Citations

8617 Background: Dato-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of an anti-TROP2 monoclonal antibody linked to a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. We report updated findings from TROPION-Lung02 (NCT04526691) evaluating Dato-DXd plus pembro with or without Pt-CT as 1L therapy for aNSCLC. Methods: Patients (Pts) received Dato-DXd (4 or 6 mg/kg) plus pembro 200 mg alone (doublet) or with Pt-CT (triplet; cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5) Q3W across 6 cohorts. Pts in the expansion stage were primarily treatment (tx)-naïve. PD-L1 expression was evaluated by tumor proportion score (TPS < 50% or ≥50%) using immunohistochemistry (22C3 assay). The primary objectives were safety and tolerability, with efficacy a secondary objective. Results: 96 pts were treated with doublet (n = 42) or triplet (n = 54) therapy in the 1L setting. At data cutoff (Oct 31, 2023), 45% and 20% of pts receiving doublet or triplet tx were ongoing. Median age was 66 years in both subgroups. Median treatment durations were 6.6 and 5.8 months. Across doublet and triplet tx, the most common any-grade (Gr) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were stomatitis (57%, 33%) and nausea (40%, 46%), mainly Gr 1–2. Gr ≥3 TEAEs were seen in 57% and 76% of pts; serious TEAEs in 38% and 44%. TEAEs associated with Dato-DXd discontinuation occurred in 29% and 39% of pts receiving doublet or triplet tx. TEAEs associated with death were seen in 2% and 9%, none considered related to study drug. Efficacy outcomes, including ORR and preliminary PFS, in the 1L setting overall and by PD-L1 status are summarized in the Table. Conclusions: As 1L therapy for aNSCLC, Dato-DXd plus pembro with or without Pt-CT continues to demonstrate durable antitumor activity. Efficacy was observed regardless of PD-L1 expression. Tolerability of the combinations was as expected based on known profiles of the individual agents, with no new safety signals observed. To date, this is the largest dataset reported for any ADC combined with an anti-PD-1/L1 agent in the 1L setting for aNSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT04526691 . [Table: see text]

8071 Background: Data from the PACIFIC study demonstrated a 5-yr median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 16.9 and 47.5 months respectively for patients with stage 3A and stage 3B NSCLC demonstrating a high risk of relapse. The 8th ed. of the IASLC staging project reports that the 60-month OS for stage 3A, B and C disease is 41%, 24% and 12% respectively, indicating that improved treatment options are needed for this patient population. Induction chemo-IO (ID chemo-IO) followed by concurrent chemo-radiation (CRT) has not been fully investigated due to concerns regarding the toxicity profile, but this may representant an important unexplored avenue for research. We aim to describe the outcomes of patients who received ID chemo-IO followed by CRT with or without maintenance IO. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study across all Mayo Clinic sites. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with Stage 3 NSCLC deemed ineligible for resection and/or requiring raditation over a large-field ] by a multidisciplinary team with plans for ID chemo-IO prior to CRT and maintenance IO. A total of 927 cases of stage 3 NSCLC patients were screened and those receiving ID chemo-IO followed by CRT were extracted (n = 36). Clinical endpoints are PFS, OS, overall response rate (ORR) and treatment related adverse events (TrAE) defined using CTCAE 5.0. Results: The median age was 67 years, 52.8% were female, all patients were past smokers and 97.2% identified as white. The tumor histologies were adenocarcinoma (66.67%), squamous (27.8%), mucinous adenocarcinoma (2.8%) and sarcomatoid (2.8%). Majority were Stage 3B (47.2%) followed by 3C (38.9%) and 3A (13.9%). N2 and N3 disease was noted in 36.1% and 55.6% of patients respectively. PD-L1 by IHC was > 1-49% (47.2%), > 50% (22.2%) and < 1% (19.4%). Patients received ID chemo-IO with pembrolizumab (83.3%), nivolumab (11.1%) and atezolizumab (2.78%). Average number of ID chemo-IO cycles were 3.67 cycles. The ORR to ID chemo-IO was 86.11%. The median PFS was 23.67 mths and the median OS was 32.07 months. About 94% of patients received CRT afterwards and 66.67% received maintenance IO with pembrolizumab (53.17%) or durvalumab (45.83%). Any grade TrAE occured in 58.33% of patients. Pneumonitis was the most common event (38.9%). Grade 3 -4 pneumonitis was noted in 28.5% (4/11) patients. Other toxicities included hepatitis (8.3%), colitis (11.1%) and myasthenia gravis (2.8%) and 22% of these TrAE’s were grade 3 or 4. Conclusions: Our results indicate that ID chemo-IO shows promise as a therapeutic approach for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, especially for patients deemed ineligible or high risk for upfront radiation. Further investigation is needed through a randomized clinical trial to systematically explore and validate the safety and efficacy of ID chemo-IO.

