Citations

AbstractBackground: The utilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT‐D) has increased significantly, since its initial approval for use in selected patients with heart failure. Limited data exist as for current trends in implant‐related in‐hospital complications and cost utilization. The aim of our study was to examine in‐hospital complication rates associated with CRT‐D and their trends over the last decade.Methods and Results: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we estimated 378 248 CRT‐D procedures from 2003 to 2012. We investigated common complications, including mechanical, cardiovascular, pericardial complications (hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade, or pericardiocentesis), pneumothorax, stroke, vascular complications (consisting of hemorrhage/hematoma, incidents requiring surgical repair, and accidental arterial puncture), and in‐hospital deaths described with CRT‐D, defining them by the validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code. Mechanical complications (5.9%) were the commonest, followed by cardiovascular (3.6%), respiratory failure (2.4%), and pneumothorax (1.5%). Age (≥65 years), female gender (OR, 95% CI; P value) (1.08, 1.03‐1.13; 0.001), and the Charlson score ≥3 (1.52, 1.45‐1.60; <0.001) were significantly associated with increased mortality/complications.Conclusions: The overall complication rate in patients undergoing CRT‐D has been increasing in the last decade. Age (≥65), female sex, and the Charlson score ≥3 were associated with higher complications. In patients who underwent CRT‐D implantation, postoperative complications were associated with significant increases in cost.

Background Reducing readmission after catheter ablation ( CA ) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is important. Methods and Results We utilized National Readmission Data ( NRD ) 2010–2014. AF was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) diagnostic code 427.31 in the primary field, while first CA of AF was identified via ICD‐9 ‐procedure code 37.34. Any admission within 30 or 90 days of index admission was considered a readmission. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to adjust for confounders. The primary outcomes were 30‐ and 90‐day readmissions and the secondary outcome was AF recurrence. In total, 1 128 372 patients with AF were identified from January 1, 2010 to September 30, 2014. Of which 37 360 (3.3%) underwent CA . Patients aged ≥65 years and female sex were less likely to receive CA for AF . Overall, 10.9% and 16.5% of CA patients were readmitted within 30 and 90 days post‐CA, respectively. Most common causes of readmissions were arrhythmia ( AF , atrial flutter), heart failure, pulmonary causes (pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and bleeding complications (gastrointestinal bleed, intracranial hemorrhage). Patients with diabetes mellitus, heart failure, coronary artery disease ( CAD ), chronic pulmonary and kidney disease, prior stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), female sex, length of stay ≥2 and disposition to the facility were prone to higher 30‐ and 90‐day readmissions post ‐CA . Predictors of increase in AF recurrence post‐ CA were female sex, diabetes mellitus, chronic pulmonary disease, and length of stay ≥2. Trends of 90‐day readmission and AF recurrence were found to improve over the study period. Conclusions We identified several demographic and clinical factors associated with the use of CA in AF , and short‐term outcomes of the same, which could potentially help in the patient selection and improve outcomes.

Background Chronic kidney disease ( CKD ) remains an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. CKD complicates referral for percutaneous coronary intervention ( PCI ) in non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction ( NSTEMI ) patients because of the risk for acute kidney injury and the need for dialysis, with American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines underscoring the limited data on these patients. Methods and Results Using the National Inpatient Sample to analyze hospitalizations in the United States from 2004 to 2014, we sought to assess PCI utilization and in‐hospital outcomes in NSTEMI admissions with CKD . NSTEMI admissions were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) code 410.7. CKD admissions were identified by ICD‐9‐CM code 585. Propensity score–matched cohorts of patients with NSTEMI were matched for age, sex, comorbidities, race, median household income, primary payer status, and hospital characteristics. Of 4 488 795 hospitalizations for NSTEMI , 31% underwent PCI . Overall, 89% of admissions had no CKD . In addition, 32% of NSTEMI admissions with no CKD and 23%, 14%, and 22% with CKD stages 3, 4, and 5 underwent PCI , respectively. Hospitalized NSTEMI patients with CKD stages 4 and 5 had 41% and 20% less likelihood, respectively, of undergoing PCI compared with those with no CKD . Among hospitalized NSTEMI patients with no CKD or CKD stage 3, 4, or 5, PCI ‐treated groups had 63%, 57%, 39%, and 59% lower likelihood, respectively, of all‐cause, in‐hospital mortality compared with propensity score–matched medically managed groups. Conclusions PCI use decreased among hospitalized NSTEMI patients as CKD severity increased, and all‐cause, in‐hospital mortality was greater for NSTEMI patients admitted with more severe CKD regardless of treatment strategy.

