Citations

BACKGROUND: Increasing interest in neurosurgery residency has led to a growing number of unmatched applicants, who often struggle to find appropriate guidance for their next steps. The authors examined trends, opinions, and options available to unmatched neurosurgery residency reapplicants. STUDY DESIGN: Demographic data of US applicants from MD programs obtained from the National Resident Matching Program (2009 to 2024) were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA analysis of time-interval averages. Opinions about reapplicants were assessed via an online survey of national neurosurgery leaders, including residency program directors and chairpersons (N = 356). RESULTS: All application trends showed greater change over time; however, the rate of accepted reapplicants showed no significant change among early (2009 to 2013: 4.8 ± 1.8), mid (2014 to 2018: 7.6 ± 4.8), and recent periods (2019 to 2024: 9.8 ± 2.5; p = 0.068). The survey had a 23.0% response rate (82 of 356). Commonly indicated reasons for failure to match included poor interview skills, weak recommendation letters, and personality issues. Although most survey respondents supported candidates reapplying, dual applications (applying to more than 1 specialty) were not widely encouraged. For those reapplying, pursuing a preliminary general surgery or research fellowship, obtaining new letters of recommendation from new subinternships, and publishing higher-quality research were the most endorsed uses of time before reapplying. However, most programs reported interviewing reapplicants sometimes to rarely and matching a reapplicant rarely to never. CONCLUSIONS: The number of reapplicants successfully matching into neurosurgery has not changed significantly during the past 15 years. Surveys indicate that leaders view reapplicants unfavorably, despite reapplicants’ efforts to improve their applications. These results suggest that neurosurgery mentors may do a disservice to potential reapplicants based on how residency program leadership considers reapplications. Candid guidance is needed for reapplicants in the residency matching process.

Background To compare the effectiveness of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) versus bariatric surgery on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction and obesity. Methods Using the TriNetX research network, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (aged ≥18 years) with HF with preserved ejection fraction and obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m 2 ) from 2017 to 2022. Patients were categorized into 2 cohorts: those receiving GLP‐1 RAs (semaglutide or tirzepatide) and those who underwent bariatric surgery. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Primary outcomes included acute HF events and all‐cause hospitalizations. Secondary outcomes included all‐cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and follow‐up body mass index. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Results A total of 2747 patients were included per cohort (mean age, 68 years). GLP‐1 RA therapy was associated with lower incidence of acute HF events (38.9% versus 44.6%; HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.72–0.85]), all‐cause death (11.1% versus 14.8%; HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.61–0.82]), and all‐cause hospitalizations (66.4% versus 77.3%; HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.58–0.66]). Rates of myocardial infarction (13.8% versus 13.4%; HR 0.99 [0.86–1.14]) and stroke (9.7% versus 10.7%; HR, 0.87 [0.74–1.02]) were similar between groups. Mean body mass index at follow‐up was 38.0 in the GLP‐1 RA cohort versus 37.7 after bariatric surgery ( P =0.34). Hemoglobin A 1c at follow‐up was higher in the GLP‐1 RA group (7.4 versus 6.8; P <0.001). Conclusions In patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction and obesity, GLP‐1 RA therapy was associated with improved outcomes compared with bariatric surgery, supporting the need for prospective trials to evaluate GLP‐1 RAs as a therapeutic alternative.

Ventricular arrhythmias after electrical cardioversion for AF are rare. Most of these arrhythmias are related to QT prolongation, resulting from marked and sudden slowing of heart rates, treatment with Class III antiarrhythmic drugs or other QT-prolonging medications, and the ventricular repolarisation remodelling effect of electrical cardioversion. A case of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia post-cardioversion of rapid AF in a patient with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy and the use of amiodarone is reported.

