Citations

TPS228 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition, in combination with other modalities, has demonstrated significant benefit in patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair–deficient CRC. However, these agents have limited, if any, clinical benefit in pts with microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair–proficient (pMMR) CRC. RP2 is an enhanced potency oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 which expresses the fusogenic gibbon ape leukemia virus glycoprotein with the R sequence deleted (GALV-GP-R–), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and an anti–CTLA-4 antibody-like molecule; RP3 additionally expresses 4-1BB and CD40 activating ligands but does not express GM-CSF. Both agents have demonstrated preliminary safety and antitumor activity in pts with solid tumors. This study will evaluate the safety and activity of RP2 and RP3 in combination with atezolizumab (Atezo) plus bevacizumab (Bev) in pts with advanced MSS/pMMR CRC (NCT05733611). Methods: Pts with a histologic diagnosis of unresectable and/or metastatic CRC, with documented MSS or pMMR status, and previously treated with up to 3 standard-of-care systemic regimens will be enrolled in the RP2 + Atezo + Bev or RP3 + Atezo + Bev treatment groups (30 pts per group). Further key inclusion criteria include Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 and adequate hepatic, renal, and hematologic function. RP2/RP3 will be injected into tumors by direct or image-guided injection. Pts will receive 8 total doses of up to 10 mL of RP2 or RP3, with a first dose concentration of 1 × 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL, followed by 3 doses of 1 × 107 PFU/mL every 2 weeks, and then 4 doses of 1 × 107 PFU/mL every 3 weeks. Pts may receive a second course of up to 8 injections of RP2/RP3 if study criteria are met. Bev will be administered starting on week 1; Atezo will be administered starting week 7. The primary endpoint is objective response rate; secondary endpoints are safety, overall survival, progression-free survival, duration of response, and complete response rate. Antitumor activity will be evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 as modified for this study. Safety will be assessed by physical examination, clinical laboratory evaluations, vital signs, and monitoring for adverse events (AEs; including serious AEs). Clinical trial information: NCT05733611 .

Abstract Purpose: Onvansertib is a highly specific inhibitor of polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), with demonstrated safety in solid tumors. We evaluated, preclinically and clinically, the potential of onvansertib in combination with chemotherapy as a therapeutic option for KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Preclinical activity of onvansertib was assessed (i) in vitro in KRAS wild-type and -mutant isogenic colorectal cancer cells and (ii) in vivo, in combination with irinotecan, in a KRAS-mutant xenograft model. Clinically, a phase Ib trial was conducted to investigate onvansertib at doses 12, 15, and 18 mg/m2 (days 1–5 and 14–19 of a 28-day cycle) in combination with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab (days 1 and 15) in patients with KRAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer who had prior oxaliplatin exposure. Safety, efficacy, and changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were assessed. Results: In preclinical models, onvansertib displayed superior activity in KRAS-mutant than wild-type isogenic colorectal cancer cells and demonstrated potent antitumor activity in combination with irinotecan in vivo. Eighteen patients enrolled in the phase Ib study. Onvansertib recommended phase II dose was established at 15 mg/m2. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AE) represented 15% of all treatment-related AEs, with neutropenia being the most common. Partial responses were observed in 44% of patients, with a median duration of response of 9.5 months. Early ctDNA dynamics were predictive of treatment efficacy. Conclusions: Onvansertib combined with FOLIFRI/bevacizumab exhibited manageable safety and promising efficacy in second-line treatment of patients with KRAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. Further exploration of this combination therapy is ongoing. See related commentary by Stebbing and Bullock, p. 2005

Background The C-C motif chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5)/C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) axis plays a major role in colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to characterize the molecular features associated with CCR5 / CCL5 expression in CRC and to determine whether CCR5 / CCL5 levels could impact treatment outcomes. Methods 7604 CRCs tested with NextGen Sequencing on DNA and RNA were analyzed. Molecular features were evaluated according to CCR5 and CCL5 tumor gene expression quartiles. The impact on treatment outcomes was assessed in two cohorts, including 6341 real-world patients and 429 patients from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial. Results CCR5 / CCL5 expression was higher in right-sided versus left-sided tumors, and positively associated with consensus molecular subtypes 1 and 4. Higher CCR5 / CCL5 expression was associated with higher tumor mutational burden, deficiency in mismatch repair and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels. Additionally, high CCR5 / CCL5 were associated with higher immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of MMR proficient tumors. Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed upregulation of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 cancer immunotherapy pathway, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) signaling, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) signaling in cytotoxic T lymphocytes, whereas several inflammation-related pathways were downregulated. Low CCR5 / CCL5 expression was associated with increased benefit from cetuximab-FOLFOX treatment in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial, where significant treatment interaction was observed with biologic agents and chemotherapy backbone. Conclusions Our data show a strong association between CCR5/CCL5 gene expression and distinct molecular features, gene expression profiles, TME cell infiltration, and treatment benefit in CRC. Targeting the CCR5/CCL5 axis may have clinical applications in selected CRC subgroups and may play a key role in developing and deploying strategies to modulate the immune TME for CRC treatment.