2531 Background: The immune co-stimulatory receptor OX40 is expressed on CD4+ T cells, including regulatory T cells (Tregs). First generation OX40 agonists faced limitations from interference with endogenous OX40-OX40L binding, leading to decreased surface OX40 levels on T cells. Distinguished by its unique epitope on OX40, the novel next generation IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) HFB301001 facilitates agonistic activity without impeding endogenous OX40 ligand binding. This allows for effective co-stimulation of T cells without diminishing OX40 levels. Additionally, HFB301001 exhibited superior in vivoanti-tumor activity and ability to enhance effector CD8+ T cell function compared to a benchmark first generation OX40 agonist in preclinical studies. Here, we report initial data of an ongoing dose-escalation study (NCT05229601) of HFB301001 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: A Phase I trial designed to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy of HFB301001. Eligible pts ≥18 years old (ECOG PS 0-1) with advanced solid tumors are enrolled in 4 different dose cohorts in monotherapy (Q4W) dose escalation. Solid tumor types were selected using Drug Intelligent Science (DIS®), employing integrative bulk and single cell RNAseq (scRNAseq) analyses to confirm and prioritize prospective targets in specific immune cell types. Sequential analysis of peripheral blood and tumor tissue biomarkers is performed. Radiographic response is assessed every 8 weeks. Results: As of January 06, 2024, 26 pts were enrolled, all having received prior systemic therapy (median 2, range 1-4); 81% received prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment. The majority of pts (77%) were male, median age was 62.5 years (range 41-78). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 34.6% of pts, none ≥ grade 3. Common TRAEs included rash (19%), pruritis (12%) and arthralgia (8%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Preliminary results demonstrate dose-proportional increases in maximum concentration, typical mAb volume of distribution, and nonlinear clearance. On treatment biopsies revealed expansion of both natural killer and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, with no notable expansion of Tregs. Analysis of peripheral blood by scRNAseq and immunophenotyping revealed expansion of cytotoxic CD8+T cells relative to CD4+ T cells post treatment. Preliminary efficacy analysis indicates a disease-control rate (DCR) of > 60% with greatest effect seen in hepato-cellular and renal cell carcinoma. Median time on treatment was 1.9 months (range 0.9-17 months). Conclusions: HFB301001 demonstrates a favorable safety profile, dose-dependent PK and PD immunomodulation, and DCR in heavily pretreated solid tumors. HFB301001 warrants further evaluation and expansion in specific tumor types is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT05229601 .

