenic therapy with IV bevacizumab and/or low‐dose oral pazopanib appears to provide benefits in patients with LVAD‐associated GIB with reduced hospitalizations, blood transfusions, and need for GI endoscopic procedures.

Introduction: Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) with magnetically levitated impellers have become standard due to hemocompatibility and survival profile. To optimize LVAD speeds, we previously introduced simultaneous right and left heart (RH/LH) catheterization during ramp studies. Here, we report pairing of this approach with pressure-volume (PV) assessment in a patient with a HeartMate 3 LVAD with mitral regurgitation (MR). The combined approach evaluated left ventricular (LV) hemodynamics and right ventricular (RV) PV-relationships during ramp testing. Methods: A 68-year-old male with ischemic cardiomyopathy, two years following HeartMate3 implantation, presented with NYHA class III symptoms. To evaluate for dyspnea, he underwent a RH/LH catheterization ramp study. RV PV-loops were created by use of a conductance catheter system, allowing creation of PV loops. Results: At the baseline LVAD speed of 5300 rotations per minute (RPM), right atrial pressure was elevated at 16 mmHg and pulmonary artery (PA) pressure of 26 mmHg. Left-end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was elevated (16mmHg). Baseline cardiac index (CI) was 2.01 L/min/m 2 . Ramp testing was performed, increasing speeds from 5300 to 5800 RPM. Progressive LV unloading was observed with a 5 mmHg drop in LVEDP and a 3 mmHg drop in PA pressure. However, RV PV loop monitoring revealed a negative impact on RV contractility with the maximal elastance (Emax) slope demonstrating a 22% reduction. Furthermore, a 17% reduction in RV stroke volume was documented, while diastolic function remained unchanged. Thus, despite excellent LV offloading and diminishment of RV afterload, the significant negative impact on Emax resulted in no net increase in CI (+0.04 L/min/m 2 ) during the ramp evaluation. Inotrope therapy was initiated for RV function with increased LVAD RPM to outcompete MR. Conclusions: While RH/LH catheterization provides a real-time perspective of the interventricular relationship during ramp, the impact of increasing LVAD speeds on RV function has yet to be directly measured. Here, the RV PV loop relationship during LVAD ramp showed that although LVAD speed increases in the setting of MR may facilitate LV unloading, a drop in RV afterload did not compensate for reduction in RV contractility.

For patients in cardiogenic shock, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSD) have emerged as critical tool to improve hemodynamics and optimize end-organ perfusion; successfully bridging patients to recovery, decision or transplantation. The most commonly utilized MCSD is the femoral intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). However, femoral access hampers the patient's mobility, quality of life, and capacity to participate in rehabilitation. The advent of the axillary artery approach has served to circumvent limitations associated with the femoral artery approach. However, optimum anatomical placement of IABP within the axillary artery (axIABP) is a topic of debate considering its proximity to the brachial plexus. Here, we report our experince with percutaneous access of the third poriton of the axillary artery which showed promising results with minimal device related complications or adverse events. Methods/Results: Between 2017-2023, a total of 89 patients in cardiogenic shock underwent percutaneous axIABP placement at the Mayo Clinic, MN. All demographic, clinical, and periprocedural data were obtained from hospital chart review and recorded in a database under IRB approval. Indications for axIABP support was determined by multidisciplinary assessment. Complications encountered in the cohort included infection at site 6.7% (n=6), device malfunction [rupture, fracture, leak] 8.98%(n=8), and balloon migration 5.61% (n=5). One patient developed local erythema, 4 (4.49%) patients developed significant vascular complications, including access site bleeding in two patients 2.24%, arterial thrombosis in three patients 3.37%, and self-limited intracranial bleeding in one patient 1.12%. Of note, no nerve injury or damage was observed in the entire patient cohort. Conclusion: Our study highlights the feasibility of percutaneous axIABP in the third portion of the axillary artery, while assessing safety profile and ease of removal. Notably in our review, we did not encounter any brachial nerve damage. Ultrasound was pivotal in identifying and avoiding nerves and nerve bundles during initial access. In conclusion, this approach of axIABP insertion is feasible and can be leveraged for delivery of future innovation in MCSD

