Citations

AbstractBackgroundFood intake is regulated by homeostatic and hedonic systems that interact in a complex neuro‐hormonal network. Dysregulation in energy intake can lead to obesity (OB) or anorexia nervosa (AN). However, little is known about the neurohormonal response patterns to food intake in normal weight (NW), OB, and AN.Material & MethodsDuring an ad libitum nutrient drink (Ensure®) test (NDT), participants underwent three pseudo‐continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) MRI scans. The first scan was performed before starting the NDT after a > 12 h overnight fast (Hunger), the second after reaching maximal fullness (Satiation), and the third 30‐min after satiation (postprandial fullness). We measured blood levels of ghrelin, cholecystokinin (CCK), glucagon‐like peptide (GLP‐1), and peptide YY (PYY) with every pCASL‐MRI scan. Semiquantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps in mL/100 gr brain/min were calculated and normalized (nCBF) with the CBF in the frontoparietal white matter. The hypothalamus (HT), nucleus accumbens [NAc] and dorsal striatum [DS] were selected as regions of interest (ROIs).ResultsA total of 53 participants, 7 with AN, 17 with NW (body‐mass index [BMI] 18.5–24.9 kg/m2), and 29 with OB (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) completed the study. The NW group had a progressive decrease in all five ROIs during the three stages of food intake (hunger, satiation, and post‐prandial fullness). In contrast, participants with OB showed a minimal change from hunger to postprandial fullness in all five ROIs. The AN group had a sustained nCBF in the HT and DS, from hunger to satiation, with a subsequent decrease in nCBF from satiation to postprandial fullness. All three groups had similar hormonal response patterns with a decrease in ghrelin, an increase in GLP‐1 and PYY, and no change in CCK.ConclusionConditions of regulated (NW) and dysregulated (OB and AN) energy intake are associated with distinctive neurohormonal activity patterns in response to hunger, satiation, and postprandial fullness.

INTRODUCTION: Inadequate bowel preparation can result in decreased diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy for colon cancer screening. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) has been used to assess the quality of bowel preparation. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are commonly used medications for diabetes mellitus and obesity that are known to delay gastrointestinal motility. We hypothesized that the use of GLP-1RA would be associated with decreased quality of bowel preparation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent screening or surveillance colonoscopy at a large academic medical center between December 2021 and December 2022. We included patients taking any GLP-1RA for diabetes or obesity during colonoscopy defined as our cases, and patients who were prescribed GLP-1RA at one point but not within 3 months of colonoscopy defined as our controls. We excluded patients on any promotility or antimotility agents and those without BBPS recorded on their procedure report. Independent t test assessed statistical differences in the case and control groups to compare the quality of bowel preparation for continuous variables, and the χ 2 test was used for categorical variables. Multivariate linear regression including diabetes as a covariate was also performed for continuous variables, and multivariate logistic regression was performed for categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 446 patients were included in the study, comprising 265 (59%) cases and 181 controls (41%). There were no statistically significant differences between groups at baseline except for the diagnosis of diabetes ( P = 0.001) with a higher proportion of patients with diabetes in the cases. The mean BBPS was significantly higher in controls (7.0 ± 1.9 vs 7.5 ± 2.4, P = 0.046) when controlling for diabetes. The percentage of patients with a total BBPS score of <5 was significantly higher in cases (15.5% vs 6.6%, P = 0.01). The proportion of patients who required a repeat colonoscopy due to poor bowel preparation was also significantly higher in cases (18.9% vs 11.1%, P = 0.041). DISCUSSION: The use of GLP-1RA was associated with a statistically significantly lower quality of bowel preparation, with additional clinical significance given a notable difference in the need for a repeat colonoscopy. It will be essential to understand the cumulative effect of medications that may delay gastric emptying on the quality of bowel preparation to better understand the appropriate measures and counseling that need to be taken before undergoing outpatient colonoscopies.

INTRODUCTION: Limited data exist evaluating antiobesity medications (AOM) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: We performed a case-control study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of AOM in patients with IBD with obesity, matched to non-IBD controls. RESULTS: After 12 months, the case (n = 36) and control (n = 36) groups achieved similar percent total body weight loss of −6.9 ± 8.3 and −8.1 ± 7.0 ( P = 0.30), respectively. Side effect profiles were similar between groups. Seven patients experienced an IBD flare, all managed medically. DISCUSSION: AOM use in patients with IBD demonstrated similar effectiveness and safety when compared with that observed in the non-IBD population.