LBA3 Background: National guidelines recommend the early integration of palliative and oncology care for patients with advanced cancer, given robust evidence showing that this care model improves quality of life (QOL) and other important outcomes. However, most patients do not receive early palliative care (EPC) in the outpatient setting due to limited access and resources. To overcome these barriers, we conducted a large-scale comparative effectiveness trial of EPC delivered via secure video versus in person among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and their caregivers. Methods: Between 6/14/2018 and 5/4/2023, we enrolled 1250 patients with advanced NSCLC, diagnosed in the past 12 weeks, into a randomized trial of telehealth versus in-person EPC across 22 cancer centers in the US. Patients were randomly assigned to meet with a palliative care clinician every four weeks from enrollment through the course of disease either via video or in the outpatient clinic. Participants completed self-report measures at baseline and weeks 12 and 24. The primary aim was to evaluate the equivalence of the effect of telehealth versus in-person EPC on QOL at week 24, using regression modeling with an equivalence margin of ±4 points on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L, range = 0-136). We also compared rates of caregiver participation in EPC visits and patient-reported depression and anxiety symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), coping (Brief COPE), and perceptions of prognosis (Perceptions of Treatment and Prognosis Questionnaire) between groups. Study recruitment ceased for two months at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Participants (mean age = 65.5 years; 54.0% female; 82.1% White) had a mean of 4.75 and 4.92 palliative care encounters by week 24 in the telehealth and in-person groups, respectively. Due to the pandemic, the in-person group had 3.9% of visits occur via video. QOL scores at week 24 for patients assigned to the telehealth group were equivalent to those receiving in-person EPC (adjusted means: 99.67 versus 97.67, p < 0.043 for equivalence). The rate of caregiver participation in EPC visits was lower in the telehealth versus in-person group (36.6% versus 49.7%, p < 0.0001). Study groups did not differ in depression and anxiety symptoms, use of coping skills, or perceptions of the goal of treatment and curability of their cancer. Conclusions: The delivery of EPC via video versus in-person visits demonstrated equivalent effects on QOL in patients with advanced NSCLC. The two modalities also did not differ across a range of patient-reported outcomes, though caregivers attended more in-person versus video visits. The findings underscore the considerable potential for improving access to and broader dissemination of this evidence-based care model through telehealth delivery. Clinical trial information: NCT03375489 .

11108 Background: Advances in cancer treatment have led to a growing population of patients living with metastatic cancer. Symptom burden for these patients is understudied. Our objective is to report the prevalence and severity of SPPADE symptoms (sleep disturbance, pain, physical function impairment, anxiety, depression, and low energy /fatigue) in a large cohort of patients with metastatic cancer. Methods: These data are drawn from the Enhanced, EHR-facilitated Cancer Symptom Control (E2C2) stepped wedge pragmatic trial evaluating a symptom management intervention for cancer patients (NCT03892967). This analysis was limited to those identified with metastatic disease using ICD- codes and a natural language processing algorithm prior to or within 30 days of their baseline symptom survey. Symptom severity was measured on a 0-10 scale with scores of 1-3 categorized as “mild”, 4-6 as “moderate”, and ≥7 as “severe.” A SPPADE composite score was calculated by summing six individual symptom scores and is an indicator of total symptom burden. We report descriptive statistics for each symptom by severity category. We also test for differences in SPPADE composite score by race, disability status, employment status, education and cancer type using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: 12,824 patients with metastatic disease completed a survey between March 2019 and January 2023. Discretized score distributions for the SPPADE symptoms are reported in the Table. The SPPADE composite mean score for the cohort was 17.6 (SD +/- 12.0). Significant differences were found in total symptom burden by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics ( p<0.01): Higher total symptom burden (Mean [SD])was experienced by individuals who were American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) (23.8[13.5]) or African American (AA) (20.5[14.7]), disabled (24.0[12.8]) or unemployed (21.1[13.0]), and had a high school education (20.0[13.3]) or less than high school education (18.5[12.4]). There were also statistically significant differences ( p<0.01) in symptom burden across cancer types, with patients with metastatic lung cancer reporting the highest symptom burden (20.0[12.2]) and those with metastatic melanoma reporting the lowest (14.7[11.4]). Conclusions: SPPADE symptoms are common in patients with metastatic cancer, especially fatigue, sleep disturbance, and physical function impairment. Symptom burden is especially high in AI/AN, AA, disabled/unemployed, and less educated patients. Further research is needed to tailor symptom interventions among those living with metastatic disease. [Table: see text]