Introduction: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) results in HFrEF, but its natural history and response to GDMT remains uncertain. Methods: We queried a registry of 631 CS patients evaluated at our institution to identify those with LVEF < 35% on TTE within 30 d of diagnosis and a follow-up TTE 12-18 months later (external CS diagnoses were excluded). Demographics, LVEF, NT-proBNP, GDMT, immunosuppression, CIED, and outcomes (hyperkalemia, LVAD/transplant, CV hospitalization, death) were recorded. Results: Overall, 25/631 (4%) of CS patients had an LVEF <35% at initial presentation (36% female, 84% white; median age of 58 y; probable/not biopsy-proven CS in 52%). Mean baseline LVEF was 27% (σ=7%), NT-proBNP 1736 pg/mL (n=11), potassium 4.3 mEq/L (n=18), and median NYHA Class II (54%). Patients were on a mean 1.7 GDMT agents at CS diagnosis (Figure). Most were treated with immunosuppression (88%) for mean 0.75 y, usually prednisone (88%, mean 16 mg daily) and fewer with mycophenolate (32%, mean 1875 mg daily), methotrexate (28%, mean 18mg weekly), or TNF-α inhibitor (4%). 64% were on trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis. At follow-up (median 317 d), 3 patients (12%) required LVAD and 1 (4%) required heart transplant. Mean LVEF improved to 37% (excluding LVAD/transplant, σ=11%, p=0.001). CIED prevalence increased from 48 to 81% (p=0.03). Overall GDMT did not change (mean 2.0 agents, p=0.2) and only beta-blocker dose changed (64 to 138 mg mean daily metoprolol equivalents). Potassium did not change (p=0.4) and hyperkalemic events were infrequent (16%). No patients died, but unplanned hospitalization occurred in 36% of patients. Conclusions: CS patients with HFrEF are usually on partial GDMT at diagnosis, presumably due to earlier recognition of HFrEF, but intensification of GDMT may be limited. Despite improved LVEF which may be due to GDMT, immunosuppression, and/or CIED, over 1/3 patients were hospitalized within 18 mo, highlighting the high-risk profile of HFrEF in CS.

Abstract Background Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a difficult to diagnose inflammatory heart disease. Certain types of genetic cardiomyopathy have been reported to masquerade as inflammatory cardiomyopathy. The utility of genetic testing in the evaluation of inflammatory cardiomyopathy is not completely explored and data regarding the prevalence of genetic cardiomyopathies in patients with presumed CS is limited. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients evaluated from May 2020 to October 2022 in our Cardiac Sarcoid Clinic diagnosed with presumed CS as inferred by either fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) - computed tomography (CT) or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or both. Pertinent demographic, genetic, electrocardiographic, and imaging data for these patients was extracted from the electronic medical record. Results Genetic testing was obtained in 47 (22%) of the 213 presumed CS patients, among whom 43 (91%) presented with suspected isolated CS, and 4 (9%) with possible cardiac involvement in the setting of systemic sarcoidosis. Among the patients who underwent genetic testing, 10 (21 %) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant(s) in a genetic cardiomyopathy-susceptibility gene, including DSP (n=2), LMNA, FHL1, TPM1, MYBPC3, NRAS, MYH7 (n=2) and TTN (n= 2) genes. All P/LP patients had FDG uptake, and in those with CMR data, 100% had late gadolinium enhancement. The seven patients with P/LP who underwent endomyocardial biopsy had no evidence of granulomatous inflammation. Immunosuppression was initiated in 60% of the P/LP patients before knowledge of genetic results. Conclusion Patients suspected to have CS may have concomitant or primarily genetic cardiomyopathy that may masquerade as an inflammatory phenotype Genetic testing should be considered in these patients, not only to clarify the diagnosis and its prognostic and therapeutic implications, but also to offer cascade screening for the family of patients with P/LP variants who otherwise would not have been considered to have a heritable disease.