PURPOSE CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80405 was a randomized phase III trial that in first-line patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with bevacizumab or cetuximab with chemotherapy. We aimed to discover novel mutated genes associated with prognosis and differential response to therapy with the biologics. METHODS Primary tumor DNA from 548 patients was sequenced using FoundationOne. The effect of mutated genes and mutations on overall survival (OS) was tested adjusting for microsatellite instability status, BRAF V600E, all RAS mutations, arm, sex, and age. RESULTS The median number (lower-upper quartile) of mutated genes was 5 (3-7), 5 (3-6) in microsatellite stable and 12.5 (4.5-32) in microsatellite instability-high tumors. Mutated KRAS and APC were more frequent in Black (53% and 85%) than White (27% and 65%, respectively) patients while BRAF V600E was less frequent in Black (5%) than White (14%) patients. The median OS in patients with BRAF non-V600E (2.2% of patients) was 31.9 months (95% CI, 15.1 to not applicable [NA]) similar to that of BRAF wild-type (WT) patients (31.2 months [95% CI, 29.0 to 33.9]). Mutated LRP1B (10.7% of patients) was associated with improved OS compared with WT LRP1B (hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.80]). RNF43 (5.6% of patients) interacted with treatment arms as, in the cetuximab arm, patients with mutated RNF43 had a median OS of 11.5 (95% CI, 10.8 to NA) months compared with 30.1 (95% CI, 24.9 to 35.3) months in patients with WT RNF43, whereas in the bevacizumab arm, patients with mutated RNF43 had a median OS of 25.0 (95% CI, 14.2 to NA) months compared with 31.3 (95% CI, 29.0 to 34.3) months in patients with WT RNF43. CONCLUSION These results can provide new tools to predict patient outcome and improve therapeutic decisions and trial participation in patient minorities. The molecular alterations identified in this study may direct biomarker-driven studies.

3566 Background: According to the various types of clinical trials for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), ETS and DpR are suggested as the surrogates of OS. Whereas associations between ETS/DpR and OS/PPS in the era of chemotherapy (chemo) +anti-EGFR antibody (ab)/bevacizumab (bev) in 1st line therapy have not been elucidated. Methods: From 40,889 Individual patient data (IPD) from 59 studies in ARCAD mCRC database, 2,138 treatment-naïve pts with RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC were selected from 7 randomized studies (PRIME, CAIRO2, CRYSTAL, OPUS, CALGB80495, WJOG4407G, ATOM) of chemo with/without anti-EGFR ab or bev. The ETS was defined as 20%≥ tumor shrinkage at 8 ± 2wks (ETS+: ≥20%, ETS-: <20%). Multivariate Cox regression models for OS/PPS were performed to investigate associations between ETS+ and ETS- by primary tumor location (overall/left-sided/right-sided), adjusting for potential confounders. DpR was defined as tumor shrinkage at nadir. OS/PPS were evaluated across quartile limits of DpR by multivariate Cox regression models. Results: In pts with overall or left-sided RAS wt mCRC, adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of OS/PPS between ETS- and ETS+ for chemo +anti-EGFR ab, chemo +bev, and chemo alone showed great improvement, respectively (Table). In pts with overall or left-sided RAS wt mCRC, HRs of ETS for OS/PPS are higher in pts treated with chemo +anti-EGFR ab compared to those treated with chemo +bev or chemo alone. Compared to the pts with highest quartile (defined as ≥ 75th percentile (Q3)) of DpR, HRs of OS/PPS for lower quartile groups showed upward trends in pts with RAS wt & overall (Table). Conclusions: ETS/DpR in pts with RAS wt mCRC might be a potential prognostic marker of OS/PPS regardless of targeted therapy and primary tumor location. Superior prognostic values of ETS+ are expected in pts treated with anti-EGFR ab. [Table: see text]