AbstractIntroductionStructured data capture requires defined languages such as minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE). This pilot assessed the feasibility of capturing 5 mCODE categories (stage, disease status, performance status (PS), intent of therapy and intent to change therapy).MethodsA tool (SmartPhrase) using existing and custom structured data elements was Built to capture 4 data categories (disease status, PS, intent of therapy and intent to change therapy) typically documented as free‐text within notes. Existing functionality for stage was supported by the Build. Participant survey data, presence of data (per encounter), and time in chart were collected prior to go‐live and repeat timepoints. The anticipated outcome was capture of >50% sustained over time without undue burden.ResultsPre‐intervention (5‐weeks before go‐live), participants had 1390 encounters (1207 patients). The median percent capture across all participants was 32% for stage; no structured data was available for other categories pre‐intervention. During a 6‐month pilot with 14 participants across three sites, 4995 encounters (3071 patients) occurred. The median percent capture across all participants and all post‐intervention months increased to 64% for stage and 81%–82% for the other data categories post‐intervention. No increase in participant time in chart was noted. Participants reported that data were meaningful to capture.ConclusionsStructured data can be captured (1) in real‐time, (2) sustained over time without (3) undue provider burden using note‐based tools. Our system is expanding the pilot, with integration of these data into clinical decision support, practice dashboards and potential for clinical trial matching.

AbstractBackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has led to significant improvement in outcomes for patients with nononcogene‐driven advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The rate of crossover and receipt of postprotocol ICI in frontline trials for advanced NSCLC has not been systematically evaluated.MethodsClinicalTrials.gov was used to identify phase 3 studies evaluating the use of immunotherapy or combination chemoimmunotherapy against chemotherapy alone in the frontline management of advanced NSCLC. Data on outcomes, rate of crossover and/or subsequent post‐protocol receipt of immunotherapy, and the start dates of these clinical trials were then extracted.ResultsTwenty‐three frontline trials in nononcogene‐driven advanced NSCLC were identified. Six trials with ICI monotherapy/dual ICI therapy and 17 trials evaluating chemotherapy/ICI in first‐line advanced NSCLC were included in the analysis. The crossover rate ranged 0% to 54% in ICI monotherapy/dual ICI trials and 0% to 52% in chemotherapy/ICI trials. Nineteen of 23 trials provided information on subsequent postprotocol therapies. Among the trials not allowing crossover, postprotocol ICI was administered to 17% to 45.8% of patients. Information regarding the eventual receipt of ICI therapy was available for 22 of 23 trials. Of 6631 patients, 2507 (37.8%) randomized to the control arm eventually received ICI therapy.ConclusionThe rate of crossover and postprotocol ICI use was low in frontline trials for first‐line NSCLC incorporating ICI. Given the proven improved overall survival of ICI in a broad population, there is a need to ensure availability of this life‐prolonging therapy in future trials, either by crossover treatment or postprotocol administration.

Abstract BACKGROUND Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of cancer with median overall survival (OS) of 3-6 months following diagnosis. Proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) is a novel treatment option for LMD, permitting whole neuroaxis treatment with tolerable toxicity and improved efficacy compared to conventional photon whole brain radiation therapy and as needed focal spine radiotherapy. Despite this, patients experience progression and succumb to LMD. Addition of systemic therapy to pCSI may improve outcomes. METHODS In this single institution retrospective case series, we report feasibility of combination treatment with pCSI and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in patients with LMD from solid tumors. RESULTS Three patients were treated with pCSI (30 Gy in 10 fractions) and ICI. The first patient developed LMD related to large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of lung primary, diagnosed by imaging and cytology, having previously undergone resection and stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. Clinical and radiographic improvement was noted following pCSI, bevacizumab, and pembrolizumab therapy. Patient experienced disease progression and passed away only after ICI was held due to hypophysitis, with 6-month OS. The second patient developed LMD related to BRAF V600E mutant melanoma, diagnosed by imaging and cytology, having previously undergone ICI and BRAF-targeted therapy. Following pCSI, relatlimab, nivolumab, and BRAF-targeted therapy, the patient remains alive 7 months after LMD diagnosis despite radiographic progression treated with carboplatin, paclitaxel, intrathecal IL-2, ipilimumab, and bevacizumab. The third developed LMD related to BRAF-wildtype melanoma, diagnosed by imaging, having previously received ICI. Patient underwent pCSI followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab, progression-free 5 months after LMD diagnosis. CONCLUSION Addition of systemic therapy to pCSI is feasible for patients with LMD. Combination of ICI and pCSI may confer additional survival benefit, even among patients with prior exposure to ICI. These initial promising results warrant prospective evaluation.