Abstract Disclosure: S. Fansa: None. W. Ghusn: None. E. Tama: None. B. Nicolalde: None. D. Anazco: None. S. D'Andre: None. S. Faubion: None. C. Shufelt: None. A. Acosta: None. M.D. Hurtado: None. Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) block estrogen synthesis and are used as adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. AIs are associated with weight gain that can lead to increased cardiometabolic risk, thereby affecting health and survivorship quality in these patients. The role of anti-obesity medications (AOMs) in patients using AIs has not been studied. We sought to investigate weight loss outcomes to AOMs in patients taking AIs for breast cancer treatment. Methods: This is a matched case-control retrospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors on AI using FDA-approved AOMs (AI/AOM group). We compared their weight loss outcomes with a group of female patients with obesity, without a history of breast cancer or AI use, on AOMs (AOM group). We matched patients by age and body mass index (BMI). Exclusion criteria: AOM initiation prior to AI therapy, ≤3 months of AOM use, history of bariatric surgery, active malignancy, or pregnancy. Primary endpoint: total body weight loss % (TBWL%) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints: TBWL% at 3 and 6 months and % of patients achieving categorical TBWL ≥5%, ≥10% and ≥15% at 12 months. We used Pearson χ2 and unpaired t-test to compare baseline characteristics and outcomes between groups, and univariate analyses to estimate the contribution of variables to TBWL% in the AI/AOM group. We present results as mean ± standard deviation. Results: We included 99 patients: 63 in the AI/AOM group (63.5±10 years, BMI 34.4±7.0 kg/m2) and 36 in the AOM group (60.4±8.7 years, BMI 36.3±6.9 kg/m2). Liraglutide, semaglutide and phentermine were the only AOMs used. There was no difference in the frequency of use of these three AOMs among both groups (p= 0.1). AI/AOM group had a lower TBWL% compared to the AOM group during follow-up: 3.7± 4.3% vs. 5.6 ± 4.1% (p= 0.03) at 3 months, 3.9± 4.3% vs. 9.5± 4.7% (p&lt; 0.0001) at 6 months, and 5.2± 5.3% vs. 10.5± 6.8% (p&lt; 0.0001) at 12 months. Although the AI/AOM group was more likely to use lower doses of AOMs (p= 0.0004), TBWL% differences persisted among groups at 12 months after adjusting for AOM dosing (p&lt; 0.0001). There was no difference in nutritional and behavioral modification sessions among groups (p=0.06 and p=0.9, respectively). At 12 months, the percentage of patients achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% TBWL was greater in the AOM group compared to the AI/AOM group: ≥5% TBWL, 85.7% vs. 50.0% (p&lt; 0.0001); ≥10%, 57.1 vs. 20.0% (p&lt; 0.0001); and ≥15%, 28.6 vs. 5.0% (p&lt; 0.0001); respectively. We found no predictors of TBWL% at 12 months in the AI/AOM group. Conclusion: Weight loss outcomes in breast cancer survivors on AIs taking AOMs are poorer compared to patients without breast cancer history and not taking AIs. Studies are needed to assess the mechanisms behind the different weight loss response to AOMs in women taking AIs, which we hypothesize may relate to AIs’ anti-estrogenic effect on lean and fat mass. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Abstract Disclosure: S. Fansa: None. W. Ghusn: None. B. Nicolalde: None. D. Anazco: None. E. Tama: None. A. Acosta: None. M.D. Hurtado: None. Introduction: The increasing prevalences of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D), the “twin epidemics”, have led to the development of drugs targeting both diseases simultaneously. Liraglutide and semaglutide, GLP-1 receptor agonists used for T2DM, are also FDA-approved for weight loss. Tirzepatide, a novel dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist approved for T2D, has shown promising weight loss outcomes in clinical trials. To date, no study has assessed weight loss outcomes of tirzepatide in a real-world setting. Our aim is to assess its efficacy and safety in patients with overweight or obesity. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of adults with overweight or obesity taking weekly subcutaneous tirzepatide for T2D or off-label for weight loss. We excluded patients taking tirzepatide for less than one month, prior bariatric procedure, use of any anti-obesity medications, and active malignancy or pregnancy. The primary outcome was total body weight loss percentage (TBWL%) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included TBWL% at 1 and 2 months; TBWL% difference by T2D status (with and without) and by sex at 3 months; proportion of patients achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% of TBWL% at 3 months; predictors of TBWL% at 3 months; and reported side effects during follow up. We used paired t-test to assess TBWL% compared to baseline, non-paired t-test to compare TBWL% by T2D status and sex, and univariate analyses to estimate the contribution of other variables to TBWL%. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Results: We included 175 participants (81% female, age 49.8±12.2, 91% white, BMI 38.8±7.3 kg/m2). One third of patients had T2D (n=59, 34%). Most patients were on 5mg (39%) or 7.5mg (22%) of tirzepatide weekly. TBWL% at 1, 2, and 3 months was 3.6±2.5% (n=87), 5.8±3.5% (n=100), and 8.4± 4.3% (n=60), respectively (p &lt;0.0001 compared to baseline at all timepoints). Patients with T2D lost less weight at 3 months compared to patients without T2D: 6.9±4.0% vs. 9.1±4.4% (p= 0.03). At 3 months, TBWL% was greater in females, 9.2±4.3% vs. 5.0±2.5% for males, p&lt;0.0001. Greater baseline weight was associated with greater TBWL% (R=0.32, p&lt;0.0001). At 3 months, 60 patients had documented weights with 81.6% achieving ≥ 5%, 30% achieving ≥10%, and 10% achieving ≥15% TBWL. Forty participants (23%) reported side effects. The most frequent were nausea/vomiting (n=27, 15%), constipation (n=6, 3%), and abdominal pain (n=5, 3%). Eight patients (5%) had to either decrease dosage or discontinue the drug due to side effects. Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort study, tirzepatide led to substantial weight loss at 3 months. Patients with T2DM lost less weight than patients without. Further real-world studies with longer follow-up duration and higher tirzepatide doses are needed to establish the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this drug in this setting. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023