Introduction: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a non-ischemic disease which can present with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, but there is a paucity of research describing RV function and natural history in CS. Methods: We queried a registry of 512 CS patients for those with baseline and follow-up echocardiography (TTE). Demographics, medications, and baseline/follow-up TTE data were collected. RV-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling was approximated by ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (TAPSE:ePASP). Results: Our query yielded 343 CS patients with mean age 56y (σ=12y), who were predominantly male (67%) and white (90%) with a median follow-up 4y (interquartile range 4.1y). Most had pulmonary sarcoidosis (68%). Baseline TTE data showed left ventricular ejection fraction 48% (σ=14), abnormal RV function with RV systolic pressure (ePASP) 34 mmHg (σ=11), TAPSE 21mm (σ=5), RV S′ 0.14 m/s (σ=0.07), and RV-PA uncoupling (TAPSE:ePASP 0.69 mm/mm Hg, σ=0.25). Baseline RV function parameters did not differ by pulmonary involvement of sarcoidosis. 92% received immunosuppression and 65% received neurohormonal blockade. In long-term follow-up, the overall cohort demonstrated a trend towards worsening of both RV S’ and RV-PA coupling (P=.02 and P=.003 for linear trend, respectively) but stable ePASP (P=.11). Trends in both non-invasive ePASP and RV-PA coupling were similar in patients with and without pulmonary involvement (P=.48 and P=.79, respectively). Conclusions: In our large CS cohort with extensive follow-up, metrics of RV function and RV-PA coupling are often abnormal at CS diagnosis. Echocardiographic measures of PASP tend to remain stable but markers of RV dysfunction, including RV-PA coupling, tend to worsen throughout the disease course irrespective of pulmonary sarcoidosis. More granular phenotyping of pulmonary hypertension in CS is required to better understand this relationship.

Mechanical circulatory support is increasingly being used as bridge-to-transplant and destination therapy in patients with advanced heart failure. Technologic improvements have led to increased patient survival and quality of life, but infection remains one of the leading adverse events following ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. Infections can be classified as VAD-specific, VAD-related, and non-VAD infections. Risk of VAD-specific infections, such as driveline, pump pocket, and pump infections, remains for the duration of implantation. While adverse events are typically most common early (within 90 days of implantation), device-specific infection (primarily driveline) is a notable exception. No diminishment over time is seen, with event rates of 0.16 events per patient-year in both the early and late periods postimplantation. Management of VAD-specific infections requires aggressive treatment and chronic suppressive antimicrobial therapy is indicated when there is concern for seeding of the device. While surgical intervention/hardware removal is often necessary in prosthesis-related infections, this is not so easily accomplished with VADs. This review outlines the current state of infections in patients supported with VAD therapy and discusses future directions, including possibilities with fully implantable devices and novel approaches to treatment.

The effects of left ventricular unloading on septal function in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have not been well characterized in vivo. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between markers of septal function with echocardiography in relationship to RV dysfunction and late RV failure after LVAD implantation. A retrospective study was conducted of patients supported on centrifugal-flow LVADs implanted over a 10-year period. Echocardiographic data were collected pre-operatively and up to 2 years after implantation. Interventricular septum (IVS) measurements were taken at end-systole and end-diastole. Interventricular-septal output (ISO) was calculated using the formula: (IVSs–IVSd)×heart rate. A total of 110 patients were included. An immediate and sustained reduction in both lateral annulus systolic velocity (RVS’) and TAPSE were observed after implant (p < 0.0001). However, ISO gradually decreased over time (p < 0.0001). While ISO was not predictive of late RV failure, a decrease in ISO by 25% or greater from pre-implant to hospital discharge was associated with late RV failure (OR 4.8; 95% CI, 1.4–16.5; p = 0.012) even after adjusting for relevant clinical variables (p ≤ 0.01 for each model). RV function is known to be influenced by mechanical ventricular interdependence and we demonstrate that measurement of ISO may be a useful marker in assessing RV dysfunction and predicting RV failure in patients following LVAD implantation.