AbstractBackgroundCatheter ablation is widely accepted intervention for atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs, but limited data are available regarding contemporary trends in major complications and in‐hospital mortality due to the procedure. This study was aimed at exploring the temporal trends of in‐hospital mortality, major complications, and impact of hospital volume on frequency of AF ablation–related outcomes.MethodsThe Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was utilized to identify the AF patients treated with catheter ablation. In‐hospital death and common complications including vascular access complications, cardiac perforation and/or tamponade, pneumothorax, stroke, and transient ischemic attack, were identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD‐9‐CM) codes.ResultIn‐hospital mortality rate of 0.15% and overall complication rate of 5.46% were noted among AF ablation recipients (n = 50,969). Significant increase in complications during study period (relative increase 56.37%, P‐trend < 0.001) was observed. Cardiac (2.65%), vascular (1.33%), and neurological (1.05%) complications were most common. On multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR]; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]; P value), significant predictors of complications were female sex (OR = 1.40; CI = 1.17–1.68; P value < 0.001), high burden of comorbidity as indicated by Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (OR = 2.84; CI = 2.29–3.52; P value < 0.001), and low hospital volume (< 50 procedures).ConclusionOur study noted a decline in AF ablation–related hospitalizations and complications associated with the procedure. These findings largely reflect shifting trends of outpatient performance of the procedure and increasing safety profile due to improved institutional expertise and catheter techniques.

AbstractBackgroundThere are sparse clinical data on the procedural trends, outcomes and readmission rates following FDA approval and expansion of Transcatheter mitral valve repair/MitraClip®. Whether a complex new technology can be disseminated safely and quickly is controversial.MethodsThe study cohort was derived from the National Readmission Data (NRD) 2013–14. MitraClip® was identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) codes. The primary outcome was a composite of in‐hospital mortality + procedural complications. Secondary outcome included 30‐day readmissions. Hierarchical two level logistic models were used to evaluate study outcomes.ResultsOur analysis included 2003 MitraClip® procedures. Overall in‐hospital mortality was 3.9%. As expected, there was a significant increase in procedural volume post‐FDA approval. Importantly, a corresponding downward trend in mortality and procedural complications was observed. Significant predictors of in‐hospital mortality and procedural complications included the use of vasopressors (P <0.001) and hemodynamic support (P < 0.001). Higher hospital volume (≥10 MitraClips/year) was associated with lower in‐hospital mortality and complications (P = 0.02). There were 304 (15.1%) 30‐day readmissions, with heart failure being the most common cause of readmission. Elective procedures had lower in‐hospital mortality (P < 0.001) and lower readmission rates (P = 0.011) compared with nonelective procedures.ConclusionA significant increase in MitraClip® procedural volumes occurred post‐FDA approval. Overall morbidity and mortality were low and trended downwards. Hospital procedure volume ≥10 cases were associated with lower mortality and overall complication rates. These data suggest a successful roll out of a very complex novel structural heart procedure.