Importance Treatment for cognitive dysfunction due to postacute sequelae of long COVID (ie, symptoms of fatigue, malaise, weakness, confusion that persist beyond 12 weeks after an initial COVID infection) remains a significant unmet need. Objective To test evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for improving cognitive symptoms in persons with long COVID. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a 5-arm, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of 3 remotely delivered interventions conducted between August 17, 2023, and June 10, 2024. The study took place at 22 trial sites and included the screening of individuals with cognitive long COVID. Interventions Participants were randomized to 1 of 5 arms: adaptive computerized cognitive training (BrainHQ [Posit Science]), cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation involving both group and individual counseling sessions (PASC-Cognitive Recovery [PASC-CoRE]) paired with BrainHQ, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with BrainHQ. Two comparator arms were included as follows: unstructured computer puzzles and games (active comparator) and sham tDCS paired with BrainHQ. The interventions occurred 5 times per week over 10 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Cognitive and behavioral in-person assessments were performed at baseline, midintervention, at the end of intervention, and 3 months after the end of the intervention. The primary outcome measure was the modified Everyday Cognition Scale 2 (ECog2) completed at the end of the intervention compared to the baseline visit based on participant self-report looking back over the prior 7 days. Results A total of 378 individuals were screened, from which there were 328 participants (median [IQR] age, 48.0 [37.0-58.0] years; 241 female [73.5%]; race: 15 Asian [4.6%], 47 Black [14.3%], and 235 White [71.6%]; ethnicity: 52 Hispanic [15.9%]). None of the 3 active interventions demonstrated benefits on the modified ECog2 in the intention-to-treat population by the end of the intervention period. The adjusted differences in mean change were 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for tDCS-active + BrainHQ vs tDCS-sham + BrainHQ, and 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs BrainHQ alone. Secondary participant-reported outcomes and neuropsychological tests showed no differential benefits for any treatment arm. All 5 arms demonstrated some improvements over time on the modified ECog2 and on secondary outcomes. There were no serious adverse events attributable to the interventions. Conclusions and Relevance This phase 2 randomized clinical trial failed to demonstrate differential benefits for online cognitive training, a structured cognitive rehabilitation program, and tDCS for cognitive long COVID. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05965739 .

Abstract Aims We evaluated clinical outcomes with GLP-1 RA use post-TAVI in patients with T2D. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) lower cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D), but their impact in patients with valvular heart disease, including those undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI), remained unexplored. Methods and results We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX network, including 25 184 adults (≥18 years) with T2D who underwent TAVI (2015–2023). Patients were stratified based on GLP1-RA initiation within 14 days post-TAVI. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory data were balanced using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for events from one-month post-TAVI until the most recent follow-up. PSM yielded 1101 patients per group, with a mean age of 73 years and 39% female. Mean follow-up duration was 2.2 ± 1.1 and 2.6 ± 1.8 years for GLP1-RA users and non-users, respectively. GLP1-RA use was also associated higher survival probability (HR: 0.708 [95% CI: 0.583–0.859]), and lower rates of all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.790 [95% CI, 0.706–0.885]), major cardiovascular events (HR: 0.849 [95% CI: 0.749–0.963]), and acute heart failure exacerbation (HR: 0.785 [95% CI: 0.677–0.909]), acute kidney injury (HR: 0.843 [95% CI: 0.719–0.988]), and major kidney events (HR: 0.665 [95% CI: 0.510–0.866]). No differences were observed in acute myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, or cardiac arrest. Conclusion In patients with T2D undergoing TAVI, GLP1-RA use is associated with significant survival benefits and improved cardiorenal outcomes. However, these findings are limited by the observational design, high comorbidity burden, lack of data on medication compliance, and specific cause of death. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm these benefits.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use during liver transplantation is a complex and evolving aspect of critical care. This retrospective analysis presents the largest North American case series to date, offering a detailed comparison of survival outcomes in liver transplant (LT) patients supported by ECMO. A total of 15 patients were supported with ECMO, eight were supported on venoarterial (VA) ECMO and the remaining seven on venovenous (VV) ECMO. The median duration of ECMO support was 10 days. Mean intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays were 34.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1–158) and 49.2 days (IQR: 1–121), respectively. Overall survival was 33.3%, comparable to published rates (20–30%). Survival was based on ECMO initiation timing: preoperative 33.3% (1/3); intraoperative 50% (3/6); postoperative, 16.6% (1/6). All the patients (five) discharged from hospital were alive at 1 year follow-up. Significant ECMO-related complications included acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (40%, n = 6/15), neurological complications (40%, n = 6/15), and bleeding requiring transfusion (26.6%, n = 4/15). Literature review suggests better outcomes with intraoperative or postoperative ECMO. While ECMO use is increasing in LT, outcomes remain poor. Improved survival may depend on careful patient selection, optimal timing of initiation, and distinguishing reversible pathology from irreversible one.