3528 Background: Tucatinib (TUC) is a highly selective HER2-directed TKI approved by the FDA in combination w/trastuzumab (Tras) for treatment (tx) of pts w/ RAS wild-type HER2+ unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that has progressed following tx w/ fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy. There are currently no established best practices for HER2 testing/interpretation in mCRC. Here we present results of central HER2 testing across multiple platforms and response to tx for MOUNTAINEER pts treated w/ TUC + Tras based on central HER2 status. Methods: MOUNTAINEER (NCT03043313) enrolled pts w/ local HER2+ mCRC using ≥1 method: IHC, ISH, and/or NGS testing; retrospective central assessment of HER2 status was performed on multiple platforms. Pts in cohorts A+B were treated w/ TUC + Tras; pts in cohort C were treated w/ TUC monotherapy. Confirmed objective response rates (cORRs) using RECIST v1.1 per BICR, DOR, and PFS were calculated for pts treated w/ TUC + Tras based on each central testing method. Results: 114 pts were enrolled in cohorts A (n = 45), B (n = 39), and C (n = 30) w/ HER2+ tumors per ≥1 local testing method. Of samples submitted for central testing for Cohorts A and B, 70 per IHC/FISH, 50 per tissue NGS, and 71 per blood NGS had evaluable results. In all cohorts, there was 81.0% (95% CI, 68.6-90.1) agreement between blood and tissue NGS, 92.6% (95% CI, 83.7-97.6) between IHC/FISH and tissue NGS, and 79.5% (95% CI, 69.2-87.6) between IHC/FISH and blood NGS. In cohorts A and B, pts w/ HER2+ tumors by central IHC/ISH had a mDOR of 16.4 months (95% CI: 10.6-25.5) and mPFS of 10.1 months (95% CI: 4.2-15.2). cORR was 41.1% to 47.7% for the 3 assays. Detailed HER2 results are presented in the Table. Conclusions: Percent agreement of HER2 status was highest w/ tissue-based platforms. Detection of HER2 amplification by ctNDA NGS is useful; however, pts w/o HER2 amplification should be confirmed w/ a tissue-based assay. HER2 status by all 3 platforms predicted tx response to TUC + Tras. cORR in IHC2+/ISH+ was numerically lower but remained clinically relevant. These data support use of the above methods to identify HER2+ mCRC patients that may benefit from TUC + Tras. Clinical trial information: NCT03043313 . [Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Engaging diverse populations in cancer genomics research is of critical importance and is a fundamental goal of the NCI Participant Engagement and Cancer Genome Sequencing (PE-CGS) Network. Established as part of the Cancer Moonshot, PE-CGS is a consortium of stakeholders including clinicians, scientists, genetic counselors, and representatives of potential study participants and their communities. Participant engagement is an ongoing, bidirectional, and mutually beneficial interaction between study participants and researchers. PE-CGS sought to set priorities in participant engagement for conducting the network's research. Methods: PE-CGS deliberatively engaged its stakeholders in the following four-phase process to set the network's research priorities in participant engagement: (i) a brainstorming exercise to elicit potential priorities; (ii) a 2-day virtual meeting to discuss priorities; (iii) recommendations from the PE-CGS External Advisory Panel to refine priorities; and (iv) a virtual meeting to set priorities. Results: Nearly 150 PE-CGS stakeholders engaged in the process. Five priorities were set: (i) tailor education and communication materials for participants throughout the research process; (ii) identify measures of participant engagement; (iii) identify optimal participant engagement strategies; (iv) understand cancer disparities in the context of cancer genomics research; and (v) personalize the return of genomics findings to participants. Conclusions: PE-CGS is pursuing these priorities to meaningfully engage diverse and underrepresented patients with cancer and posttreatment cancer survivors as participants in cancer genomics research and, subsequently, generate new discoveries. Impact: Data from PE-CGS will be shared with the broader scientific community in a manner consistent with participant informed consent and community agreement.