Abstract WSD0922-Fu is an oral, CNS-penetrant, small molecule EGFR inhibitor which potently inhibits EGFR aberrations specific to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and high-grade astrocytoma (HGA). MC1914 (NCT04197934) is a first-in-human phase 1 trial in patients with EGFR aberrant recurrent HGA and NSCLC. Adult patients with either recurrent EGFR mutant NSCLC with CNS metastases or recurrent EGFR aberrant HGA were enrolled and treated across six cohorts (40 mg once daily to 320 mg twice daily, 28-day cycles) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). 25 patients (17 HGA, 8 NSCLC) were enrolled (median age = 57 years; 24% female; 36% ECOG 0). All patients with HGA received prior radiation and temozolomide. All patients with NSCLC had previous disease progression on EGFR inhibitor therapy (prior osimertinib 88%). The median duration of WSD0922-Fu exposure among all patients was 55 days (range 3 to &gt;279 days) [NSCLC median = 131 days; HGA median = 51 days]. Common treatment-related adverse events are comparable to other EGFR inhibitors (fatigue, acneiform rash, diarrhea, nausea, pruritis). At Cycle 1 Day 15 for patients treated at MTD (160 mg twice daily), the mean terminal elimination half-life (%CV) in the plasma was 31.6 h (102%) (median 14.5 h). The mean Cmax, Tmax, oral clearance at steady state, and AUC (0-12 h) (%CV) were 4513 ng/mL (50%), 2.0 hr (69%), 6.9 L/hr/m2 (42%), and 28084 h*ng/mL (52%), respectively. Among patients with NSCLC treated at MTD or higher dose levels and with available response data, 100% (5/5) of patients demonstrated clinical benefit (SD + PR) while 60% of patients had partial responses. Intracranial and extracranial efficacy was concordant. Furthermore, prolonged stable disease (9 cycles) was observed in a patient with EGFRvIII mutant GBM. Expansion cohorts are in progress to optimize WSD0922-Fu dose and schedule for future phase 2 development.

Introduction: Medical trainees experience a high degree of stress that predisposes them to burnout. This pilot study tested a scalable approach to deliver a validated resilience program (Stress Management and Resiliency Training (SMART)) among Hematology/Oncology fellows at an academic medical center. Methods: This was a mixed-methods, prospective, single-arm clinical trial involving Hematology/Oncology fellows at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, USA. Four one-hour training sessions were conducted virtually with 26 fellows. Stress, burnout, and emotional resilience were measured at baseline, three months, and six months post-intervention using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-HSS), and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC2). Changes in mean scores were assessed using paired t-tests. Feasibility and acceptability data were obtained during a virtual focus group. Results: Statistically significant improvements in mean stress (p = 0.004) and professional achievement (p < 0.001) were seen at three months post-intervention. At six months post-intervention, mean stress (p < 0.001) and professional achievement (p = 0.032) continued to improve, while improvements in emotional exhaustion (p = 0.001) and depersonalization (p < 0.001) also became significant. Focus group participants found the program beneficial and reported improved stress and work performance as a result of participation. Conclusion: Virtual implementation of the SMART program is feasible and resulted in improvements in stress and burnout. Focus group participants found the training beneficial, reporting lower stress and improved work performance.