Introduction: In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high cardiovascular risk, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) have been shown to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events. However, patients with valvular heart disease, including those undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI), have been largely excluded from randomized trials. Hypothesis: We investigated whether GLP1-RA use is associated with improved one-year cardiovascular outcomes in patients with T2D undergoing TAVI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX network. Adults (≥18 years) with T2D who underwent TAVI between 2015 and 2023 were included and stratified based on GLP1-RA initiation within 14 days post-TAVI. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory data were balanced using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included acute heart failure (HF) exacerbation, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cardiac arrest, and ischemic stroke. Outcomes were assessed from 1 month to 1 year after TAVI. Survival probabilities were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 20,454 patients with T2D undergoing TAVI from 2015-2023, 937 received GLP1-RAs. After PSM, 930 patients were included in each cohort, with a mean age of 73 years and 37% female. The mean follow-up duration was 342 days for GLP1-RA users and 325 days for non-users. GLP1-RA cohort exhibited a higher 1-year survival probability (93.8%) compared to non-users (89.5%) (HR 0.573 [95% CI, 0.410-0.801]; p=0.001). GLP1-RA use was also associated lower rates of all-cause hospitalization (HR 0.762 [95% CI, 0.652-0.891]; p=0.001), acute HF exacerbation (HR 0.687 [95% CI, 0.566-0.834]; p<0.001), and cardiac arrest (HR 0.452 [95% CI, 0.213-0.960]; p=0.034). No differences were observed in AMI (HR 1.033 [95% CI, 0.750-1.423]; p=0.844), or ischemic stroke (HR 0.875 [95% CI, 0.659-1.162]; p=0.356). Conclusions: In patients with T2D undergoing TAVI, GLP1-RA use is associated with significant survival benefits and improved cardiovascular outcomes, including reductions in acute HF exacerbation, all-cause hospitalization, and cardiac arrest. These findings highlight the need for prospective clinical trials to confirm these results.

Background: HIV cardiomyopathy (HIV-CM) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have benefits in heart failure (HF), but their role in the specialized population of HIV-CM is poorly understood. Methods: Patients in the TriNetX Network with HIV-CM and SGLT2i therapy were compared to a propensity matched control group of patients with HIV-CM without SGLT2i use. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included all-cause hospitalization, acute heart failure (HF), acute myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiac arrest, new atrial fibrillation, and ventricular tachycardia. Results: In the total of 2,606 included patients, SGLT2i therapy was associated with significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.475, 95%CI 0.337–0.671) and all-cause hospitalization (HR 0.725, 95%CI 0.646–0.814). No significant differences were observed rates of acute HF (HR 1.111, 95% CI 0.957–1.289), myocardial infarction (HR 0.828, 95% CI 0.555-1.235), stroke (HR 0.995, 95% CI 0.747–1.327), cardiac arrest (HR 0.564, 95% CI 0.308-1.036), atrial fibrillation (HR 0.954, 95% CI 0.798–1.140), or ventricular tachycardia (HR 1.225, 95% CI 0.898–1.672). Conclusions: SGLT2i use was associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality and hospitalizations in patients with HIV-CM, but not cardiac specific outcomes.

Background: Progressive heart failure cardiogenic shock (HFCS) often requires escalation to temporary or durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as a bridge to transplant (BTT). Following the 2018 UNOS allocation changes, our center revised its BTT strategy to optimize support and shorten wait times. At our institution, the Impella 5.5 with SmartAssist via the axillary approach was selectively used for patients who remained refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy, failed single-inotrope therapy, and were not considered suitable durable LVAD candidates by our multidisciplinary heart team. We compared transplant-related outcomes of BTT patients supported with Impella 5.5 versus durable LVAD. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of all heart and heart/kidney transplant candidates at Mayo Clinic Florida from October 2018 to February 2021. INTERMACS profile, baseline characteristics, and perioperative data were collected at the time of device implantation and throughout the transplant hospitalization. Results: A total of 87 heart and 4 heart–kidney transplants were completed. Forty-five patients (49%) required MCS as BTT: 27 (60%) with a durable LVAD and 18 (40%) with an Impella 5.5. All eighteen patients with Impella 5.5 as BTT (100%) were transplanted compared to nineteen patients with durable LVAD (70%), p = 0.001. The median time from listing to transplant was substantially shorter with Impella (32 vs. 696 days, p < 0.001), and this difference persisted across INTERMACS profiles. UNOS status at transplant was more urgent for Impella than LVAD (p < 0.001). Transplant surgery following Impella support required shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (181 vs. 219 min, p < 0.001) and resulted in lower postoperative vasoactive-inotropic requirements (7.9 vs. 13, p = 0.003). No patients in the Impella group died or were delisted while awaiting transplant, whereas 5 LVAD patients (26%) died or were removed due to LVAD complications (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our data demonstrates that the use of the Impella 5.5 as BTT was associated with significantly shorter waitlist time, higher transplantation rates, reduced perioperative morbidity, and lower postoperative vasoactive support compared with durable LVAD as BTT. These benefits were achieved despite a higher severity of illness at transplantation in the Impella cohort.