198 Background: HER2 overexpression/amplification (HER2+) occurs in 3%-5% of patients (pts) w/ metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Rates of HER2+ can increase to ~10% in pts w/ RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC tumors. The MOUNTAINEER trial (NCT03043313) evaluated the efficacy and safety of the investigational combination of tucatinib with trastuzumab in pts with HER2+ and RAS wild-type mCRC. Established regional guidelines for mCRC recommend HER2 testing and HER2-directed treatment options; however, there is currently no established best practice for HER2 testing and interpretation in mCRC. Here, we present data from a concordance analysis comparing breast and gastric HER2 testing algorithms in the mCRC setting. Methods: The MOUNTAINEER trial enrolled pts w/ HER2+ mCRC identified using ≥1 method: tissue-based local immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH), and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing. Archival or fresh tumor tissue was submitted to a sponsor-designated central laboratory for confirmatory HER2 testing w/ IHC/FISH per the package insert of the FDA approved assay and scored by both the breast and gastric algorithms for HER2 IHC. A positive result per the breast scoring criteria for IHC requires circumferential membrane staining for HER2, while the gastric criteria allows for circumferential, basolateral, or lateral staining patterns. Results: A total of 114 pts were enrolled with HER2+ tumors per ≥1 local testing methods; 69 pts were HER2+ by NGS, 46 by IHC 3+, and 36 by ISH. Of 105 pts who had tissue available for central HER2 testing w/IHC/FISH, 98 had valid HER2 results; 82/98 (83.7%) of pts had tumors centrally confirmed as HER2+ using both the breast and gastric algorithms. Tissue samples from pts in the MOUNTAINEER trial had 100% concordance between breast and gastric algorithms in HER2 status and 99% concordance in HER2 IHC score. Conclusions: Central pathology testing using both the breast and gastric criteria showed high concordance between these two commonly used algorithms. A high central confirmation rate of local HER2+ results was also observed. These data support the use of either the breast or gastric algorithms to identify HER2+ mCRC tumors until an FDA-approved HER2 assay is available for mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03043313 . [Table: see text]

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesPublished data comparing peritoneal metastases from appendiceal cancers (pAC) and colorectal cancers (pCRC) remain sparse. We compared pAC and pCRC using comprehensive tumor profiling (CTP).MethodsCTP was performed, including next‐generation sequencing and analysis of copy number variation (CNV), microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB).ResultsOne hundred thirty‐six pAC and 348 pCRC samples underwent CTP. The cohorts' age and gender were similar. pCRC demonstrated increased pathogenic variants (PATHs) in APC (48% vs. 3%, p < 0.01), ARID1A (12% vs. 2%, p < 0.01), BRAF (12% vs. 2%, p < 0.01), FBXW7 (7% vs. 2%, p < 0.01), KRAS (52% vs. 41%, p < 0.05), PIK3CA (15% vs. 2%, p < 0.01), and TP53 (53% vs. 23%, p < 0.01), and decreased PATHs in GNAS (8% vs. 31%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in CNV, fusion rate, or MSI. Median TMB was higher in pCRC (5.8 vs. 5.0 mutations per megabase, p = 0.0007). Rates of TMB‐high tumors were similar (pAC 2.1% vs. pCRC 9.0%, p = 0.1957). pCRC had significantly more TMB‐high tumors at lower thresholds.ConclusionsDespite a reduced overall TMB, pAC demonstrated mutations distinct from those seen in pCRC. These may serve as discrete biomarkers for future study.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co‐primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. Acquired genomic alterations (Acq-GAs), specifically RAS, BRAF, and EGFR-ectodomain mutations and ERBB2 and MET amplifications, are recognized as major mechanisms of resistance to later-line anti–EGFR-antibody therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, data regarding emergence of these Acq-GAs under the selective pressure of first-line anti–EGFR-chemotherapy are lacking. We performed next-generation sequencing (Guardant360) on circulating tumor DNA obtained from paired plasma samples (pretreatment and postprogression) from the CALGB/SWOG-80405 trial, which randomly assigned patients with mCRC between first-line chemotherapy with cetuximab (anti–EGFR-chemotherapy) or bevacizumab (anti–VEGF-chemotherapy). The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of Acq-GAs on anti–EGFR-chemotherapy and compare this to the prevalence with anti–VEGF-chemotherapy on trial and pooled estimates (N = 292) seen with later-line anti–EGFR-antibody therapy as reported in the literature. Among the 61 patients on anti–EGFR-chemotherapy, only four (6.6%) developed ≥ 1 Acq-GAs of interest compared with 10.1% (7) on anti–VEGF-chemotherapy (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.20 to 2.11) and 62.0% on anti–EGFR-antibody therapy in later lines (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.23). Acq-GAs, classically associated with anti–EGFR-antibody resistance in later lines ( RAS, BRAF, and EGFR-ectodomain mutations; ERBB2 and MET amplifications), were rare with up-front use of anti–EGFR-chemotherapy indicating divergent resistance mechanisms. These findings have critical translational relevance to timing and value of circulating tumor DNA–guided anti-EGFR rechallenge in patients with mCRC, especially those treated with anti-EGFR therapy upfront.