AbstractBackgroundUnderstanding the factors associated with early readmissions following atrial flutter (AFL) ablation is critical to reduce the cost and improving the quality of life in AFL patients.MethodThe study cohort was derived from the national readmission database 2013–2014. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD‐9‐CM) diagnosis code 427.32 and procedure code 37.34 were used to identify AFL and catheter ablation, respectively. The primary and secondary outcomes were 90‐day readmission and complications including in‐hospital mortality. Cox proportional regression and hierarchical logistic regression were used to generate the predictors of primary and secondary outcomes respectively. Readmission causes were identified by ICD‐9‐CM code in primary diagnosis field of readmissions.ResultReadmission rate of 18.19% (n = 1,010 with 1,396 readmissions) was noted among AFL patients (n = 5552). Common etiologies for readmission were heart failure (12.23%), atrial fibrillation (11.13%), atrial flutter (8.93%), respiratory complications (9.42%), infections (7.4%), bleeding (7.39%, including GI bleed–4.09% and intracranial bleed–0.79%) and stroke/TIA (1.89%). Multivariate predictors of 90‐day readmission (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval, P value) were preexisting heart failure (1.30, 1.13–1.49, P < 0.001), chronic pulmonary disease (1.37, 1.18–1.58, P < 0.001), anemia (1.23, 1.02–1.49, P = 0.035), malignancy (1.87, 1.40–2.49, P < 0.001), weekend admission compared to weekday admission (1.23, 1.02–1.47, P = 0.029), and length of stay (LOS) ≥5 days (1.39, 1.16–1.65, P < 0.001). Note that 50% of readmissions happened within 30 days of discharge.ConclusionCardiac etiologies remain the most common reason for the readmission after AFL ablation. Identifying high risk patients, careful discharge planning, and close follow‐up postdischarge can potentially reduce readmission rates in AFL ablation patients.

BackgroundSeptal ablation (SA) is a key modality for left ventricular outflow tract gradient reduction in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients with refractory symptoms. The primary objective of our study was to evaluate post‐procedural mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), and cost of hospitalization following SA.MethodsWe queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2005 and 2011 using the ICD9 procedure code of 37.34 for ablation of heart tissue. Only adult patients with HOCM (ICD‐9‐CM: 425.1) were included. Patients with any arrhythmia diagnosis or open surgical ablation procedure code were excluded. Hierarchical mixed effects models were generated in order to identify the independent multivariate predictors of outcomes.ResultsA total of 358 SAs were available for analysis. There was no reported mortality during the study period; permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 8.7%. Highest hospital volume tertile (OR, 95%CI, P‐ value) predicted significantly lower post‐procedural complications (0.51, 0.26–0.98, P = 0.04). Univariate analysis of highest versus lowest tertile of hospital volume showed significant decrease in LOS (2.6 days vs. 3.8 days, P<0.01) and non‐significant decrease hospitalization costs (16,800$ vs. 19,500$, P = 0.29).ConclusionsSA is a safe procedure and associated with low peri‐ procedural mortality rate. A higher burden of baseline comorbidities is associated with worse outcomes while higher annual hospital volume is associated with lower rate of post‐procedural complications, length of stay, and cost of care following SA.

ObjectiveThe aim of our study was to study the impact of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) on in‐hospital outcomes.BackgroundThere is paucity of data regarding the impact of GPI on the outcomes following peripheral endovascular interventions.MethodsThe study cohort was derived from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between the years 2006 and 2011. Peripheral endovascular interventions and GPI utilization were identified using appropriate ICD‐9 Diagnostic and procedural codes. Two‐level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The study outcomes were: primary (in‐hospital mortality and amputation studied separately) and secondary (composite of in‐hospital mortality and postprocedural complications). Hospitalization costs were also assessed.ResultsGPI utilization (OR, 95% CI, P‐value) was independently predictive of lower amputation rates (0.36, 0.27–0.49, <0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of in‐hospital mortality (0.59, 0.31–1.14, P 0.117), although GPI use predicted worse secondary outcomes (1.23, 1.03–1.47, 0.023). Following propensity matching, the amputation rate was lower (3.2% vs. 8%, P < 0.001), while hospitalization costs were higher in the cohort that received GPI ($21,091 ± 404 vs. 19,407 ± 133, P < 0.001).ConclusionsMultivariate analysis revealed GPI use in peripheral endovascular interventions to be suggestive of an increase in composite end‐point of in‐hospital mortality and postprocedural complications, no impact on in‐hospital mortality alone, significantly lower rate of amputation, and increase in hospitalization costs. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.